Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Follow Giants Fans During The Game At Big Blue View

Royals Acquire Mike Jacobs for Some Reason

It was inescapable:

KANSAS CITY -- The Royals acquired power-hitting first baseman Mike Jacobs from the Florida Marlins on Thursday for right-handed reliever Leo Nunez.

Jacobs, who turned 28 on Thursday, should answer the Royals' need for a proven power hitter. He had career highs of 32 home runs and 93 RBIs for the Marlins last season. A left-handed hitter, he batted .247 and had an on-base percentage of .299.

(Note: I've disabled the comments on the various Jacobs posts that have been popping up so we can have all the discussion funneled to one place. The Royals blogosphere has been abuzz about this possible trade for days, and this site has been no different.)

Well, this is right out of the blueprint. With pitching the currency of baseball, Dayton Moore has used some of his change to acquire Mike Jacobs. Isn't incredible that Dick Kaegel even included his anemic OBP in the second paragraph? As devil fingers put it today, Dayton values power at the corners... and nothing else.

A Kaegel reminds us:

Jacobs, is eligible for arbitration for the first time, and his salary is expected to rise to roughly $3.5 million in 2009.

The addition of Jacobs creates an even bigger jam at first base for the Royals, who already have Ryan Shealy, Ross Gload, Billy Butler and Kila Ka'aihue lined up there.

Now, Jacobs did hit 32 home runs last season, and is about to turn 28, so its not like they've just acquired Dougie Mientkiewicz. He could even slug .500, though in adjusting to the better league, I wouldn't bet on that happening. In some respects he isn't even peaking as a player:

PA BA OBP SLG
'05 110 .310 .375 .710
''06 514 .262 .325 .473
'07 457 .265 .317 .458
'08 513 .247 .299 .514

 

I wouldn't go so far as to say he's declining, so much as he's morphing into a latter day Rico Brogna.

You know what would have been cool? Acquiring Jacobs three years ago, especially since he was paid under $400,000 annually to be Nick Swisher without the walks. Still, even at say, Kaegel's guess of $3.5 M, he's a relatively inexpensive player. He's not cheap, but its basically an irrelevant figure salary wise given that it would be hard to see this effecting additional moves, which is all that matters.

Which returns us to Nunez and the effectual payment made. Considering that there were rumors that Carlos Rosa and Ramon Ramirez were rumored to be potential Jacobs fodder, I'm happy that it was Nunez instead.

However...

However...

Nunez will be just 25 next season and is coming off his best season, having posted a 2.98 ERA in 48.3 IP, good for a +143 ERA+. Leo's FIP was also a healthy 3.75 (only two homers allowed), and he allowed the lowest LD% of his career (17.9%). Nunez may not have Rosa's potential (which also may never happen) or Ram-Ram's overall sexiness, nor is he a safe bet health wise, but he is a useful pitcher, and the Royals bullpen was much better when he was a part of it. Stay tuned for a heartfelt "Remembering Leo Nunez" post sometime this winter.

More than anything else, it comes down to whether the additional runs from upgrading from Shealy/Kila to Jacobs makes up for losing Nunez. For now, that's 80% of the issue as I see it. I haven't cruched the numbers, but here in October, that looks like more or less a wash. There are some marginal issues however, and almost all them come up as negatives. Let's run another table:

                                           
Positives Negatives
- Jacobs does have power. - Cost a useful Nunez and possibility of Nunez breakout.
- Some possibility of a MJ breakout. - Hackfest continues.
- Jacobs is better than Gload, I think. - Addition of a negative glove & baserunner.
- Opportunity cost of giving Kila/Shealy more of a look & lost potential of their breakout. Additional opp. cost of signing a better option at 1B/DH.
- Weird move & increased logjam at 1B/DH raises possibility of future sup-optimal decisions.

 

Grade: Jacobs has legitimate power and should be an upgrade over Gload. Unfortuately, that isn't really a useful standard. Losing Nunez isn't a disaster, but considering the Royals already had upgrades over Gload on hand, and that 1B/DH is the easiest position to fill, the trade just seems, in a best case scenario, pointless. Questions about Moore's ability to build a lineup unfortunately must continue. C

Comment 446 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Listening to Petro at lunch,

and although they were covering the move from all conceivable angles, they never did even hint that Jacobs would DH instead of play 1B.

Wonder what the plan is from the Royals point of view? Do they even know the defensive metrics show him as possibly a worse 1B than Butler? If so, do they believe the metrics?

Mr Glass, this is a pro sports team, not a retail store - run it like one!

by loyal2sdad on Oct 30, 2008 1:16 PM EDT reply actions  

Butler=Gone

There is no way that this is the only trade involving a 1b/DH. The only one of the group that has trade value is Butler. Shealy is too old to trade and I think he has better value if we keep him. Also, I think defensively he is the best of the bunch. I hope this just means Jacobs is DH and occasionally 1B (when Shealy needs off). I like the idea of a Delmon Young/Matt Garza type trade involving Butler. Maybe a Butler for a young pitcher and catcher combo. I see Shealy at 1st for half the season, then Shealy/Kila platoon the second half with Jacobs pretty much full time DH.
Maybe the best part about this is there is no way Gload is on the team next year. No way…hopefully.

In the Royals game of life, Neifi Perez is the rake.

by Matty486 on Oct 30, 2008 1:16 PM EDT reply actions  

does Butler lose value because he can't start for the KC Royals?

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jeff Clement?

Is that possible? Please not Yunieski Betancourt

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 30, 2008 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Who cares

cut him and take the hit, trade him for a bat boy, hope he finds a new religion and moves to Belize or something I don’t care just get Gload out of here!

Sign Alex Gordon to a life time contract!!!

by eboston on Oct 30, 2008 2:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

in reality though

do you see us getting rid of Gload. Hillman has been sipping on the Gload koolaid since he got here

by royalsfan03 on Oct 30, 2008 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Then someone

take the cup holding that koolaid away from him right now!

Sign Alex Gordon to a life time contract!!!

by eboston on Oct 30, 2008 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

kool aid?

Do we really have to keep hearing that term? It hasn’t been clever or witty for a long time.

by AxDxMx on Oct 30, 2008 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

wrong sir

it is still hip and relevant.

by ZeppelinDZ on Oct 30, 2008 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Real Libation

Of choice at Jonestown was Flavor Aid; that’s what all the true believers in hopeless causes really drink.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Oct 30, 2008 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would hope on all that is good and holy

that the outcome is no more Gload and a Shealy/Jacobs DH with Butler taking 1B duties. Please God let that be what is happening!

Sign Alex Gordon to a life time contract!!!

by eboston on Oct 30, 2008 1:18 PM EDT reply actions  

That would make the most sense

of course, what would make the most sense is not resigning Gload last season, or DFAing him this season, not trading anyone, and, if you must pick up a third guy for the 1B/DH group to go with full-time Butler and part-time Shealy, make it one of the many free guys out there who are actually better (and will be cheaper) than Jacobs.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 30, 2008 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fair Value Return, but not a good fit?

I think that sums up my feelings. Jacobs for Nunez is certainly fair – but until we see other move(s) Moore makes to deal with the 1B/DH logjam, I have to say Jacobs is not a good fit given the current roster makeup.

Biggest concern to me: trading Butler now would be trading low, and there is a very real risk that a move like that could blow up on the Royals big-time. IMHO, Moore would be staking his job on the outcome of a move like that. Butler is ONLY 22! He could easily still develop into one of the best offensive players in baseball.

Mr Glass, this is a pro sports team, not a retail store - run it like one!

by loyal2sdad on Oct 30, 2008 1:20 PM EDT reply actions  

maybe he starts in AAA?

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

i've been saying this since the rumor came up.

He has options. So does Kila. Gload, Shealy, and Jacobs are who we currnetly have to keep on the 25-man. Should we keep Butler up? Should Kila get the shot? I would guess that both will get a look in ST and probably start in AAA if we don’t dump Gload or trade Shealy by then. Sure, having Butler in AAA seems like a waste, but he wasn’t particulalry fantastic last year and he would get a chance to work on defense nearly every day.

Don't Stop Believing!

by KC Chris on Oct 30, 2008 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Butler in Omaha

Everyone thinks Butler was a little rushed to the ML level… so he should have spent some time in Omaha before getting here. I guess sending him there now for the ’09 season would be an option…. but it never really entered my head. Where would KK play if Bam Bam was in Omaha? It sounds like a very interesting possibility to me.

by CollininCalifornia on Oct 30, 2008 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

ok

Yeah, I guess that would be ok too. But it means either Shealy, Jacobs, or Butler is on the bench every night. And eventually Kila too. That’s not maximizing your talent. This is why I see another trade coming.

In the Royals game of life, Neifi Perez is the rake.

by Matty486 on Oct 30, 2008 1:21 PM EDT reply actions  

maybe

I agree, but it depends on what we get back. I other teams know this too and would be willing to pay a good price. Hopefully

In the Royals game of life, Neifi Perez is the rake.

by Matty486 on Oct 30, 2008 1:22 PM EDT reply actions  

i doubt it

they would realize that we have 4 or 5 first basemen/ DH and would lowball the shit out of us…excess supply=cheaper price

by royalsfan03 on Oct 30, 2008 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

butler trade

Butler=great potential young hitter. We should be able to get something back in that category, like great potential young pitcher or outfielder or catcher…or 2 of the 3

In the Royals game of life, Neifi Perez is the rake.

by Matty486 on Oct 30, 2008 1:23 PM EDT reply actions  

Except that DMGM and Hillman

by not playing him at first, sending him down, and not-so-subtley sending out messages about his work ethic and maturity, have devalued him even further than his disappointing performance would have by itself.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 30, 2008 10:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hopefully that works in our favor.

Dayton may not get an offer that he finds acceptable because of that.

Go Royals!

by BabyBlues on Oct 30, 2008 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm all for that

why trade a 22 year old who has shown a great ability to hit at all levels?
he could end up being the best hitter on the team
I say either play him at first or store him in Omaha – he can live at my house

The concept of progress acts as a protective mechanism to shield us from the terrors of the future. - Collected sayings of Muad'Dib

by buddyball on Oct 30, 2008 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lock your frig

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 31, 2008 12:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

call the local Wendy's

The Baconater is on the loose!

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 31, 2008 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

But the fanshot was up before this...

why would the fan shot be taken down for this?

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 1:24 PM EDT reply actions  

jacobs

Jacobs + Seitzer = .430 OBP and .925 OPS

It’s just math guys.

In the Royals game of life, Neifi Perez is the rake.

by Matty486 on Oct 30, 2008 1:26 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

yes!!

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

i forgot

I forgot to mention that he’ll probably only hit 14 HR’s though. But lots of opposite field singles though!

In the Royals game of life, Neifi Perez is the rake.

by Matty486 on Oct 30, 2008 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Teahen!

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Oct 30, 2008 11:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm backing off a bit

I was initially very much against this. But I’ll soften up. I think we’re focusing too much on what Jacobs can’t do – which Bill James has written can be a flaw of bad franchises. Yea his defense is lousy. Yea, his OBA is awful. Yea, he struggles against lefties. But he does mash home runs. Even if they go down slightly at Kauffman, he does provide a proven track record of 20-30 home run power, something that is sorely needed in Kansas City.

And let’s be honest. Ryan Shealy is nearly 30 now with not much of a MLB track record to go on. Kila was a non-prospect until last year’s dream season. They are huge question marks.

I do think this means Billy Butler is on his way out and if we can spin him in a Matt Garza type deal, this might start to shape up to look pretty good. (If he deals him for Yunieksi Betancourt, I think I might jump out a window).

I think devil_fingers said it best when he said that this is probably a good short term deal for the Royals that immediately makes them better, but is probably short-sighted in the long-term and reveals a deeper flaw in Dayton’s acquisition of offensive players with low OBA. We shall see. In the meantime, it will be nice to see someone in the lineup able to hit the ball out of the ballpark.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 30, 2008 1:36 PM EDT reply actions  

a part of me feels the same way

but seriously, that non OBP is a killer

OUTS are the actual currency of baseball

by Freneau on Oct 30, 2008 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's OK

as long as Butler isn’t the odd man out, or if they can miraculously get a good return for him. Try to get Scott Baker or Liriano from the Twins, I guess… not old enough to get Kemp or Ethier for the Dodgers. Maybe if the Royals throw JoGui in…

Better yet (and I’m sorry to keep yelling this) THERE ARE GUYS OUT THE IN FREE AGENCY WHO ARE BETTER (even just considering hitting, I think better defense goes without saying) WHO CAN BE HAD FOR LESS THAT $3M, DUMBSHITS OF KAUFMAN STADIUM.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 30, 2008 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

but how do you really feel about it?

The concept of progress acts as a protective mechanism to shield us from the terrors of the future. - Collected sayings of Muad'Dib

by buddyball on Oct 30, 2008 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Interesting Mets catcher fetish

I just realized we have a very odd fetish for Mets minor league catchers:

Ed Hearn
Justin Huber
Mike Jacobs

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 30, 2008 1:38 PM EDT reply actions  

So what are the possibilities of Butler?

Who wants him? What’s a good offer? Best fits?

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 1:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Seattle

Looks like the only really good fit to me. I mentioned Jeff Clement before.

Oakland could be a long-shot, although they have Jack Cust. They could put Cust in LF, although he’s terrible defensively. Or Butler could platoon at 1B with Daric Barton. Oakland has some pitchers – Greg Smith, Dana Eveland, Justin Duchscherer – they could part with or perhaps one of their young outfielders. Not sure we could get Trevor Cahill or Brett Anderson though.

Other than that, what other AL teams need a DH? Maybe Toronto? They have Adam Lind though. Butler for Jesse Litsch? Can’t see the Jays doing that.

Hard to see any NL teams going for Butler.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 30, 2008 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree... He'd have to stay in the AL

22 year old DH. Not a good label.

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Reds

Billy Butler’s offensive threat in Great American Band Box would be at least a reason to overlook his defensive ineptitude. We could get back Homer Bailey – who the Reds have lost patience for. Bob McClure works his magic – we have Greinke’s replacement (if we can’t resign him).

BB at Coors would also be a potential fit for the Rox – not sure what we can get back though.

by Cleveland on Oct 30, 2008 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Cincy has Joey Votto

Unless you’re suggesting Butler move back to OF.

Colorado has Todd Helton at 1B, and Joe Koshansky wasting away behind him. Also Jeff Baker and Ian Stewart can play 1B. Colorado does not need Butler.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 30, 2008 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

we could trade Shealy to them.

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Votto could move to LF

And that lineup would not be missing Griffey or Dunn whatsoever.

by Cleveland on Oct 30, 2008 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Personally, I like this trade

We add immediate power. The thing that EVERYONE has been ranting and raving about all year on this board.

We add MLB experience.

Playoff race experience.

What about the other things? Intangibles? Leadership? Work ethic? (grit?) I threw that last one in for some of you out there.

We moved an often injured relief pitcher for a power bat. We got the upper hand in that deal.

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 1:41 PM EDT reply actions  

Getting the upper hand does not mean its the right move

There has to be a good fit, and in this case, it is not a good fit.

We always did feel the same, We just saw it from a different point of view, Tangled up in blue.
-Bob Dylan

by Royal Kingdom on Oct 30, 2008 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

In a vacuum, the move is perfectly fine

RP for starting 1B/DH. Nothing wrong with that.

The problem is the chain reaction of events which have to follow. Until that plays out, it’s too hard to tell how good or bad this trade was.

by Top Ramen on Oct 30, 2008 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I think it's great value for us.

A power hitting LH for us. We move a replaceable RH relief pitcher.

I think it pushes Shealy out before anyone else. KK starts in AAA like he would have anyway. Butler fights for his position with Shealy and we start the season with 2 of them.

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

GMDM

He just said he thinks Gload has value on the trade market and that Kila will definitely start in AAA.
UPDATE: Gload was just traded with Teahen to the Indians for Gutierrez and and a warm bottle of Dr. Pepper

In the Royals game of life, Neifi Perez is the rake.

by Matty486 on Oct 30, 2008 1:42 PM EDT reply actions  

Why must you get my hopes up like that?

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 30, 2008 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

We got a warm bottle of Dr Pepper? What a steal!

by sterlingice on Oct 30, 2008 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Matty in rare form today!

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

GMDM

Now he did just mention that he likes getting Jacobs with Seitzer.

In the Royals game of life, Neifi Perez is the rake.

by Matty486 on Oct 30, 2008 1:43 PM EDT reply actions  

sounds like an awful mixed drink

The concept of progress acts as a protective mechanism to shield us from the terrors of the future. - Collected sayings of Muad'Dib

by buddyball on Oct 30, 2008 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

GMDM

He said Seitzer has recently been watching a lot of tape on Jacobs. Do guys still watch “tape?” I would think they would be watching DVD’s or files on their computer.

In the Royals game of life, Neifi Perez is the rake.

by Matty486 on Oct 30, 2008 1:45 PM EDT reply actions  

What is a "computer"???

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 30, 2008 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  


The files are in the computer???

by Top Ramen on Oct 30, 2008 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

+1

Nothing like a good Zoolander reference.

Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!

by cmkeller on Oct 30, 2008 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

why not get both

5 1b/dh just aren’t enough, need more depth

by ZeppelinDZ on Oct 30, 2008 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

might as well! :)

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

I project 28 HRs, 46 2Bs, 1 3B, and 100 RBI!

This gives JoGui some protection in the lineup (Im joking).

.265 average with 50 BB and 100 K.

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 1:56 PM EDT reply actions  

I have talked about this before. I like the move

KC struggled against RHP last year and Jacobs helps them for that reason. Leo IMO is not a long term answer in the pen. IMO his(Nunez) body will continue to breakdown. I don’t know how the ballpark plays in Miami for LH but it is pretty big 345 RF, 385 Power Alley 434 CF. He hit well on the road (.872 OPS) and against RHP (.857) and is a decent platoon 1b option with Billy.

It takes 46 muscles to frown but only 4 to flip 'em the bird.

by kcscoliny on Oct 30, 2008 1:58 PM EDT reply actions  

Platoon w/Shealy, Not Butler

As eboston was praying earlier…play Butler everyday and let Shealy and Jacobs platoon.

I don't fight extra players.

by paleblueeyes on Oct 30, 2008 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ya that too

and ship Gload away and suffer thru the defensive errors at 1b. I’m glad that they didn’t trade Rosa while he isn’t in the majors GMDM has shown talent at finding bullpen help and trading a possible front line starter would’ve been a mistake. GMDM can find a bp replacement for Nunez.

It takes 46 muscles to frown but only 4 to flip 'em the bird.

by kcscoliny on Oct 30, 2008 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Even better...

You wouldn’t know this from the brilliant KC press, but Gload’ s only above average year at 1B was 2007… Shealy has been above average every time he’s played.

Still, Jacobs is bad enough that when he plays first, he’s a below-replacement level scrub like Gload.

The man can hit, though, and if utilized the right way can help the Royals.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 30, 2008 10:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think Butler showed enough

to let him take on a full season at 1B. If that is the plan then I am perfectly fine with this trade.

Sign Alex Gordon to a life time contract!!!

by eboston on Oct 30, 2008 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Can’t stand the move for all of the previously stated reasons.

Here’s a prediction for the now-inevitable Butler trade: Part of a package to the Rockies for Holliday. Butler is exactly the kind of guy the Rockies love, and I’m frightened to know what numbers he would put up in Colorado. Moore has a growing relationship with Boras; I’m ready to put money on Holliday being in the outfield next year.

I'm about to change my username to DannyDuffyfan

by jackie ballgame on Oct 30, 2008 2:05 PM EDT reply actions  

So does this move put the Royals in the "making a run" camp?

You guys are still way, way off.

Can we still expect a Rangers-Royals trade?

GREINKE HO!!!!!

by oc on Oct 30, 2008 2:07 PM EDT reply actions  

Or JP Howell

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 30, 2008 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Or Mark Ellis. Or Jon Lieber.

Seriously, this trade smells exactly like those in the 90’s that sunk the Royals franchise to the sad state it’s in today. What a pathetic franchise.

Waiting for April.

by DC Royal on Oct 30, 2008 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

really?

I don’t think so.

Don't Stop Believing!

by KC Chris on Oct 30, 2008 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Are you kidding?

Leo Nunez was hardly the savior. Adding a 30 HR guy for him is decent even if it adds a logjam at 1b. I don’t know what the other moves that follow this will be maybe he is a shortterm add to trade again. IDK but this is hardly the TITANIC move.

It takes 46 muscles to frown but only 4 to flip 'em the bird.

by kcscoliny on Oct 30, 2008 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

exactly

Moore would not be smart to trade Butler at this point unless he got a Garza-type deal. He can always put Butler in AAA to start thr season, and then trade Jacobs/Shealy/etc mid-season.

Don't Stop Believing!

by KC Chris on Oct 30, 2008 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

so was Leo Nunez a long term answer for us?

No. He’d be injured. I bet he goes on the DL at least 2 times next year.

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

were you asking me?

because I was in agreement with you. I would say most likely not.

I don’t know about twice, but I bet he hits it at least once (twss…).

Don't Stop Believing!

by KC Chris on Oct 30, 2008 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

no... just posting it for everyone.

It seemed like an ok place to put it…!??

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nunie was an injury risk

but most likely, the guy who replaces him in the bully will be too

by Freneau on Oct 30, 2008 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Of course,

now the marlins will make him a starter and he’ll have a 150 ERA+ in 190 innings next year.

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Oct 30, 2008 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

in the NL.

In the AL it’d be -2

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Then The Career

Ending injury.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Nov 6, 2008 1:20 AM EST up reply actions  

was i the only one that liked Nunez?

i think i would have rather gotten rid of somebody else. I still think Nunez could close one day

by royalsfan03 on Oct 30, 2008 2:23 PM EDT reply actions  

i suppose

but he couldn’t stay healthy for very long. That’s why I’m not shedding any tears.

by CollininCalifornia on Oct 30, 2008 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

I saw him

As the heir apparent to Soria’s closer role. But if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 30, 2008 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

A lot of us were, and are, fans of moving Soria to the rotation

And FWIW, I saw RamRam as the heir to Soria if that happened, rather than Nunez.

by DarthYoshi on Oct 30, 2008 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

agree

RamRam profiled better there with the K’s and GB’s

by ZeppelinDZ on Oct 30, 2008 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think many on here like the idea

but Dayton has pretty much nixed the idea, so why beat a dead horse?

We always did feel the same, We just saw it from a different point of view, Tangled up in blue.
-Bob Dylan

by Royal Kingdom on Oct 30, 2008 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

oh, many of us are

but oddly, in our weekly conference calls, Dayton didn’t seem to enthused. I think he was too caught up in doing BABIP regressions or something.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 30, 2008 10:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

I liked Nunez

but a 30HR guy is more than fair in return. I’m fine with this trade in it’s most basic form. Just concerned what the implications are.

Sign Alex Gordon to a life time contract!!!

by eboston on Oct 30, 2008 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

Don't Stop Believing!

by KC Chris on Oct 30, 2008 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

BBRef Similar Batters for Mike Jacobs

   1. Josh Phelps (957)
   2. George Crowe (934)
   3. Marcus Thames (932)
   4. Olmedo Saenz (929)
   5. Luke Easter (929)
   6. Josh Willingham (929)
   7. Steve Bilko (927)
   8. Bob Hamelin (925)
   9. Dave Revering (923)
  10. Harry Anderson (920)

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 30, 2008 2:39 PM EDT reply actions  

I wonder if the Harry Anderson comp is based on

comedy or magic talent????

We always did feel the same, We just saw it from a different point of view, Tangled up in blue.
-Bob Dylan

by Royal Kingdom on Oct 30, 2008 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Night Court Season 2

finally coming to DVD in February – can’t wait!

Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!

by cmkeller on Oct 30, 2008 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'v never met Mike Jacobs

but I’d bet $100 that he’s funnier than Harry Anderson

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 31, 2008 12:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Does this mean

Tony Pena is still on the team?

Mike Jacobs you're 2009 AL MVP

by eboston on Oct 30, 2008 2:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Jacobs/Guillen

the most feared 3/4 in the Central? Only time will tell

Mike Jacobs you're 2009 AL MVP

by eboston on Oct 30, 2008 2:59 PM EDT reply actions  

who will hit into more double plays?

The concept of progress acts as a protective mechanism to shield us from the terrors of the future. - Collected sayings of Muad'Dib

by buddyball on Oct 30, 2008 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jacobs actually isn't so bad that way

do hitting him behind Guillen isn’t the end of the world… although in front of might be

(line)

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 30, 2008 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

stop it, must.resist.urge.to.make.snarky.comment

The concept of progress acts as a protective mechanism to shield us from the terrors of the future. - Collected sayings of Muad'Dib

by buddyball on Oct 30, 2008 10:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

More like 4/5

not 3/4. Gordon should be in the 3 hole. The lineup sounds better at least without Gload.

DDJ
Aviles
Gordon
Guillen
Jacobs
Butler/Shealy
Buck/Olivo/B Pena/??
Teahen/warm bottle of Dr. Pepper/Gutierrez/Kila moves to OF?/??
Callaspo

by AxDxMx on Oct 30, 2008 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

According to Fox Sports

Nunez is an “Elite” reliever…what have you done Dayton?

Mike Jacobs you're 2009 AL MVP

by eboston on Oct 30, 2008 3:00 PM EDT reply actions  

lol.....elite.... lol... what a joke.

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

He was pretty decent. Elite? No.

And wasn’t he a little suspect after the injury?

Don't Stop Believing!

by KC Chris on Oct 30, 2008 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

hmmm...

how many other elite relievers do we have that we don’t know about?

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

no...

that’s Sluggerrrrrrrrrrrr

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 31, 2008 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

(facepalm)

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Oct 30, 2008 3:40 PM EDT reply actions  

Preferable To Faceplant?

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Nov 6, 2008 1:23 AM EST up reply actions  

DM on 610 right now

Sam Mellinger seemed kinda down on the deal

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 30, 2008 3:45 PM EDT reply actions  

update??

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments

-Wanted to trade for Jacobs this past summer
-Its up to Trey whether Jacobs will hit 4th, 5th or 6th
-Feel Jacobs can improve his defense
-Feels at age 28, Jacobs can still improve
-Will spend some time at DH
-Mentioned Billy Butler has options
-Mentioned we could very possibly move one of our many first basemen in another deal

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 30, 2008 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

More comments

-Better lineup will be better for Zack and Gil
-Shealy recaptured expectations, has a chance to play everyday (where?)
-Didn’t want to engage in hypotheticals regarding Greinke

Pretty short interview

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 30, 2008 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

"Immature"

and not DMGM’s guy.

Seriously, I hardly think I’m being unfair…. I had more written here, but I’m getting myself too worked up over one stupid deal.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 30, 2008 11:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hmmm....acquire a 1B and mention immediately that BB has options

Assuming BB isn’t traded, what’s the over/under on his weight coming into spring training? I’m thinking it just dropped 25 pounds.

by kcdc1 on Oct 30, 2008 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Note To Self

Sell Wendy’s Stock.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Nov 6, 2008 1:25 AM EST up reply actions  

Mellinger's still trying to get the bad taste of his midseason JoGui enthusiasm out of his mouth

it would be nice if someone besides JoPo had the stones to call DMGM out with, you know, numbers and facts.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 30, 2008 10:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just a thought that I had

and I apologize if it’s already been covered, but I haven’t had time to read through all the posts, but one possibility could be that Billy the Kid is optioned to Omaha to start the year in order to give Shealy the opportunity to play everyday at IB with Jacobs as the DH, or vice versa. If Shealy bombs, then you bring up BB.

This still leaves Gload on the roster, and I am doubtful that he will be released. That would mean that Teahen would have to go, IMO.

I hereby resign from this post.

by Home Run Tony Cogan on Oct 30, 2008 3:53 PM EDT reply actions  

I think that is the plan

Unless they are able to trade Butler or Shealy, which it sounds like they are looking to do.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 30, 2008 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

i don't know if they're

looking to trade Butler so much as fielding offers on him. It wouldn’t make any sense to shop him since he has options unless DM is convinced he’s not going to pan out.

Don't Stop Believing!

by KC Chris on Oct 30, 2008 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Even if Butler stays

And becomes the hitter he should be, I think Dayton’s attitude has made it far more likely that his sixth season in KC would be his last, as there’s probably 29 organizations who would cherish his bat more than KC seems to cherish him.

Sometimes you just gotta roll the potato.

by CentralChamps2009 on Oct 30, 2008 7:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

What?

I go to teach 7th hour and I come back to only 50 more posts? Ridiculous. Next time I get back here I want 2 1B traded. Get it done! I don’t care who, except one of them has to be Gload.

Gload – we can get some type of beverage, probably, and hopefully cold. If we settle on a warm bottle of DP then I guess that’s something. What about Gload and TPJ for Milwaukee’s AA backup catcher and some of that Miller Genuine Draft they brew up there. That sound’s fair, right?
And….Butler to Oakland for Carlos Gonzalez/Aaron Cunningham and Gio Gonzalez/Dallas Braden. One of the hitters and one of the pitchers.

In the Royals game of life, Neifi Perez is the rake.

by Matty486 on Oct 30, 2008 3:58 PM EDT reply actions  

Nobody has said it,

but on a personal level, this really sucks for Nunez. I mean, I would think a young guy who has been through these losing years would be pretty excited about getting out of KC, but then to find out it’s the Marlins… ouch.

Don't Stop Believing!

by KC Chris on Oct 30, 2008 3:58 PM EDT reply actions  

Um

The Marlins were contenders last year!

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 30, 2008 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

ya living in Miami as a young Hispanic would suck compared to KC

It takes 46 muscles to frown but only 4 to flip 'em the bird.

by kcscoliny on Oct 30, 2008 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

i guess.

I’ve never been a young hispanic in either area. Although I do eat a lot of mexican food downtown.

Don't Stop Believing!

by KC Chris on Oct 30, 2008 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Google the city woman see the difference LOL

KC
Miami

I think that says it all…I wish my wife would trade me to Miami

It takes 46 muscles to frown but only 4 to flip 'em the bird.

by kcscoliny on Oct 30, 2008 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

for mike jacobs?

would she be happy with Mike?

by Freneau on Oct 30, 2008 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Argentine District Rules!

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Nov 6, 2008 1:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Every KC baseball fan knows a little Spanish

Nostromos Creemos!

Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!

by cmkeller on Oct 30, 2008 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I Don't Know

What that means.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Oct 31, 2008 12:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

It means

“I believe the Royals will get creamed!”

Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!

by cmkeller on Oct 31, 2008 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

A few questions, because I don't think we've been reacting to this strongly enough

1. Mark Jacobs: awful player or the worst player ever?

2. Dayton Moore: the worst GM in baseball or the worst GM in professional sports?

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by Scott McKinney on Oct 30, 2008 4:04 PM EDT reply actions  

+1

It takes 46 muscles to frown but only 4 to flip 'em the bird.

by kcscoliny on Oct 30, 2008 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

umm...

Is this sarcasm?

In the Royals game of life, Neifi Perez is the rake.

by Matty486 on Oct 30, 2008 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

don't forget the flip side

which is probably over-stating how good Nunez is/was

still… i do think this is just a bizarre, pointless move

and I really don’t understand the negative turn re: Butler

by Freneau on Oct 30, 2008 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, Nunez is/was a good middle reliever

A good setup man who can be counted on to pitch about 3/4 of a season.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by Scott McKinney on Oct 30, 2008 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hmmm

Do you think 80% of pitchers spend as much time on the DL as Nunez has in his career? I don’t think the numbers bear that out. But, more importantly, do you think his market value was higher than Jacobs? Not that Jacobs was the right player for the Royals to acquire. But it’s not like the Royals undersold Nunez’s talent/value.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by Scott McKinney on Oct 30, 2008 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think we need more data to decide on these questions

I mean, it’s firmly established that DMGM is the most brilliant pitching evaluator of all-time, but I’ll need to see 5-10 more years of hitter acquisitions to make a judgment.

Especially since I can’t find a “Mark Jacobs” who played 1B for the Marlins lately…

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 30, 2008 11:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hooray for strawmen!

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 31, 2008 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hooray for you!

You took a debate class. Go pat yourself on the back. Oh wait, you’re already doing that.

by AxDxMx on Oct 31, 2008 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think he's actually on your side on this one, AxDxMx

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 31, 2008 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

does someone have good defensive numbers for jacobs?

could we cobble together a quick Gload/Jacobs comp?

by Freneau on Oct 30, 2008 4:05 PM EDT reply actions  

how about a

Jacobs/Brazell comp? :)

Don't Stop Believing!

by KC Chris on Oct 30, 2008 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Gload innings at first and +/-

2006 CWS 247.1 -6
2007 KC 675.2 +5
2008 KC 878.1 -7

Jacobs
2006 Fla 972.0 -12
2007 Fla 903.0 -10
2008 Fla 927.1 -27

by laxtonto on Oct 30, 2008 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

wow

-27

but don’t wprry GMDM thinks he can improve

by Freneau on Oct 30, 2008 11:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

GMDM apparently thinks "-6" = Gold Glove

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 31, 2008 12:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

Come on NYRoyal

Don’t turn into Rob Neyer

In the Royals game of life, Neifi Perez is the rake.

by Matty486 on Oct 30, 2008 4:07 PM EDT reply actions  

Hey

I thought it would be good if Shealy and Jacobs were part of a LH/RH platoon except a little research reveals Shealy can’t hit for shit against righties.

See ya Ryan.

Accidentally not thedude925 anymore. I do hate this new name.

by wildthang on Oct 30, 2008 4:10 PM EDT reply actions  

His odd reverse platoon split is only in small sample sizes

In larger sample sizes (as you can see in minor league numbers), he has more normal platoon splits (hits LHP better).

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by Scott McKinney on Oct 30, 2008 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

ok

I was about to look that up but I just guessed because a guy like Ryan Shealy would hit righties better than lefties as a righty.

oh well, I still think he and Gload are gone and not Butler.

Accidentally not thedude925 anymore. I do hate this new name.

by wildthang on Oct 30, 2008 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Butler

I dont think anyone has turned on Butler, but there HAS TO be another move. I don’t know who else it could be. He’s the one with the value. And you still have a good chance that either Shealy or Kila turns into a good ML run producer. The odds are strong, I think. If we turn Butler into a strong starter or hitter, then it will basically be like we traded Nunez for a strong starter or hitter if Jacobs puts up the same numbers as Butler, which they won’t be that different.

In the Royals game of life, Neifi Perez is the rake.

by Matty486 on Oct 30, 2008 4:11 PM EDT reply actions  

OK yeah this was a good move

Jacobs rakes, and although the OBP sucks, we still got a big power guy for the small price of a middle reliever.

Did Nunez even have that much service time left?

Accidentally not thedude925 anymore. I do hate this new name.

by wildthang on Oct 30, 2008 4:14 PM EDT reply actions  

agreed

In the Royals game of life, Neifi Perez is the rake.

by Matty486 on Oct 30, 2008 4:15 PM EDT reply actions  

I don't think it was a good move

The Royals didn’t give up too much for him, but a .250/.300/.500 1B with poor defense is something that can be found for $1M or less on the FA market. Now the Royals will be paying $3M+ for it, as well as giving up Nunez. Not an awful acquisition, but a poor one.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by Scott McKinney on Oct 30, 2008 4:16 PM EDT reply actions  

not only that

but it seems to signal more bizarre moves

by Freneau on Oct 30, 2008 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

We really have no idea about that

Does that mean they’ll trade Butler? No idea. If so, will they trade him for less than makes sense for the Royals? No idea. Will there be other “bizarre” moves, or will they be good ones? No idea. We really don’t know what this signals.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by Scott McKinney on Oct 30, 2008 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not sure it signals bizarre moves,

but on the surface its not real progress and its adding to the logjam at 1B/DH. If it means the end of gload, that’d be neat. But that wouldn’t be fair to Rossy.

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Oct 30, 2008 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

there has been a logjam at 1b/DH

and somehow part of the solution was to acquire another one

sure, DM could have some brilliant move planned involving Butler, and everyone knows he’s been poor-mouthed by me from time to time…

how do you come out of last season and say, before anything else, “I need to trade butler”?

overall, this just seems like weird decision-making and less than savvy thinking. as you said, cheaper options can be found at 1B/dh, to say nothing of the internal ones… yea, Shealy/Kila/Gload is probably below average, but then again, what is mike jacobs really?

1b/dh is not the problem with this team, and if it was, jacobs isn’t a solution anyway

by Freneau on Oct 30, 2008 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

That last line pretty much sums up my thinking on this

I’m really not in love with this move.

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Oct 30, 2008 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

my thoughts on the logjam at 1B

they are all about the same… Gload, no power, not what we want. Shealy, not proven, power potential, Butler, not proven, high average, medium power, Kila, one great year in the minors… I don’t see a logjam of GREAT talent there. This improves that position.

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

No it doesn't

Jacobs has a career .318 OBP, and he already peaked.

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Oct 30, 2008 5:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Did you read RR's piece?

He’s actually been getting worse in terms of OBP recently, and his three trend is far from encouraging.

Also, no crap? “I don’t know that.” Brilliant argument. Everything we deal with when it comes to baseball deals in probability. I don’t “know” anything 100%. Neither do you. But I’m pretty damn sure last year was Jacob’s “best year” in terms of power, and he’s moving to the tougher league.

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Oct 30, 2008 5:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

just like Gil Meche had peaked at 27....

and was headed down.

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, right,

and Gil Meche is such a good player comp for Mike Jacobs. Thanks for that.

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Oct 30, 2008 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

what did you say about Meche when he was signed?

(i wasn’t a member at this great site so I don’t know) 28 years old, reaching the peak of his productive years…. get a good year out of him, then Kila is ready, and then HOSMER is ready… all for 40 IPs.

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 5:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

I said I didn't think much of the signing,

though I did a long piece that outlined some of the positive such as his strikeout rate in comparison to some of the better pitchers in the league.

What I said or anyone else said about Gil Meche has nothing to do with Mike Jacobs.

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Oct 30, 2008 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

but it shows you could be wrong... and I could be too.

If you didn’t like Meche and he’s turned into a solid #2 borderline #1, let’s just trust GMDM instead of throwing out bad names and thoughts on the guy. We should be excited that we have PROBLEMS at first base. I wish we had these problems at C.

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 5:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh wow

you proved that I don’t know everything about baseball. There’s a good argument. Got me there! What the hell was the point of that BS?

Meche is not a legit comp for Jacobs, so I don’t place any weight in what you’re saying. And I’m not trusting GMDM to be right about a move that has a significant body of evidence that suggests that it is at best redundant.

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Oct 31, 2008 2:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

A little touchy today?

i think you’re letting your off-the-field incidents affect your play on the field… ever get that resolved?

Anyway, this is really not a huge trade. And Jacobs can be traded at any point; Moore could trade him before ST if he wants. And Shealy, Butler, Gload have been less than impressive so far.

Do I think Jacobs was necessarily the shrewd trade GMDM should have made? No.

Is it terrible and going to cripple the franchise? No.

And yes, I read RR’s piece. He had considerably fewer plate appearances in ‘05 than the other three years, so I took that one with a grain of salt. I’ll admit that I’m not very good at analyzing stats, and yes, last year was his peak year for power so far. But I think I read he also had a low BABIP last year. Since his OBP is heavily tied to AVG, and Moore/Seitzer thinks that can improve, shouldn’t we also think there’s room for improvement? I don’t know a whole lot about him, but I think stating that at 28 years old he is completely washed up is a little brash.

Don't Stop Believing!

by KC Chris on Oct 31, 2008 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

i think you’re letting your off-the-field incidents affect your play on the field… ever get that resolved?

That’s an unfair assumption. When you disagree vehemently with me, should I suggest you’re having problems “off the field”? That’s not a fair way to argue a point of contention about baseball players or anything else. So whatever. And no, off field events have nothing to do with my thinking some of the arguments in this thread are baloney.

Do I think Jacobs was necessarily the shrewd trade GMDM should have made? No.

Is it terrible and going to cripple the franchise? No.

I never said it was franchise crippling, just not a good trade and not a sign that Moore’s learned anything about the team’s OBP issues.

And yes, I read RR’s piece. He had considerably fewer plate appearances in ‘05 than the other three years, so I took that one with a grain of salt. I’ll admit that I’m not very good at analyzing stats, and yes, last year was his peak year for power so far. But I think I read he also had a low BABIP last year. Since his OBP is heavily tied to AVG, and Moore/Seitzer thinks that can improve, shouldn’t we also think there’s room for improvement? I don’t know a whole lot about him, but I think stating that at 28 years old he is completely washed up is a little brash.

Who said he was washed up? Not me! I just made the totally valid point that he’s not very good and just had his Age 27 “breakout.”

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Oct 31, 2008 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

No reason for this.

I was just joking around. It was not my place to jest on that. It is the sort of comment my buddies and I would have made when arguing about something, and I obviously don’t know you well enough to joke like that with you. Sorry if it offended you. I responded too quickly to some of the things you posted (no crap, brilliant, oh wow…). I took them as very snarky. So I made an off-color comment about whatever the situation you’ve been having is. Won’t happen again.

Anyway…

No, you didn’t say that the move was franchise crippling, nor did I say you did. I was making a point that this is fairly minor. I’m pretty sure Moore knows that Jacobs has a crappy OBP. He probably took it into consideration with another move or two he has planned. Maybe not. I have no idea. I’m just not going to get too worked up over this trade. I didn’t see Nunez being with us for much longer as he had already been traded once and is injury prone. Could we have gotten more, or maybe someone at a different position than Jacobs? Again, I have no idea, but probably.

You did not specifically say he was washed up; I mistyped on that. You did say he had already peaked. My bad on jacking up the semantics.
 
And we are not disagreeing on Jacobs. I’m not thrilled with what he can’t do. I do appreciate what he can do, thoguh. And the trade is done, so I ‘m not going to worry about what we coulda/shoulda/woulda done. I’ve sat through a lot of seasons. There are good trades and bad trades. Hopefully there will be more good than bad and the Royals win.

Don't Stop Believing!

by KC Chris on Oct 31, 2008 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

My snarkiness had something to do that I'd much rather

have a debate of opinions rather than have someone tell me that “I don’t know that” or “you’ve been wrong before.” I see no reason not to just skip that stuff. You disagree with me? Fine. I just think it’s a given that I’m fallible. None of my posts have disclaimers that say “this is the only right opinion, mine!” :)

There are no problems I’m having in “real life” that are affecting my opinions here, just to clarify. Thank you for your apology.

You did not specifically say he was washed up; I mistyped on that. You did say he had already peaked. My bad on jacking up the semantics.

There’s a big difference between “peaked” and “washed up.” Most average players are peaking or have already peaked around Jacob’s age. He just set career highs in counting stats. These some of the things I’m taking into account when I say he’s peaked.

And we are not disagreeing on Jacobs. I’m not thrilled with what he can’t do. I do appreciate what he can do, thoguh

I acknowledge that his power is pretty good. He’s just another not-very-impressive corner player without the upside of Butler or the intrigue of Ka’aihue.

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Oct 31, 2008 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

your true colors....

…are showing…. I don’t see enough royal blue.

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 31, 2008 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

You're going to have to explain

how me thinking Jacobs isn’t very good means that my “true colors are showing.”

Or maybe you can’t, because that’s just a ridiculous statement.

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Oct 31, 2008 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was talking more about your lack of faith in the Royals

than this specific trade….

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 31, 2008 3:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't know how you're coming to the conclusion

that I have a lack of faith in the Royals. I think I’m generally pretty optimistic about them, to the point where sometimes I have to tone it down. I just don’t like this trade and the implications for Butler and Ka’aihue.

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Oct 31, 2008 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wait,

what’s more, I also REALLY don’t care to get in a pissing contest about which team I root for. Just so’s you know.

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Oct 31, 2008 3:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

What I'd really like to know

is where the “pissing contest” metaphor started. I mean in general. All the sudden, I have no idea why someone would think it is a good idea.

Little help? RR, isn’t this a chapter in your dissertation?

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 31, 2008 9:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

I came to that conclusion from reading the above comments from you

go back and read what you wrote, look at it from an outside point of view.

And please don’t get irrationally mad like you did at KC Chris that started this whole thing…

I merely stated that I thought it made us BETTER as a team even though it added to the percieved logjam….

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 31, 2008 8:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah,

well you seem to be questioning whether I care if the Royals do well. So what? Because I don’t like this deal, I’m not Royal Blue enough? I wish I’d known that someone had given you power to judge that. If that’s what you think, I don’t care to justify myself to you. Go ahead and think I’m a Red Sox homer who doesn’t give a shit about KC.

and I was stating I don’t think this deal improves the team. That’s called a difference of opinion, and it’s not a reasonable basis to accuse someone of that “showing their true colors” stuff.

Irrationally mad? Yeah okay. You attack my fandom and now I’m mad at you because I think it was a stupid thing to do. That’s not irrational. Unless your definition of “irrational” is “in opposition to my point of view.”

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Nov 1, 2008 3:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

+1

Cindy Lauper will bring us all together in these trying times

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 31, 2008 9:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Cindy Comes Through

Time after time.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Nov 1, 2008 8:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

D+.

We saw what Shealy has become and cockblocking him with someone like Jacobs is inexcusable. Nunez was one of my favorites after pitching very well since he wasn’t traded for Bradley, but I guess Dayton is set on getting rid of every single trinket of the Baird era this off-season.

Banny being Banny.

by JobDDT on Oct 30, 2008 4:17 PM EDT reply actions  

We saw what Shealy has become?

When did we see that? One good month in the majors? Come on. We still have no idea what Shealy is. Sure I’d rather he and Kila get some good PT in the majors in 2009 to see that, but to argue that we know Shealy is at least a decent MLB 1B is baseless.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by Scott McKinney on Oct 30, 2008 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

He was only given one month majors time last season.

He was raking in the minors. He put up numbers in the minors I would expect Jacobs to have put up in the minors. We finally brought him up in spite of Dayton’s man-crush for all things Ross, and he did nothing but be the best Royals player on the roster for September. Shealy should be our 1B next year, unless we can get someone better. Mike Jacobs, overall, is not better.

Banny being Banny.

by JobDDT on Oct 30, 2008 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

He wasn’t raking in the minors. A guy of his age, who has been in AAA for multiple seasons, in the PCL should be hitting better than a .850 OPS. That isn’t “raking” by any reasonable definition of that word. Any faith in Shealy or expectation that he’ll be good is based on…..what? There really isn’t much of any support for it.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by Scott McKinney on Oct 30, 2008 4:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

you THINK mike jacobs is better than ross gload?

really? geez, you really are blinded by your anti dayton moore glasses.

by chicagoroyalsfan on Oct 30, 2008 4:24 PM EDT reply actions  

wanna see how the defensive numbers shake out

but yea, jacobs is better than gload

how much, i don’t know

by Freneau on Oct 30, 2008 4:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not hyperbole

Jacobs was the worst fielding regular 1B in the majors last year by a considerable margin. Dewan had him at -27 plays (about -22 runs), or 9 plays (about 7 runs) worse than Jason Giambi. RZR/OOZ had Jacobs dead last too.

by Gopherballs on Oct 30, 2008 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Low Razor Ooze

That can’t be good, especially around Halloween.

Sometimes you just gotta roll the potato.

by CentralChamps2009 on Oct 30, 2008 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

+1000000

of course, I hear the jury’s still out on statistics.

The very fact that they impugn the brilliance of the Gload and Jacobs acquisitions show their flaws.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 30, 2008 11:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

everyone just say

platoon partner platoon partner platoon partner over and over.

Its not a bad deal when we look at it that way.

we traded a non pivotal asset in Nunez who if we believe in Moore’s high success rate in finding quality relievers (hopefully not just statistical noise) then its nno loss there.

Accidentally not thedude925 anymore. I do hate this new name.

by wildthang on Oct 30, 2008 4:24 PM EDT reply actions  

Didn't work

I liked thinking of Kila as a platoon partner this year, but that dream is over, so, it doesn’t make it better.

Sometimes you just gotta roll the potato.

by CentralChamps2009 on Oct 30, 2008 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

if the whole dh-ing for the royals thing doesn't work out...

…I’d say he definitely has a second career lined up in musical theater.

by DarthYoshi on Oct 30, 2008 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

ha!

Don't Stop Believing!

by KC Chris on Oct 30, 2008 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

caption contest?

He looks like he’s in a musical.

Don't Stop Believing!

by KC Chris on Oct 30, 2008 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Gotta dance!!!!!!!!!!!!

The concept of progress acts as a protective mechanism to shield us from the terrors of the future. - Collected sayings of Muad'Dib

by buddyball on Oct 31, 2008 8:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Looks like he just let one rip

A fart I mean, not a home run.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 30, 2008 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

"If I do this 40 times a year, I'll reach replacement level"

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 30, 2008 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm really going to miss Leo.

It was easy rooting for him after the Milton Bradley debacle.

Banny being Banny.

by JobDDT on Oct 30, 2008 4:33 PM EDT reply actions  

Anybody have Bill James Projections on Jacobs?

It takes 46 muscles to frown but only 4 to flip 'em the bird.

by kcscoliny on Oct 30, 2008 4:48 PM EDT reply actions  

Fishstripes already posted them

0.270/0.325/0.515 0.841 OPS

26 HR

I have found that James projections are usually pretty optimistic, especially for power hitters.

I think he had Jose Guillen OPSing about .816 this year or something, for example.

I like James’ writing, but his projections are, um… I’ll wait for Pecota or Zips.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 30, 2008 11:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Let me add

that I don’t think Bill personally does the projections, right? They just slap his name on the “Stats, Inc.” projections?

Someone fill us in here.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 31, 2008 12:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

correct

its stats or whatever his brand is now

by Freneau on Oct 31, 2008 12:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

Are those projections

for him specifically as a Marlin? Facing NL pitching, playing in Miami?

Any reason to think they’d be revised with the understanding that he’d be a Royal?

Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!

by cmkeller on Oct 31, 2008 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not good.

There are many problems with this trade, many of which have already been enumerated above. But one which has been glossed over a bit: I think somewhere I saw some remark about getting a “proven” 25-30 HR guy. He hit 32 this past year, never more than 20 before that. He had the one bizarre power burst at the end of his fractional first season with the Mets, and got over thirty last year, and otherwise has not been that strong a power guy. There’s too strong a possibility that last year was a stastical fluke/27-yr-old peak to trust that Jacobs is going to provide this kind of pop on any regular basis. For some teams this might be an OK trade but it hardly seems the best use of resources (both financial and personnel) for the Royals at this point.

Murphy was an optimist.

by The Ol' Perfesser on Oct 30, 2008 4:49 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

True date, Professor

I know that “proven power guy” is a relative term for the Royals, but hitting 30 HRs once doesn’t make you a power hitter. Yes, it’s an improvement over Gload, but we’re giving up a lot in defense/OBP/AVG for a guy who will probably hit > 30 HRs.

by hippdoghipp on Oct 30, 2008 5:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

when was the last time we had a Royal just go and hit 30 HRs?

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 5:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

It doesn't matter much if he somehow hits 32 HRs again

against better competition—doubt it—if the rest of his game drags him down into Gload territory.

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Oct 30, 2008 5:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

the question was...

When was the last time we had a Royal (on our roster) hit 30 HR in a season?

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

A billion years ago?

I guess my answer is that I don’t really care if he’s still a net loss. :D

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Oct 30, 2008 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

now we've got a shot.

Hopefully it’s not the last one.

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hopefully next time we get a shot,

it’s also a good player who pushes this team towards contention instead of an extra three million put towards dreams of adequacy.

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Oct 30, 2008 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

News Radio ep!

took mer .1 seconds! We were just talking about this on another thread.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 30, 2008 11:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's unbelievable.

My favorite show evah until Arrested Development came along.

by hippdoghipp on Oct 30, 2008 11:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think it was Gary Gaietti

Who challenged the record back in his day by getting 35. I think Jeff King got close without breaking 30. Sweeney may have had as many as 27 (I refuse to actually look anything up). So, it’s been a long time.

Sometimes you just gotta roll the potato.

by CentralChamps2009 on Oct 30, 2008 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Given that Dayton Moore made this move

I fully expect Jacobs to regress to Gload-ian like levels this season (.250/.290/.430 is not out of the realm of possibility) and then Moore to reward him with a 2-year contract loaded with bonuses, incentives, and an option for a third year!!!

I kid, I kid.

But does anyone else find it amazing that Moore has yet to acquire ONE well-disciplined hitter at the MLB level, yet? Think about it. Not ONE.

by Royals Nation on Oct 30, 2008 4:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Really?

I guess I was under the impression that most of it was contact-based. In other words, he could hit .300 easily, but doesn’t possess a ton of patience otherwise. His OBP is fine, sure, but there isn’t much of a BA-OBP split.

by Royals Nation on Oct 30, 2008 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

If he added some doubles power,

it might be more obvious. He drew more walks than Ks in his last full year in the minors.

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Oct 30, 2008 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Callaspo is one of the best in the majors

at not swinging at balls outside the strike zone, making contact, not striking out, and hitting line drives, plus he walks at a league average rate (8%).

by Gopherballs on Oct 30, 2008 5:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

oops didn't see this

This ^

Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.

by doublestix on Oct 30, 2008 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

discipline isn't always about walks

But isn’t it pretty f’ing (best way I can put it) clear that Callaspo could take a ball in his sleep? He almost never swings at anything outside the zone.

Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.

by doublestix on Oct 30, 2008 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Potential Eddie Joost

without the power, and maybe very little of the defense, but even if he only turns out to be Esty, Jr., that’s not bad for a league-minimum stopgap

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 30, 2008 11:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wonder

Is it possible that GMDM got dazzled when Jacobs jacked 2 HR off the Royals in the interleague series?

Murphy was an optimist.

by The Ol' Perfesser on Oct 30, 2008 4:59 PM EDT reply actions  

There goes Butler as at least part of a package to Texas for a young catcher. Do we sign Bradley when he is let go, with Butler as his DH replacement? What young pitcher goes as part of this same deal? Do we get Byrd as well?

by Scutch on Oct 30, 2008 4:59 PM EDT reply actions  

would it be a bad idea

 to trade Butler for one of their young catchers? Just curious. I don’t actually have an opinion on it.

Don't Stop Believing!

by KC Chris on Oct 30, 2008 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

If it's for more than just a C

I would think about it

Mike Jacobs you're 2009 AL MVP

by eboston on Oct 30, 2008 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah

it doesn’t necessarily need to be straight up.

Don't Stop Believing!

by KC Chris on Oct 30, 2008 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

What about Jeff Clement?

I don’t know the scouting report/stat analysis of Clement.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 30, 2008 8:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

And just to clarify

I actually think this trade makes sense. Also, I believe we won this trade. Jacobs possesses obvious holes in his game (defense/baserunning/plate discipline), but anytime you can get a 35-HR potential hitting full-time, competent first baseman for an injury prone set-up man, I think you’re doing yourself a duty.

However, I hope this doesn’t signal the negatives that Will mentioned above. What about Kaaihue? Selling low on Butler? Shealy’s career as a Royal possibly over? The 1B/DH logjam? Given that Jacobs has reached his peak, I’m hoping he can reach his 2006 or 2007 levels.

I do wonder if Jacobs could be used as further tradebait.

by Royals Nation on Oct 30, 2008 5:07 PM EDT reply actions  

Correction

Maybe 30-HR potential, given that Kauffman Stadium hates HR hitters.

by Royals Nation on Oct 30, 2008 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Duty, always funny!
I think you’re doing yourself a duty.

Mike Jacobs you're 2009 AL MVP

by eboston on Oct 30, 2008 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, it'll make a world of sense

when Trey Hillman continues to play Ross Gload everyday because of his grittyness. He doesn’t give the Royals “slug”, but he gives them something intangible, much like a fart vanishing in the wind.

by AxDxMx on Oct 31, 2008 12:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm sure that will happen.

Gimme a break.

Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.

by doublestix on Oct 31, 2008 12:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

but it could linger...

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 31, 2008 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

finally calming down

so after some initial freaking out, I think I am settling into some sort of equilibrium regarding this trade. As long as B-Butler isn’t traded as part of this deal, I think i’m ok with it.

Nunez, yeah, he’s good but i agree that we got at least a fair return on him… if not somewhat of a bargain.

I have some hope that Jacobs can improve a bit — his minor league numbers don’t show a whole lot of promise, but have a look at his OBP numbers:

(age)

2002 (21) .289
2003 (22) .372
2004 (23) .248 (injured, only about 100 PAs)
2005 (24) .376

Overall, his minor league OBP was .342, or .055 above his batting avg. I think that shows some promise when coupled with a .264 BABIP for 2008. I think with some improvement in his BABIP, we could expect an OBP for 2009 to be around .320-.330. That coupled with SLG around .490-.520, he could be a valuable asset to the offense… as long as some guys get on base in front of him.

by CollininCalifornia on Oct 30, 2008 5:16 PM EDT reply actions  

I Repeat; He

Should rarely wear a glove or face LHP’s. That would give him the best chance to be valuable.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Nov 6, 2008 1:44 AM EST up reply actions  

My two cents

I hate to see Nunez traded, but he was one of our more tradable commodities. I’d much rather Ramirez and Soria in their roles, and with keeping Mahay at the deadline, he was somewhat redundant. He has potential, but he’s also an injury risk. We almost traded him for Milton Bradley a year or so ago. So I think we got a fairly good deal here.

Would it open up the Royals for a challenge trade for another former top prospect that has fallen out of favor with their respective team? Phillip Hughes or Homer Bailey for Butler. Especially for the Yankees that would be a reasonable trade with even risk for both parties. I hope we get some OBP from somewhere, but even an all slugging team can be successful (see this years White Sox).

by lordbyronk on Oct 30, 2008 5:22 PM EDT reply actions  

"Hot" Is All

In your head, and yes, she was.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Oct 31, 2008 1:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

Still good with it

Gave away a pitcher who was ok, in a position that GMDM has a good track record replacing, and is injured a bunch.

Returned a batter who has more power than anyone on our team. Power was a huge problem on this team, obviously.

Shealy has only shown one good month with us in the majors, so he’s not exactly a huge loss if he’s on the bench, platooning, or on someone else’s team.

Gload just needs to not be on the team. Trade him for anything.

Butler is obviously the one they want to keep. He’s only 22 and may end up with a bat. Of course, they already gave up on his glove last year, so if they keep him, he’ll DH.

Kila will be in the minors.

No log jam.

Personally, I think we all need to calm down. GMDM made a trade. Player for player. We got something that we didn’t have any of last year. We gave away something that we have the ability to get more of. That’s it. I think too many people are thinking that Shealy and Kila have “arrived.” They haven’t. Besides, if they trade all of the players in the log jam, would it really matter. Didn’t exactly do much with any of them last year. I say keep Butler at DH, Jacobs at 1B, and trade the rest of them for whatever you can get.

That may be the most rambling post ever. Sorry. Trying to get this out before I leave the office.

by nkkc on Oct 30, 2008 5:29 PM EDT reply actions  

Sounds good

except Butler or Shealy need to be at 1B with Jacobs DHing

Mike Jacobs you're 2009 AL MVP

by eboston on Oct 30, 2008 5:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was typing up somethign similar with a little extra at the back end...

So it’s what 47/47 % or so on people liking this/people hating this (6% to the independent party +/- 3%…). And we now have Jacobs, Gload, Shealy, Butler, and KK at first. What are our options for each?

1) Jacobs DHs, plays 1B, or is traded.

2) Gload. Yeah. He probably rides the pine but could be traded.

3) Shelay DHs, plays 1B, or is traded.

4) Butler can go to AAA, DHs, plays 1B, or is traded.

5) Kila starts the year in AAA to prove it wasn’t a fluke (I think he’s slowed down a bit in winter ball, but still has a good OBP…). Not a likely trade candidate.

I think Jacobs DHs. Glaod is traded. Shealy plays 1B. Butler plays 1B and DHs depending on who needs the day off or who is pitching. KK is in AAA. And if we want to hang on to Gload, Butler goes to AAA until the trade deadline (delaying his service time!).

OK, I don’t want to trade Butler. I think AAA should be the first option if GMDM is not happy with him. But, let’s assume GMDM is not going to budge on Butts. So, it’s completely worthless speculation time: Who would we target if using Butler as trade bait? Butler + who for who? Butler for who + who?

Don't Stop Believing!

by KC Chris on Oct 30, 2008 5:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

So when do they "arrive" and at what airport gate do we pick them up?

Seriously, if they haven’t “arrived” yet, when will they? Kila had been injured in previous years, this was his first full healthy season. Shealy had a monster September. Do they not deserve shots at starting? At what point do they just say “Screw it, they’ll never give us a chance.” and give up?

by AxDxMx on Oct 31, 2008 12:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Neyer posted a blog on ESPN about Jacobs/Moore

but I don’t have Insider Access anymore – so if anyone wants to post/summarize key points of the article, that would be cool. It looks to be one of the quintessential Neyer articles about hopeless the Royals are.

by jsolo on Oct 30, 2008 5:37 PM EDT reply actions  

He might be right sometimes,

but I am oh so tired of his schtick.

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Oct 30, 2008 5:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pretty much

I think he gets excited when the Royals make a controversial move so he can bag on them.

Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.

by doublestix on Oct 30, 2008 5:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Headline: "High Hopes for Royals under Moore Sinking Fast"

Neyer: "I don’t mean to suggest that Jacobs will be a disaster next season. He’s only 28. If he can maintain the power and add 20 walks he won’t be the worst first baseman (or DH) in the American League. But this is exactly the sort of trade a team like the Royals shouldn’t be making. They’ve got organizational strength at exactly one spot: 1B/DH. With youngsters Butler and Ka’aihue, those two hitters’ spots — along with Alex Gordon and third base — are essentially the only positions management should not be worrying about. Relievers are fungible, and Nuñez is just the sort of reliever who should be used as trade bait to fill holes on the roster.

That doesn’t mean you just give him away."

by andrewmiller on Oct 31, 2008 8:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

butler to A's

for

Vin Mazzaro milb’s AA pitcher of the yr
Santiago Casilla- hard throwing reliever, take nunez spot
Josh Donaldson- will be in AA 09, Keith Law put him in his 09 top 50 overall…future catcher
Greg Smith or Dana Eveland- mlb ready lefties

Patrick (Chicago): Keith, what kind of return could Kansas City expect to get for Billy Butler?

SportsNation Keith Law: The more they acquire replacements/obstacles, the less they’re going to get. If they could trade him for a couple of good-not-great prospects, that is probably their best option (well, short of just PLAYING THE GUY). Toronto would be a great fit.

by Asfan4ever723 on Oct 30, 2008 5:37 PM EDT reply actions  

Yeah, so PLAY THE GUY

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Oct 30, 2008 5:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd be happy with one of the LHP and one of the other guys.

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 5:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

butler is in the doghouse

the jacobs deal bought him a one way ticket out of kc…its blatantly obvious since there’s already 3 other 1b/DH types on the roster

along with butler being their best trade chip outside of greinke who DM said was already untouchable

by Asfan4ever723 on Oct 30, 2008 5:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think you have any information

that concretely supports that Butler is headed out of KC. I don’t think that’s “blatantly obvious” at all.

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Oct 30, 2008 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

True that, as the kids say,

but even Rany seems to think that’s the direction things are heading.

I’ll withhold judgment until it happens…

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 30, 2008 11:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

(am i a cool kid now for doing that?)

by CollininCalifornia on Oct 30, 2008 5:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

yes.

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

i think its a fair deal

2 premium prospects in mazzaro/donaldson
mlb ready pithers in casilla + one of the lefties

i know its hard to ompare situations but heck that haul is probably more than santana/harden got in their trades

if more has to be added A’s have a ton of depth..you want more pitching?

cahill/anderson/gio/simmons/gallagher?

need relievers?

devine/ziegler/blevins/carignan/bailey/demel

need more 1b?
barton/doolittle/arter

need more infielders?

patterson/cardenas/pennington

need OF’s?

buck/cunningham/sweeney/gonzalez/brown/sulentic

by Asfan4ever723 on Oct 30, 2008 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

unless you are Billy Beane

it don’t matter.

Well, even if you are Billy Beane, we aint Dayton Moore, so it still don’t matter

by GoBabies!! on Oct 30, 2008 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Toronto would be interesting

They do have Adam Lind though (although he seems to be their Butler – good minor league numbers, but they refuse to play him every day)

Toronto has a mess of decent pitchers, but they’re all on the DL – Casey Jansen, Shaun Marcum, Dustin McGowan. Jesse Litsch would be a great haul, but I don’t think Toronto makes that deal. I don’t see any young hitters that would interest us much except Travis Snider, and he’d be clearly off-limits.

I can see DM trading Butler for IF Aaron Hill and C Curtis Thigpen. Ugh.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 30, 2008 8:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

J. P.

has collected as many good pitchers as Moore has, and is better at getting hitters on the cheap. Hell, Frank Thomas didn’t make as much money as Guillen.

I don’t think J. P. a good GM, or better than Moore, actually, but his main problem is that he comes off as a hotheaded jerk…

But if J. P. had made a move like this, it would be roundly mocked, and no one here would be trying to justify it.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 30, 2008 11:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

The way I see it....

We got basically a stop-gap 1B that has the ability to help a team win.

Keep in mind, we only have control of him for 2 more years (I think). That would be about a year ahead of the earliest Hosmer pace. He has a hell of a better track record than Shealy or Kila. as Royals fans, we have been conditioned to think it is OK to go into a MLB season with un-proven commodities and hope that we catch lightning in a bottle. This move spits in the face of that and I like it.

I don’t care that Nunez is gone. I wrote in one of the threads that is locked before this deal went down that I hoped it was Nunez that we traded. he’s just too frail to stay healthy for his career, and HIS track record shows that.

We got a 25-30 HR hitting 1B/DH for 1-2 years for a 60-80 inning a year pitcher (at best).

by GoBabies!! on Oct 30, 2008 5:44 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

And

I don’t think Butler is going anywhere just because we only have Jacobs for 1 – 2 years (could be potentially traded at deadline if one of the Kila/Butler/Shealy 3 headed monster shows they ARE ready for 1B @ MLB level).

We have Butler for 4 more years of team control. He’s not going to be traded unless it is for a significant amount IMO.

by GoBabies!! on Oct 30, 2008 5:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jacobs for 3 years

This is his first year of arbitration

by Top Ramen on Oct 30, 2008 5:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Having 5 more years

of Butler control, only strengthens my belief that he isn’t being traded unless overwhelmed…

by GoBabies!! on Oct 30, 2008 5:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Neyer Blog on Insider

The Kansas City Star’s Bob Dutton on the first notable trade of the off-season:

      The Royals wasted no time Thursday in pulling the trigger on their first major off-season move by acquiring slugging first baseman Mike Jacobs from the Florida Marlins for reliever Leo Nuñez.

      —snip—

      Jacobs is a left-handed hitter who provides the Royals with some much-needed punch for their lineup. He hit a career-high 32 homers this season in 141 games, although he batted just .247 with a .299 on-base percentage.

      “We’re delighted to acquire a productive hitter to impact the middle of our lineup,” general manager Dayton Moore said. “Mike’s a winner and has a very aggressive approach to baseball, and we look forward to his presence on our club.”

      The Royals haven’t had a player hit 32 homers since Jermaine Dye had 33 in 2000. José Guillen led the club this season with 20.

      —snip—

      Nuñez, 25, was 4-1 with a 2.98 ERA in 45 games last season. He fits better into Florida’s salary structure because he is not yet eligible for arbitration, meaning he’s in position for only a modest raise from $405,000.

      The trade raises several issues within the Royals’ existing roster. It suggests the club is not convinced that either Ryan Shealy or Kila Ka’aihue is ready for regular duty, and also appears to recognize veteran Ross Gload was overexposed.

      It also suggests the Royals might be ready to adopt a harder line in assessing Billy Butler’s development.

If not for my lingering affection for the team of my misspent youth, this might strike me as funny. But instead it’s a little sad and a little infuriating.

Mike Jacobs is not a good baseball player. He’s just not. Jacobs’ career OPS+ is 110. That number almost perfectly describes Jacobs’ current abilities, as he has been quite consistent. Here are his OPS+ numbers for the past three years: 106, 100, 109. Good for a hitter, but not for a hitter who plays first base.

Yes, he did hit 32 home runs last season. To be a good hitter with a .299 on-base percentage, you have to hit at least 40 homers. Maybe 50.

Oh, and fielding? According to the numbers, Jacobs is one of the worst-fielding first basemen in the majors. He’s lousy on bunts, he’s lousy on the balls hit to his left, he’s lousy on the balls hit to his right and he’s lousy on … wait for it … the balls hit right at him.

I don’t mean to suggest that Jacobs will be a disaster next season. He’s only 28. If he can maintain the power and add 20 walks he won’t be the worst first baseman (or DH) in the American League. But this is exactly the sort of trade a team like the Royals shouldn’t be making. They’ve got organizational strength at exactly one spot: 1B/DH. With youngsters Butler and Ka’aihue, those two hitters’ spots — along with Alex Gordon and third base — are essentially the only positions management should not be worrying about. Relievers are fungible, and Nuñez is just the sort of reliever who should be used as trade bait to fill holes on the roster.

That doesn’t mean you just give him away.

The moment I learned that Moore had acquired Jacobs, I recalled this passage from an interview Moore gave to Joe Posnanski just a few weeks ago:

      “We have to understand the importance of on-base percentage,” Moore says, and he repeats those words — “on-base percentage” — about 29 times during the interview, which is good to hear. The last five years, the Royals have finished 12th, 13th, 11th, 13th and 13th in on-base percentage, and frankly it’s really, really hard to score a lot of runs when you can’t get on base (especially when you do not have much power — and the Royals don’t. Plus they play in a big ballpark).

Moore repeated on-base percentage 29 times in one interview. Dayton Moore gets it, finally … until his very first significant offseason move, when he acquires an everyday player who will, more than anything, be a drag on the team’s on-base percentage. This is exactly the sort of thing the Royals would have done 20 years ago — those teams were perennially OBP-challenged, too — which, come to think of it, makes a lot of sense because the man making the moves 20 years ago was John Schuerholz. Moore’s mentor before he got his job with the Royals? John Schuerholz.

Moore was supposed to build Schuerholz’s winning Braves of the 1990s. But instead he’s rebuilding Schuerholz’s losing Royals of the late 1980s and early ’90s. And we had such high hopes for the young man.

by GoBabies!! on Oct 30, 2008 5:48 PM EDT reply actions  

so find us something better for Leo Nunez and quite complaining. Be Happy. We got BETTER today.

Dutton needs a kick in the head.

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 5:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like this passage in particular

Oh, and fielding? According to the numbers, Jacobs is one of the worst-fielding first basemen in the majors. He’s lousy on bunts, he’s lousy on the balls hit to his left, he’s lousy on the balls hit to his right and he’s lousy on … wait for it … the balls hit right at him.

by GoBabies!! on Oct 30, 2008 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

good thing he's in the AL then... won't have to field many bunts.

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 5:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Or Batted Balls

Can you say “DH”?

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Nov 6, 2008 1:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Why only hitting HRs (and nothing else) is overvalued

Over the last three years, Doug Mientkiewicz has been a more productive hitter than Mike Jacobs on a per at-bat basis. Let’s use two rates stats that properly weigh OBA and SLG — wOBA (from statcorner.com) and Runs Created per 27 Outs (from fangraphs.com).

2006
Mientkiewicz: .356 wOBA, 5.60 RC/27
Jacobs: .345 wOBA, 5.14 RC/27

2007
Mientkiewicz: .362 wOBA, 5.47 RC/27
Jacobs: .338 wOBA, 4.81 RC/27

2008
Mientkiewicz: .349 wOBA, 5.40 RC/27
Jacobs: .338 wOBA, 5.29 RC/27

Doug Mientkiewicz (who was also worth about 25 runs more than Jacobs on defense last year) will likely be available this offseason, like last offseason, for a minor league contract and an invitation to spring training.

by Gopherballs on Oct 30, 2008 5:59 PM EDT reply actions  

Ack.

I felt much better about the trade before seeing these numbers.

Gopher, since you are very in tune with the statistical side of baseball, perhaps you could create some kind of statistic that actually makes this look like a good deal.

For example,

If you assign a number to each letter in the player’s last name corresponding to that letter’s spot in the alphabet (e.g. A=1, J=10, etc.) and sum all those letters you will get a new statistic – let’s call it StatX. With StatX, if the lower the number the better, Jacobs is a far better play than Nunez and way better than Mientkiewicz.

I am the best statistician ever.

by jsolo on Oct 30, 2008 6:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's a great stat. I'm going to keep using it!

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 30, 2008 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

thank god

I wonder what people would be saying if Allard Baird had made this deal?

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 30, 2008 11:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agree

I’d feel better if DM hadn’t already gone after Gathright, Guillen, Andrew Jones, etc. I don’t think he knows how to build an offense.

by hippdoghipp on Oct 30, 2008 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

weren't you listening

“power on the corners, defense up the middle”

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 30, 2008 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Apparently those two traits must be polar opposites

As TPJ, Gathright, Jacobs, and Guillen all demonstrate

by Top Ramen on Oct 31, 2008 9:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

What can you get for a 150 Lbs middle reliever who pitches 2/3 of the season

from what I see in this thread quite a bit more. Why didn’t KC get Hanley Ramirez? KC only had two everyday players OPS higher than Jacobs. DAMN YOU GMDM you have crippled KC for years with this trade.

I would like the haters to take a look at the list that OPS’d around .800 and tell me who they could’ve gotten for Leo instead? Is Ryan Shealy really proven? Yes he should start the season in KC but is he a lock to be on the midseason 25. Is it that unbelieveable to believe that his hot september was fluky? At least Jacobs can hit RH for power something KC lacked with the exception of AG.

It takes 46 muscles to frown but only 4 to flip 'em the bird.

by kcscoliny on Oct 30, 2008 6:16 PM EDT reply actions  

Why is Leo Nunez

The only player we’re allowed to trade?

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 30, 2008 8:48 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Because he was acquired by Idiot Allard Baird

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 30, 2008 11:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

What?

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 31, 2008 12:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

Under 160 pounds

Royals, NBA, Golden Hurricane, Hawkeyes, Chiefs, and KU basketball, in that order.

by Rowyal on Oct 31, 2008 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

Geez... with Jacobs, Butler, and Guillen all on the team

I’m not sure the Royals can risk have a reliever on the plane any heavier than Leo

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 31, 2008 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Because That's Who

The Marlins wanted?

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Oct 31, 2008 1:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

it was just so obvious we couldn't figure it out, could we?

I completely agree with you. They wanted Ram Ram or Rosa… instead they got Nunez. Pretty shrewd if you ask me…

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 31, 2008 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

And the Marlins

Are the only team we can trade with?

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 31, 2008 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

(my head is exploding with jokes)

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 31, 2008 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Stats only tell you what a guy HAS done, not what he's GOING to do!

Good point.

Gold Glove, here comes Mike Jacobs!

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 30, 2008 11:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Tony Pena Jr.

Home run champion!

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Oct 31, 2008 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

We are going crazy because

home run hitters come to Kauffman to die. And we had some promising hitters that deserve their shot.

by AxDxMx on Oct 31, 2008 12:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

isn't

the Marlins stadium more of a pitcher’s park than the K?

Don't Stop Believing!

by KC Chris on Oct 31, 2008 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

I mentioned it above...

and got snarked.

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 31, 2008 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

Over 250 comments

May mean that this trade has inspired some passionate reaction, but I think it truly means that we were absolutely desperate for the Series Somewhat Resembling a World Series (in which a really long rain delay was the most interesting thing that happened) to end so we could get on with baseball stuff that actually means something to someone outside eastern Pennsylvania (where they don’t cling to guns-and-religion, just cheesesteak and foul language) and the seven guys who actually bought Rays season tickets.

Sometimes you just gotta roll the potato.

by CentralChamps2009 on Oct 30, 2008 6:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Edwin FREAKIN Jackson

Yeah, I wish we could trade Billy for a “ready now” guy like Edwin Jackson. He may have had a decent record this year with the Rays, but he still had a WHIP of 1.51 and an ERA+ of 101. NO THANK YOU.

by AxDxMx on Oct 31, 2008 12:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

Butler is too much....

But the Rays should be looking to trade one of their starters to open up a spot in the rotation for Price. I’d try to make a play for Sonnenstine or Edwin (i don’t see them dealing Shields, Garza or Kazmir).

GEEZIS, that rotation is going to be SICK for YEARS to come!

by GoBabies!! on Oct 31, 2008 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

As for the trade

I’ve been a true believer in GMDM since the start—Gathright gives us great speed and defense! Ross Gload knows how to play the game the right way! Jose Guillen won’t be a clubhouse problem here!—but, man, this deal makes no sense for a team who already doesn’t know how to take a walk—well, all except Kila, who now absolutely will not be on the MLB roster next year. Stop saying “on base percentage” is important if you don’t mean it, Dayton.

Sometimes you just gotta roll the potato.

by CentralChamps2009 on Oct 30, 2008 6:46 PM EDT reply actions  

POWER FIRST

OBP Second.. our top HR guy hit 20 homers.. Jacobs can challenge the club record (36) next year in a smaller park then he played in last year

THE OFFSEASON ISNT OVER— we can still go get some OBP machines since thats all 90% of you care about

ugh.

by focs on Oct 30, 2008 6:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Except

OBP is a skill set that nobody on this team has, power can still develop in younger players (Gordon, Butler) while OBP generally does not, Jacobs blocks (maybe permanently) a legitimate home grown power hitting 1B prospect who also happened to lead the minors in walks last year, Jacobs is nowhere near a lock to break 36 as his 32 this year may very well be an outlier, and, if Nunez was a legitimate trading chip, he’s now no longer available to put towards a bigger impact move (i.e., trading for an outfielder with some legitimate power potential—if Jacobs played LF, I’d be much happier about this trade).

Sometimes you just gotta roll the potato.

by CentralChamps2009 on Oct 30, 2008 6:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jacobs was a catcher first

If they convert him back to catcher, it’s the best deal ever.

Of course then you’d have to move one of the infielders to backstop to field all the passed balls but I don’t think we really need a second baseman anyways. Plus, it would be new and different

by jsolo on Oct 30, 2008 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Instead

of waiting for developing power every year.. now we dont have to

ugh.

by focs on Oct 30, 2008 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd rather have, you know, a good player

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Oct 30, 2008 9:29 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

that's crazy

The concept of progress acts as a protective mechanism to shield us from the terrors of the future. - Collected sayings of Muad'Dib

by buddyball on Oct 30, 2008 11:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm crazy

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Oct 31, 2008 12:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

crazy pshycho?

It is Halloween

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Oct 31, 2008 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

Moore likes him, that's good enough for me

Look at his impeccable judgment.

Except where it goes wrong. STill need to wait those out.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 30, 2008 11:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Except Ned Colletti: Genius

(of the comic variety)

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 31, 2008 9:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

I might change my mind

Jeffery Flanagan was against the trade, and I can’t see myself agreeing with him on anything (although his reasoning seemed to have a lot to do with the renewed value of Shealy, so maybe I still do disagree with him).

Sometimes you just gotta roll the potato.

by CentralChamps2009 on Oct 30, 2008 7:16 PM EDT reply actions  

+1

I hated this, but knowing that Flanagan likes it makes me wonder it there’s something to it.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 30, 2008 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

After watching the black hole at 1B over the past few years,

with Dougie and Gload, I am excited about a guy who can go deep and has a track record of one season of 30 HRs. I wonder how many season it would take to get to 30 HRs with Gload getting 400 ABs each year.

A platoon of Shealy and Jacobs could net the Royals 40 HRs from the 1B position. That is a huge improvement. Let Butler DH full time or a rotation with Shealy. Would be nice to have a player on the bench who pinch hit a HR. KC’s bench was remarkably lacking in power.

Kila was going to start in Omaha. With the Royals track record of developing everyday players, let him hit his way to KC.

Can’t see Gload staying with the team but Shealy could be the odd man out as well.

I liked Nunez but he is definitely replaceable. See Carlos Rosa as stepping nicely into his 1-2 innings slot in the pen. Ramirez and Mahay late with Rosa and Bale as middle relievers looks good to me. Soria as closer.

Bottom line – KC has a 1B who can hit for power. The lineup is better than it was in 08. Who did Royals Review fans think was going to be available for a Leo Nunez caliber player? The money – it’s baseball – does it matter. If KC trades Teahen, then it is simply trading salary of Jacobs for Teahen with both being arbitration eligible. I’d rather have Jacobs with 500 ABs than Teahen any day.

by daveyork on Oct 30, 2008 7:54 PM EDT reply actions  

That's just it.

The Royals have a guy who hit a ton of homers last year, but he’s not “proven”.

Jacobs has hit more than 20 homers once and he has a “track record of one season of 30 homers”. And he IS proven?

Please.

Worst. Deal. Evar.

by AxDxMx on Oct 31, 2008 12:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

omg

we gave up Leo freaking Nunez. A 60 Innings a year pitcher because he has NEVER shown the ability to stay healthy. It’s not like we sold the farm to get him. If wwe gave up Rosa or Ram Ram, I’d be concerned, but Nunez is pretty easy to replace…

by GoBabies!! on Oct 31, 2008 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

The point is not that I don't like Jacobs or loved Nunez

I just think our guys would have done the same or better. Maybe not as many homers, but we’re building for the future, and i don’t see Jacobs as part of that future. Plus, it shows Dayton is not willing to play what little strength we have at 1B. Butler/Shealy/Ka’aihue could have manned 1B and DH very efficiently with Gload gone and now we have a clusterf*ck there that’s worse than before because we still have Gload. Does DMGM know what he is doing? It really worries me, and I think this team could be heading in the direction of signing Juan Gonzalez to make a run like in 2004. Moves that seem to bolster the team, but really don’t and it is why I find this move puzzling. To me it doesn’t really bolster the team as we had real promise there for once and now we’re not going to use it.

by AxDxMx on Oct 31, 2008 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

i don't think DM's building for the future

I think he’s building for next year.

Don't Stop Believing!

by KC Chris on Oct 31, 2008 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

We bring up Orlando to play two positions in the outfield.

Then we can have two first basemen. Problem solved.

Go Royals!

by BabyBlues on Oct 31, 2008 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good news! Jacobs knows what OBP is and actually talked about improving it!

Unfortunately he talked about it in terms of hits…

“If I get 10 more hits this year, then … my OPB is .320”

…….

Kansas City Royals: your 2006 and 2007 NL Central champions!

by mazoboom on Oct 30, 2008 8:28 PM EDT reply actions  

That's right, all he has to go is raise his on-base percentage

that’s what all the Royals should decide to do!

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 30, 2008 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

its like weird bizarro world

kaegel mentioning OBP… Jacobs talking about using hits to raise his…

by Freneau on Oct 31, 2008 12:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

Prediction

sometime around the all-star break, Seitzer gets into a screaming match with Jacobs and Guillen, john Gibbons gets involved, and at least 2 people end up dead

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 31, 2008 12:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

what are you talking about?

Gibbons is GREAT with people?

I can’t see him clashing with anyone

ohh wait…

by Freneau on Oct 31, 2008 12:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

I actually look forward to it

wasn’t he on the ’86 Mets? I hope he mentors Callaspo.

I can’t wait until the first time Gibbons and TPJ meet…

Better Yet, Gibbons and Joe Posnanski.

Prediction: JoPo writes a column about how John Gibbons is a Really Good Guy.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 31, 2008 12:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

...at some point this year

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 31, 2008 12:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

slow speed chase

around the plaza…

I hereby resign from this post.

by Home Run Tony Cogan on Oct 31, 2008 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

outstanding

that’s one of the many things I love about RR… HRTC and I have had our debates, but we can all get behind the cause of Royals-related humor…

But who’s in the Bronco? Who’s on the phone?

“This is Jo-Gui, dammit, you know who his is!”

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 31, 2008 9:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

How about this hypothetical linup for next year?

lefties
1. Furcal (SS)
2. DDJ (LF)
3. Aviles (2B)
4. Lefty only masher (rf)
5. Guillen (DH)
6. Gordan (3B)
7. Bulter (1B)
8. Buck ©
9. Gootz (CF)

righties
1. Furcal (SS) / Callaspo
2. DDJ (LF) /German
3. Aviles (2b) /Callaspo
4. Shealy /Jacobs (1B)
5. Guillen /German (rf)
6. Jacobs/Bulter (DH)
7. Gordan/Herman (3B)
8. Buck/Jacobs/German ©
9. Gootz/DDJ (CF)

Go Royals!

by BabyBlues on Oct 30, 2008 10:18 PM EDT reply actions  

I don't think

You can legally use the copyrighted “Buck/Jacobs/German ©” without the express written approval of “Buck/Jacobs/German ©”

Sometimes you just gotta roll the potato.

by CentralChamps2009 on Oct 30, 2008 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

What boggles the mind, more than anything about this trade

Is how the Marlins look at Rosa, say “Naw, he’s way too injury prone”

but then turn around and accept Nunez, a guy who’s been on the DL almost ever year

by Top Ramen on Oct 30, 2008 10:34 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

there's a difference

You know, Rosa is INJURED RIGHT NOW. Nunez is not.

Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.

by doublestix on Oct 30, 2008 11:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ok I think I just figured out how this could pretty effectivly work!

Its needlessly complicated, features 6 players over 3 positions and would actually give the Royals one of the best 1B/DH tandems in the League.

We start with 3 positions: C, 1B, DH
The Royals for these positions are: Buck, Olivo, Gload, Jacobs, Shealy, Butler, Ka’aihue and hopefully not JoGui.

The idea: Utilize Platoon splits to give the Royals the best possible combinations (all number are career)

Heres how it breaks down:
Vs. LHP
C: Buck (OPS: .757)
1B:Billy Butler (OPS: .985)
DH: Miguel Olivo (.841)
Vs RHP
C: Buck (OPS: .672)
1B: Shealy (OPS: .843)
DH: Jacobs (OPS: .850)

Thats not Great. But it does bring a lot of power.

Also something people are not mentioning about Jacobs is that his BABiP was a paltry .260 this year…well off his career line of .289

I refuse to set up a signature....DAMMIT

by RoyalPug on Oct 30, 2008 11:08 PM EDT reply actions  

god, that was a chore to get thru that

will all moves be analyzed so closely and at such length?

The concept of progress acts as a protective mechanism to shield us from the terrors of the future. - Collected sayings of Muad'Dib

by buddyball on Oct 30, 2008 11:22 PM EDT reply actions  

Anyway, after a day of emotional release

I stand by my positions, variously articulated in comments and stuff elsewhere, but I apologize to anyone I offended with my emotional venting and frustration. I’m sorry if people feel targeted by my sarcasm and stuff. It’s just sports, and a dumb trade that actually might help the team short term. I stand by my concerns about what this says about how the team evaluates players and stuff, but, well, i already said that.

So sorry about the “crazy” thing on this thread especially… Good night and good luck to all.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 30, 2008 11:40 PM EDT reply actions  

that's confusing

let me put it this way: I’m not sorry for what I said, I’m sorry for how I said it

SORRY I WAS KIND OF A JOGUI TODAY

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 31, 2008 12:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

A Neutral site on the tradeBeyond the Box Score on he Trade

From R. J. Anderson on Beyond the Box Score:

On the Marlins side, well congratulations guys, you just got a nice reliever. A bit of a groundballer who gets an average amount of swinging strikes. Nunez throws hard and does not have any shining flaws. Worst case: his tRA regresses towards 4 rather than low 3’s next season. Florida is savvy enough to plug someone like Jorge Cantu in at first and replace Jacobs at no cost.

Um, Kansas City, why? Mike Jacobs has an awful OBP, provides some good power, but is not good defensively. He’s posted back-to-back .338 wOBAs which compares favorably to Ross Gload’s .339 wOBA in 2007. Why do I get the feeling that comparison was a big reason why the Royals made this move? And where does this leave Ryan Shealy and Kila Ka’aihue?

pretty much says it all with “Florida is savvey enough to plug someone like Jorge Cantu in at first and replace Jacobs at no cost.”

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 30, 2008 11:46 PM EDT reply actions  

Guys, you are all missing the point.... NUNEZ IS A NON FACTOR!

We traded a tiny relief pitcher, with health problems and a fragile frame for a guy that is most likely going to slug .500 for us. GMDM can find relief pitchers in his sleep, trading Nunez was nothing to him… it doesn’t matter, he can replace him easily. Whine all you want about Jacobs, but who are we going to magically pluck out of thin air that can mash righties and slug .500? You really think we play Shealy everyday he’s going to hit .262/.320/.500? Okay…. Or we could just start Gload for another season? Where was all this indignation when we traded Jeremy Affeldt (way more valuable than Nunez IMO) for Shealy.

We trade Shealy, trade gload or keep him as a backup, Jacobs DH’s full time and Butler starts at 1B. This is how it’s going to go down.

realistically speaking

by slayor on Oct 31, 2008 12:30 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

there is that possibility

although Nunez did have a nice season, finally, last year…

time will tell

by Freneau on Oct 31, 2008 12:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

YOU ARE MISSING THE POINT

WE DON’T GIVE A CRAP ABOUT NUNEZ. WE JUST FIGURED OUT OUR GM DOESN’T KNOW CRAP ABOUT BASEBALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And for the record, Shealy would beat the crap .262/.320/.500.

by AxDxMx on Oct 31, 2008 12:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

so will you guys please trade billy butler for edwin jackson?

i could see them even throwing jeff niemann in the deal for him

by RaysOfHope on Oct 31, 2008 12:33 AM EDT reply actions  

Whine all you want about Jacobs, but who are we going to magically pluck out of thin air that can mash righties and slug .500?

just off the top of my head:

Eric Hinkse
Russell Branyan

maybe even Matt Stairs

All those guys are as good or better than Jacobs (well, Stairs might be a stretch), more capable of playing you know, merely terrible defense rather than historically shitty, and cost no talent. And can be had for less than $3 million. Well, Stairs might be under contract next year. I bet Branyan could be had for less than $1 million

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 31, 2008 12:33 AM EDT reply actions  

You're assuming Branyan can stay healthy, and even if he has, he hasn't put up more than 200 AB's

since what, 2006?

Isn’t Hinske’s career OPS lower than Mike Jacobs? I guess what I’m getting at here, is while there might be near equivalent players out there, we gave up essentially nothing for Jaocbs. Barring Nunez going out and just setting the world on fire next season, I don’t understand how this is a bad trade. For the love of god, he’s a tiny middle reliever with an all out delivery, and 2 average offspeed pitches. Not to mention he didn’t look that great after coming back from the DL last season.

realistically speaking

by slayor on Oct 31, 2008 12:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

all decent points

I guess the smartass would ask why the marlins wanted him

but then someone else could say they wanted to dump jacobs potentially sorta large salary

by Freneau on Oct 31, 2008 12:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not a huge Nunez fan or anything

but his run value this year was better than Jacobs two best offensive years in Florida combined.

Still, my problem isn’t so much the trade, as the fact that Jacobs doesn’t really add much to the team. He’s pretty much the worst defender in baseball, and he’s barely above average as a hitter for a 1B anyway, and has been hitting in a league with demonstrably weaker pitching.

Hinske was better this year, especially if you count the league differences. He can play average D at first, and crappy (a la Guillen) defense in the outfield. He also would cost less than $4M, and Nunez could be used in another trade.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 31, 2008 12:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Who gives a shit about his run value when we're starting Ross Gload at first base?

This lets us DH Jacobs full time ( glove will not matter! I repeat, glove will not matter!) negating one of his huge downfalls, defense. Bam, he’s in the AL now, suddenly a much more valuable player because we can hide him at DH. Butler shifts to 1B starting, he’s going to get better with the glove and reports of his defensive deficiencies are great exaggerated IMO. This leaves us with Shealy and Kila – stash Kila in AAA, let him bang out another 20 HR’s so everybody in baseball believes he’s for real, then evaluate at the ASB. Shealy? He’s old, no major league track record to speak of, bundle him up with X player and ship him out. Jacobs crushes right handed pitching, this is something we need in the lineup.

This whole idea of a logjam or whatever at 1B or DH or whatever is pretty disingenuous in my opinion as it sounds like something Baird would have said. If we can acquire a talented albeit one dimensional player for an oft-injured middle reliever, let’s hoard that talent baby.

realistically speaking

by slayor on Oct 31, 2008 12:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hoarding the best talent would have been keeping Nunez

in three years in Florida, Mike Jacobs has barely been above average twice as a hitter… Seriously. As a designated hitter (which favors him more than including his -20 run defense at first, which puts him into Gload/TPJ/Jose Guillen territory), t hen, in this, his best full year, he’s still less than a win above replacement level.

But again, it’s not about Nunez vs. Jacobs. It’s about how DMGM seems to view 1) what a good hitter is (unless you think that Mark Grudzelaniak was an awesome hitter, Mike Jacobs certainly wasn’t — their wOBA’s are pretty close… would you trade for Mark Grudzelaniak to be the Royals’ DH?); 2) who belongs on the roster; 3) positional value; 4) defense; 5) replacement value.

I don’t want to get into it, because I’ve posted my thoughts about this too much. I guess we just disagree. I’m more concerned about what this says about Moore’s ‘smarts" when it comes to position players than anything else. I’ve said it might help the team long term.

Here’s the thing, though — even if Shealy hits a 10 runs worse than Jacobs next year, if he can play first, he’s still about as valuable becaues he’s not DHing (and Jacobs isn’t that hot of a hitter). If they’re both playing first, then there’s not contest, because Jacobs is simply one of the worst defenders in baseball.

I agree that Gload needs to go no matter what — another replacement level position player Moore not only traded for, but is going to give more than the league minimum to.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 31, 2008 1:04 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I'll take

a guy who is “less than a win above replacement level” over the guys who were all below replacement level.

It’s been siad several times that we need to replace our below replacement level guys with at least replacement level guys. We’re not going to sign Texieria, or somebody like that. We are not going to improve by leaps and bounds at any one position. We can marginally improve the collective piece-by-piece.

Do I think Jacobs is going to be an All-star? No. Is he better than what we had last year? Yes. Is he moveable if someone else proves better this year? Yes.

Don't Stop Believing!

by KC Chris on Oct 31, 2008 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

we'll see

I just won’t go into all of it. It’s a bad deal, but it can help the team short-term, particularly if other correct choices are made (bye-bye Gload, Keep Butler playing full-time unless you get a really f-ing good trade [not Edwin Jackson, for instance], use Shealy as Jacobs platoon partner, hide Jacobs glove/cut off his glove hand)…

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 31, 2008 9:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

yep

we’ll see. I guess I’m just hoping that this move isn’t a stand alone deal. I sort of expect, right or wrong, that this move does make us better because it forces us to get rid of Gload (only acceptable move I can think of, barring a Garza-type deal for Butler) and Jacobs is going to DH. And I could be completely pissed off in 6 months. I’m just choosing to stay positive right now.

Don't Stop Believing!

by KC Chris on Nov 2, 2008 12:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Wouldn't the best Nunez trade involve

moving him to the closer’s role, and shifting Soria to the rotation?

This space intentionally left blank.

by marbotty on Oct 31, 2008 1:18 AM EDT reply actions  

Nunez couldn't close a closet door,

yet alone a ML game. Look at his build! My 7 month old daughter has more brawn than him. I was never a Starvin’ Marvin fan and am glad he’s gone. Total ’tweener in my book. Ram Ram is our best bet at closing if the Mexicutioner were to be moved into the rotation.

You always deal from a strength/depth. So now GMDM gets to trade away Gload and his rediculous contract for some marginal A players, or sell Butler while he’s on the cheap for AAA pitcher or two. Shealy, even with his torrid September, has value NIL. KK might have some sort of retarded value ATM too…

How come it's a penny for your thoughts but you have to put your two cents in? Someone is making a penny.

by Grantastica on Oct 31, 2008 1:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wow. Never a fan of Starvin' Marvin?

Did you WATCH the team for the last two years? There is a reason people on this particular forum have been ripping the kid to shreds and people at Sportsline and Fox Sports are praising his ability.

Banny being Banny.

by JobDDT on Oct 31, 2008 7:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Another Thing with Jacobs

If Kila continues to develop at AAA, and he has a season like he did this year. If Jacobs has a decent season, he could be flipped at the deadline just as easily for a piece that we need, seeing as Jacobs will be more expensive due to arbitration. If we keep Butler at DH, have Shealy/Jacobs platoon at 1B and DFA Gload, then that’s not really that bad of a setup.

by lordbyronk on Oct 31, 2008 9:54 AM EDT reply actions  

I really think that we need to see how this plays out

There are numerous permutations of this that could end up resulting in a positive outcome for us. We could:

Release Gload
Trade Gload
Trade Shealy
Option Butler to AAA
Flip Jacobs for a more pressing position of need – after all, Moore may have seen an opportunity to create some value and wanted to pre-empt the other suitors. Unlikely, but possible.

All of these moves would be acceptable. Even releasing Shealy, while not the greatest option in the world, isn’t really a killer, is it? I’d like to give the guy one more shot to see what he can do, but he’s past his peak and has an injury history. Kila is still there in AAA, so it’s not like he’s going anywhere, he’s still an option for next year, 2010 and beyond.

Remember, not too long ago everyone was decrying our inability to score without putting together a singles train. That’s what a guy like Jacobs gives you, the ability to score with one swing of the bat. I wish he had a higher OBP, but he doesn’t, and what are you going to get for Leo Nunez? This trade balances our lineup somewhat, so I would expect an improved offense just from this trade alone. And if it doesn’t work out, it’s a one or two year experiment at a reasonable cost to the team.

While this could also be a total disaster should we trade Butler and not get fair value for him (which I’m beginning to think is less likely – a trade I mean), or we release Shealy and keep Gload, I’m choosing to stay positive and see what transpires over the next few months. If we break camp next spring with Jacobs and Shealy, with Butler in AAA ready to come up should either of those players bomb, I’m fine with that.

I hereby resign from this post.

by Home Run Tony Cogan on Oct 31, 2008 10:07 AM EDT reply actions  

Dayton is ahead of the curve,

brilliant!!888

I hereby resign from this post.

by Home Run Tony Cogan on Oct 31, 2008 10:20 AM EDT reply actions  

oops

supposed to refer to Top Ramen’ comment

I hereby resign from this post.

by Home Run Tony Cogan on Oct 31, 2008 10:20 AM EDT reply actions  

For Comparison

Jose Guillen is overpayed, but who would you rather have; Guillen or Jacobs?

Remember how awesome we thought the Shealy trade was? Which do you think looks like a better deal at the time of the trade – Shealy or Jacobs? Remember Jacobs has proven ML experience.

If we don’t trade Shealy/Ka’aihue there should be a great competition for the starting job – somehting this team has sorely lacked.

I’m not big on Jaocbs, but he is not the problem; what comes next will determine the value of this trade.

by David Howards Legacy on Oct 31, 2008 10:44 AM EDT reply actions  

I know why you think that way, sometimes I do, to

but just because a guy isn’t as overpayed (by approxiamtely $12 million/year, by my numbers) as Jose Guillen, doesn’t mean he’s worth having… that’s a bad path to go down.

“Hey, Bobby Abreu probably isn’t worth this 4/63 offer, but hell, he’s better than that clown we gave 3/36 to.”

know what I mean?

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 31, 2008 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

For those in the know

When creating a fan post with a table from excel — How do you keep the color in the cells? When I copy and paste, it comes over ok in the box until I actually insert it.

by Top Ramen on Oct 31, 2008 3:50 PM EDT reply actions  

It might be easier to use Google docs

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 31, 2008 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Mike Jacobs Will Hit Tons More Once He's Out of Florida

From THT:

Jacobs managed to post adequate batting averages and True Batting Averages in 2006 and 2007, but the decreasing contact rate trend and drop in BABIP caused his True Batting Average to plummet to .239 this year. If we throw him into Kansas City, it would have been .233.

One of the best things about HitTracker and True Home Runs is that we can see how a player would hit in a different environment. This is exactly what I did with Jacobs, as you can see above. Despite a big rise in HR/FB this year, Jacobs’ True Home Run numbers have been on a three-year decline. It looks as though KC’s Kauffman Stadium will be a little tougher on him than Dolphin Stadium was, which is especially bad news given that he derives most of his value from his power (that batting average certainly isn’t doing anything for him)…. He will be 28 next year and could turn things around, but Jacobs doesn’t look anywhere close to the 32 home run beast he appeared to be in 2008.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Oct 31, 2008 10:43 PM EDT reply actions  

yikes.

Don't Stop Believing!

by KC Chris on Nov 2, 2008 12:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Pretty obvious that the Royals got robbed

Jacobs only hit 6 more Home Runs than Nunez got strike outs last year.

439 comments debating the quality of this trade? Very impressive.

by Hearditbefore on Nov 4, 2008 10:32 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Nacho_small
Interview with Royals Review Editor Jeff Zimmerman
Small
OT: Determining the exact date of Ice Cubes "Good Day"
Royalsretro_small
The 100 Greatest Royals of All-Time - #26 Al Cowens
Small
2 years, 2 months and 22 days ago: Never Forget

Recent FanPosts

Small
2012 Omaha and NWA Rosters
The_laz_small
KU / MU OPEN THREAD
Nacho_small
Friday Open Thread - Super Bowl Rematch Issue
Maverick_tank_7_small
TBFIB Strike Again
Small
Royals TV Broadcast Deal
Royalsretro_small
Friday Open Thread - Year of the Dragon Edition
Matt_ssv_pic_small_small
A Lesson In Patience: Brad Lidge, Jonathan Broxton And The Settled Market

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Cimg0036_small Freneau

Editors

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

Authors

Royalsretro_small RoyalsRetro

Headshot_small Old Man Duggan