Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dana White Announces Koscheck vs. Hendricks for UFC on FOX

Buddy

Just when I thought you couldn't do anything dumber, you do something like this. And COMPLETELY redeem yourself.

All of you, I'm sure, remember Tony Pena's getting doubled off second on a short pop up to center a couple days ago. I'll let JoePo relate it since he is a better writer than I:

"Pena was almost certainly safe on the play. There is no way the tag got him before he got back to the bag. But Buddy Bell did not argue the play ... and when asked about it afterward, Buddy (to his everlasting credit) said: 'I don't argue for stupid baseball.'"

Somebody needs to say something good about Buddy, so there's my contribution.

Comment 11 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I read that
Thought it was awesome. At least Buddy has that going for him. Which is nice.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on May 11, 2007 1:41 PM EDT reply actions  

The problem is
Buddy rarely argues for smart baseball either.  Actually BB doesn't do much of anything except sit in the dugout like a bump on a log and collect a paycheck.  BB is on cruise control and has been pretty much since he got hired, I don't think he thought he would last this long.

by EricConley on May 11, 2007 1:44 PM EDT reply actions  

Buddy
Buddy doesn't hold his players accountable for "stupid baseball" either.  Seems as though Buddy almost encourages "stupid baseball".  

by Stook on May 11, 2007 3:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Contrarily
Bell should have argued, because the infield fly rule was called, and the OAK infielder tagged the base with his foot, and THEN tagged Pena, by which time Pena was OBVIOUSLY safe!!!

I agree that Pena committed a stupid, boneheaded play, but he WAS safe, and deserved to be supported by Bell as such.

I wonder if Bell didn't even realize the infield fly rule was called on the play, and that since it was, the OAK player was REQUIRED to TAG Pena out, not touch the 2nd base bag.

Surely he knew, right?

Right?

Birds chirping................................

by loyal2s dad on May 11, 2007 5:34 PM EDT reply actions  

Notice I didn't even talk about the bigger
boneheaded decision in that inning - having one of your few good hitters try to sacrifice, despite there being 1st and 2nd with no outs, despite said hitter being a lefty vs a righty, despite having the top of the order coming up, and despite having a slow catcher running from 2nd.

Other than that, that was a great decision by Bell, and yes, I was SCREAMING about it while selling peanuts, BEFORE he bunted, and BEFORE the ensuing disaster occurred, so I am NOT armchair managing - I was right and Buddy was wrong AGAIN.

OOPS - guess I ended up talking about it after all.

by loyal2s dad on May 11, 2007 5:37 PM EDT reply actions  

I don't even want to talk about
Sacrificing in two consecutive innings with runners on first and second.

The fact that neither of them were successful.

Also, that one of the bunters was David DeJesus, our best hitter.

by Moose Tacos on May 11, 2007 7:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

You all our talking about a play and
or a game.   Buddo needs to be canned because we suck.  We are 11-26.  We will have 40 losses before we have 20 wins.

What is the blog waiting for?  Something has to change.  You either fire the team or you fire the manager and staff.

Which is it?

by grudz69 on May 12, 2007 11:55 PM EDT reply actions  

If we had Dusty
we'd at least be led to the playoffs where he could blow a clinching Game 6 lead for us and subsequently put a listless team out there for Game 7.

by mazoboom on May 14, 2007 8:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.

FanPosts


Managers

Cimg0036_small Freneau

Editors

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

Authors

Royalsretro_small RoyalsRetro

Headshot_small Old Man Duggan