Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Hugh Douglas Admits To Stealing From Jaguars

RR Royals #4 Prospect RUNOFF

#1 Mike Moustakas, 3B
#2 Eric Hosmer, 1B
#3 Daniel Cortes, RHP
#4 ???

Duffy, Melville, and Kila Monster are all very close. And thus...runoff.

Vote.

Daniel Duffy | LHP | 19-years-old | 6-foot-3, 185 pounds
-Four pitch lefty. Fastball 88-93, has been clocked higher in the past. Good curve, good change, both potential to be plus. Still needs to improve fastball command, but made huge strides this year thanks to improved mechanics.

Kila Ka'aihue | 1B | 24-years-old | 6-foot-3, 230 pounds
-Tremendous plate discipline with very good power. Defense at 1B isn't particularly great, but it plays. Charts all of his AB's and strives to get better. Not a great minor league track record. Nearly big league ready if not already there.

Tim Melville | RHP | 18-years-old | 6-foot-5, 205 pounds
-Extremely projectable with present stuff. Already 91-94 with chance for plus curve and change. Scouts love his long term fastball projection, think he could throw very hard.

Poll
Who is the Royals #4 prospect?
Daniel Duffy, LHP
44 votes
Kila Ka'aihue, 1B
49 votes
Tim Melville, RHP
36 votes

129 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 34 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I was the first

But not the last! Gooooooooooo Melville!

Waiting for a 90+ win season

by RoyalsFanInMarinerTown on Oct 21, 2008 1:38 AM EDT reply actions  

+1

2nd Melville supporter.

by DarthYoshi on Oct 21, 2008 2:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

me too, although I am #19 apparently

he seems to have the most potential upside

The concept of progress acts as a protective mechanism to shield us from the terrors of the future. - Collected sayings of Muad'Dib

by buddyball on Oct 21, 2008 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like it that Duffy

has actually done something in pro ball. (I actually voted for Rosa before.) What I love most is that the Royals actually have enough decent prospects to make the discussion worthwhile.

by BrRoyal on Oct 21, 2008 8:28 AM EDT reply actions  

Ka'aihue

might be the most likely to contribute at the MLB level of the group, and if the numbers from the last year are real, might have the most upside of the group as well. I like Duffy a lot and I think I’ll like Melville too once he proves he can handle pro competition, but KC needs OBP and slugging so badly right now, it’s hard to vote against the guy that really could fill that hole starting next year. The odd’s aren’t necessarily great that he will, but they’re probably better than Duffy or Melville’s chances of being top of the rotation starters at the MLB level.

by kcdc1 on Oct 21, 2008 12:51 PM EDT reply actions  

Depends on how you rank prospects

KC needs OBP and slugging so badly right now, it’s hard to vote against the guy that really could fill that hole starting next year

I wouldn’t give Kila an edge just because he would fill an immediate need at the bigs while Duffy and Melville are at stronger filled positions.

by Top Ramen on Oct 21, 2008 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

fair enough

Kila might not bring as much in a trade as the Duffy or Melville, so in that sense, he might not be as valuable of a prospect. On the other hand, he’ll probably be in the majors next year, and the skill set he brings perfectly suited to the team’s needs. I think it’s very fair for Royals fans to consider Ka’aihue the single most exciting prospect in the system for those reasons. Duffy and Melville are 50-50 shots to make the majors. I’ll take the bird in hand, especially when the major league club has precisely a bird/hand shaped hole.

by kcdc1 on Oct 22, 2008 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

How about this?

Neal Musser has a much better chance of making it to KC next year than Melville, Duffy or any prospect in the low minors. Does that make Musser a better prospect? Does it even make him a top 10 prospect?

Professionals who evaluate prospects (BA, BP, Sickels, etc.) rank them based on tools, performance and how good they are likely to be in the majors. It isn’t about how soon they’ll get to the majors.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by Scott McKinney on Oct 22, 2008 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

it partially is...

you have to take in to count (or at least I do) the chances the do make it to the show. the closer the better, obviously. this isn’t really the case with the TOP prospects, like say moustakas or jason heyward (braves) who are still a ways away but have legitimate MVP type upside. but after those guys, ya I do take likelihood to reach the bigs (most of the time that means closer). it’s not a huge factor but it is a factor nonetheless.

Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.

by doublestix on Oct 22, 2008 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Got a chance to watch Kila

in Springfield this past year, the guy was very impressive. The AA cards pitched around him like he was Barry Bonds, and when they couldn’t, he just raked

by dn_311 on Oct 21, 2008 8:19 PM EDT reply actions  

My problem with Kila's breakout year

is that it is the first time he has shown this type of ability. He has always had a good eye but in his previous years we just haven’t seen the impact. I would love it if he were the real deal! I had him at 6.

Melville could be much higher but just hasn’t pitched yet.

Duffy has had two good years in a row – LH starting pitchers are valuable commodity.

by daveyork on Oct 21, 2008 11:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Duffy has only pitched 119 innings!

Small sample size alert!!!
Kila’s breakout season is a better sample size then Duffy’s! and its at high minor leauge level.
So why no love for Kila?

Go Royals!

by BabyBlues on Oct 21, 2008 11:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Duffy doesn't have other data which competes with Kila's one good season

Duffy doesn’t have other data which might make his good season look like an aberration. Kila has multiple years of mediocre-to-poor performance. Look at the various years of his professional career. Which of them is not like the other? He was essentially a non-prospect (marginal prospect at best) before 2008. Did he suddenly just figure everything out? It’s possible. But it is also possible that this is something we’ll never see again. I don’t think it was a total fluke. But I also don’t think he magically became a great hitter. I think he’s a pretty good prospect now. But a top 5 in this organization? IMO, no way.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by Scott McKinney on Oct 22, 2008 12:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

Oh Yeah!

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by Scott McKinney on Oct 22, 2008 12:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

In fairness,

I think all of his previous seasons were mediocre – none poor. (I am ignoring the one year that was poor, because by all accounts he played the entire year at less than 100% due to an injured knee, which kills any chance at putting up even mediocre power numbers)

Does that remove all skepticism about his 08 performance? No, but if you ignore that injured year when analyzing him, it makes the argument that he went from a mediocre performer and a marginal prospect to a spectacular performer and a serious prospect much easier to make, and it would align with a prospect who suddenly “got it” seemingly overnight. That doesn’t happen all that often – but it does happen on occasion, and I would argue that true power may be the last tool to develop, and once it develops, it only enhances plate discipline skills because pitchers begin to attack the hitter differently.

Mr Glass, this is a pro sports team, not a retail store - run it like one!

by loyal2sdad on Oct 22, 2008 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

I basically agree with that

And that is why I think he is a real prospect now and deserves to be in the Royals top 10. But I think given the high quality of the Royals top 10 prospects, it is a big stretch to put him in the top 5.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by Scott McKinney on Oct 22, 2008 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's good

Unfortunately, winter league numbers — like spring training numbers — aren’t very instructive for us.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by Scott McKinney on Oct 22, 2008 6:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

well

Kila is pulling away. I get back from class at like 11:30 ct tomorrow, if he’s ahead by 10-15 by then I’ll start the new one.

Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.

by doublestix on Oct 22, 2008 12:21 AM EDT reply actions  

skip class

I thought you loved the Royals…

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 22, 2008 12:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

:p

if I didn’t have a test tomorrow…(which I still need to study for)

Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.

by doublestix on Oct 22, 2008 12:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

you know what's overrated?

taking tests.

you know what is even more overrated than that?

studying for them.

by DarthYoshi on Oct 22, 2008 2:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

that makes me feel bad

i just wrote like 4 pages of notes for my test. blah.

Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.

by doublestix on Oct 22, 2008 3:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Just Close Your

Eyes and use the force.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Oct 22, 2008 6:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

I am amazed at how close this is

question now is do you do a second runoff without melville (chance that all the pro melville people would be pro pitcher in general and break for duffy), or just keep this list going and reward Kila with #4, he has won two polls now.

I think we need a poll on whether we show do another poll

by ZeppelinDZ on Oct 22, 2008 2:27 PM EDT reply actions  

i'll "close" the voting at 4 ct

whoever is winning i’ll just put at #4.

i am also a little surprised it’s so close at this point.

Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.

by doublestix on Oct 22, 2008 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think they are all going to be close from here on out

At least until we get to about #10, at which point there will probably be less interest in differentiating between C+ prospects.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by Scott McKinney on Oct 22, 2008 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

The_laz_small
RRCCA Vol. IV -- Before You Was Born
293205_10100249842300990_16917861_47946787_6111553_n_small
8 Items You Might Not Know Existed but Probably Need from The Official Online Store of the Kansas City Royals
293205_10100249842300990_16917861_47946787_6111553_n_small
6 Items You Don't Need From The Official Online Shop of the Kansas City Royals
Nacho_small
Interview with Royals Review Editor Jeff Zimmerman
Small
OT: Determining the exact date of Ice Cubes "Good Day"

Recent FanPosts

The_laz_small
RRCCA Vol. IV -- "Before You Was Born" -- The playlist
Finished_pug_small
Dayton Moore trivia time
273440_1587063989_3272169_n_small
Ya Want Hope & Faith?
Small
Royals.com to webcast all KC Spring Training games
Small
How much for McClutch? You like what I did there?
Specialk2_small
RoyalsReview Fantasy League
Royalsretro_small
Is This the End of the Line for Ross Gload?
Nyroyal3a_small
Royals Rotation Projections
Cimg0036_small
Valentine Poem of the Week: An Arundel Tomb
Small
Jonathan Sanchez and the blogosphere that can never be pleased

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Cimg0036_small Freneau

Editors

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

Authors

Royalsretro_small RoyalsRetro

Headshot_small Old Man Duggan