The Worst Free Agents in Royals History
The Worst Free Agents in Royals History
As we embark on the Hot Stove season and free agents begin to sign, let's take a look back at some free agent signings of the past for the Royals. First, we will take a look at the worst free agents. Next week, I'll look at the best.
The Royals, being one of the smallest markets in baseball, have traditionally not spent a lot of money on free agents, even back when Ewing Kauffman ran the ballclub. Occasionally the club has doled out the big money for a player, with mixed results.
For this list:
1. I only included Major League free agents, not waiver wire pickups or minor league free agents.
2. I only included free agents signed from other teams, not contracts given to players already on the club.
3. I only included the initial contract figure, but not extensions.
10.Chuck Knoblauch, Albie Lopez, Joe Mays, and Brett Tomko
Chuck Knoblauch
2002 - 1 year $2 million
80 Games .210/.284/.300 6 HR 22 RBI
2 Win Shares
Albie Lopez
2003 - 1 year $1.5 million
4-2 12.71 ERA 22 1/3 Innings
0 Win Shares
Joe Mays
2006 - 1 year $2 million
0-5 8.70 ERA 23 1/3 Innings
0 Win Shares
Brett Tomko
2007 - 1 year $3 million
2-7 6.97 ERA 60 1/3 Innings
-1 Win Shares
All of these guys are pretty much the same. They were all signed to very low, but very guaranteed Major League contracts when they all probably should have been signed to non-guaranteed minor league deals for the league minimum or better yet, not brought into camp at all. They were all god awful to varying degrees and the Royals would have been better off flushing the money down the toilet.
9. Juan Gonzalez
2004 - 1 year $4.5 million
33 Games .276/.326/.441 5 HR 17 RBI
3 Win Shares
This signing gets panned more than it should in my view. It was a perfectly reasonable gamble considering where the Royals were. They were coming off their remarkable 2003 run, and needed some punch in the lineup. Gonzalez, when healthy, was still a feared slugger coming off a season in which he slugged .572 in limited action. The only question was his health. To their credit, the Royals offered him just a one year deal with a low base salary and plenty of incentives. It just didn't work out.
"Juan Gone is a slugger. A real one. He has the nickname. He has the numbers. He has the look. If they sign him, Gonzalez will be the most celebrated player the Royals have ever signed."
-Joe Posnanski
Juan Gone got off to a good start, blasting a pair of home runs in an early game against Minnesota. But he began slumping in May and late in the month he strained his back. He would never play again that season, and would bat just one more time in the big leagues, in 2005 with the Indians.
8. Storm Davis
1990-1991 - 3 years $6 million
10-19 4.85 ERA 226 1/3 Innings
6 Win Shares
Storm Davis had been a nineteen game winner for the World Champion Oakland Athletics, and was still in the prime of his career. Back then sabermetrics was pretty much confined to Bill James and a pack of loyal followers in their mom's basements, but it didn't take a mathematician to see Storm's success was due to a powerful offense and a spacious ballpark. Nonetheless, the Royals inked him to a three year deal in 1990.
"Some people say that his statistics, other than wins and losses, don't really match up, but the bottom line is wins and losses. He's a fly-ball pitcher, but we've got a big ballpark."
-John Schuerholz
Davis was a low-strikeout pitcher in Oakland and he proved that was not a fluke in Kansas City. He was hit hard and posted a 4.74 ERA in his first season with the Royals, missing a month of the season with injury. He got off to a better start in 1991, but when the Royals hired Hal McRae, Davis was bumped to the bullpen to make room for another pricey free agent, Mike Boddicker. Davis requested a trade, but no one wanted the pitcher with a 4.96 ERA. Finally, that winter Storm's old team, the Orioles, picked him up for backup catcher Bob Melvin.
7. Doug Henry and Scott Sullivan
Doug Henry
2001 - 2 years $2.9 million
2-2 6.07 ERA 75 2/3 Innings
2 Win Shares
Scott Sullivan
2004 - 2 years $4.7 million
3-4 4.77 ERA 60 1/3 Innings
3 Win Shares
Doug Henry and Scott Sullivan were rather similar. The Royals crowed "poor" for a decade, yet still spent millions on these two old, mediocre relievers. The Royals had a mess of bullpen problems under the Allard Baird regime, so that caused him to panic and seek veteran help. He signed the thirty-seven year old Henry to set-up for closer Tom Gordon. That plan fell through when Gordon signed with the Cubs. The plan fell apart even more when Henry proved he was no longer a set-up man and stunk it up
for a season. The next spring, the Royals released the right-hander, eating the $1.5 million remaining on his contract.
Sullivan was signed in response to the Royals unlikely run in 2003. That team had lost quite a few close ballgames due to an injury-filled and inexperienced bullpen. So they brought in the thirty-three year old Sullivan. The sidearmer had been a workhorse with the Reds, frequently topping over 100 innings in the pen. Those innings caught up with him in Kansas City. In August of 2004, he injured his back, ending his season and ultimately his career.
6. Reggie Sanders
2006-2007 - 2 years $10 million
112 Games .259/.325/.437 13 HR 60 RBI
9 Win Shares
Despite being a great clubhouse guy and a solid starter on several playoff teams, Reggie Sanders had bounced around the league quite a bit. He had often played for winners, so it was out of character when he signed a two year deal with the Royals. Sanders was thirty-eight, but coming off a very productive, albeit injury-limited season. Still, some questioned whether bringing on Sanders and other veterans on the wrong side of thirty, was in keeping with the youth movement.
"I feel very, very comfortable saying this fits right in with our plan." -Allard Baird
Sanders provided some modest power, but produced his lowest batting average and on-base percentage since 2000. He also missed the entire month of September with injury. The next spring, the Royals looked to move the veteran, but could not find a willing taker. Sanders would play just twenty-four games in 2007 before calling it a career.
5. Jose Lima
2005 - 1 year $3.5 million
5-16 6.99 ERA 168 2/3 Innings
-2 Win Shares
LIMA-TIME!
Jose Lima had been a sensation in 2003 when the Royals plucked him from obscurity in the Atlantic League. He resuscitated his once All-Star career by winning his first seven decisions. The Royals could not afford to keep Lima, so he split for Los Angeles. But like herpes, Lima returned. The Royals, desperate for pitching, gave Lima a decent one year deal. After getting shelled opening day, Lima continued to be putrid by posting a 6.99 ERA, the third highest ERA in Major League history by a pitcher qualified for the ERA title.
4. Benito Santiago
2004 - 2 years $4.3 million
49 Games .274/.312/.434 6 HR 23 RBI
3 Win Shares
After the Royals surprising run in 2003, Allard Baird decided to complement the core of his team that had finished 83-79 with some second-tier free agent veterans. One such veteran was Benito Santiago. Santiago was just one season removed from being the backstop for the NL pennant-Giants and had even garnered MVP votes in 2002.
Santiago was still putting up productive numbers, but was thirty-nine years old. Nonetheless, the Royals handed him a two year, multi-million dollar deal. Santiago actually played fairly well through June before he was hit on the hand with a pitch and missed the rest of the season. That winter, Santiago admitted to a grand jury the reason for his productivity. The Royals found a team stupider than them to take on his contract when he was shipped to Pittsburgh for pitcher Leo Nunez. He played six games in Pittsburgh before calling it a career.
3. Mike Boddicker
1991-1992 - 3 years $9.24 million
13-16 4.38 267 1/3 Innings
12 Win Shares
This is a pretty overlooked bust in Royals history I guess because Boddicker had one decent season and has been a really nice guy who is still visible in the Kansas City community. Mike had put together a very solid career with the Orioles and Red Sox and was coming off a seventeen win season when the Royals signed him in December of 1990. It was the first free agent deal for new General Manager Herk Robinson. It was a substantial deal, but the Iowa-born Boddicker turned down even greater deals to return to the Midwest.
"Money was not the biggest issue. Contract was not the biggest issue. My family was the biggest issue. And a winning ballclub. This is a great town to raise a family."
Boddicker won twelve games with a mediocre ERA of 4.08 in his first season in KC. After just two starts in 1992, he was demoted to the bullpen. He ended the year with a 4.98 ERA in twenty-nine games. That winter he had arthroscopic surgery on his knee. While rehabbing in Omaha, the Royals sold him to the Brewers.
2. Scott Elarton
2006-2007 - 2 years $8 million
6-13 6.59 ERA 151 2/3 Innings
2 Win Shares
During the Allard Baird years, the Royals shopped for free agents the way hyenas sift through garbage. If there was a player with some pretty significant limitations to his game, the Royals were probably looking to sign him. Elarton had been a fireballer early in his career, but suffered major injuries. He reinvented himself as a junkballer and had a decent comeback in 2005 with a 4.61 ERA. Decent numbers, but with his age and his injury concerns and a lack of proven history, probably not worth sinking a lot of money into.
That's where Allard Baird stepped in. Baird, desperate to cobble together a rotation that could resemble Major League pitchers, signed Elarton to a two year deal. Elarton even won the Opening Day starting assignment, pitching well in a 3-1 loss to Detroit. After one month, Elarton had a 4.28 ERA and it looked like Allard had made a shrewd investment. After that, Scott completely collapsed and by July he was out for the year with injury. He returned in 2007 to make just nine starts before mercifully getting released with an ERA over ten.
1. Mark Davis
1990-1992 - 3 years, $14 million
9-13 5.31 ERA 167 2/3 Innings 7 Saves
4 Win Shares
Well we all knew he would be tops on this list, didn't we? Davis was the reigning Cy Young Award winner with the Padres, and in December he became the highest paid player in baseball* by signing with the Royals. The Royals had American League Cy Young Award winner Bret Saberhagen, making them the first team ever to have both reigning Cy Young Award winners.
*-Is it just me or is it kinda sad that from 1990-2006, the Royals only signed one free agent to a richer contract than Mark Davis? That was David Cone in 1994 - three years $15 million. Dayton Moore must have used the Jedi Mind Trick to get David Glass to open up the wallet.
Even if Davis had been a solid reliever with the Royals, in hindsight it seemed like a waste of resources to spend so much money on a closer. The Royals had two solid relievers in Jeff Montgomery and Steve Farr. But neither had the "Proven Closer" label or had "closer stuff"**, so the Royals were not confident letting either close out games on a full-time basis. The Royals had a very good rotation and had finished second in the league in complete games, and third in ERA. The reason they couldn't keep up with the Oakland Athletics was because they couldn't score runs. They were eleventh in runs scored and got particularly abysmal production from their designated hitter position from guys like Pat Tabler and Bill Buckner. Spending the money on a big bat would have been a much better use of money than the bullpen.
**-which is kinda curious since Dan Quisenberry was one of the greatest closers of all-time, yet never had "closer stuff."
Davis was actually pretty good his first month with the team, converting three saves in a row. He then blew a 6-2 lead against Texas.
"When you have a guy like Mark Davis, they are going to feel confident to turn the ball over to him."
-Manager John Wathan
He then blew three saves in a week in May and by the end of the month Jeff Montgomery was closing games and Davis was in long relief. He ended his first season with an awful 5.11 ERA and just six saves. He was slightly better the next season with a 4.45 ERA, but was already considered a huge bust. After thirty-six innings and an ERA over seven in 1992, the Royals finally dumped him on the Braves. Mark Davis became an infamous name in Royals lore.
3 recs |
43
comments
Read Related
Comments
I don't know, I think I would have put Juan Gone closer to the top
For me, it was that here was someone with huge potential who just failed, got hurt, and disappeared.
The concept of progress acts as a protective mechanism to shield us from the terrors of the future. - Collected sayings of Muad'Dib
by buddyball on Nov 14, 2008 1:22 PM EST 0 recs
the steroid's took their toll
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
by 306008 on
Nov 14, 2008 1:51 PM EST
up
0 recs
I think #9's about right
It was a one year deal that didn’t really hurt the franchise. The numbers he put up during that year were repectable (not great) for the 33 games he played.
If it had been a 3 year / 15 M deal, it would’ve been much, much worse.
by Top Ramen on
Nov 14, 2008 2:40 PM EST
up
0 recs
i agree
i still think the gonzalez signing was a good gamble — i didn’t expect him to get hurt so soon, but i also didn’t see him playing much more than 130 games that season — so with lowered expectations going in, and for the price, it seemed a good deal at the time
This space intentionally left blank.
by marbotty on
Nov 15, 2008 3:06 PM EST
up
0 recs
+1
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on
Nov 15, 2008 3:28 PM EST
up
0 recs
Good call Joe
“Juan Gone is a slugger. A real one. He has the nickname. He has the numbers. He has the look. If they sign him, Gonzalez will be the most celebrated player the Royals have ever signed.”
-Joe Posnanski
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
by 306008 on Nov 14, 2008 1:45 PM EST 0 recs
i dont know how you can put benito santiago on this list....
just look….that signing allowed us to get nunez, which allowed us to trade for the right to pay a below average player $3.5 million to block our 2nd best hitting prospect in 10 years.
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Nov 14, 2008 1:59 PM EST 0 recs
Barring a sudden revitalization and/or trade
Jose Guillen will easily top this list when all is said and done. Well, maybe Win Shares is more charitble to guys who get a lot of RBI by just hanging around than more recent and improved player evaluation systems.`
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Nov 14, 2008 2:05 PM EST 0 recs
I don't see
Mark Davis EVER getting knocked off the top of this list personally. Think about it, if that move had worked out, or not been made at all, the KC front office wouldn’t have been gun-shy (in theory) to touch any other big name FA for the better part of a decade.
That single move (in my opinion) changed the course of the franchise more than any other event (save the passing of Mr K. & the strike of ’94)
by GoBabies!! on
Nov 14, 2008 4:10 PM EST
up
0 recs
OK
fair enough. I hadn’t thought about it that way. I was thinking in terms of just dollars/wins above replacement. But even then, I didn’t adjust for inflation.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on
Nov 14, 2008 4:17 PM EST
up
0 recs
don't worry, jose's still a pretty good bet for #2
This space intentionally left blank.
by marbotty on
Nov 15, 2008 3:04 PM EST
up
0 recs
All the anti-Soria-to-the-rotation people
should read this post carefully (the Mark Davis part). Just further proof that closers have been overvalued for a long time now.
We really need to find out if Soria translates to a good SP.
Mr Glass, this is a pro sports team, not a retail store - run it like one!
by loyal2sdad on Nov 14, 2008 2:37 PM EST 0 recs
I'm slowly...
coming around on this one
Don't be lonesome for your heroes. Be your own hero.
by PhattStairs on
Nov 20, 2008 8:21 AM EST
up
0 recs
Added cost of Mark Davis
The organization felt burned (rightly so) by how this turned out, thus the FA spigot was more or less turned off as a result, at least for a while.
Just goes to show what can happen when you don’t understand cause and effect. Mark Davis failing was NOT an indication that free agency wasn’t a valid option for adding value to your franchise – it was an indication that targeting the wrong types of free agents.
I am always catching flack here for suggesting the Royals target top tier free agents. For example, the guy who would have made the most sense this season would have been Mark Teixiera. Spend 25 million a year on him, and you KNOW he won’t bust.
If all the Royals can do is acquire mediocre vets like Guillen last year, or Ibanez this season, or any number of other examples I could name over the past decade, they ought to not bother and simply invest all their money in player development, and, when appropriate, player retention.
Mr Glass, this is a pro sports team, not a retail store - run it like one!
by loyal2sdad on Nov 14, 2008 2:43 PM EST 0 recs
Not sure the Royals should target Teixeira
because its just too much of this teams budget, if he gets hurt.
But the thought is exactly right, loyal2sdad (your handle falls really oddly on the keyboard for me) — the market works so that the top free agents ironically bring in the most surplus value, and the second-tier guys are the ones who are overpaid. 6/140 for Mark Teixeira would be a lot smarter than 4/64 for Adam Dunn.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on
Nov 14, 2008 3:04 PM EST
up
0 recs
i don't see dunn as second tier, necessarily
much rather have him than Ibanez.
at any rate, L2’sdad is right, as usual
This space intentionally left blank.
by marbotty on
Nov 15, 2008 3:09 PM EST
up
0 recs
He'll probably end up paid like a lower-first tier guy
but he’s definitely far, far, less valuble than teixeira, and relative to that value, will be far more overpaid
Just getting pumped for the Navy comeback. I hope those Fightin’ Irish Cinderellas can hold on against the evil Service Academy Football Machine
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on
Nov 15, 2008 3:30 PM EST
up
0 recs
I disagree
They got Boddicker the next year, and they even said that the failures of Storm and Mark were not going to scare them off. They also signed Kirk Gibson to a fairly expensive deal.
Then they made another splash in 1993 signing Gagne and Cone and they worked really hard to get Joe Carter.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on
Nov 14, 2008 3:57 PM EST
up
0 recs
So essentially we have turned Benito Santiago
Into Mike Jacobs.
Wierd.
I refuse to set up a signature....DAMMIT
by RoyalPug on Nov 14, 2008 3:36 PM EST 0 recs
Now that sounds pretty good
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on
Nov 14, 2008 3:38 PM EST
up
0 recs
The conversation begins and ends with Mark Davis
"If a tie is like kissing your sister, then losing is like kissing your grandmother with her teeth out." -- George Brett
by u l washington's toothpick on Nov 14, 2008 5:17 PM EST 0 recs
despite being on the list
Reggie Sanders will always be number one in my heart
by royalsfan03 on Nov 15, 2008 12:17 PM EST 0 recs
Re-reading through the list
The Royals have had plenty of FA busts, but luckily there really haven’t been any franchise-crippling FA deals. The longest deal was for 3 years, with most of the deals being 1 or 2 year contracts.
There’s no Carl Pavano, Albert Belle, or even to a lesser extent 10-250 deal to ARod, the kind of deals that would’ve held the franchise held back for years.
by Top Ramen on Nov 21, 2008 3:50 PM EST 0 recs
There was one contract extension like that
There’s no Carl Pavano, Albert Belle, or even to a lesser extent 10-250 deal to ARod, the kind of deals that would’ve held the franchise held back for years.
Not a FA, but Mike Sweeney’s contract extension held the franchise back for years.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Nov 21, 2008 5:13 PM EST
up
0 recs
I can't evern remeber the value of the deal
It was probably a bad idea either way, but hadn’t he been pretty much completely healthy until the second after he signed the extension? Allard (with plenty of help from the Glass family) made his own bed, but he didn’t get much help from Lady Luck, either.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on
Nov 21, 2008 5:43 PM EST
up
0 recs
You've forgotten "The Royale?"
Sweeney got the first “Royale,” a 5/55 contract. Meche took away much of the stigma of that kind of contract. Based on the stats, skills and position, they should have spent the money on Beltran instead of Sweeney. But, for all I know, they tried to sign Beltran for something like that and he declined. Regardless, a former catcher playing 1B wasn’t worthy of a 5-year risk.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Nov 21, 2008 6:11 PM EST
up
0 recs
yeah... long time ago, many stories ago
On Beltran: wasn’t Boras the issue as in “we’re going to test FA no matter what?” I remember thinking they should have resigned Beltran, too, but my more knowledgeable friends back then told me that Beltran never would, anyway.
Yeah, Beltran’s awesome. That’s not going to stop me from making cracks about JoPo’s unfulfilled crush on him, though.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on
Nov 21, 2008 6:14 PM EST
up
0 recs
On Beltran: wasn’t Boras the issue as in "we’re going to test FA no matter what?"
Probably. His guys rarely re-sign before going to free agency.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Nov 21, 2008 6:22 PM EST
up
0 recs
HOLLIDAY NOW
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on
Nov 21, 2008 6:42 PM EST
up
0 recs
If only Glass would stop being so stingy
…and offer him a serious 6/150 deal. Why won’t Glass take this team seriously!?!?!?!?
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Nov 21, 2008 6:51 PM EST
up
0 recs
Still would have rather had 3 more months of Beltran
than watch Mike Wood give up batting practice one Sunday afternoon in St. Louis. Don’t get me started on all of Buck’s 0-for-6 games, either.
by jbrocato on
Nov 22, 2008 11:20 AM EST
up
0 recs
Although it may have ruined some of your experiences at Royals-Cards games
…the Royals got good value for 3 months of Beltran. Keeping him around for the fun of seeing him for 3 months plus the draft compensation wouldn’t have been smart.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Nov 22, 2008 11:35 AM EST
up
0 recs
I would have rather released Beltran
than had Buck in a Royals uniform. No one has risen to the challenge of naming a worse player to be a four-year starter for the Royals.
by jbrocato on
Nov 22, 2008 9:10 PM EST
up
0 recs
I know
can Yankees fans name a worse 13 season starter at shortstop than Derek Jeter?
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on
Nov 22, 2008 9:31 PM EST
up
0 recs
jbrocato
You are deranged.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Nov 23, 2008 11:25 AM EST
up
0 recs
You are still dodging the question.
I’ve attended 13 Royals games this year (despite living 230 miles from the K) and 11 last year. Name a worse player who has been a starter for the Royals (any time from 1969-2008) as long as Buck has.
by jbrocato on
Nov 23, 2008 5:09 PM EST
up
0 recs
David Howard?
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on
Nov 23, 2008 8:27 PM EST
up
0 recs
I thought about mentioning "the extension"
since it did somewhat cripple the franchise despite not being a FA deal, but wasn’t sure about how this board views the Sweeney deal.
Even mentioning that the Sweeney deal was a bad idea on some Royals boards leads to pages long post about how Sweeney is the greatest guy to play baseball ever.
by Top Ramen on
Nov 24, 2008 10:58 AM EST
up
0 recs
The extension was a wonderful idea at the time
Sweeney at the time was one of the best hitters in baseball, relatively injury free, and signed at well below market rate. He would have easily gotten $14 million per year as a free agent.
Unfortunately, sometimes moves don’t work out, but it was a good idea at the time.
by jbrocato on
Nov 24, 2008 1:13 PM EST
up
0 recs















