Does Anyone Else Feel a Little 2003ish?
Does it seem a little bit like 2003 to anyone else? That team was incredibly efficient offensively (or lucky, or clutch, if you prefer) turning a somewhat limited number of raw bases into more runs than you'd normally expect. At the same time, the pitching was league average, which in the AL Central of 2003 meant something. Could we be heading down the same path this year?
I claim ignorance regarding pitching, but just think about the lineup for a second. It actually looks like a real American League lineup that never gives the pitcher an easy inning, especially if Buck/LaRue can keep things interesting. Last year, we had way too many Buck-Berroa-Gathright innings that lasted about 7 minutes long. Part of what 2003 demonstrated is that it can make alot of difference if you just don't have any absolute sinkholes in the offense. In the right environment, even if you don't have an elite hitter, facing guys like Raul Ibanez and Michael Tucker can be tougher than normal when Desi Relaford is on base all the time.
We'll see how it plays itself out.
For the pitching, if Peralta and Dotel can emerge... and Gobble eats innings... and... Well, you know...
The game thread will be posted later tonight. In the meantime, this story on the Royals Welcome Luncheon by Alan Eskew is worth the read. Nothing builds chemistry like winning, and it seems like everyone was feeling pretty good about themselves on Tuesday.
Now back to reading Washington Irving...
32 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
What strikes me about this team
No, not really
New Rob n Rany up.
I actually like our chances
by pd on Apr 4, 2007 1:40 PM EDT reply actions
Wasn't Sidd Finch a descendant of
I'll trade you Irving for my 4th block sixth grade science class.
Washington Irving?
It's about time for some optimism, RR!
I want .500 this year so bad it hurts. And a sweep against the Sox would be nice. Let's go ODIE!
Given the excitement surrounding the Meche signing, the Berroa demotion, Tony's son, Greinke's revival, Buck's long hair, and Dotel's fireballing, can you even IMAMGINE how crazy this city would be if we started this year ANYTHING like we started '03? It would be insane in KC. I'm just hoping for 2 series wins vs. Sox and Tigers. Go Royals!
by Gordon Roy on Apr 4, 2007 2:25 PM EDT reply actions
Game threads
My daughter was born in '03
Thank you guys
ever read Stephen King's Insomnia...
Pitching
by EricConley on Apr 4, 2007 2:55 PM EDT reply actions
Misleading stat
Blown Saves
"Carla was the prom queen."
by NHZ on Apr 4, 2007 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Irrationally Optimistic
by nycroyal on Apr 4, 2007 4:14 PM EDT reply actions
I just want a winning season...
Good luck, with Washington Irving. I am reading
The Rainbow, by D.H.Lawrence.
Go Blue.....
by grudz69 on Apr 4, 2007 4:55 PM EDT reply actions
Reading Rainbow???
by pd on Apr 4, 2007 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions
Irving is hilarious
Never read The Rainbow... only Lady Chatterley's Lover and... that may be it
For better or worse,
"There are two things I can't stand: people being intolerant of others' cultures, and the dutch!"
"Carla was the prom queen."
by NHZ on Apr 4, 2007 7:45 PM EDT up reply actions
I was just going to post that
I loved Catch-22, but I have forgotten what Washington Irving had to do with it
Major Major Major Major
"Carla was the prom queen."
Catch 22...
RE: Catch-22
Catch-22 is one of those books that's kind of satiric and realistic at the same time, in that the writing-style is intended to be humorous, but you can identify with the stuggles of the characters at the same time. The stories about Yossarian and his fellow soldiers can be quite entertaining, but there are places where the author jerks you into what seems like a frightening reality of war (McWatt's death, for example).
While not really a Tarantino-esque effort, the storyline is not exactly linear; it seems like almost every chapter focuses on a different character, highlighting the different individuals who are sent to war, and what the experience does to them/how they deal with it. If you're looking for a linear storyline that's easy to follow looks elsewhere; it's kind of helpful at some points to think of each chapter as a type of extended character sketch if you start to get annoyed with the writing style.
I'm no english major, but I'm pretty sure the main message of the book is to show how war contains none of the glamour and glory that it is commonly assoicated with, and that it's really just a bunch of people who would rather be at home doing what they're told so they can try to survive long enough to get home. I think it also hints at how the different sides really don't "hate" each other on a personal level.
That's pretty much what I got: Catch-22 is kind of the opposite approach that "Platoon" takes towards showing the evil of war. Let me know if this helps. :)
"Carla was the prom queen."
yeah it helped...
Optimism and magic
Then again, magic could happen. If a few more pitchers succeed than I expect and a couple of the right position players play over their heads, things could get really interesting.














