We've talked about this a lot, but I thought you all might like to see this. I'm largely in agreement with the view that, as infuriating as Buddy is, it probably doesn't make a lot of difference to wait until the end of the season. Also, we're more likely to hire somebody good in the offseason.

Ken Rosenthal on managers that could be fired:

http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/6817896

The part about Buddy:

Buddy Bell, Royals

There's little evidence to suggest that Bell is the right choice to spark the Royals' turnaround. There's also little reason to dismiss him before his contract expires at the end of the season.

Bradford Doolittle of the Kansas City Star points out that of the 116 managers who have managed at least 1,000 games, Bell owns the second-worst career winning percentage, .413. Of course, the quality of Bell's teams has something to do with his record -- and the 2007 Royals are another stinker.

Granted, Buddy Bell isn't given much to work with, but his record is still less-than-stellar.

Bell is one of the game's most respected figures, and general manager Dayton Moore isn't likely to embarrass him, particularly when he lacks an alternative. Another disappointing finish, however, will give Moore the justification he needs to replace a manager he inherited after taking over last season.