Five Fun Facts About Shane Costa
Back one night in June, as the Royals prepared to take on the hated White Sox in a key matchup for 4th place, I pondered the career of Shane Costa. I'm still not really sure what my angle was, but then again, that was somehow caused by the topic itself, namely that Costa's already mapped out a curious little big-league career.
Somehow the flexibility, mediocrity and playing time measured out in fits and starts makes for a very random career. While some guys end up being lionized for being capable of being imagined as just about anything, for Costa only his irrelevance seems to be underscored. Granted, there is a difference between an outfield tweener and a infield utility man, but perhaps not as large a asset gap as you might assume. Despite actually seeing quite a bit of him, in three years its quite possible that most of us will go months without ever thinking of Costa, possibly longer. I guess this is why I'm a blogger and not something better, since I don't really know how to tie this up, but the whole Shane Costa vortex just seems weird to me, placing him somewhere between a scrub, an everyman and a cipher. Even Joe McEwing and Joey Gathright types have their supporters, but not so much the Costas.
Well, from here on out, you can count me as a Shane Costa supporter!
Well as fate would have it -- I'm sorry, fate is a pagan concept, and we all know the Royals aren't pagans anymore -- I mean, as providence would have it, that very night Buddisimo threw Costa into the cleanup spot, where he promptly went 2-4 and paced the Royals to a 8-1 victory. For good measure, the night before Bell had batted him leadoff.
For whatever reason, somewhat against my June thesis, my thoughts turned to Costa tonight as a perfectly good candidate for another Fun Facts profile. So lets jump right in:
- To my knowledge, Costa has never really been injured. Since being drafted in 2003 out of Fullerton, Costa's been a dependable soldier from A-ball to the K. Not being injured sounds fun to me!
- Although Costa struggled in very limited AAA action in 2005, in the last two seasons he's certainly had no problems in Omaha. In 2006 he hit .342/.398/.593 against the PCL, followed by a .326/.402/.502 campaign in 2007. Still, you'll immediately notice that downtick in power, Costa only popped 5 HRs with the O-Royals in 2007.
- Costa's most active big league season is still 2006, when he earned 243 PAs with the Royals, appearing in 72 games. In 2007, most of his action was in May and June, before he was sent down again in early July. Costa wouldn't return until the end of August. In that second major chunk, Costa appeared in 22 games, but only got 42 PAs, as Bell viewed him as more as a late inning tool than anything else. Still, Shane managed to hit .289/.357/.421 over that stretch, although that number is a bit misleading, since Costa hit .400/.429/.600 in a 21 PA stretch from August 26th through September 2nd. From that point on, he hot only .176/.300/.235, in 20 PAs. So I guess the fun fact here is: Costa did OK in a somewhat large mini-sample of PAs, even better than you would expect due to the circumstances, but, when you dig even deeper into that mini-sample, it actually turns out that he actually struggled when the assumed tough circumstances actually came to fruition. See, this is why I am such a good teacher, I make learning fun!
- Despite accumulating some surprisingly hefty career totals as a Royal, because his career thus far has been so herky-jerky over the last three seasons, Costa's actually not faced many pitchers more than once. Moreover, because of the timing of his sundry callups, he's actually got a distinct AL West flavor to his matchup log. Overall, his most common combatant on the mound has been Carlos Silva. In 13 career battles with Silva, Costa is .500/.538/1.000, with three doubles, a home run and a hit by pitch. So when theres a Silva-Costa brawl in 2012, we'll know why. Who else does Costa own? How about Tanyon Sturtze: he's 1-1 with a HR. Costa killers? Shane's 0-5 against Francisco Rodriguez, with three strikeouts, and 0-6 against Jered Weaver and Scott Baker.
- Speaking of the Weaver family, Costa's first career home run was off Jeff Weaver, in the 5th inning of a 2-2 tie at the K. While some would consider that a clutch home run, I cannot. Why? of Costa's five career big league HRs, three have come with no outs and the other two with 1 out. Moreover, four of his five homers have been solo shots, with the other a measly two-run HR. Clearly, Costa doesn't care about winning, he just cares about his stats. If Tom Brady ever looked at him, he would immediately burst into flame.
- In June I touched on how the Bell/Costa combination produced all kinds of batting order madness. For the record, Costa has batted in all nine positions, although he has never actually started a game as the #3 hitter, though he has two career PAs there. At the major-league level, Costa's most common slot has been 6th, with 108 PAs. Here's the full breakdown:
He Gets Around: Costa's PAs by Batting Order Position
- 6th- 108 PAs
- 7th- 77 PAs
- 1st- 76 PAs
- 5th- 75 PAs
- 8th- 52 PAs
- 9th- 31 PAs
- 4th- 16 PAs
- 2nd- 12 PAs
- 3rd- 2 PAs
Seriously, while we spent much time last season discussing Bell's lineup machinations, I must state again: I really had no problem with it. However, viewed from above, with guys like Costa, I think this does reflect something of the organization's general feeling of uncertainty about him. And its not only the general spread, but the distribution here: its not like he's all leadoff and #9, or all 3-5 or something like that. No, at various times, he's been theoretically just about everything, from a middle-back of the lineup run-producer (think Joe Randa types) or maybe a table-setter of import, or maybe just end of the lineup garbage.
Bonus Fun Facts! Costa is currently 119th in team history in at bats (421), and will tie Joe Nunnally with his next Royal appearance. Sadly, Costa has already been easily passed by organizational Johnny-Come-Lately Joey Gathright (457). Costa is currently tied with Jeff Conine for 117th in team history in hits, with 107, and is tied with Ruben Gotay for 118th in total bases, with 154. Ruben Gotay made it into 130 games? Who knew!?!
According to the official team bio, Costa was hit by pitches 57 times as a college player... Costa participated in the 2006 Royals Caravan, and props for doing that (although no word if he was part of the crew that watched the Office)... At least one person out there hopes Costa is single, and thinks he's hot... Costa's signing bonus was $775K, and he's accumulated 1.108 years of MLB service time... This may or may not be Costa's myspace page... Costa was discussed on Royals Authority this time a season ago.
0 recs |
27
comments
Read Related
Comments
Costa...
by doublestix on Jan 14, 2008 1:49 AM EST 0 recs
step one, Emil leaving, has happened
i wouldn't mind seeing it happen either
by royalsreview on
Jan 14, 2008 1:56 AM EST
up
0 recs
The guillen signing doesn't help him
by playingwithfire on Jan 14, 2008 3:51 AM EST 0 recs
that was fun
I was ready to write him off last season, but the fact is that he has had two very good seasons in the PCL over the last two years, making him the type of player I usually champion.
So, in order to stave off cognitive dissonance, I'm joining the Costa bandwagon, at least until he's compiled a full seasons worth of at bats in the majors, at which points all bets are off. If he hasn't put it together by then, then perhaps he never will.
By the way, it looks as though there may be an extra fun fact in your five fun facts.
by marbotty on Jan 14, 2008 7:59 AM EST 0 recs
"There are three kinds of people
by buddyball on
Jan 14, 2008 1:48 PM EST
up
0 recs
RR, you make Costa fun...
by RTC Fan on Jan 14, 2008 10:16 AM EST 0 recs
Costa is a rorshack test
Somehow the flexibility, mediocrity and playing time measured out in fits and starts makes for a very random career. While some guys end up being lionized for being capable of being imagined as just about anything, for Costa only his irrelevance seems to be underscored. "
He is whatever you want him to be. In him, you can see your dreams.
Shane Costa is to the outfield what Bill Pecota was to the infield.
by RoyalsRetro on Jan 14, 2008 10:45 AM EST 0 recs
Costa becoming a useful MLB outfielder
Is Costa's situation at all similar to Matt Diaz' a few years ago?
by James Quinn on Jan 14, 2008 11:18 AM EST 0 recs
Diaz hit similarly to Costa...
looking at his minor league stats... he looked a little better than costa has, but overall, yea, fairly comparable
by royalsreview on
Jan 14, 2008 12:57 PM EST
up
0 recs
Costa's D is supposed to be horrible
i'm not sure... i've always assumed he was athletic, but also not a good gloveman
by royalsreview on Jan 14, 2008 12:27 PM EST 0 recs
From what I've seen
by RoyalsRetro on
Jan 14, 2008 1:29 PM EST
up
0 recs
Costa defense
by buddyball on Jan 14, 2008 1:40 PM EST 0 recs
An unimpressive 5th OFer
I'm glad that he OF is deep enough now that we might not actually see Costa in KC in 2008. Please.
by NYRoyal on Jan 14, 2008 2:01 PM EST 0 recs
the killer is the bad D
still, he can hit .280 in the bigs
he could be jeff davanon, but... the supposedly bad defense really kills him
by FireBell on
Jan 14, 2008 2:09 PM EST
up
0 recs
Profile like Teahen's?
by NYRoyal on
Jan 14, 2008 2:17 PM EST
up
0 recs
teahen has now had two pretty rough seasons
here are their career big league #s:
Teahen: .274/.340/.429
Costa: .254/.289/.366
Considering Costa has only seen consistent PT with the Royals in about 1/3rd of his big league career, I think he could easily bump up to just below Teahen, especially regarding plate discipline. Its hard to be patient when: 1) you are trying to prove yourself and 2) you are the new guy and your coaching staff is telling everyone to BE AGREESIVE! constantly
by FireBell on
Jan 14, 2008 2:23 PM EST
up
0 recs
Teahen and Costa
Two pretty rough seasons? He had a poor rookie season. That's pretty common. Lots of good players have bad rookie seasons. He had an excellent sophomore season. In his third season, his OPS+ was 98. That is basically league average. I don't see two "pretty rough" seasons.
Teahen: .274/.340/.429
Costa: .254/.289/.366
That is a huge difference, particularly when you conisder that Teahen was much better in his most recent two years than in his first year. Costa, on the other hand is showing no improvement. His worst season was his most recent season.
Considering Costa has only seen consistent PT with the Royals in about 1/3rd of his big league career, I think he could easily bump up to just below Teahen, especially regarding plate discipline.
Costa has shown very little discipline in the majors. His OBP is only 35 points better than his batting average. And, most importantly, he isn't showing signs of improvement.
Its hard to be patient when: 1) you are trying to prove yourself and 2) you are the new guy and your coaching staff is telling everyone to BE AGREESIVE! constantly
Teahen has been working to prove himself as well. Teahen has had the same coaching staff. And Costa has shown me nothing. He's shown no particularly good skills. To say that he's just a full season of regular work away from being nearly as good as Teahen is really an usupportable assertion. At worst, Teahen is an average hitter. At best, Costa is a below average hitter.
by NYRoyal on
Jan 14, 2008 2:43 PM EST
up
0 recs
well
Hey, I'm championing him already!
by marbotty on
Jan 14, 2008 4:16 PM EST
up
0 recs
But is that a good argument?
Teahen's rookie season - 447 AB, .685 OPS
Costa's MLB career - 421 AB, .655 OPS
Second, it is not fair or equal to compare 447 at bats in a rookie season to 421 at bats over 3 seasons. Costa had the benefit of three seasons of physical development and professional experience in which to improve...and didn't.
I can't believe anyone is seriously arguing that Costa is or might eventually be nearly as good as Teahen. The two players are in two completely different classes.
by NYRoyal on
Jan 14, 2008 4:22 PM EST
up
0 recs
they're both the same age
Would Costa have hit as well as Teahen if given more at bats? There's really no reason to believe he would.
by marbotty on
Jan 14, 2008 4:55 PM EST
up
0 recs
I think the Costa experiment is nearly over
by NYRoyal on
Jan 14, 2008 4:58 PM EST
up
0 recs
Royals Depth Chart
Does is strike anyone else as interesting that the only backup listed for Teahen in RF is Costa and that Shealy is listed behind Teahen at 1B and that Teahen isn't considered at least the 3rd string 3rd Baseman? I know it is early and that they probably don't update very often, but those seem like questionable assumptions.
by MileHighKCfan on Jan 14, 2008 5:46 PM EST 0 recs
I doubt that is meaningful
by NYRoyal on
Jan 14, 2008 5:50 PM EST
up
0 recs
I agree
by MileHighKCfan on
Jan 14, 2008 6:10 PM EST
up
0 recs
Could be Dick Kaegel
by NYRoyal on
Jan 14, 2008 9:35 PM EST
up
0 recs












