Looking Back at When We Looked Forward
Back on March 30th, in a season opening piece, I wrote:
So where are we? I'm hard pressed to come up with a team that's legitimately harder to project in the short term, although from the other end of the competition arch the White Sox may rival our Royals. In 2008 the Royals will score 770 runs and allow 790, which comes out to about 79-83, a number consistent with what I've been telling people all off-season. That runs allowed number is factoring in a breakout from Greinke and some roster trash being erased from 2007, but small steps backward for a number of other players and increasingly difficult competition.
The win-loss prediction ended up not being that far off, although it took an abberant September (18-8) to even sniff 79 runs. Still, 75-87 isn't far afield from where many of us thought the team would end up. Actually, my prediction of 79-83 ended up being exactly the community average.
Nevertheless, the Royals came up four wins short in what turned out to be a much weaker AL Central than anyone expected. There was no 95-win behemoth in the Central this year, much less two, which looked possible at the beginning of the season. Instead, the Twins & White Sox ended up tied at 88 wins, while the Indians and Tigers combined to be fourteen games below .500. The Royals ended up 31-41 against their division, but only 20-34 against non-Tigers. Overall, you'd have to say that those were a soft 75 wins for the Royals. If the 79-win team we thought we we're getting had shown up in this year's Central, the Royals may have ended up with 81 or so wins.
The runs scored & runs allowed data further reveals how far the 2008 Royals slid off of our imagined tracks. For the first time since 1995, the Royals failed to score over 700 runs, topping out at 691, the third lowest total in the American League. Instead of improving upon 2007's total of 706 runs scored, the Royals lost ground. On the whole, more players disappointed at the plate in 2008 than surprised. This team still doesn't get on-base and it still doesn't hit for power.
What saved the 2008 Royals however was the pitching staff. Unlike some Royals fans, I was worried about the staff being unable to improve on their 2007 performance, and predicted 790 runs allowed, twelve more than the 2007 total. This is what happened. The Royals allowed 781 runs, three more than in 2007. Getting an extra 80 quality innings out of Zack Greinke erased a lot of minor problems, and the Royals held on to their 2007 level of performance despite seeing their purported #3 starter blow up. Had the Royals really regressed and allowed something like 820 runs, it would have been a much longer year.
So grading myself, I'd give my overall Royals prediction a B-, thank you. Next week, we'll take a look at the 2008 season in greater detail.
0 recs |
13
comments
Comments
One big improvement
We seem to beat the bad teams (except Baltimore) and lose against the good teams. You couldn’t say that about past Royals teams.
This will be an interesting, and I predict, busy off-season.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Oct 1, 2008 12:42 PM EDT 0 recs
Imagine how much worse the offensive production would have been
if TPJ only merely sucked instead of putting up one of the all-time greatest suck years ever? If that happened, he would most likely have kept his job and Aviles would never have been called up. Subtract about 50 runs for that.
Shealy replacing Gload in September added another 10 or so runs as well.
This team could have ended up south of 650 runs fairly easily. That’s pretty damn alarming.
by loyal2sdad on Oct 1, 2008 1:17 PM EDT 0 recs
Here's an interesting take on the division race in 2008
AL Central Standings: Games played OUTSIDE the division:
Detroit 47-43
Minnesota 45-45
Chicago WS 45-45
Cleveland 45-45
Kansas City 44-46
AL Central Standings: Games played WITHIN the division:
Minnesota 43-29
Chicago WS 43-29
Cleveland 36-36
Kansas City 31-41
Detroit 27-45
Not sure what this means, but I found it quite interesting. Apparently, if the Royals had merely turned their 6-12 performance against both Min & Chicago around to, say 11-7 vs each, they would have WON THE DIVISION.
Actually, considering the interleague domination, what I really think this means is that the entire division is not very good, and most likely the White Sox will make a quick exit from the post season.
by loyal2sdad on Oct 1, 2008 1:25 PM EDT 0 recs
August was as aberrant as September
it took an abberant September (18-8) to even sniff 79 [wins]
The horrible month(s) were as aberrant as the great month(s).
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 1, 2008 2:50 PM EDT 0 recs
Correct
I didn’t understand how we could go on those long losing streaks with this pitching staff and bullpen. I thought those days were behind us.
by raefzilla on
Oct 1, 2008 3:26 PM EDT
up
0 recs
The same reason some hitters go on hot streaks and cold streaks
statistical probability doesn’t guarantee an even distribution of results.
Or something.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on
Oct 1, 2008 4:04 PM EDT
up
0 recs
how about?
“sometimes, random events ditribute non-randomly”
(although i learned about it in stats class, Dr. Drew Pinsky put it that way)
by benfunke on
Oct 1, 2008 4:48 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Exactly
And that’s why it pays to look at as large of a sample as possible. In this case, 162 games is as big as it gets. Sometimes they played better than a 75-win team, and sometimes worse. Overall, they were a 75-win team.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Oct 1, 2008 5:32 PM EDT
up
0 recs
let’s revise that to “random events segregate non-randomly”. i rembered the actual quote last night.
by benfunke on
Oct 2, 2008 12:44 PM EDT
up
0 recs
You know, I think I know why half the team needs to be blown up
Because otherwise everyone on the team will already know Trey’s chair trick.
Kansas City Royals: your 2006 and 2007 NL Central champions!
by mazoboom on Oct 1, 2008 5:05 PM EDT 0 recs
Alex is screwed in the offseason
he was smirking right in Trey’s face even before that test
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on
Oct 1, 2008 10:09 PM EDT
up
0 recs
na...
next season he’ll have something new worked out, and we can have a 5,000 word joepo column about how hes more relaxed or whatever
by royalsreview on
Oct 2, 2008 1:03 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Sensationalism!!
Should we take odds on DMGM/Glass family having JoPo’s press pass revoked after that obvious smear job on Trey? Viscious, irresponsible bastard.
I also think we should have a poll of what new motivation tool/sneaky character test Trey is going to use this Spring.
Bringing Angel back as bench coach might also “relax” Trey. Which would be awesome.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on
Oct 2, 2008 11:17 AM EDT
up
0 recs








