Cubs showing interest in Teahen
When should we expect a "That's a lie. Anything you've heard about trading Teahen to the Cubs is a lie." rebuttal?
about 3 years ago
Top Ramen
125 comments
0 recs |
Comments
you beat me to it! grrrrrrr!
your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!
this was what Darth said in his deleted post
Dutton raises the possibility of swapping Teahen for Felix Pie, Ronny Cedeno, or Mike Fontenot.
Pie and Cedeno were familiar hot-stove names here last year, Fontenot not so much.
If the Royals do flip Teabag for either Cedeno or Fontenot, that will functionally be DM conceding that Callaspo is no longer the 2b of the future for the Royals.
I have mixed feelings on Pie—in spite of his horrendous MLB stats through two seasons, his minor-league numbers are hard to ignore, and acquiring him and shifting DDJ to left would place the Royals pretty well as OF defense goes, in spite of Guillen.
I’m no big fan of Teahen, but I’d probably ask for one of those three guys plus a throw-in for Teahen. Teahen is definitely more valuable than Fontenot, and probably a little more valuable than Cedeno. Pie…the jury is probably still out on him.
Thoughts?
If the Royals do flip Teabag for either Cedeno or Fontenot, that will functionally be DM conceding that Callaspo is no longer the 2b of the future for the Royals.
I don’t think that is necessarily true. It would be adding another decent option for second base. No one knows if or how Callaspo will pan out. We also don’t know for sure how well Cedeno or Fonteno would perform. But having two iffy options for that position increases the chance that there will be one player who turns out to be at least pretty good.
I have mixed feelings on Pie—in spite of his horrendous MLB stats through two seasons, his minor-league numbers are hard to ignore, and acquiring him and shifting DDJ to left would place the Royals pretty well as OF defense goes, in spite of Guillen.
Yeah, I love the CF defense, which would help and he still has some upside as a hitter. But he may never become a decent MLB hitter, even for a CFer.
I’m no big fan of Teahen, but I’d probably ask for one of those three guys plus a throw-in for Teahen. Teahen is definitely more valuable than Fontenot, and probably a little more valuable than Cedeno. Pie…the jury is probably still out on him.
Teahen is worth more than Pie+throw in or Cedeno+throw in. I’d do Teahen for Pie and Cedeno. If that is too much for Teahen, I’d toss in a throw-in.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 18, 2008 6:26 PM EST up reply actions
Teahen for Pie + Cedeno
Please God. If for no other reason than there would absolutely no longer be any excuse to keep TPJ on the roster.
by Sweep_the_Leg on Nov 18, 2008 6:31 PM EST up reply actions
You're probably right on Callaspo
At present, I don’t think the Royals brass has much faith in Callaspo, but Callaspo’s strong September may give him the benefit of the doubt in spring training. If Cedeno or Fontenot is acquired, then I do think it spells the end of TPJ’s stay in KC, with Callaspo’s AB’s being significantly decreased. Assuming a 12-man pitching staff, it is hard to see German making the 25-man roster either in this scenario.
I do think Pie + Cedeno is probably asking too much for Teahen straight-up. But if we were looking for OF defense, I wish that Teahen-for-Gutierrez rumor would have turned out to be true.
Why not throw in JoGui, Gload, and Jacobs with Teahen
And for their troubles we’ll take Pie, Cedeno, and Fukudome.
Turn Cedeno into Fontenot and you have a deal
NOw, all we have to to is get one of us to be GM of the Royals, and the other to GM the Cubs…
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Nov 19, 2008 9:50 AM EST up reply actions
Sounds interesting
If this happens, I would bet that Pie would be involved. It’s interesting that Moore is almost always very measured and diplomatic in his comments and then calls two rumors “lies” and suddenly the fanbase (or some therein) are upset with his emotional, moralistic, explosive comments. How dare he.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
as i said, it could be a weird verbal tick or a pet-tendency
I just can’t recall another GM breaking out with the “lies” card before…
Can I ask, what difference does it make?
He isn’t going after anyone. He’s saying that the rumor simply isn’t true. He’s trying not to be vague so that his statement cannot be interpreted to mean that it is a non-denial denial. He’s going beyond GM-speak to make a clear denial. Is there anything wrong with that? Is “lie” really that incendiary of a word? Many GM’s routinely breakout much stronger words than “lie”.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 18, 2008 6:21 PM EST up reply actions
Agreed
If we’re looking for crazy comments by a GM, I think a certain Mr. Ricciardi north of the border is probably the standard-bearer.
by Sweep_the_Leg on Nov 18, 2008 6:25 PM EST up reply actions
If the word “lie” causes the bells and whistles to go off around here, then I think we have our GM Language Monitor set to ultra-sensitive.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 18, 2008 6:28 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t know if anyone is upset or not, but a few people have been complaining about it for some unknown reason. I think it’s because it’s fun to complain about the GM when there is good reason to and when there is not.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 19, 2008 12:20 AM EST up reply actions
Upset?
snicker
I think you’re trying to put emotion into my sentence, when there isn’t meant to be any. I just find it amusing that out of the three (or so) major stories that have come out about the Royals this offseason (Teahen to the Indians, Jacobs, Butler), Moore has told reporters that two are “lies. Absolute lies, and you can print that.”, which is definitely not usual GM speak.*
* I also find it amusing when Bostoners talk about their “idears” at work and southerners talk about watering their garden with their “hosepipes”.
It wasn’t just about your mention of “lie.” It wasn’t even primarily you. There have been other complaints about how shockingly over the top the use of the word “lie” is.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 19, 2008 12:21 AM EST up reply actions
i like this trade rumor
Teabag for Cedeno = meh… Cedeno seems like a slightly better hitting TPJ
Teabag for Fontenot + low-level throw in = fine
Teabag for Pie + good low-level throw in = fine
Is that fair? I’m not familiar with Cedeno but based on his numbers he seems like TPJ with a .250 batting average. I guess my only problem with Fontenot is that he’s 28 yrs old. I am weary of Pie — we already have Joey Gath waiting around… I guess Pie would be Gathright but with a little more power potential.
I guess it’s not bad, but I prefer Fontenot with a decent low level throw in.
by CollininCalifornia on Nov 18, 2008 6:31 PM EST reply actions
A little more power......?
Pie has A LOT more power than Gathwrong.
I’d prefer Fontenot too, though. Very good hitter, could bat #2.
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
Teabag for Fontenot + low-level throw in = fine
Teabag for Pie + good low-level throw in = fine
Is that fair?
No, I don’t think that’s fair. Pie has never done anything in the majors, while having been given a shot. Teahen’s worst major league years are better than Pie’s best. And Pie is out of options, which also hurts his value. Fontenot has more in the way of performance as compared to Pie, but less in the way of tools. And his good performance comes from only one good partial season. And he’s 28. So either of them plus a throw-in is underselling Teahen. Teahen’s value is considerably higher than these guys because he’s an ok hitter, and can play 4 positions, including pretty good OF defense.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 18, 2008 6:43 PM EST up reply actions
so do you like any of the Teabag trade talk?
or is there someone else on the cubs you think would be a good fit. As i said, I’d be happy with Fontenot and a good throw in.
by CollininCalifornia on Nov 18, 2008 6:58 PM EST up reply actions
As I said in one of my posts above, I’d do Teahen+throw in for Pie+Cedeno. I might do Teahen+throw in for Pie+Fontenot. I think Teahen for Fontenot plus a throw in is really, really selling low. You may well know more about Fontenot than I do. He hit well this year, but in only 243 AB’s. Before that in 241 AB’s he was pretty bad. His numbers throughout his minor league career were ok, but not great. Is he great defensively?
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 18, 2008 7:12 PM EST up reply actions
here is some stuff on Fontenot from Beyond the Box Score
9. Mike Fontenot (22 off, 8 def, 30 tot) — Here’s a guy who snuck up on my radar. Fontenot absolutely crushed the ball this year, to the tune of .305/.395/.514 in just under 300 plate appearances. He’s old for someone with less than two years of service time-2009 will be his age 29 season -but if he can give the Cubs even league-average offense with his good glove, they’ll be more than happy to take it.
Basically he’s a decent 2B defensively… #9 on their list…. not that they are the ultimate judge. But I think he could break out in ’09.
by CollininCalifornia on Nov 18, 2008 7:28 PM EST up reply actions
(sorry i got link happy -- both links go to the original website)
…and sorry about the random strike thru on the text.
by CollininCalifornia on Nov 18, 2008 7:29 PM EST up reply actions
and couldn't he be decent until...
… Johnny Giavotella arrives?
by CollininCalifornia on Nov 18, 2008 7:32 PM EST up reply actions
He could be decent
But his track record does not inspire great confidence in my mind. His minor league track record is just ok. And then he doesn’t show anything in the majors until age 28. I think we’ve seen his breakout already and I’d be shocked (I think just about anybody would be shocked) if he ever has a full season which is anywhere near as good as his 243 MLB AB’s in 2008. As BtB said, if he can be a league average hitter for his position with a good glove, I’d be happy to have him. He might be. But he might not. Certainly at his age, he’s likely peaked.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 18, 2008 7:37 PM EST up reply actions
at the very least
I think Fontenot could be a decent on base guy. I mean looking at his career including minor league numbers, he has almost the same type of production with little tinie tiny improvements.
by Royal from Queens on Nov 18, 2008 7:43 PM EST up reply actions
Could be
But can he maintain enough contact to keep the OBP up? He could end up being a .290/.365 (BA/OBP) guy or a .250/.325 guy, or anywhere in between.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 18, 2008 7:50 PM EST up reply actions
To be fair
Between his major league and minor league production, his career OBP is .365.5 So it’s been pretty consistent. There are some guys that are huge questions marks when it comes to playing time and all that stuff but he’s just… maintained since 2005. Its a nice enough sample size that I expect a .365 OBP at the very least, which isn’t too shabby,
by Royal from Queens on Nov 18, 2008 7:55 PM EST up reply actions
So it’s been pretty consistent.
No, it hasn’t. It’s been consistent since his second year in the PCL at age 25. When looking at his minor league track record, you have to age, level and league into account. When seen in that light, those recent years of good OBP don’t look so impressive.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 18, 2008 8:01 PM EST up reply actions
Can He Still
Rake?
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Nov 18, 2008 8:08 PM EST up reply actions
Huh?
Well technically, that was his first season in the PCL, but his second in AAA.
I mean how much of a track record is needed to convince you then? We’re not one season with only 200 AB’s. He’s done for like 3 years now between the majors and the minors.
by Royal from Queens on Nov 18, 2008 8:10 PM EST up reply actions
I mean how much of a track record is needed to convince you then?
More than one half of a season in the majors. In his half season in the majors in 2007, his OBP was .339. And his recent good OBP seasons in the minors were only after he had repeated the level and was old for the level. So, do I need more of a track record to be convinced that this 28-year-old can be counted on to have a good MLB OBP. It’s not like AAA OBP’s always carry over to good MLB PA’s.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 18, 2008 8:13 PM EST up reply actions
Regarding OBP
Yeah, your right, AAA OBP’s don’t equal MLB OBP’s but at a certain point the decision is made with what’s available.
Unfortunately I haven’t seen alot of Fontenot to make the assessment of whether or not its “real” but if Teahen is traded for a Fontenot he must be accompanied by someone else like Pie.
by Royal from Queens on Nov 18, 2008 8:19 PM EST up reply actions
uhh...pie's had 260 ABs in the majors...
and put up 825 OPS in the minors…he’s still young…and he fills a need…
teahen is a 4th OF…ill take the upside over a 4th outfielder any day
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Nov 18, 2008 7:57 PM EST up reply actions
That's why I'm willing to take him as part of a Teahen trade
But if you think Pie has more value on the trade market than Teahen, you’re nuts. Nor is Pie plus a throw-in at Teahen’s level.
And am I supposed to be impressed by a .825 OPS in the minors, particularly when a significant part of that was in the PCL?
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 18, 2008 8:03 PM EST up reply actions
And especially since Pie's projections look a lot like Mitch Maier's except with more steals
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Nov 18, 2008 10:03 PM EST up reply actions
Defense!
You’re the one who is supposed to tell me that Pie is going to save 50 runs with his defense.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 18, 2008 10:11 PM EST up reply actions
Maybe, but he's just a placeholder for Paulo Orlando
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Nov 18, 2008 10:12 PM EST up reply actions
In reality
every event from the formation of the universe to now and until that day finally arrives is just a placeholder for Paulo Orlando.
Accidentally not thedude925 anymore. I do hate this new name.
I Did Not
Know that. It’s all perfectly clear now.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Nov 19, 2008 1:12 AM EST up reply actions
what kind of young pitching do the cubs have available?
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
nothing less than Vitters by the way!
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
by 306008 on Nov 18, 2008 6:50 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Hunch
I think we may actually see this trade go down.
Not sure who the plays will be but I think Teahen goes to the Cubs.
I’m hoping it could be for both Fontenot and Pie. And for some reason I feel its realistic.
I’d be willing to take the offensive risk of playing Pie out in CF.
by Royal from Queens on Nov 18, 2008 7:30 PM EST reply actions
Some sort of a trade for Teahen will happen, and this is why...
So Trey and Dayton can have Gload as the 4th outfielder. To do that, they need to move Teahen. Hopefully we get better option then Gathright, otherwise it will be Gathright starting in center.
Go Royals!
Only way im a fan of this trade is..
if the royals get another outfielder that is ready to play now through free agency or a trade… Pie needs more time in triple A i think we all know
ugh.
pie has no more options...
… so he’d have to pass thru waivers to be shipped to AAA.
by CollininCalifornia on Nov 18, 2008 8:00 PM EST up reply actions
Fontenot straight up for Teahen would be a steal
Average MLB 2B in 2008: 276/338/409
Fontenot MLB Career (479 AB): 290/369/457
Marcel Projection for 2009: 285/361/455
He hit well in the minors too:
AA: 325/393/481
AAA: 289/364/447
Plus/Minus had him as +11 plays in 2008 and +0 in 2007, so he reasonably projects as an average to above average 2B (somewhere between 0 and 10 runs).
With the late start to his major league career, he has less than two years of service time, so he will cost the league minimum in 2009 and be under club control for 4 more years. (He might be a “Super Two” arbitration eligible in 2010).
So he is above average offensively (especially for his position), above average defensively, dirt cheap, and under club control through his likely useful life. Even if he regresses to league average offensively and defensively, he is a bargain with his contract status.
You, of all people, shouldn't use the word "reason" in any discussion about Teahen (or Costa)
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 18, 2008 8:07 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
A steal? I couldn't possibly disagree more
You know the limitations of Marcel. Fontenot has been good for 243 MLB AB’s, period. And you should know that PECOTA, ZiPS and Chone will project him at much less than that. There’s a reason his career had a late start. He just isn’t very good. He could be a decent MLB 2B. Teahen is more valuable, period.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 18, 2008 8:06 PM EST up reply actions
Teahen is more valuable, period.
Are we talking the OF version of Teahen or the 3B version of Teahen?
If we’re talking the OF version I don’t think it should be dismissed so quickly
by Royal from Queens on Nov 18, 2008 8:13 PM EST up reply actions
I’m talking about the Mark Teahen who can play LF, RF, 3B, or 1B and give you an OPS+ around 95 with good OF defense. That versatility is a key part of his value. Also the fact that he’s a known quantity in the majors, not an iffy player with a limited track record.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 18, 2008 8:15 PM EST up reply actions
I wrote it above but I'll repeat it here
I’m not trying to imply you trade Teahen for just Fontenot. I think Fontenot MUST be together with someone else like a Pie, or hell maybe even a fun project like Rich Hill (although I doubt the Cubs do that).
by Royal from Queens on Nov 18, 2008 8:26 PM EST up reply actions
That is a poor use of punctuation, exclamation point
Before Fontenot’s great 2008 season, Fontenot’s 2008 PECOTA forecast was 282/357/431. He hit as well as an average MLB 2B in 2007 (and still outhit the 2008 version of Teahen). After Fontenot’s 2008, his 2009 PECOTA should be just as good, if not better.
Teahen is not major league average wherever you play him, plus will cost $3.5 million. Fontenot projects as above average at 2B, and will cost $400,000 (and then is cost-controlled for 4 more years). Fontenot is more valuable, and it is not even close.
"it's not even close"
At least we agree on something.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 18, 2008 8:25 PM EST up reply actions
Pie obviously is a pretty big risk
but his glove in CF may be good enough to keep him in the lineup for a year or so to see if his bat can develop. Even if he never becomes an above average hitter, his defense may make him at least an average CF overall. I understand the comparisons to Corey Patterson, but Pie has better (but still below average) plate discipline. For a team that regularly played Joey Gathright in CF, Pie would be a fair upgrade and with his tools, who knows, you might hit a jackpot.
ok thanks
that is my thoughts too. i think Pie is the kind of talent we should take a chance on. i think even a Teabags for Pie trade straight up would be good for us.
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
this is exactly what im thinking...
i really dont see teahen as a piece when we contend…he’ll be a $6 million four corner backup…the yanks can do that…we cant….pie could turn into something special right around the time things should be coming together…
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Nov 19, 2008 12:17 AM EST up reply actions
There Has To
Be an OF in the trade; DDJ, Gator/Maier and Hoagie is not a good OF.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
Go Ahead, Ridicule
Me; I can take it. I’m a man !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I’m over 50!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111111111 I just had a colonoscopy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111111111112486j[’pdfkg
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Nov 18, 2008 8:06 PM EST up reply actions
Thanks for that visual....
can’t wait to see that video on you-tube.
Let's Go Blues!
by powderbluesfor08 on Nov 19, 2008 9:10 AM EST up reply actions
I can't wait for softball season to start, either
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Nov 18, 2008 10:06 PM EST up reply actions
Frankly
I don’t think Fukudome should be off the table. Sure he slumped, but that just means he has been devalued and we can get him for cheap. He still posted very good OBA numbers and supposedly we have the money to spend.
I’m not real impressed with Cedeno or Pie. It wouldn’t be a horrible trade, and I don’t expect some huge bounty for Teahen, but I doubt either player will be much more than a placeholder.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
Really?
Every player who comes to the majors for the first time is a question mark. You never know how a guy from another league will perform in the majors. Fukudome came to the majors and performed well until the third week of June. From then on, he played like total crap, and that includes his OBA. He looks like a guy who hit well when major league pitchers didn’t yet know how to pitch to him, and once they figured him out, he couldn’t hit…at all. There’s no reason to believe he’ll ever be any good in the majors. Taking on Fukudome and his 3/38 contract would be amazingly stupid.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 18, 2008 8:46 PM EST up reply actions
Guillen actually hit pretty well in the seasons before Moore signed him at 3/36
Fukudome, on the other hand, had a poor MLB season. So giving up talent for the privilege of paying him 3/38 would be significantly worse.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 18, 2008 8:49 PM EST up reply actions
That's a lie
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Nov 18, 2008 8:47 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
One note on Cubs minor leaguers
While the PCL is a hitter’s league overall, the park factors for Iowa suggest it has played neutral to somewhat pitcher friendly in recent years.
And then there's the other 50% of the parks they hit in
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 18, 2008 9:19 PM EST up reply actions
50% of those are neutral to pitcher friendly too
A hitter in Iowa is playing in a hitter’s park roughly 25% of the time, rather than 75% of the time as hitters playing for Albuquerque, Colorado Springs, or even Omaha.
by Gopherballs on Nov 19, 2008 12:04 AM EST up reply actions
that is a statistically impossible, btw
And Iowa is a big time hitters park!!!! A lot more homers than omaha, and pitchers hit there occasionally where as in Omaha pitchers never hit.
Teahen < Pie
Teahen is getting worse, and makes more money. Pie provides an option in center field makes less, and could actually end up being a baseball player. If we could get fontenot and pie for Teahen, gload, buck, gathright, guillen, that would be the REAL steal.
At least Wally Joyner's not on the team....
50% + 25% = 75%
Iowa players play 50% of the time at home and 50% of the time on the road. Only about half of the PCL parks are hitters parks. Iowa is not one of them according to here, here, and here. The rest of the parks are neutral or pitcher’s parks, so while the PCL is a hitter’s league overall, the effect is not nearly the same for the players who play their homes games in the neutral or pitcher’s parks.
by Gopherballs on Nov 19, 2008 12:38 PM EST up reply actions
ha, very close .97 vs. 1.03
and i bet if you looked at stats since then its changed. Omaha had some bashers mid/early 2000s and Icubs have been bashers of late.
And it isn’t statistically impossible because the statistics are not mutually exclusive.
Even if Iowa and Omaha were really different which they aren’t, the two teams would be playing different road schedules with Iowa playing at Omaha and Omaha playing at Iowa. etc. So iowas would be over 25 percent on road and omahas would be under.
even with the flawed 50%, 0 percent, it still wouldn’t their stats wouldn’t be affected at near that rate. Its not like omaha is 100 percent hitters and iowa is 0 hitters. they were both dang near 1.00.
And they compare hitters parks vs. pitching parks by eachother, so if they are all hitters parks the least hitters park would look like a pitching park. So basically the hitters park, especially comparing omaha and des moines is silly.
At least Wally Joyner's not on the team....
The park factor data is for 2006-2008
For example, per BTB, in the 2008 season, Iowa suppressed HRs by 5% while Omaha inflated HRs by 10%. First Innings shows a similar gap in 2008. Omaha historically has a similar rate, with Iowa neutral or below.
I am not sure I understand your argument here. Iowa hitters are playing half their games in an environment that is neutral to somewhat more difficult than the average park. When they go on the road, they play roughly half their games in hitters parks but the other half are either neutral or favor the pitcher to varying to degree. The point is that roughly three quarters of the time (or if you prefer 11/15 of the time), Iowa hitters are playing in environments that are neutral or suppress offense. The hitters who play home games in the hitters parks, however, end up playing roughly three quarters of the time (or 11/15 of the time) in environments that inflate offense. Thus, when applying the PCL effect adjustment, the effect is going to be greater on the teams who play in hitters parks than those, like Iowa, who play in neutral or pitchers parks. Sure, that effect is not going to be as great in Omaha as Colorado Springs, but it is more than Iowa.
and what of the other parks he hit in the other 50% of the time?
Accidentally not thedude925 anymore. I do hate this new name.
One thing this does show
is that the royals are satisfied with Aviles at SS.
Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.
Maybe not if Cedeno's in the trade
Gotta be a bit rough on Dayton to see that not only are his FA/trade acquisitions failing to unseat dumb ol’ Allard’s boys, but they’re actually being disposed of by AAA grinders like Mike Aviles, who not only replace TPJ, but in about 180 fewer PAs, are are about about 3-5 wins more than the $36 million dollar man.
But hey, Ryan Shealy could still surprise ya!
Anyhoo, don’t follow the NL that much. But after some reading and checking out available projections, Allow me to pontificate with numbers as if I have jack crap to contribute to this discussion. So here’s how I would rank the players discussed.
1) Fontenot
2) Pie
3) Cedeno
I’ll have to see what PECOTA and ZiPS say, but offhand I’d say that Teahen is a 1 run hitter, a +3 defender, -7.5 for corner OF25 runs for AL replacement level = 21.5 runs above replacement. He’s also 27 next year. That’s a league average position player in the NL, a bit below in the AL. It’s about 2 WAR. That might be a bit high or low, but it also doesn’t include his baserunning, which is excellent, although I don’t have numbers for it. Just learning about outfield arms. The THT ratings for 2008 aren’t out yet, but he was about +5 runs in 2007 (Mr. Arm JoGui was +1, which totally made up for his -21 range). I know people are sick of Teahen, but let’s not go nuts before we have all the evidence. If he’s still a +5 arm, then, well, the Royals might just have a 2.5 WAR player on their hand, whether that is evident to the fans or not. (GIven how many of them have a Kaegel-like excitement over Dayton Moore Specials like Mike Jacobs and Jose Guillen, I’m guessing “not.”)
Cedeno does look a lot like a rich man’s TPJ. I quick conversion of ZiPS has him as pretty much exactly replacement level on offense (-22 runs). His defense is supposed to be pretty good, but I don’t know if it’s that good. Maybe as a throw-in he could be a good utility infielder, given the uncertainty about Callaspo’s bat and Cedeno’s superior defense… Still, he definitely wouldn’t be worth being the main chip for Teahen.
Pie… the lack of options are a problem, since his bat really isn’t ready. He does profile as a pretty good defensive CF. CHONE projects him (probably relying a lot on scouting reports given lack of playing time) as a +5 run CF. His best offensive projection is, of course, James, which has him as about a -5 hitter. I think that’s pretty generous. Converting ZiPS over has him at about -14. Marcels is problematic for younger players with limited playing time, but it doesn’t like him, either. Not straight up. Like Gopherballs says, if you think his bat will keep developing, he can hold down the fort in CF. But otherwise, he’s a homeless man’s Franklin Gutierrez. IN other words, he’s no Ryan Langerhans. I’d say he’s 1.5 WAR at best at this point, although he’s young enough to still be developing. Not straight up for Teabag. Pie’s 2007 arm rating was just average.
Fontenot. Not sure where the hell he came from, and he came out of nowhere in Aviles-like fashion this year so much that he fooled Marcel into thinking he could OPS over .800 again. I highly doubt he’s a +14 run hitter. Nor do I think he’s the +11 run stud of the James projection. It’s hard to tell…
ZiPS is a bit more realistic. Although I don’t have ZiPS official league average yet, with a .338 wOBA I have Fontenot at -2.5 over a full season. I think that’s more conservative and realistic given his age and pedigree. Maybe not fair, but, hey.
As Gopherballs points out, he was a 11play or ~9 run player according to Dewan’s. PMR likes him ever more. He wasn’t nearly as good last year, although PMR still has him above average. CHONE’s projections (yeah, I know), as well as ZiPs, project his defense as almost perfectly average.
Indeed, Zips and Chone together have him at minus 2.5 offense, +1 defense, +2.5 position = +1 runs. +20 runs for NL replacement level = 21 runs above replacement. Of course, this excludes all the more optimistic projections. I’d say he’s about as valuble as Teahen, though. While he’s had better recent performance, he’s also in his decline phase, whereas teahen may still get better.
I’d say that if the Royals have to do this trade, Teahen + throw-in (JoGui!) for Fontenot and Pie would be a good deal for the Royals, if the Cubs would do it. Fontenot can hold down the fort. Indeed, there would be a nice symmetry between the old Grudz-German tag team and the Fontenot-Callaspo combo (older, declining but still underrated white guy backed up by a Latin guy with a sometimes good bat and bad defense). While Fontenot would be declining, in the meantime Pie might be developing into a decent CF. Or just the next Corey Patterson.
Not sure how to end that, but that’s just my two cents. I like the idea of Fontenot and Pie for Teahen. Of course, last time there was as Mark Teahen trade idea I liked (Teahen for Gootz) I got excited, only to see it turn into another crappy defensive player who might have a .320 OBP if everything breaks right. But you never now.
Competent position player acquisition — say it with me Dayton: Yes we can!
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Nov 18, 2008 10:55 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
it doesnt seem to me like you're taking into account...
controlled years and how much those years are going to cost when comparing teahen to pie…teahens getting pretty expensive and has likely shown us what he is….and that just isnt that impressive…the royals get themselves into trouble by paying guys 4 million dollars to be backups…we cant afford to do that
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Nov 19, 2008 12:22 AM EST up reply actions
True, the Royals can't afford to overpay backups
like Coco Crisp, who might generously project to be as good as Teahen, and will be paid $5.75M in 2009.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Nov 19, 2008 10:53 AM EST up reply actions
Would you prefer the same Honda Accord that cost $400,000 or $3,400,000?
Plus/Minus had Teahen at -11 plays in OF this year (Plus/Minus includes OF arm), +5 last year (not including -1 in CF).
I am not quite buying the decline phase either, at least for the immediate future — an age 29 season is not decline phase, and Teahen is only 15 months younger than Fontenot.
by Gopherballs on Nov 19, 2008 12:39 AM EST up reply actions
Good points on Teahen vs. Fontenot
I don’t think we’re that far apart. The salaries and 2008 performance weigh heavily in your favor, of course. I will also admit to not realizing their ages were that close. Without saying it’s decisive, here would be my somewhat counterpoints with regard to performance.
1) Fontenot’s 2008: Last year’s performance is obviously in Fontenot’s favor both offensively and defensively. Still, it’s just one year of performance. I don’t know how I’d evaluate his minor league stats. I think Zips does (Marcels certainly doesn’t), and that’s were I got my conservative Fontenot projection from.
2) Teahen’s 2008: Teahen’s 2008 was obviously miserable, particularly offensively. plus/minus obviously didn’t like his defense. However, PMR did have him as above average in RF this year, so it’s not like the metrics are agreed on his defense. And we can both agree with respect to both players that one year of defensive stats is not definitive.
3) Past performance and future projection: Likewise, we can’t simply ignore past performance. The acknowleged weakness of Marcels is that if a player has not prior history it the majors, that time is assumed to be league average, which is why the reliability score on Fontenot is rightly very low. ZiPS takes into account his time in the minors, and that’s why it has a more conservative offensive projection for him (below league average). With Teahen, of course, we have more data. As bad as 2008 was, and as it weighs most heavily, that doesn’t mean that his 2006 and his underrated 2007 are irrelevant. Marcels takes this into account (and they are more reliable with three years of data on Teahen, and have him as an above average player. As far as defense with Teahen, we don’t know what UZR had him this year, and while plus/minus didn’t like him, PMR did. 2006 he was at third. In 2007 UZR had him at +10, and THT OF arms had him at +5. So it’s not like he’s definitely a better defender. Of course, we have a much smaller sample on Fontenot. All this comes into account (at least in terms of range) in Chone’s defensive projections, which have their limitations, but do average BIS and STATS info and regress to the Fans SCouting report relative to playing time. So despite it’s limitations, it takes into account more years of datas from multiple sources than just last year’s plus/minus rankings, and adjusts for age. That’s what I used to get Fontenot +1 @2B, Teahen +3 at corner numbers. And that’s also why I think they project as roughly equal hitters. And keep in mind that’s relative to league — it’s easier to hit in the NL than the AL (not to mention their different parks).
4) Decline — 29 Might not be right in the general decline, but it is for many skills. MGL isn’t necessarily right about everything, but he starts deducting overall for age after 27. But I agree that this isn’t as big a deal as I originally thought.
Money is money, of course, and that is an issue. And, yeah, just because DMGM is throwing away money on replacement level crap like Gload, Guillen, and now below-average CFs like Coco Crisp (CHONE has DDJ as a +3 CF, Crisp is minus 3. DMGM may want bettter defense, but it’s becoming more and more clear he can’t identify it) doesn’t mean he should waste it (if it is a waste) on Teahen. But two above average years followed by one terrible year doesn’t mean Teahen isn’t worth $4M, either, any more than one very good year means that Mike Aviles or Mike Fontenot are 3 WAR players going forward.
So anyway, to repeat, I’m not saying that my points are decisive, but just showing where I was coming from and why I think they hold water, that’s all.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Nov 19, 2008 10:14 AM EST up reply actions
How do evaluations change for 2008
when you throw in the fact that Teahen pretty much doubled Fontenot’s AB’s?
by I need more Esteban on Nov 19, 2008 11:37 AM EST up reply actions
The projections adjust for playing time over a full year
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Nov 19, 2008 3:43 PM EST up reply actions
Good points, but with the positional adjustment, I have Fontenot coming out ahead
Even using the less optimistic ZIPS projection for Fontenot, he comes out slightly better than Teahen’s Marcel (as there is no ZIPS for Teahen yet):
Fontenot ZIPS: 268/340/418
Teahen Marcel: 271/337/421
Teahen, with the corner outfielder postional adjustment, falls farther behind. I don’t think any defensive system rates Teahen enough above Fontenot to make up that difference on defense (and plus/minus has Teahen net below average for 2007-2008 combined, with Fontenot net above average for 2007-2008). At 3B, Teahen is likely below average defensively. Even using ZIPS, Fontenot comes out as an above average 2B. Teahen does not come out as an above average OF or 3B.
But even if you accept them both as the same, Teahen costs $3 million more.
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree
I’m open to changing my mind on Fontenot vs. Teahen when we have Zips, Pecota, and/or CHONE for both of them.
Another big difference between us, probably, is that Fonent only gets 2 wins for NL position player, whereas Teahen gets 2.5 for the AL.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Nov 19, 2008 3:40 PM EST up reply actions
I might be interested in Teahen for Fontenot+a good prospect
(now that Pie isn’t a smart option for the Royals)
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 19, 2008 3:43 PM EST up reply actions
I haven't seen the other thread since I got back from lunch
I don’t hate Crisp or anything, and this whole series of trade might help the Royals come out ahead… but I’m still not sure about that, and it certainly seems to be making the Royals older and more expensive.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Nov 19, 2008 3:44 PM EST up reply actions
I think it was a wrongheaded move
…and that DDJ should have stayed in CF with Crisp-like money spent on a corner OF FA who provides the same overall improvement and the Royals don’t give up Ramirez.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 19, 2008 3:47 PM EST up reply actions
I agree
Teahen + X for Pie + Fontenot
And X doesn’t have to be a meaningless crappy throw-in. It just shouldn’t be someone who isn’t a top 20 prospect.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 19, 2008 12:52 AM EST up reply actions
Not really
A trade for Cedeno could lead to Aviles getting moved over to second. What it may show is that Aviles will be manning one of the Middle Infield positions.
Pie + Fontenot for Teahen + filler would work.
Personally, I’d rather wait and see whether or not the Cubs can get anything done with Pie this winter, pick him up on waivers, and call it a day.
You'd trade Teahen and $1M for a thank you note
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 19, 2008 12:22 AM EST up reply actions
I don't get it
DM has stated he wants power on the corners and shifting David to left field would not allow that to happen.
DM on the subject today:
“It would be reckless and inappropriate for me to comment on any potential trade or potential free-agent acquisition,” Moore said.
Lack of a denial probably means there’s smoke.
However, then there’s this line in the article as well:
MLB.com learned from a source that no deal involving Teahen or DeJesus had been discussed by Moore and his Cubs counterpart, Jim Hendry — at least not to this point.
Guillen for Fukudome + cash?
Not only that
But it makes a lot of sense to publicly and vigorously deny the Teahen-Indians rumor if he was talking to the Cubs. Surely it would make the Cubs harder to deal with.
Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!
It had better be a lot of cash
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 19, 2008 2:08 PM EST up reply actions
+1
Who knows if Fukudome will ever hit well again — he’s still a better player than Guillen based on defense. Still, trading for another decline-phase corner outfielder with an even bigger, dumber contract is a baaaad idea.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Nov 19, 2008 3:41 PM EST up reply actions
So we just traded RamRam for Coco Crisp
and i guess that means we won’t want Pie anymore.
Don't Stop Believing!
D'oh
I’m still going to finish my boring post on Teahen, etc.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Nov 19, 2008 10:01 AM EST up reply actions
CRISP
Chone CF projection: minus 3
Marcels bRAA: minus 6.4
Arms ratings the past three years in CF:
2005: minus 16.5
2006: minus 4.9
2007: minus 0.2
Let’s generously call that minus 1
So… minus 10.4 = about Minus one win.
+.25 wins for CF + 2.5 wins for AL replacement = 2.25 minus 1 =
1.25 WAR player over full time.
If that’s right, DMGM just made a bad trade, given that Ramirez outpitched Soria last year.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
Correction
should be 1.75 WAR. Math mistake. That’s better, but still assumes he plays full-time. Still don’t think he’s as good as Ramirez, and he makes more than $5M/yr more…
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Nov 19, 2008 10:34 AM EST up reply actions
Is it just me or did some of our biggest strengths juuuuust get dumped for two questionable position players?
To create a two headed monster with the combined name of Coco Jacobs??
At least Wally Joyner's not on the team....
The good news
…is that “some of our biggest strengths” (relievers) are something that Moore does a good job of finding. He’s a good bet to re-load effectively.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 19, 2008 2:10 PM EST up reply actions
I guess that's the saving grace.
Since I know we at least share a man-crush on Ramirez (I’m not sure why you got to move on so quick from Banny), though, I think that Ramirez is the kind of player who’s a good bit harder to replace than someone like Robinson Tejada or Nunez… he was simply awesome this year.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Nov 19, 2008 3:43 PM EST up reply actions
Have you seen Ram Ram's projections for 2009?
I posted them in a couple threads. The projections don’t think Ramirez is very special.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 19, 2008 3:44 PM EST up reply actions
No, I haven't
We’ll see when other stuff comes out. I don’t trust the James projections. I haven’t seen the Zips stuff. And, as I’ll say elsewhere, I think people are more than justified in skepticism Moore’s regime’s ability to scout position players effectively.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Nov 19, 2008 3:45 PM EST up reply actions
GMDM Is Busy
Fashioning a league-average reliever from duct tape and baling wire as we speak.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Nov 19, 2008 6:13 PM EST up reply actions
He doesn't waste his time with league average relievers
He sprinkles fairy dust on the mass of duct tape and bailing wire and turns it into a good reliever.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 19, 2008 6:34 PM EST up reply actions
Bale wire, perhaps?
Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!
and Duckworth tape?
Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!
Well crafted
And I think one of them will be on the 25-man roster on opening day and the other will not.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Nov 19, 2008 6:55 PM EST up reply actions
Well Played
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Nov 19, 2008 9:35 PM EST up reply actions
















