Big Start Friday
So, I figured they would trade for a young position player, maybe with a little power. Nope.
OK, so, we got a struggling pitcher from Atlanta (warning) for Dotel. They'll keep him in AAA (where he was recently demoted) and let him work things out a little before working him into the Royals rotation, right? Wrong.
Work him into the rotation in a low impact game? Wrong again.
Kyle Davies will have his first start for the Royals in Yankees stadium. Welcome to the team, Kyle; you've been given the honorary "Eduardo Villacis" position in our rotation. Make us proud. And the way we're playing against the Twins right now, we might be riding a 4 game losing streak.
I suppose it's possible he'll go out and toss 7 scoreless on "the big stage" and Moore will look like a genius. And Davies track record says he's good when he gets himself "up" for these types of situations.
It's also possible to run across the street with your eyes closed in rush hour traffic and not get killed (paraphrasing another poster) and you might also get three HRs out of a lineup that includes Jasons Smith and LaRue. It doesn't make either a good idea.
It's also very possible that Davies will implode, essentially killing any "change of scenery" bonus gained from the trade. McClure and the Royal's coaches will have had zero opportunity to make any significant improvement with him and the catchers will barely know his stuff. A disastrous performance will destroy almost as much fan good will as the infamous "Elarton Start".
What's the hurry? Why immediately into the rotation? Is 4th place worth making the same mistakes they made with the guy in ATL? Does he replace JDLR or Nunez, both young players who have performed better than he has to date? I don't understand.
0 recs |
10 comments
Comments
How about a no-hitter?
by RTC Fan on Aug 1, 2007 11:52 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Friday's start is only big for some fans
Considering what Moore and his staff (including front office staff, scouts and coaches) have done to identify, acquire and develop talent, I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt.
It was pointed out by someone on WHB radio yesterday (Soren Petro, I think) that the Royals coaching staff (most credit goes to McClure) helped/fixed/improved the mechanics of both Meche and Bannister which has helped to make them into really good pitchers this year. If Moore thinks Davies can benefit from that, then I'll agree with him.
Moore's decisions have worked in the recent past, particularly with regard to pitchers. Why do so few Royals fans trust him?
---
If Davies goes out on Friday and gets shelled, many posters on this site will say, "Thanks Moore, Davies sucks. You wasted our best piece of trade bait." But we won't really know about Davies until at least sometime next year, maybe years from now. Clearly he isn't a good major league pitcher right now. He was acquired because Moore thought he would develop into one. Let's give him some time to do that. It will take time. Hopefully most Royals fans will have the sense to show some patience.
[Note, if Davies has a good or even great start in the Bronx, that won't mean that the trade was a great one. Nothing that happens in a single start is in itself dispositive as to how good a pitcher is, or will be in the future.]
by NYRoyal on Aug 1, 2007 11:53 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm willing to give Davies th benefit of the doubt
And while I would be the first to agree that one start doesn't make a pitcher, I will also say that I will feel a whole heckuva lot better about the trade if he dominates on Friday.
by marbotty on Aug 1, 2007 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
22 years with no playoffs
by jbrocato on Aug 3, 2007 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agreee
by bobchisam on Aug 1, 2007 12:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I haven't agreed with much of what you have posted
by RoyalsRetro on Aug 1, 2007 12:31 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I would have given Nunez the start and
by grudz69 on Aug 1, 2007 12:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Not sure I get this either
by cookierojas73 on Aug 1, 2007 2:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Now with JDLR on the DL... we see why he is
by grudz69 on Aug 2, 2007 12:38 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 














