Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: More Televised Winter Baseball, Please

Renteria to Tigers

Edgar Renteria has been traded to the Tigers from the Braves in preparation for Detroit to shift former SS Carlos Guillen to first base. This suggests the Braves believe Yunel Escobar can hold down the starting shortstop position, and that the Tigers think the offense of Renteria will offset the fact that they replaced a bad defensive shortstop with a below average defensive shortstop.

Thoughts on this trade?

Comment 17 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Who Did ATL
Get in return?
Being a fan is irrational, but what is the alternative?

by philofthenorth on Oct 30, 2007 12:19 AM EDT reply actions  

I think it's not as scary as the prospects of
A-Rod becoming a Tiger. I heard Buster Olney call the Tigers the frontrunner right now. That would be ultra scary for this Royals fan.

by royaldaddy on Oct 30, 2007 12:19 AM EDT reply actions  

On first glance
it looks like Detroit got the better side in this trade.  Reteria is still a very good offensive SS.  I am sorry he is going to a division rival rather than the Royals.  

Renteria would have helped the Royals out quite a bit while they were waiting for the arrival of Moustakas.  If Renteria was on the market I wonder why Dayton didn't go out and get him.  Moore certainly has the Atlanta connections.  Put me down as lightly informed but still miffed.

by James Quinn on Oct 30, 2007 12:28 AM EDT reply actions  

Well
The Royals equivalent to what Los Tigres gave up would be something like Buckner + Lubanski. No way can we afford to give up that type of package for two years of Renteria, whose defensive skills are clearly declining.

by doublestix on Oct 30, 2007 12:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

what if it were Lumsden/Lubanski?
Or Lumsden/Derrick Robinson? I agree that Buckner/Lubanski would probably be too high, even though I'm skeptical of the Royals commitment to Lubanski.

Don't know if Atlanta would have gone for either of those trades, but I think that would have been worth it, particularly if we believe we're close to being competitive.

It seems like a bad idea to wait until your team starts playing well before you make trades for good players.  In fact, I don't think it's really even possible to play well if you don't have good players.  It's like waiting for Godot.

by marbotty on Oct 30, 2007 3:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

On Buckner
your comment made me think...

It would be so nice if we could get an above average year out of him next year. If we could get 140 innings out of him next year with some decent rate stats and maybe a 110 ERA+ he could be a valuable asset going in to next offseason. The more pieces we have to play with and make trades with the better.

I don't know how much stock anyone puts in it but is n't his repertoire of pitches similar to Meche? Does having to guys featuring knuckle curves hamper each other? I don't really think so but its something to give thought to.

I think he could  be best served as a swingman kind of like Greinke was this year. I think a guy who can come in a pitch a couple of innings at a time without several days of rest in between appearances is an undervalued and underused role in baseball. Pair him with Bale and you could have two lockdown multi-inning guys to set up for Soria.

Man, I always go long in this but I just love imagining a rotation of Bannister, Meche, Hochevar, Greinke, and a 5 starter. It could be pretty damn good too!

Now we just need the offense to come around. God, it would be nice to see Gordon come out of the gate fast and don't let up, and then see Butler knock it up a notch, get Teahen back on track , hope DDJ return to form and then get some improvement from Pena, the exact same from grudz and I think you are looking at team ready to contend.

Wooo!!!

by wildthang on Oct 30, 2007 4:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

My opinion, the Tigers win this trade
Jurrjens' Cube

Hernandez' Cube

Jurrjens' was rated a B- prospect by Sickels before the season, the #4 prospect in the Detroit organization.  It looks like he did better than expected, but from what I see there is nothing about him that shouts "potential impact pitcher."

Hernandez is basically unprojectable at this point.  He is 19 and has only played one full minor league season.  He did fine, but nothing eye popping.  Probably a C or C+ prospect at this point.

These are valuable additions.

Does anyone know how much of Renteria's salary the Braves are going to pick up?

I think the Tigers win on this one.  Jurrjens might be an OK MLB pitcher but he is no sure thing.  Hernandez is a long shot.  Renteria is a solid citizen.

I think the Buckner analogy is useful.  Basically the Tigers got Renteria (who is signed for two more years at $20M, some of which the Braves are picking up) for a pitcher somewhat better than Buckner plus a long shot speedy outfielder in the low minors (maybe similar to Joseph Dickerson).  If I were Moore I would have made that trade in a heartbeat.  I understand the Braves were motivated to move Renteria because his replacement is ready to move up next year.  It was a salary dump.

Renteria's OPS during the last two years was .797 and .860.  He would have been the best offensive player on the Royals last year.  His career line is .291/.349/.407.  And he will only be 32 next year.  He might not start declining at the plate for another three or four years.  His revised zone rating was .815 at short stop last year which makes him a slightly above average defender.  Roughly at the same level as Orlando Cabrera or Miguel Tejada.

The Tigers lost nothing they were counting on and gained at least two years of service from a well above average major league shortstop.

by James Quinn on Oct 30, 2007 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Plus, Atlanta is kicking in some money
A little note today in BP's blog says that Atlanta is paying for some of Renteria's contract.
I probably disagree with you.

by Scott McKinney on Oct 30, 2007 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Atlanta is beginning to remind me
Of the early 90's Royals.
"I'm tired of all these stupid a$$ questions every day. Why the f**k would I hit Brett for Miller?" The rest is history.

by DC Royal on Oct 30, 2007 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Tigers
are now firmly in the "trying to win every year" division with the Red Sox and Yankees. They are certainly making an effort to restock their farm system quickly enough to do trades like this one.

There is always the chance that their model will explode when their current wave of young pitching hits free agency. Then again, they will lose some contracts (Magglio, Sheffield, Renteria) by that time so maybe that isn't a concern.

We'll see over the next few years if they have the resources to pull this off or if they have to retreat and periodically have "reloading" years.

by Moose Tacos on Oct 30, 2007 8:50 AM EDT reply actions  

Young pitchers
I don't think they're that worried, with guys like Porcello and Casey Crosby (fell to 5th round due to signability) being drafted every year (their fourth rounder was also a pitcher).  It seems that for every Bonderman, Verlander or Miller who might get away in a certain year, they'll have another stud to jump in and take his place.

On the bright side, there are real reasons to believe that the Royals will start to be this same kind of ptiching factory within the next few years.  In BA's rankings of the Top 20 prospects in each minor league, all but two of the nine Royals included in those lists were pitchers, five of whom are newer, younger Royals acquired during the first year of the Dayton Moore regime--Cortes, Pimentel, Duffy, Mitchell, and Runion (Hochevar and Buckner were the other two pitchers, and Butler and Idaho Falls outfielder Adrian Ortiz were the non-pitching prospects).  When you can add five legitimate pitching prospects each year, you're going to 1) have a pretty doggone good pitching staff and 2) be able to weather the storms of free agency pretty well.

by CentralChamps2009 on Oct 30, 2007 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

Pretty even trade
Tigers get a decent shortstop who is likely to regress but is probably still above average and provides good defense.

The Braves get Jair Jurrjens, who had a 2.15 ERA in AA and a 4.70 ERA in the majors at age 21 last year. He can step in right away and compete for the 5th spot in the rotation. It also frees up money so the Braves can pursue Tom Glavine. And they get OF Gorkys Hernandez, a guy who hit.294 with 54 steals last year in low A ball, a tremendous athlete with high upside.

A smart deal for both clubs, you have to appreciate those kinda deals! Let the Hot Stove Heater begin!

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 30, 2007 10:03 AM EDT reply actions  

I think the Tigers will be dissappointed . . .
Does anyone remember Renteria's year in the AL with Boston? He stunk. I know some of that was due to the pressure of Boston itself, but I also think Renteria thrives off of NL pitching that has less power than AL. I think his offensive stats will nosedive, and the Tigers will wish they had their prospects back.

by Eppenweb on Oct 30, 2007 10:05 AM EDT reply actions  

Good Trade
The Braves will eventually be the winners in the deal.  I think Hernandez has a ton of potential and Jurgens is a solid back of the rotation starter.  I wonder how Renteria will fare in the AL again, but it's better than Jack Wilson who the Tigers were reportedly interested in.  

by lordbyronk on Oct 30, 2007 10:14 AM EDT reply actions  

Supposedly
The Tigers offered Jurrjens and OF Brett Clevlen to Pittsburgh for SS Jack Wilson at the deadline, but Pittsburgh declined.

FAIL

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 30, 2007 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.

Managers

Cimg0036_small Freneau

Editors

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

Authors

Royalsretro_small RoyalsRetro

Headshot_small Old Man Duggan