Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dana White: Carlos Condit Accepts Rematch With Nick Diaz

Royals vs. NL Central

So my roommate, being a huge Cubs fan, has been following their series against the Brewers pretty closely.  Tired of hearing him talk about how awesome they've been playing, I reminded him that they play in a joke of a division and would be in no better than fourth place in the AL Central.  Not surprisingly, this led to some Royals bashing.  Which brings me to the point of this diary.

Does anyone have any stats to back up the fact that the Royals and Cubs of this year are actually far closer in quality of play than their win-loss records would otherwise indicate?  Strength of schedules, common opponents, etc.  Or, any defensible projections of what the Royals' record would be if they played in the NL Central and the Cubs' in the AL Central would be pretty helpful.

Comment 5 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Here's the best I can do
The Cubs are probably the best team in the NL Central, which makes this difficult - however, it is pretty easy to show that they are closer than they appear. Because of small sample sizes it is pretty tough to make a case based on common opponents.

Most projections are built on Runs Scored and Runs Against - since my analysis is going to be crude and quick anyway, I'm going to go with the oldest version of the "Pythagorean formula."

But first, an adjustment for league. The AL as a whole has scored 180 runs more than it has given up, or 12 6/7 per team. I'm going to split this about evenly and assume the Royals would have scored 7 extra and given up 6 fewer runs in a neutral league. It's only 11 1/9 per national league team, so I'll give the Cubs six fewer runs, giving up five extra.

After this correction we get a Pythagorean win percentage of:
Royals - .480 ~ 63-69
Cubs - .532 ~ 70-62

So seven games back, which is pretty close. For reference:
Twins - .529 ~ 69-63, so they and the Cubs would be duking it out for third.

by Moose Tacos on Aug 31, 2007 1:53 PM EDT reply actions  

by the way
I just realized that my league adjustment was done in entirely the wrong way. So sue me, I've been drinking. Anyway, if somebody else wants to the real adjustment in would just entail scaling the run differential over the course of 114 games, which is how many games we have played against the AL (I think), and doing some normalization.

I think this has the effect of closing the gap further.

by Moose Tacos on Aug 31, 2007 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Let's also add that all but 3 AL teams
Have winning records against the NL in interleague play.  

That's a pretty heavy indictment of the NL, and as we know, the NL Central's the worst division of them all, whereas the AL Central may be the best.

by marbotty on Aug 31, 2007 1:58 PM EDT reply actions  

right you are
However, an (admittedly crude) check shows the AL Central 4 games below .500 as a division, which is not good for our claim.

by Moose Tacos on Aug 31, 2007 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

54%
thats the percentage of interleague games american league teams won against the nl.  you can argue that it's enough to show the al's superiority, and i'd agree the al is superior (obviously), but its really not like varsity against jv.

by byebyebalboni on Aug 31, 2007 5:28 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Nacho_small
Interview with Royals Review Editor Jeff Zimmerman
Small
OT: Determining the exact date of Ice Cubes "Good Day"
Royalsretro_small
The 100 Greatest Royals of All-Time - #26 Al Cowens
Small
2 years, 2 months and 22 days ago: Never Forget

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Cimg0036_small Freneau

Editors

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

Authors

Royalsretro_small RoyalsRetro

Headshot_small Old Man Duggan