Teahen to Indians?
Bob Dutton says there are talks for Teahen for Franklin Gutierrez, Ben Francisco or minor-leaguer Trevor Crowe.
about 1 year ago
daverclear
431 comments
2 recs |
Comments
If I had to rank those guys in order of preference...
…it would probably go, Francisco, Crowe, and Gutierrez, but of those three, only Francisco really excites me. Gutierrez has had one decent year (2007) bracketed by two pretty awful years (2006 and 2008), although to be fair, this was the first year in which Gutierrez was playing mostly full-time. Crowe is a borderline top-10 prospect for the Indians who did ok splitting time between AA and AAA ball, but I don’t know if he really is MLB-ready yet. The big knock against Francisco would be his age (he just turned 27, whereas Crowe and Gutierrez are both fairly younger).
What I don’t get about Francisco is why the Indians saw the need to keep him in AAA ball for as long as they did—with the exception of his abbreviated 2008 AAA stats (which, in the context of his career numbers, seems like an outlier), he was consistently hitting at around .800 OPS or higher in AAA ball since 2006. If he plays an even remotely decent center field, I’d be willing to trade Teahen for him straight-up. But for Gutierrez or Crowe, I’d probably ask for a throw-in, as their lacks of offensive production and upside, respectively, probably make them less valuable than Teahen, especially if the Indians were to move Teahen back to third base, which it appears they would like to do.
by DarthYoshi on Oct 26, 2008 6:25 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Intriguing
Dayton might stumble into something good here (although the fact that Mark Shapiro is considering this makes me, personally, think the Royals should hold on to Teahen).
It’s pretty funny to read that the Royals need more offense, and then bring up Gutierrez… since he’s a right-handed guy with bad platoon splits (sounds like everyone on the Royals but DDJ and Gordon) who at best, is no better than Teahen offensively over the last three years, and is actually probably worse. Bad OBP guy. He is a stud defender in right field, though — one of the best defenders in the AL — about +20 runs! It would be better to get rid of Guillen and add Gutierrez and then mix and match with DDJ (who would lose a win a year in positional value moving to left, although if Gutierrez can play better in center that DDJ [no sure thing] it works out). Personally, I doubt Dayton is after him because of his underrated defense outweighing his crappy offense, but hey, success comes in all forms. Still not sure he’s necessarily much, if any, of an upgrade on Teahen. Gutierrez is younger (25).
Fransisco is about the same age as Teahen. It’s hard to tell who’s the better defender. Another right-hander doesn’t really help the Royals that much, although he doesn’ t have a major platoon split. I think this might be selling a bit low on Teahen — same age, right-handed, equal defensive value at best. I guess if you think Teahen is a replacement level-type (and Shapiro’s interest re-enforces my belief that this isn’t the case), the Fransisco is an upgrade. I would see this as a parallel move.
Gutierrez is inferior as a hitter, but is younger than either and is a stud defender. If people don’t care about defensive stats, then get ready for a downgrade in offense, unless he “breaks out.”
Dutton also confirms the Jacobs deal… uh oh… Is Dayton really that upset by the “young guys?” I dunno… he’d have to make other moves for the Jacobs deal to make any sense. Some of this sounds like shaking things up to shake them up…
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 6:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I guess I disagree with Yoshi
I think Gutierrez is the best player of the three if they are all at current performance levels, given his defense. He also may have some offensive upside, but I wouldn’t count on it.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 6:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with d_f - I'd go with Gutierrez
Gutierrez is two years younger than Francisco and I think he has more overall talent (defense counts). I don’t know that I’d trade Teahen for Gutierrez straight up. Maybe.
Dutton also confirms the Jacobs deal… uh oh… Is Dayton really that upset by the "young guys?" I dunno… he’d have to make other moves for the Jacobs deal to make any sense. Some of this sounds like shaking things up to shake them up…
The Jacobs deal may well have been accompanied by other moves (like trading Butler or Kila). And I don’t have any problem with trading Teahen in a way that helps the Royals get better. Teahen has value, but he’s not exactly a cornerstone. I’d definitely go for Teahen for Gutierrez and Crowe, for instance. I think it takes a lot of unwarranted assuming to look at these deals and conclude that they are shaking things up for the sake of shaking things up.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't mind trading Teahen
I just don’t think I’d do it for just Francisco or just Crowe… and I like Francisco.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 6:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I'd much rather they trade Teahen for a younger player with more upside
And I think Gutierrez fits that bill. Although I think it should be Gutierrez+. I just don’t think that this rumor leads me to think that Moore is shaking things up just to shake things up. If a Teahen-for-Francisco trade goes down, I’d have to re-think that.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 6:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
BTW, Dutton didn't confirm the Jacobs trade rumor
He just relayed that the Miami Herald reported it.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 6:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ah...
Sorry if i went a bit nuts about Jacobs. It depends on who they trade for him. Everything says to me “this guy blows,” though, in the numbers.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 6:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Oct 26, 2008 9:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I absolutely would not trade Teabag for just Crowe either
I would be open to a “Gutierrez+” package for Teahen, as NYRoyal puts it. Not sure who the throw-in would be.
by DarthYoshi on Oct 26, 2008 6:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
I guess they can through in Choo. You, Korean army and all.
Twist my arm, Guillen and Gload go the Indians to get it done.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 6:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"THROW"
&&%%#!
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 6:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"you know, korean army and all"
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 6:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
True, it was assuming
but using Mike Jacobs to replace either Kila or Butler (if, that is what is/was planned) seems to me to be generously described as such. It would make the rumored Butler-for-Yuniesky Betancourt deal look like a stroke of genius.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 6:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I generally agree with your assessment on Gutierrez in terms of his tools
For Francisco, however, I don’t necessarily think this would be selling low on Teabag. Teahen doesn’t play CF, and Francisco reportedly can. I don’t know what Francisco’s defensive metrics are like, but all things considered, if it is hard to tell who is the better defender between the two, then I would not consider Teahen-for-Francisco to be a parallel move because of the sole fact that Francisco plays CF and Teahen doesn’t. I would consider this an upgrade. DDJ won’t be a huge slugger for a COFer, but Francisco provides a decent amount of power for a CFer. And if Guillen could ever learn how to take a walk, that wouldn’t be a bad outfield from an offensive standpoint. They won’t win a pennant for you, but they won’t kill you either.
As for Gutierrez’s value, I go through his stats and I see a slightly better version of Joey Gathright. Francisco has better plate discipline and hits for substantially more power. If his defense in CF won’t kill us, then I think he is the preferable player to pursue.
by DarthYoshi on Oct 26, 2008 6:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Francisco is about as realistic an option in CF as Teahen is. Yeah, they could do it and maybe it wouldn’t hurt the team too much, but they’d both be well below average defensively at that position.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 6:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
if I can dig up any defensive metrics on Francisco...
…and they turn out to be significantly below-par, I am happy to re-evaluate my perspective on him. But given the anemic state of the Royals’ lineup, Francisco brings more to the table in plate discipline and power. I just don’t see much offensive upside from Gutierrez, and his age isn’t that much of a plus—he’ll be 26 by opening day 2009, so he’ll be approaching his peak fairly soon.
by DarthYoshi on Oct 26, 2008 6:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Justin Inaz has Fransisco at -2.4 runs on defense this year. He has Gutierrez at +21.2.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 6:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
so the question becomes, does Francisco's offense...
…represent a 23ish run improvement over Gutierrez’s production?
Hah.
Maybe I should care more about Gutierrez’s defense…I knew he was good, but not that good.
by DarthYoshi on Oct 26, 2008 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Overall, offense + defense + position adjustment
Justin has Fransisco at 12.7 runs above replacement, Gutierrez at about 23 rar. (both get negative positional adjustments for playing primarily corner outfield positions)
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 6:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you and I might agree, d_f
I don’t like Francisco in CF (unless you’re going for a really outside the box OF solution which sacrifices CF defense), but I like Gutierrez in CF a lot.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 6:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure Francisco is a better hitter than Gutierrez
If you compare them by age and level, they look pretty similar. They have career AAA numbers:
Gutierrez: .284/.361/.436 (parts of five seasons, age 19, 21-24)
Francisco .292/.358/.459 (parts of four seasons, age 23-26)
Gutierrez was clearly called up to the majors a little early, but still managed a good 2007 season. And Gutierrez has at least one more peak year in front of him than Francisco does.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
One potential issue with Gutierrez
his main tool that gives him his defensive advantage over Fransisco — speed — is the one that starts declining the earliest, from what little I’ve read. Plate patience, contact, isolated power, all a bit later. Now that I think about it, I’m not sure what difference it makes between them, other than it’s likely Gutierrez is at his defensive peak now. Of course, the same is true for Francisco.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 6:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
One difference between Gutierrez and Francisco
About 1.3 years. The difference in their ages means that Gutierrez is about 1.3 years further away from his peak than Francisco is. That’s 1.3 years more than Francisco away from decline and 1.3 years of potential development to improve. In short, I like Gutierrez’s chance of improving over the next three years more than Francisco’s.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'll spot you that Gutierrez was called up too early
…but their MLB offensive numbers paint very different stories. Both were ticketed for full-time duty for the first time this year. Francisco hit .266/.332/.438, while Gutierrez hit .248/.307/.383. In 2007, Gutierrez was still a part-time player, and I can’t help but think that made a difference (not unlike, say, Esteban German or Ross Gload—guys who generally hit better when not starting full time). This year, he regressed substantially and his production was abysmal, and he only has another year (two at most) to start hitting his peak. Gutierrez’s career MLB line produces an OPS+ that is a full 15 points higher than Gutierrez’s. A DDJ-Gutierrez-Guillen lineup would be atrocious from an OBP standpoint.
Also, that Gutierrez has one more peak year ahead of him is negated, or at least signficantly mitigated, by the fact that he is under club control for one less year than Francisco.
by DarthYoshi on Oct 26, 2008 7:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We have an age and sample size problem here
Gutierrez’s career MLB line produces an OPS+ that is a full 15 points higher than Gutierrez’s.
I assume that first “Gutierrez” was supposed to be Francisco. Francisco has all of 509 MLB at bats. That’s not even a complete season of full-time duty. I think it is hard to draw meaningful conclusions from only one season’s worth of data (or less than one). And I think it is a mistake to equate all major league experience, regardless of age. Francisco’s MLB career .329 OBP came from ages 25-26. Gutierrez’s carer .308 OBP came from ages 22-25 (mostly 24-25). And if you just look at his age 24-25 years, his OBP was .311. In short, if you leave Gutierrez in AAA until he’s 25, his major league numbers would look better. Given their ages and minor league track record, I find it difficult to argue that Francisco is going to have a better next few years than Gutierrez.
Francisco is maybe the better hitter by a little. Maybe. Gutierrez is a much, much better defender, and younger. Perhaps most importantly, Gutierrez is a realistic CFer, while Francisco is not. To me, the choice is clear.
Also, that Gutierrez has one more peak year ahead of him is negated, or at least signficantly mitigated, by the fact that he is under club control for one less year than Francisco.
I don’t see it that way. For Francisco, that one additional year is going to be in his 30’s when he’s a few years past his peak. Since I think we’re talking about players who are only pretty good and no better than that (this goes for Teahen, Francisco and Gutierrez), I don’t think I’m too excited about the chance to have these guys for their age 31 season. They are all limited players, none of which is likely to be average hitters for a corner position. I’d much rather have 4 years of Gutierrez in CF than 5 years of Francisco in RF.
francisco .329 25-26
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 7:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've come to agree with y'all on Gutierrez's defense
but I don’t think calling them similar hitters is accurate. It isn’t just OBP, Francisco has shown a greater potential for power as well. Gutierrez’s SLG is about as abysmal as his OBP. Sure, Francisco has one extra year of experience, but he has a track record of fairly consistent production throughout his career, minors and majors. Gutierrez simply does not.
Again: the more and more I read about Gutierrez’s defensive metrics, the more I am willing to concede he seems to be the better player overall. But I disagree with putting him and Francisco in the same camp offensively.
by DarthYoshi on Oct 26, 2008 8:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure about their respective offenses, either
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 8:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
but I don’t think calling them similar hitters is accurate. It isn’t just OBP, Francisco has shown a greater potential for power as well. Gutierrez’s SLG is about as abysmal as his OBP. Sure, Francisco has one extra year of experience, but he has a track record of fairly consistent production throughout his career, minors and majors. Gutierrez simply does not.
In AAA, Francisco’s Isolated Power is only about 10 points higher than Gutierrez. In the majors, the difference is greater, but again, can we really take a lot of meaning from 500 AB’s?
But I disagree with putting him and Francisco in the same camp offensively.
Why? Because of Francisco’s one good partial year of hitting in the majors? Because their minor league stats (when you compare same age and same level) are very, very similar.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 8:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
what about body type?
Would that be a good reason?
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
by 306008 on Oct 26, 2008 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A good reason for what?
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 10:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
this isn't going anywhere good
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 27, 2008 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
power projection.
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
by 306008 on Oct 27, 2008 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They have similar bodies
Gutierrez is an inch taller, IIRC, and Francisco is just a little heavier. I guess Gutierrez has a bit more room to fill out. I don’t think the small difference in their bodies amounts to much.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 27, 2008 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
THAT's what I was looking for
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 27, 2008 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I personally think Teahen has at least as much chance ot play CF as Francisco
although I see that I disagree with NYRoyal re: Teahen vs. Gutierrez in CF. Viva la differance!
Teahen’s metrics (insert “all defensive metrics should be taken with a grain of salt” line here) are all over the place - UZR had him as the third best defensive RF in the AL in 2007 at +10 runs- although Guterriez, was the best at +20 or so, iirc. Some have him below average this year and last. Maybe this just reflects him being jerked around defensively the last two years.
Who knows with Teahen — I have given up on the guy a number of times, but I just can’t quit him. I know this is unfair to DMGM, but I guess that, despite questionable draft strategy, I see Shapiro and the Indians in general (Woolner!) as being way ahead of the Royals in terms of overall position player evaluation.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How Far Is
Crowe from the bigs? For some reason I like the idea of taking a flyer on potential.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Oct 26, 2008 7:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
he split time between AA and AAA ball this year
He put together a decent line in AA ball. His AAA line wasn’t as good. He could probably use another year in the minors.
by DarthYoshi on Oct 26, 2008 7:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Unfortunately, his potential is limited
He isn’t a great, high-ceiling prospect. He didn’t make it to AAA until age 24. That’s not a good sign. He’s an ok prospect. Quite frankly, I think he’s most likely going to end up as a Teahen/Francisco/Gutierrez quality player.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Didn't the Indians try to make him a second baseman?
That failed…
by Royal from Queens on Oct 26, 2008 7:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
TEAHEN TO SECOND NOW
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've Suggested It
As a last option.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Oct 26, 2008 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
by the way(here I got again)
If Dayton can’t pull this off, but still wants some better OF — Ryan Langerhans is/was available for free earlier. Geez, he’s even a former Brave! Yeah, he’s older (28), and hasn’t hit that well (although not as bad as you’d think — was OK in Washington this year, inconsistent playing time since his early Atlanta days), but his defense profiles as a poor man’s Gutierrez — studly in the corners, at least average in center. If they don’t think Mitch can cut it and they figure out that Gathright sucks, he’d be a good budget 4th OF.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 7:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Seen him recently?
Langerhans is pretty bad man.
Good defender though.
by Royal from Queens on Oct 26, 2008 7:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm
I liked his .380 OBP this year (small sample size) and his .350 OBP in 2006. Given his great defense, he sounds like a 4th OFer upgrade to me. And the price is right.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 7:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
he's the white endy chavez
the minor subplot around the time of the nerdy Mark Ellis brouhaha
Tango liked my joke it was unprecendented for a Gritty White Guy like Ellis to give the “Athletic Black Guy” discount and still retain Gritty White Guy Status. If the O-Dog gets the Gritty White Guy Bonus, the universe may explode.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are you buddy-buddy with Tom now?
Soon you’ll be palling around with terrorists.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 8:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know...
Not really… I l ike reading over there, and I’ve posted a few times… but those guys are way, way beyond my abiilties… learned a lot, though.
Pretty funny how there seem to be “rungs” of the sabermetric ladder… Or better yet, concentric circles. The Tango/MGL crowd is in the center, and look down on the others, even if they don’t mean to (and, hey, maybe they should — everything they write that my tiny brain understands has been pretty convincing). The best stats people at BP, THT, and others like Symborski may be in this, but are more ikely in the next circle. Then third circle out are the BP “writers” like Sheehan and Karhl, also maybe Neyer, whom the “inner circle” likes, but occasionally gets really angry with and savages from time to time.
Or, more likely, I’m full of crap.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What they do in games?
With all the numbers in the thread, who LOOKED like the better player?
I mean I know for a fact Guittierez was nice with the defense. I don’t need stats to tell me that, although its good to know I’m not crazy in analyzing the defensive skill.
I personally can’t remember the approaches Guitierez or Francisco had. Does anyone remember what they saw at the plate from those two?
by Royal from Queens on Oct 26, 2008 7:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'd trade Teahen for any of 'em and be cool with it
You can throw as many stats as you want at me, but that’s the way I feel.
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
by doublestix on Oct 26, 2008 8:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Prepare to be bonked in the head with wOBA
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 8:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you'd trade him for used pitching machine
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 8:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I might
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
by doublestix on Oct 26, 2008 8:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Migrating over here from Let’s Go Tribe, where we have a similar, if slightly upside down thread.
First, how was Teahen’s defense at 3B? My sense is not good, but I’d appreciate your thoughts.
Regarding the Tribe outfielders, my thought is that Gutierrez is far and away the best of these guys. It is unclear what kind of a hitter he’s going to be (pretty good in 2007, terrible the first half of 2008, pretty good in the second half of 2008), but he is an elite defender. By several metrics, he was one the best defensive OFer in the game last year and his value would be improved even more by a switch to CF. Francisco is a major league 4th OFer. Defense is serviceable, but not good at the corners, more of a wildcard in CF. Good contact hitter, though, with ok gap power. Crowe has regularly been injured and aside from a few short hot flashes, hasn’t done much other than hit singles.
by APV on Oct 26, 2008 8:07 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Just agreeing with my LGT countryman: Gutierrez could have a lot of value for the Indians as a reserve CF and a platoon partner for Choo. I’m not sure Gutierrez for Teahen is equal value. If you want an accurate picture of Francisco, take a look at his second-half 2008 numbers, not his early summer hot stretch. I would never get him as a regular starter if I could help it, let alone a full-time CF. And Crowe … you can have him. Lots of luck.
by fleerdon on Oct 26, 2008 8:11 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
First, how was Teahen’s defense at 3B? My sense is not good, but I’d appreciate your thoughts.
I always thought his defensive skills at 3B looked pretty good. The advanced defensive metrics say he was crap. I think he basically handles what is hit to him pretty well, but his range isn’t so good. He isn’t going to make a lot of mistakes, but he also isn’t going to get to much at the edge of his zone or out of his zone.
What do you think of a trade of Teahen for Gutierrez? Fair? Unfair to the Indians?
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 8:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
unfair to the Indians, but I have an admitted mancrush on Gutierrez’s defense
by APV on Oct 26, 2008 8:13 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
adding…Gutz has the best skill (his defense) of any of the players in this discussion, and he manifests it at a high value position (CF).
by APV on Oct 26, 2008 8:14 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I guess it depends how much the Indians want Teahen as their third baseman
That’s the only reason the trade makes sense for the Indians at all.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 8:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like Gutierrez, too
as you can hopefully tell from above.
Doesn’t seem to be much of a sample at CF, though. Maybe the best defensive RF in baseball, however.
It’s nice to have people from another SN site come in here and not pull the expected “well Teahen’s OK but if u want Francisco your going to have 2 throw in Butler.”
I won’t mention any names, though…
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 8:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gutz hasn’t played much CF because of this guy named Sizemore. But trust me, scouts and his minor league performance suggest he would be an awesome defensive CFer.
by APV on Oct 26, 2008 8:25 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
his offense worries me a bit
if he loses a step or two on defense, he could easily turn into Jose Guillen without the power.
Still, as you see from above, I really, really like him. Was hoping Cleveland would sour on his bat and sell low as a 4th OF/platoon guy/backup CF to the Royals. Should’ve figured Shapiro is to smart for that.
Can’t wait until the Royals get some computers in their offices.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 8:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have to say, I’ll be shocked if Gutz was traded straight up for Teahen. Cleveland has some pretty smart guys in the front office and I think they realize the value of Gutz’s defense. Either of the other two make a lot more sense.
by APV on Oct 26, 2008 8:29 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Gutierrez is the OF version of Mark Ellis
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 8:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
maybe…although Gutierrez was once projected as a big-time power guy and for awhile in 2007 actually looked like he was going to follow through on that projection. He can hit moonshot homeruns.
by APV on Oct 26, 2008 8:52 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
You know that was supposed to be a big compliment, right?
I thought the S. S. Mark Ellis left port from letsgotribe?
Ellis has hit 10 more homers the last two years than FGut (yeah, playing time, so on and so forth).
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 8:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's what I remembered
I couldn’t even get it to dock here, although I guess Beane sunk it to begin with
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 9:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I made one for that as well.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Oct 26, 2008 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
saw it already
I think the Royals deserved Ellis more, since Allard “I may be stupid, but at at least I didn’t sign Jose Guillen for 3/36” Baird drafted him (I think, maybe it was Robinson.
Maybe that means they deserved him less.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 27, 2008 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that was you...
awesome
I guess you still have Asdrubal… what’s with the warlock name?
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m pretty sure it’s slightly more common in certain Latino countries. Something historical.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Oct 26, 2008 9:54 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
The history of warlocks in Latino culture.
by world dictator on Oct 26, 2008 10:14 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Has to do with a family member of Hannibal, IIRC.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Oct 26, 2008 10:26 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
his brother i think. got cut off in northern italy when they ran out of elephants
Anti-Ben Fran before it was cool.
by Gradyforpresident on Oct 27, 2008 12:38 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
It’s nice to have people from another SN site come in here and not pull the expected "well Teahen’s OK but if u want Francisco your going to have 2 throw in Butler
I was thinking Greinke :-)
by world dictator on Oct 26, 2008 8:33 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
shot this guy now...!!
If you want Grienke…. what do you think would be fair? Do you have the prospects to get him? (seriously, I’m interested)
And what is your opinion on Grienke? Ace now? Future ace? Overrated?
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
by 306008 on Oct 26, 2008 10:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think he's participating in my joke
remember all the Rangers guys who thought that Texas should be able to get Greinke without giving up Davis as part of the package?
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 27, 2008 9:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So it's settled
Franky Guitierrez it is.
by Royal from Queens on Oct 26, 2008 8:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If the Indians were reluctant to sell high on Gutierrez, I think it’s unlikely they’ll sell this low.
by fleerdon on Oct 26, 2008 8:19 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
I think you are probably right
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 8:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who said its selling low?
They’d be getting their replacement for Casey Blake! Corner IF and OFextrodinaire
by Royal from Queens on Oct 26, 2008 8:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Selling low
….meaning that they are selling their player (Gutierrez) when he is at low value (now) rather than when he had a higher value (after the 2007 season).
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 8:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
alright relax
It’s something called a joke
by Royal from Queens on Oct 26, 2008 9:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just trying to help
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 9:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The difference is
They have more of a glut of OFers since the Sabathia trade, and they really want a new 3B.
by BrRoyal on Oct 27, 2008 8:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
only if we can immediately turn Teahen around for two prospects equivalent to Carlos Santana and John Meloan
by APV on Oct 26, 2008 8:24 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
NEVER…underestimate the power of Mark Shapiro!
…besides I bet we can get Seattle and LA (dodgers) in a bidding war over Teahen.
by world dictator on Oct 26, 2008 8:35 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
LA will never bite
Teahen won’t be 33 for another 7 years.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 8:49 PM EDT up reply actions 5 recs
I joined from LGT to rec this.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Oct 26, 2008 9:40 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
how come things turn green with just 2 recs here?
by APV on Oct 26, 2008 10:02 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Because that is how the boss set it here
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 10:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
because our boss rules!!
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
by 306008 on Oct 26, 2008 10:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and yours sucks....
that’s what she said!
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
by 306008 on Oct 28, 2008 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don’t hold our superior humor against them. if you’re a fan of any Cleveland team developing a sense of humor is mandatory.
by world dictator on Oct 26, 2008 10:16 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
We rec comments very sparingly around here
Here, one rec on a comment is a lot (and often more than it deserves).
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 10:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We rec if someone suggests a good beer. And I like it that way.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Oct 26, 2008 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Culture clash
With these kinds of fundamental differences, I don’t know if Royals fans will ever be able to relate to Indians fans. Can’t we all just get along?
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Depends, what kind of beer do you like?
by world dictator on Oct 26, 2008 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Sure. Rec for no hard feelings.
Get green up in this mother.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Oct 26, 2008 11:00 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
after a little rethinking
Teahen for Gutierrez would be an enormous steal for us. He’s an elite defender wherever you put him in the outfield, and he has offensive upside (second half stats!).
I’d even throw in a little something extra to get him, not a lot, but a little.
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
by doublestix on Oct 26, 2008 8:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Gordon
bad attitude — sometimes he doesn’t even swing, and then he just WALKS to first base, as if he deserved a BASE because of the BALLS he took… I’m not sure what it’s called. Lazy Guy’s discount, I think.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 8:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
When I said above that it would take Gutierrez+, I was thinking of him merely as a corner OFer. Since he can play CF, and probably play it well, that changes a lot. I’d be happy to take Gutierrez for Teahen straight up. They can have a throw-in if necessary (Blake Johnson, Paulo Orlando, Mario Lisson).
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 8:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But Orlando will be +40 in CF!
Even if he bottoms out at his collapse rate of .280/.360/.480, that’s still pretty good.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 9:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Giving up Paulo would hurt
…but sometimes you have to take the big risks.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 9:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We Gave So
Much to get him, we must not give him up for less.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Oct 27, 2008 1:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pujols!!!!!!1!!!11!1!11!!
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
by doublestix on Oct 27, 2008 2:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pessimist
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
by doublestix on Oct 26, 2008 9:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
WTF
So, I read for weeks that Teahen may wind up being a non-tender candidate. But suddenly Crowe or Francisco or Gutierrez are not fair value in return. Are you kidding? If anything, I think the Royals would need to pitch in another player to land Gutierrez, who is one of the better OF defensively in the whole game. If Gutz offense comes around he could end up being a star. I think Teahen for Crowe or Francisco, straight up, is more than fair.
by MickS on Oct 26, 2008 9:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No, of course he's not a non-tender candidate
Where have you been reading this for weeks? He’s a good value for the money. Not a great player. Not an average corner OFer. But a good player, and particularly a nice value at 3B.
But suddenly Crowe or Francisco or Gutierrez are not fair value in return. Are you kidding?
Neither Francisco nor Crowe would be a fair value straight up. Don’t even get me started on Crowe. He’s not even a particularly good prospect. He’s an ok prospect and that’s about it. Francisco has decent numbers in 500 MLB at bats and he’s the same age as Teahen. Neither is a great hitter. Neither is a bad hitter. Neither is or will be an average hitting corner OFer. They are very similar. But Teahen has at least had a season where he performed at a considerably higher level. One of the reasons this wouldn’t be a good deal for the Royals is that it doesn’t help us a bit. It is a trade of one sub-par corner OFer for another. That doesn’t help us. It helps the Indians by giving you a 3B. The Royals would need to fill a position of need with an upgrade. So Gutierrez who can play CF would make sense. I think Teahen plus a throw-in for Gutierrez would be fair. And by throw-in I mean a decent prospect, but certainly not a top 10.
I think Teahen for Crowe or Francisco, straight up, is more than fair.
I think that is rampant homerism.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t want to speak for the Royals front office but I suspect their thoughts about Fransisco being an upgrade on Teahen go something like this:
- Fransisco is cheaper than Teahen
- Fransisco plays better defense than Teahen
- Fransisco can play a decent CF
- Fransisco is just as good offensively as Teahen right now
- Fransisco strikes out a lot less than Teahen
- Fransisco could potentially be better, and more consistent, than Teahen
I base the last sentence on the fact that while Teahen had a great year in 2006, his productivity has gone down every year since. Bottomline, there’s a potential upside for both teams in a Teahen for Fransisco trade but they’re both gambling to a certain degree.
I can see why you want Franklin over Fransisco, he’s a somewhat proven commodity because of his defense, but I don’t think Fransisco for Teahen would be a horrible trade for the Royals.
by world dictator on Oct 26, 2008 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I don't think it would be horrible either
But I think it would be rearranging the deck chairs, instead of actually improving the team. And since Teahen can play 3B, there will be other suitors as well. I’m not saying someone is going to offer the Royals a great young player, but there’s no reason at this point to sell Teahen for essentially the same player, who plays the same position, roughly at the same level, who is the same age.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This is largely how we feel about Teahen, I think. While Teahen would save us some money over a FA we could probably get Casey Blake to come back for pretty cheap.
What we’d all actually like is to get a, you know, a good third basemen. Just like I’m sure you guys would prefer to get something better than Francisco or Gutz who are each sort of ok but not actually good.
by afh4 on Oct 26, 2008 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I’m not sure what the market is for a player who OPS’ed .715 last year. I’m not being a smartass, I’m just genuinely wondering what the value of “the better prospect” you’ll get for Teahen is.
I sort of understand where you’re coming from regarding rearranging deck chairs. But BenFran is definetely a potential upgrade over Teahen. It doesn’t have the “wow factor” and I doubt it’s meant to win the division next year, but it is a solid upgrade IMO.
by world dictator on Oct 26, 2008 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I don’t think any GM evaluates talent by looking at only one season of stats.
. But BenFran is definetely a potential upgrade over Teahen.
Potentially, yes. And there is also potential that Teahen will perform better than Francisco (he’s done it before).
but it is a solid upgrade IMO.
Would anyone be surprised if Francisco had a 90 OPS+ next year? I wouldn’t. I’m just saying his improvement and upgrade over Teahen’s career numbers is anything but assured.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 10:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I am in fact predicting that Ben Francisco will have 90 OPS+ next year.
by afh4 on Oct 26, 2008 10:55 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
even i’ll agree to this
Anti-Ben Fran before it was cool.
by Gradyforpresident on Oct 27, 2008 12:41 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Note to RR people: just read his signature.
by Voltaire on Oct 27, 2008 12:45 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
i just wish i would have bet you something on ben fran
Anti-Ben Fran before it was cool.
by Gradyforpresident on Oct 27, 2008 12:47 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I don’t think any GM evaluates talent by looking at only one season of stats.
Is three years a good sample size to look at? Mark Teahen:
OPS:
2006: 874
2007: 763
2008: 715
That’s what we call a downward regression.
Look I think we agree on the nuts and bolts but you’re missing the big picture, IMO. I am by no means telling you that BenFran is going to come into Kansas City and rock your faces off. I’m also not saying he’s a guarantee to produce the same very respectable numbers he put up this year. My point is that there’s an almost an equal chance that BenFran puts up the same numbers he did last years vs Teahen rebounding. (Personally I think there’s a bit of a better chance for BenFran putting up similar numbers) But its a gamble on both sides.
But at the very least, if BenFran sucks to the tune of .715 OPS in 2009, he’ll do it cheaper, with better defense, and less strike outs.
by world dictator on Oct 26, 2008 11:03 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
That’s what we call a downward regression.
Yes, I see the trendline. I also know that his value does not equal a .715 OPS player. You may think he’s really just a .715 OPS player, but I doubt most GM’s see it that way. Nor should they.
My point is that there’s an almost an equal chance that BenFran puts up the same numbers he did last years vs
Teahen rebounding. (Personally I think there’s a bit of a better chance for BenFran putting up similar numbers) But its a gamble on both sides.
Why gamble at all? Teahen is going to hit better than .715 OPS next year. You can count on that. If they are going to trade Teahen, they should do it for some area of need, not for the same player.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 11:12 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Couldn't agree more NY
I’ve been reading all this and just wanting someone to say: This trade means nothing!
OK, I realize it’s the World Series and we all wish that our teams were there instead (wait, I wish the Royals could’ve been in some sort of race) and there is nothing to talk about. Based on stats, this seems like we are talking about trading the same guy. Guys who had upside, are souring on the fans now, but we still have a glimmer of hope that they will turn it around.
I guess this is where GM’s make their money. Who will be the one to pick the guy that actually turns it around? Will they turn it around at all? This seems like a change of scenery type of trade and I guess the excitement comes from getting a new player. I’m pretty sure everyone agrees that this is not something to turn our team around.
Does anyone else have the fear that we will trade Teahen and he will “figure it out” somewhere else? I don’t know if I’m the only one.
by I need more Esteban on Oct 27, 2008 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not much fear
I don’t think Francisco or Teahen are going to ever have a big breakout (probably they’ve already head whatever breakout they are ever going to have). Of all of the players mentioned, I think Gutierrez is the most likely to eventually have a significant breakout season and go from being a mediocre player to a genuinely good one.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 27, 2008 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I find all of your points compelling. Except for the ones without warrants, analysis, or evidence. IE all of them :-)
by world dictator on Oct 28, 2008 1:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fransisco can play a decent CF
I would like to take huge issue with this statement.
by Voltaire on Oct 26, 2008 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
he can't?
Or less than decent?
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
by 306008 on Oct 26, 2008 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I would sooner rip my eyes out than watch him attempt to play center field. Unless he’s doing it for another team. Then I’d tune in for the lolz.
by Voltaire on Oct 26, 2008 10:49 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I think defensive reviews on BenFran are mixed. I tend to lean closer to Voltaire.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Oct 26, 2008 11:04 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Francisco works really hard out there. To some, that looks like good defense, to others, it looks like a guy who has to work hard because of mediocre skills. The numbers aren’t good.
The above refers to his defense in RF or LF. No team intending to be good would have him even as the backup CF, let alone the starter.
by Jay on Oct 26, 2008 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
I have seen Francisco get some pretty bad jumps and take some brutal routes on fly balls.
However, he does have a really good arm.
by woodsmeister on Oct 27, 2008 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Sounds a bit like Emil Brown
and that’s actually not a put down.. Well, Emil’s a bench guy now, but recently I went back and ran some numbers on his 2005 and 2006 seasons for the Royals. We joke around here about Emil, but I was shocked at what I found once I used wOBA and UZR… basically, Emil was a better than a 4 WAR OF in each of those seasons.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 27, 2008 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
sounds like a fanpost needing to be shared
:)
by royalsreview on Oct 27, 2008 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
am I being mocked?
I’ve got two half-done posts in the pipe that I’m too burned out to finish, but I’ll get to it later… I was going to use it as an excuse to figure out how to homebrew, via a baseruns spreadsheet, linear weights analysis of player value, then use it on Emil just to make sure. I’ll probably just use woBA and UZr… Seriously, though, if someone knew they could sign a guy and he would put up 2006 Emil Brown, he’d be worth at least $20 million on today’s market… I’m not kidding. That’s really messed up…
Gotta hand it to Allard on that one.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 27, 2008 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
no... i'm legitimately interested
… Emil Brown remains enigmatic
by royalsreview on Oct 27, 2008 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK....
Once I get my “Gold Glove DHs, 2008” and “The Physics of the Importence: Luck, Power, and the 2008 Royals” done and published, I’ll do something. Maybe we can collab and you can make it funnier…
I just looked at my chart…. A 4 WAR player (and Emil may have been better than that) would get something like 2/38,3/56, 4/72 these days, depending on age. I dunno, maybe he would get knocked down for being in his 30s…so 1/17, 2/33, 3/48, 4/60.
Note that I am not saying that anyone in their right mind would have resigned Emil for that. Just that a player without the failed prospect baggage but with the “4 WAR” numbers would get.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 27, 2008 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think that is rampant homerism.
I don’t think he’s an Indians fan necessarily. He doesn’t talk like he is, and he’s not even registered at LetsGoTribe.
by Jay on Oct 26, 2008 11:04 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Then keep Teahen
Who cares? You guys are the hopeless homers.
by MickS on Oct 26, 2008 9:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Right on
That jerk NYroyal.
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
by doublestix on Oct 26, 2008 9:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Uh oh, it looks like fan trade negotiations have broken down
Next time you want to play around with the trade value of players, look at some stats and also consider the position(s) the players play.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 9:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
From rotoworld.com
"The Royals and Indians are discussing a deal that would send Mark Teahen to Cleveland for Franklin Gutierrez, Ben Francisco or Trevor Crowe.
We’re surprised that the Indians would opt to settle for Teahen at third base when he’s put up OPSs of 763 and 715 the last two years. And it’s not like his triple crown stats are any better. He’s also average at best defensively. The Indians can afford to spare an outfielder, but if they’re going to bother trading for a third baseman rather than move Johnny Peralta to the position, they should attempt to do better."
by MickS on Oct 26, 2008 9:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
+1
Shapiro will never win his fantasy league that way!
Wait… is the Al Central 5×5 or head to head?
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 26, 2008 9:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
6x6!!!1!!1!!!!1
They also count OBP!
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
by doublestix on Oct 26, 2008 9:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rotoworld knows all
Good lord. You’re serious, Mick?
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just heard about this
Initial thoughts:
(1) Gutierrez is the only one that would make me want to do the trade.
(2) Seems like kind of a lateral move – mediocre hitter for mediocre hitter
(3) I don’t understand why this franchise is so hell bent on moving DJ to left.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Oct 26, 2008 9:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That Gutierrez would be a good CFer makes it interesting
The tools and stats make it appear that Gutierrez would be a good defensive CFer. And I think his hitting would be sufficient for CF as well (with the potential to be a plus for the position). If DeJesus is slowing, and therefore his defense is getting worse, then I don’t mind upgrading CF defense (with someone who can hit for the position) and moving DJ to a corner position.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know you won’t, but on behalf of everyone from LGT, trust me: Gutierrez would be a GREAT centerfielder.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Oct 26, 2008 10:11 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Yea, I think Franklin in CF would be great defensively
And thusly, DJ in leftfield would be a defensive upgrade. But it also probably hurts us offensively to move DJ from center to left and replace him in center with someone not quite as good. I guess beggars can’t be choosy. Hopefully a DJ/Franklin outfield opens the way for the Royals to acquire a defensively-challenged third corner OF like Dunn or Burrell, provided they can move JoGui.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Oct 26, 2008 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t understand why this franchise is so hell bent on moving DJ to left.
I don’t get it either. Then again, I don’t/didn’t understand:
1) Butler for Yuniesky Betancourt (fell through, thank Xenu)
2) J. P. Howell for Joey Gathright
3) Gload acquisition
4) Gload extension
5) Gload starting
what’s the possible link?
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 27, 2008 9:55 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Royals don't want to pay $12 million a year for another corner outfielder, thus DDJ in left.
Go Royals!
by BabyBlues on Oct 27, 2008 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
they've got to minimize his value somehow
and in dayton’s world you can probably only get C-OFs on the expensive FA market
by royalsreview on Oct 27, 2008 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Acquiring Franklin
Would allow the hilarity to ensue

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Oct 26, 2008 10:18 PM EDT reply actions 3 recs
If you were trying to make me laugh, you have suceeded
“Trey, is that your wife? That oatmeal needs some brown sugar…”
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 27, 2008 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hi. LGT in the house.
We don’t know who Mick S is, if that wasn’t clear.
I know you guys are going to look at things from your perspective but it Franklin’s ability in the OF cannot be overstated. He has far and away the best single skill of anyone involved in the discussion and, for that reason, I doubt he’s actually on the table.
Most metrics seem to agree (and if there’s one thing the Indians’ FO keeps up on, it’s metrics) that Gutierrez is one of the best, if not the very best, defensive RFs in the majors. Most scouts also seem to agree that he could be the best CF in the majors if he played there. In short, he’s Coco Crisp with a cannon.
I don’t really love Teahen but I’d be fine with Francisco for him; it seems like two very similar players except that Teahen can play 3B. I guess the added value for the Royals is saving cash on BFran? Or maybe it’s just some kind of challenge trade?
I hope Teahen isn’t out big solution at third.
Is Butler really on the market? I saw on that on rotoworld or something.
How about Shoppach, Sowers, Crowe, and Kelvin de la Cruz for Butler and Greinke?
by afh4 on Oct 26, 2008 10:30 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I fear for you, Andrew. Though hast committed the sin of asking about Butler.
by Voltaire on Oct 26, 2008 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
I have no problem giving up Butler...
Grienke however… that’s another beast…
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
by 306008 on Oct 26, 2008 10:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What's fair in your opinion for Butler?
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
by 306008 on Oct 26, 2008 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, what I wrote up there is probably a start.
Straight up for Butler? I don’t know. Off the top of my head you guys probably want pitching, middle infield, and catching right?
I’d do Shoppach for Butler probably. Maybe Shoppach plus a B-B+ prospect.
by afh4 on Oct 26, 2008 10:38 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Hmmm....
answer to our catching question and more… hmmmm… very tempting…
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
by 306008 on Oct 26, 2008 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
really?
I mean, I know Butler doesn’t have a position, but the kid is 22-23. Let’s wait till he get’s his man strength before we are shopping him for a player at one of the least important offensive positions.
by I need more Esteban on Oct 27, 2008 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
KC needs a decent corner outfielder more
Unfortunately, contracts preclude Dayton from replacing the worst one by far. that dang Allard Baird!
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 27, 2008 9:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know you guys are going to look at things from your perspective but it Franklin’s ability in the OF cannot be overstated. He has far and away the best single skill of anyone involved in the discussion and, for that reason, I doubt he’s actually on the table.
Not all skills are created equal. Franklin is great defensively, but also has a career OPS+ of 86. Teahen isn’t nearly as good defensively, but has a career OPS+ of 98 and can play (and has played) all four corner positions.
I don’t really love Teahen but I’d be fine with Francisco for him; it seems like two very similar players except that Teahen can play 3B. I guess the added value for the Royals is saving cash on BFran? Or maybe it’s just some kind of challenge trade?
I just don’t see how this helps the Royals. It’s not an unfair deal, it just isn’t a net positive for the Royals.
Is Butler really on the market? I saw on that on rotoworld or something.
No one in the organization is saying that. It’s guesswork. Some think the GM doesn’t like him, but there is no real evidence of that, and certainly nothing he’s said supports that.
How about Shoppach, Sowers, Crowe, and Kelvin de la Cruz for Butler and Greinke?
Don’t take this the wrong way, but are you serious?
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 10:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hmm, maybe I’m not serious. Shoppach is pretty coveted in some circles.
How about Shoppach, Sowers, Crowe, Gutierrez and David Huff?
by afh4 on Oct 26, 2008 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I wouldn't give you Greinke alone for that package
Greinke is a current ace with his best years still ahead of him. It is going to take a monster package to get him. A handful of mediocre players do not add up to one great player. I like Shoppach. Sowers is, IMO, awful. Crowe is a mediocre prospect. I like Gutierrez, but his hitting doesn’t exactly blow you away.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
what about LaPorta?
Is that attainable?
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
by 306008 on Oct 26, 2008 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
there is the answer on ZG then.
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
by 306008 on Oct 26, 2008 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No LaPorta
No Grienke…
of course it’ll take LaPorta and a few others to get ZG
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
by 306008 on Oct 26, 2008 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
For Greinke? Probably. If the Indians’ FO liked Greinke, which I doubt they do because they are pretty obsessed with “make-up” I think they’d do that.
by afh4 on Oct 26, 2008 10:46 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Certainly not straight up
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can’t even tell who we each think wouldn’t do this straight up. Operating in another fandom is dizzying.
LaPorta has a pretty solid chance of becoming…Billy Butler! And we’ve come full circle.
by afh4 on Oct 26, 2008 10:49 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
i'm dizzy now.
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
by 306008 on Oct 26, 2008 10:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
LaPorta has a lot of upside
Greinke has a lot of upside, and a good performance history.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s that versus ZG’s, what, 3 years of service left and LaPorta’s 6 or whatever.
by afh4 on Oct 26, 2008 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Service time does count
However, no one would consider a trade of a current young, cheap ace for a prospect a fair trade.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 10:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought it was two years of ZG before FA
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 27, 2008 9:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You actually probably could have gotten LaPorta during the season.
From the Brewers.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Oct 26, 2008 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
totally redundant with Jose Guillen, Ross Gload, and Ryan Shealy
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 27, 2008 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, I don’t really think that’s a handful of mediocre players. Shoppach has a lot of value and Huff is a top 30 prospect or around there I’m guessing. The other guys are definitely very mediocre.
Shoppach, Huff, Beau Mills, Aaron Laffey and Gutierrez?
by afh4 on Oct 26, 2008 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
WD
What do you think of ZG personally?
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
by 306008 on Oct 26, 2008 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m not a ZG expert but I’m personally not a fan of him from what i’ve seen. This isn’t a slam on ZG, he’s definetely a good pitcher.
I’m just not sure he’s worth trading some of our best offensive pieces within the division, and I emphasize within the division.
Additionally, I think thats a bit too much to give up for most players not named Jake Peavy. Once again, nothing against ZG but I’m not certain that even if thats a fair trade, its an efficent use of our resources.
by world dictator on Oct 27, 2008 12:23 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Greinke has the possibility to be Peavy
without the injury concern….that is my optimistic view, of course.
by I need more Esteban on Oct 27, 2008 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And he's pitching in a better league
and not in the most favorable pitcher’s park in baseball
I like Peavey, but put him in context
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 27, 2008 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're in the ballpark
I’d have to learn more about the prospects
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think that’s probably where Shap would want Dayton to start (wanting that package) and then Shap would try to get Huff or Laffey dropped out of it for a couple of other guys.
But, as I said, I don’t think Shap would want much to do with Greinke.
by afh4 on Oct 26, 2008 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Please stop, you’re making me nervous. Not that Greinke isn’t awesome.
That’s just a lot of names to process losing at once.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Oct 26, 2008 11:08 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
You’ll notice who never makes it onto my “To Trade” lists.
Our giant Canadian killing machine.
by afh4 on Oct 26, 2008 11:10 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Speak not his name. The Central can’t know what hit them.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Oct 26, 2008 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
are you drunk
Anti-Ben Fran before it was cool.
by Gradyforpresident on Oct 27, 2008 12:44 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Please explain to me how Shoppach and Huff are mediocre players?
by world dictator on Oct 26, 2008 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Shoppach is better than mediocre
But he’s also not a great impact player. He’s an above average 28 year old catcher. With how many years of team control left? And I’ll readily admit that I’m not familar with Huff.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Three years left.
Huff will probably be a top-ten ranked pitching prospect. He blew through Double-A in a few months and then pitched even better in Triple-A. First-rounder from a couple years ago, had injury problems in his first pro season, so it sort of seemed like he came out of nowhere this year.
by Jay on Oct 26, 2008 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I like kelly Shoppach
but He’s sort of a rich man’s John Buck, you know what i mean? Yeah, he’s better than Buck… but Buck had 15 homers in the first couple months of the season last year. So it’s not hard to imagine him putting up something like Shoppach’s career year 2008.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 27, 2008 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We really overvalue our own players on LGT.
by Voltaire on Oct 26, 2008 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Butler being shopped
probably came from the news earlier this year that Moore tried to trade Butler for Yuniesky Betancourt during his first offseason but Bavasi turned the deal down.
That, plus the insinuation that he was sent down for “attitude/maturity” problems rather than the inability to drive the ball.
by Top Ramen on Oct 26, 2008 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
All you guys want is Yuniesky Betancourt?
Hold on, we’ll just trade for Yuniesky Betancourt and then you can have him.
by afh4 on Oct 26, 2008 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Is Dellucci old enough? I KNEW there was a reason we held on to him for this long.
by world dictator on Oct 26, 2008 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
He's your card to get Kemp, Ethier, or both
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 27, 2008 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We’re still digesting Santana and Meloan.
by Voltaire on Oct 27, 2008 5:41 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I always liked Meloan
But he doesn’t appear to be improving his control problems.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 27, 2008 5:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’d give him a full season in the Indians system before I draw any conclusions. Hopefully his AAA season will be better.
by world dictator on Oct 28, 2008 2:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Does the Indians system have a magical effect over their pitching prospects' control?
You must have a great Roving Control Instuctor.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 28, 2008 2:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Its this thing called coaching. You may have heard of it.
I’m not saying the Indians are going to magically make Meloan better over night but each team teaches their own team philosophy. Some players click with some systems better than others. Some players click better with certain coaches versus others.
All I’m saying is that I’d give the Indians staff a chance to work with him before I draw conclusions.
by world dictator on Oct 28, 2008 2:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The only conclusions I have drawn are about how he has performed so far in his professional career. I didn’t exactly write him off as a non-prospect. I just said he has control problems which don’t appear to be getting better. He does and they don’t. Can that change in the future? Sure. Is it likely to? Hard to say. Most pitchers with serious control problems aren’t just one good coach away from having good control.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 28, 2008 2:15 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sure. I think what WD was getting at is that a lot of our major-leaguers are good at throwing strikes and this has usually been credited to Carl Willis and the coaching staff. Whether that’s just true or we happen to have a lot of strike-throwers I don’t know.
But I’m the wrong guy to ask about Meloan. I have an unbridled biased opinion saying he’s going to be closing by the summer and will never give the job up.
Could the whole starting gig last year have affected his control a bit? I’d like him to get full-on back into reliever mode and see what happens.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Oct 28, 2008 9:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Coaching
I tend to think that scouting has more to do with having a lot of strike throwers than coaching. Maybe Willis is due some credit; I know we think very highly of McClure over here. But scouting and signing guys who throw a lot of strikes (that miss bats) would tend to give you more consistently good pitching than trying to figure out and fix what’s wrong with Ricky Vaughn. And not every player interacts well with coaching.
In Meloan’s case, I’d give him a little longer before saying he has control issues (drawing conclusions on only 9 1/3 MLB innings?). His minor league and college numbers are very promising. And he’s what 24 or so? I would guess that the Indians FO is not worried about him.
Don't Stop Believing!
by KC Chris on Oct 28, 2008 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And neither am I.
And not every player interacts well with coaching.
See: Cliff Lee.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Oct 28, 2008 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
See: Zack Greinke and Guy Hansen
Don't Stop Believing!
by KC Chris on Oct 28, 2008 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Really, is that ZG’s book in your parts? I wasn’t aware of that. Does that seem real or just perceived by the press?
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Oct 28, 2008 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
tough to coach? not tough to coach?
the only “real” evidence I know of is that he had some psychiatric issues a couple years back. In my opinion, all the evidence is that those are straightened out. If he’s only psychiatric meds (probably, I would guess) I have a hard time believing he’s the only elite player in the major leagues who is.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 28, 2008 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I understand and am aware of the psychiatric issues, but I’m not sure if what you’re saying is there’s a link to some kind of perceived un-coachability.
Steel Nick
by nickjs21 on Oct 28, 2008 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
no, I agree
I hadn’t heard anything about uncoachability. Well, maybe I heard something about it, but it was right before Zack went on leave, so (and I’m totally speculating — use a salt lick there) I’m assuming that any coachability issues were really symptoms of the deeper problem.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 28, 2008 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Zack was a mess
just before going on leave. He had been quoted as saying he was throwing a BP session as hard as physically possible in hopes that his arm would blow out.
I didn’t mean it as uncoachable, just coaches and pitchers clash sometimes, regardless of why.
Don't Stop Believing!
by KC Chris on Oct 28, 2008 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, it wasn't about uncoachability
it was just that Hansen kept trying to tinker with a 22-23 year old’s mechanics, move him around the rubber, etc…
Don't Stop Believing!
by KC Chris on Oct 28, 2008 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that was a few years ago when Betencourt was highly regarded
Since then we’ve found out his offense and defense actually suck.
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
by doublestix on Oct 26, 2008 10:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't see anyone in the Indians organization
That I would give up for Grienke. Except Grady Sizemore. And that ain’t happening.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Oct 26, 2008 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
even then, I wouldn't do Sizemore for Grienke
ZG is an ACE.. A – C – E ACE! (Volleyball chant for you there…)
Sizemore is an All Star caliber CF… pitching beats good hitting everyday.
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
by 306008 on Oct 26, 2008 10:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I love Zack
but Grady Sizemore was the best position player in the AL this year, and probably will be neck-and-neck with A-Rod every year until A-Rod’s decline (A-Rod would have been right there with him if not for missing the first few weeks).
I’m not worried, though. Paulo Orlando just needs a bit more seasoning…
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 27, 2008 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
how the hell did this turn into a Zack and Butler thread???
That’s not happening.
The Teahen trade is.
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
by doublestix on Oct 26, 2008 10:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
you really think the Teahan deal will get done?
I asked what they’d give for ZG or Butler … my bad.
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
by 306008 on Oct 26, 2008 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you gotta find out what the division thinks of your players!! :0
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
by 306008 on Oct 26, 2008 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think he's saying that the Royals would easily deal Teahen
They wouldn’t hesitate to move him. However, Greinke is nearly untouchable.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes...
I don’t really care that it turned into this thread actually, but DM is not trading a #1 starter within the division unless the deal is just so ridiculous you can’t turn it down.
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
by doublestix on Oct 26, 2008 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
ZG for Buerhle, A. J. and Josh Fields
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 27, 2008 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and I was actually asking him if he really thought that the deal would be done...
It’s like that ESPN commercial where everyone finishes each other’s…
….sentences?
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
by 306008 on Oct 26, 2008 11:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry. We once had a guy come from Athletics Nation and ask who we would want for Grady Sizemore.
by afh4 on Oct 26, 2008 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
lol.
GLOAD FOR SIZEMORE!. DO IT DM.
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
by doublestix on Oct 26, 2008 10:54 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
don't you love these discussions that turn into trade negotiations between blog nerds?
I’m so glad we can confirm the Bissinger/Costas stereotype.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 27, 2008 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cross-posting this from our thread over at LetsGoTribe …
zTeahen is a role-player, albeit one with a strong pedigree (former Top 100 prospect), so you can argue there’s an upside. But he’s not going to fetch Gutierrez, for control and money reasons alone. Three seasons of arbitration-eligible Teahen does not equate to four seasons of Gootz, the first of which will be at minimum salary.
The idea that Teahen in some way is more valuable defensive than Gootz is scurrilous at best. Gootz has a legitimate chance to be the best defensive outfielder in the world. Teahen is adequate in LF and as likely as not to be a butcher at 3B. Third base is only marginally more valuable than center field, and the difference in raw skills is far bigger.
Interesting thing about Teahen though is that, like Branyan, he can be that rare infielder who bats lefty. You know who bats righty? Gutierrez/Francisco (whoever we keep), Carroll, and even Marte. So he’s a pretty damned good fit for our roster, just as Branyan would have been a good fit a year ago.
We also have to assume that the Indians have some kind of data on Teahen’s secondary skills that we don’t have. It wouldn’t surprise me a bit if he showed up to Indians spring training with some kind of great beard.
by Jay on Oct 26, 2008 10:55 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
I'd throw in a prospect with Teahen to get Gutierrez
But no one in the Royals top 10.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
no one in the top 25.
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
by 306008 on Oct 26, 2008 11:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i don’t think they are considered prospects at that point
by APV on Oct 26, 2008 11:04 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Rec'd
simply for a decent nickname for Gutierrez. Franklin Gutierrez is merely an underrated defensive outfielder with some upside. Gootz, on the other hand, is awesome.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 27, 2008 10:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sorry sir.
The rec button has been overused. It will now self destruct in 10….9….
dadgumindiansguys.
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
by 306008 on Oct 27, 2008 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
The only reason I don't want to trade Teahen
is that it pretty much guarantees Ross Gload will get 200+ ABs next year.
I was hoping management would find a corner OF, dump Gload, and put Teahen as the utility 1B/3B/COF/emergency CF
by Top Ramen on Oct 26, 2008 10:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hawk Harrelson loves Ross Gload.
Just saying.
by afh4 on Oct 26, 2008 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
unfortunately he's not the GM anymore
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
by doublestix on Oct 26, 2008 11:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you mean “unfortunately” in the sense that because he’s not the GM, we have to listen to his braying jackass routine on White Sox broadcasts, then yes.
by Jay on Oct 26, 2008 11:10 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
That too
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
by doublestix on Oct 26, 2008 11:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rowdy Hardy is playing on the Surprise Rafters with a bunch of Indians. We’re practically fans of the same team.
by afh4 on Oct 26, 2008 11:10 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Teahen + Hardy for Gutierrez
If you’ll agree to do the deal right now, I’ll tell you Hardy’s fastball velocity right after the papers are signed.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 11:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You can’t fool me. We have a guy named Randy Newsom and him and Rowdy Hardy probably hang out on the weekends.
by afh4 on Oct 26, 2008 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Pitchers with 80 mph fastballs are fun
He could dominate in Japan.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 11:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The embarrassing thing is that Hardy throws that slow and he doesn't throw submarine
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the element of surprise
I thought you were a pitching fan?
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 27, 2008 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I heard Rowdy added 40 pounds of muscle and he was throwing 96 at instructs!!!
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
by doublestix on Oct 26, 2008 11:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If he added 40 pounds of muscle, he’d have a decent shot of throwing 86.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on Oct 26, 2008 11:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
(insert joke about Jose Guillen’s “penetrating veteran influence” or something)
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Oct 27, 2008 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
another bad call by the way in the WS....
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
by 306008 on Oct 26, 2008 11:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Aw hell, LGT. Two guys have a civil, topical discussion with us and now we’re laying around like those friends of friends who end up at your place when everybody comes over after the bar closes and ask if it’s okay to toke up on your futon and you weren’t going to eat all those cookies your mom mailed you anyway, were you?
Oh, and sorry about the shower, man, we’ll fix that in the a.m.
by fleerdon on Oct 26, 2008 11:31 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Talking about Randy Newsom is my own personal lingo for toking on the futon.
“Duder, you want to Newsom this ish?”
“Submarine it, brah. 84 mph from the underside.”
“Periscope down.”
by afh4 on Oct 26, 2008 11:37 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
“It’s a fresh look out of the pen, but it can be a struggle against oppo-handed hitters.”
“Man, you ever think about letting people, like, buy shares … of you?”
by fleerdon on Oct 26, 2008 11:48 PM EDT up reply actions 4 recs
This may be the best thread
I’ve ever been to busy to participate in.
Sarcasm™. It's the new gravy.
by jonfmorse on Oct 27, 2008 12:32 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Why are all the indians guys rec'd?
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
by 306008 on Oct 27, 2008 1:02 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
That's like showing up at Kauffman in Cards gear.
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
by 306008 on Oct 27, 2008 1:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did you hear the one about the ballplayer who ruined our national innocence?
by Jay on Oct 27, 2008 1:09 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
I've been wondering the same thing
It’s a disease…must….rec’d….306008’s….post.
by I need more Esteban on Oct 27, 2008 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We'uns Joads Ain't
Likin’ to much; get offa my land.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Oct 27, 2008 2:20 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I could swear I see something in Teahen's swing
that says if he leaves the Royals he’ll hit .280/.360/.550 with about 40 HRs that year. None of the names intrigues me really. Trevor Crowe was interesting 2 years ago as a leadoff speedy guy type before he stopped hitting at higher levels. Guitierrez is a borderline average corner outfield that’s not THAT young and same goes for Franklin. I might give up Teahen for one of Francisco or Gutierrez but we sure as hell shouldn’t give up extra for those. Noting the state of the farm some low minors bat or some middle/high minors middle infielder would be welcome.
by playingwithfire on Oct 27, 2008 3:51 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

