Royals Review: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Want to help build SB Nation? We're hiring! Bar-right-arrows



Royals Auditioning For Greinke

Apologies to Top Ramen who already has a Greinke thread going, but my comment on Rany's column went a little longer than the comment section probably warranted, so here it is in a separate post.

A couple of thoughts on Greinke that I’m posting as an addendum to Rany’s Greinke column.  These are probably better served in the comments section of that column, but I like the Royals Review fan-post stage, it’s like my 15 minutes of fame. 

First of all, I’m throwing the ‘Greinke-is-more-comfortable-in-KC-for-psychological-health-reasons’ argument out the window.  When I watch Greinke carry himself these days and listen to his quotes in the paper, I don’t see a guy who enjoys any kind of safe haven in KC, I see a guy who is ready to get the hell out of town unless baseball becomes more fun.  If you’re going to make the safe haven argument, then I think you start with Miami and Tampa Bay—both are franchises that are close to his family support network, and neither are huge media markets.  But like I said, I’m not buying on that argument; I don’t think he’d hesitate for a second to pitch for, say, the Angels, so long as the team was a winner.

He’ll stay if the Royals became a fun team to play for.  And they say that Fun = Wins, so the Royals are basically auditioning for Greinke.  Greinke, by virtue of his 2008 performance (his season was comparable to those of Cole Hamels and Jake Peavy, among others), has become the critical director in a darkened theater while Moore, Crisp, Jacobs, et al tap dance on stage before him.  Moore, of course, doesn’t feel this way at all, he wants nothing to do with players who don’t want to play in Kansas City, he’s said this again and again.  This might explain why he hasn’t accomplished the contract yet.  But the issue has forced itself to the front of the room; if the Royals wait beyond the 2009 trading deadline, their potential return for Greinke diminishes. 

The question is how much does it diminish?  We assume an elite player’s value deteriorates exponentially the closer he gets to free agency, based on our experience with Beltran.  Comparing the haul the A’s reeled in for Dan Haren and those of the Indians and Twins for Sabathia and Santana sort of bears this out; the A’s take was clearly better.  But how much of that was just Billy Beane?  The Orioles’ return for Erik Bedard well before he reached free agency seems similar to what the Indians and Twins got for their aces, although Bedard isn’t/wasn’t nearly as good as the other two.   

What I’m trying to establish here is how much time, exactly, do the Royals have to convince Greinke to stay—how long is the Royals’ audition?  Conversely, how much time does Greinke have to convince Glass he’s worth elite money?  And if he has a Cy Young season next year, does that price tag go through the roof? 

Uh, yeah.

That’s what Greinke’s betting on.  He’s simply gambling that he stands to make a lot more money, and that he’s going to prove it in ’09.  You could almost say the Royals as a team, and Greinke individually, are competing for primacy—if the Royals are somehow in playoff contention by the All Star break next year and Greinke is throwing an ERA in the high 3’s, then the Royals have good leverage.  But if the Royals are treading around or below .500 and Greinke’s dealing—a far more likely scenario—then the question becomes whether you want to keep trying to keep him around or deal him at the height of his value. 

2008 Stats:

Hamels: IP - 227, ERA - 3.09, SO - 196, BB - 53, HR - 28, CG - 2, ERA+ 145, WHIP - 1.082

Peavy: IP - 173, ERA - 2.85, SO - 166, BB - 59, HR - 17, CG - 1, ERA+ 134, WHIP - 1.18

Greinke: IP - 202, ERA - 3.47, SO - 183, BB - 56, HR - 21, GG - 1, ERA+ 123, WHIP - 1.275

Okay, so definitively not as good as Hamels, although I still like the comparison for some reason - Same age, same size, both high school draftees.  And I think by the end of next year the gap will tighten.

We already know from fangraphs that Peavy and Greinke had similar seasons, but I thought I'd throw it up there anyway. 

1 recs | Comment 31 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

And my overall point is...

drumroll… I’m not waiting past next year’s trade deadline to deal him if the Royals aren’t contending. The first half of 2009 is my audition for Greinke, and if he doesn’t call us back, we deal him for somebody who will.

I'm about to change my username to DannyDuffyfan

by jackie ballgame on Nov 25, 2008 3:42 PM EST   0 recs

Agreed, that's the point of no return

If Moore doesn’t have Greinke extended by the 2009 deadline, and he can’t work out a reasonable deal to his liking, then it is an epic fail on his part, and it will largely determine his fate and legacy as a GM.

No pressure, though, Dayton.

by Sweep_the_Leg on Nov 25, 2008 3:53 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

i would also agree, with two caveats--

If it becomes clear this offseason that Zack has every intention of getting the hell out of dodge after 2010, then we should try our damndest to trade him by Opening Day. In order for Greinke to be worth as much as he is now, he would not only have to keep improving on his 2008 line, he would have to improve on it to such a point as to make up for being turned into a one-year rental (or, a one-year and three months rental if you prefer). Unless ZG has a Cy Young-caliber season—which he is capable of doing—his value is probably not going to be higher than it is now. So, I’d try to trade him now.

That being said, if he does not get traded now, I would not simply trade him at the July deadline for the sake of trading him. If we get lowballed on offers from other teams, it is better to hang onto Greinke for the remainder of the 2009 season and try to flip him then in the hopes of getting something more.

by DarthYoshi on Nov 25, 2008 4:46 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

No way on the "epic failure" of Moore

Moore’s had only 2.5 seasons by mid-year 09 to implement his direction and changes. We can ALL see already that the trend is up. That puts it on Greinke to decide whether he’s willing to patient a bit longer or go to a winner.

In sum, if Greinke doesn’t sign, by NO MEANS WHATSOEVER is it a failure on Moore’s part. I’d be more likely to pin it on Glass for not paying more to keep a winner on a soon-to-be winner—-buying patience from Greinke, as it were. And even that might not happen if Greinke isn’t willing.

In sum, the decision is Greinke’s. Whatever happens, it won’t be Moore’s fault, I believe. Moore can be held liable for decisions, but not for a player who is set on not returning to the Royals in spite of facts (i.e. upward trend, above-average management team). – TL

[In 2008] Kila Ka’aihue had the best on-base percentage of any hitter in the minor leagues. - Joe Posnanski, 11/9/2008 ... Ergo, let's give him a shot at first base in KC in 2009.

by timlacy on Nov 26, 2008 10:41 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

if Moore comes to the conclusion that Greinke simply will not sign...

…but manages to flip him for a couple of A-grade prospects who pan out, I will probably forgive the man for not at least trying to lock up Greinke up earlier (by all accounts, Moore has inexplicably made no concerted effort to do so until this offseason, and that is on him, and him alone).

The bottom line is that as GM, the buck stops with Moore. I’m still a long way off from writing a haiku to proclaim my admiration for David Glass’s ownership of the team, but Glass has given Moore a pretty long leash. And to his credit, Moore has done a lot of things right. But if Moore both fails to sign Greinke to an extension and fails to flip him in a good trade for us, then he has failed in a colossal way.

by DarthYoshi on Nov 26, 2008 11:51 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

My point was...

that if Moore cannot get him extended (either because he waited to long, or because Greinke just doesn’t want to sign), then he HAS to make a good-to-great trade in getting enough in return for Greinke. IF Moore (a) can’t get Greinke signed, and (b) screws up the trade by either (i) not getting a good return, or (ii) waiting so long on Greinke to make a decision that his value is diminished to the point where a good return just can’t be had, THEN the overall handling of the entire Greinke situation will absolutely be an epic fail on Moore’s part.

I just don’t think there will be another move over the next 3-5 years that will mean as much to Moore’s tenure than how he handles Greinke. (Whatever else is said about Baird, how he handled the Beltran situation comprises a HUGE part of HIS legacy.) It’s clear that Zack is (like Beltran was) one of the organization’s top assets, so whatever decision is made or strategy is taken by Moore will be equally amplified.

by Sweep_the_Leg on Nov 26, 2008 12:41 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

I think you're generally right about how Greinke will shape Moore's legacy

Though I will say the Beltran trade is also indicative of a larger issue that took place during the Baird years, which was our gradual trading off of an All-Star caliber outfield (Damon, Dye, Beltran), for which we ended up receiving very little in return, especially the first two trades.

by DarthYoshi on Nov 26, 2008 12:53 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

And that was the problem...

“gradual trading off” of key assets. Once it has become pretty well established (or preferably that the front office has determined on its own) that you have a top, young talent (such as Soria), then as a small-market team, you need to make a decision: Immediately start trying to extend him, and if that doesn’t look like it will happen and/or you see a peak coming in his value, then move him. You can’t simply hang on to a guy like Beltran, Dye, etc. and hope that he’ll change his mind and sign. Or that somehow ownership will completely loosen the purse strings (once EVERYONE, including the player, realizes what his probable market value will be as he enters FA). Baird either didn’t make that decision soon enough, was not “allowed” to by ownership, or did make the decision to deal the player and either waited too long or made bad-to-terrible trades (waited too long on Beltran, Perez for Dye, Berroa for Damon, etc.).

I think Moore will have enough money available from ownership to extend Greinke (as [probably] opposed to Baird’s situation). So the issue becomes, when and how do you make the determination that you’ve offered all you can (within reason and ownership constraints), and therefore when do you start seriously shopping the player? I think that, generally, it is the sooner the better in the Greinke situation. Of course, that depends on a number of factors: Is his value at its peak right now? Or does he come out and have an incredible first half of 2009 that only increases it? What contending teams will likely be looking for quality starting pitching at the 2009 deadline? What if Zack comes out of the gate in 2009 and pitches terribly?

Analyzing all that and making a judgment is what being a GM is all about. And Moore’s ultimate strategy and determination(s) will go a very long way toward what we all think about his performance in 2012.

by Sweep_the_Leg on Nov 26, 2008 1:12 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Nice post

Let’s go by tRA based stuff from stat corner. tRA (a kind park- and league- adjusted FIP) is based on runs allowed rather than earned runs, so the rate stats are a higher. All for 2008

Greinke:

tRA: 3.74
tRA* (regressed to ’true talent): 4.06
Pitching Runs above average (pRAA): 26.1
Pitching runs above replacement ((pRAR for starters = praa *1.28)): 33.4

Hamels:

tRA: 3.63
tRA* 4.10
pRAA 28.2
pRAR 36.1

Peavey

tRA 4.02
tRA* 4.26
pRAA 13.8
pRAR 17.7

Greinke’s a stud. He deserves better than Kazmir money. I hope something like that is offered and taken.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by devil_fingers on Nov 25, 2008 3:48 PM EST   0 recs

While I'd rather have Peavy thanks to his good three-year trend,

tRa here illustrates pretty clearly that Zack Greinke and Cole Hamels were damn close in value last season.

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Nov 26, 2008 4:10 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

They may have missed the boat

I was advocating for locking him up after the 2007 season.

Alas, I am not the GM.

Mr Glass, this is a pro sports team, not a retail store - run it like one!

by loyal2sdad on Nov 25, 2008 5:47 PM EST   0 recs

...yet

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by devil_fingers on Nov 25, 2008 6:23 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

can i be the scouting director?

Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.

by doublestix on Nov 25, 2008 8:05 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

who was the guy who talked about "pro scouting?"

wasn’t that south florida boy?

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by devil_fingers on Nov 26, 2008 1:43 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

We will be contending most likely next year

Why trade him??? He’s got TWO YEARS LEFT. If the Royals intend to pay him what other teams are offering he most likely won’t leave.

He’s been so much as a Royal…all his friends are Royals. He just wants what he worst so hard for : 13 – 15 million a year!!!

They Royals WILL pay him what he’s worth

by GobbleforCyoung on Nov 25, 2008 7:52 PM EST   0 recs

My opinion

While I think psychological comfort might be an issue, I think Greinke wants the money. I don’t think where he goes (or stays) is about whether the team is winning or not. Sure, all things being equal he’d rather play for a winner. But the money — for him and the vast majority of players — is the key things. In this society, men tend to value themselves based on what they do for a living and how much money they make. When you’re in a profession where your annual salary is published for all the world to see, how much money you make is even more important. He sees how much other pitchers make. He sees the other big contracts. He wants his. He wants to be in the rarefied air of those elite pitchers who make the elite money.

Now, might he be willing to get some guaranteed money now from the Royals including a year or two of fairly market rate free agent years? Possibly. It is not out of the question. But I think the size of contract offer he gets from the Royals is a lot more important than who Moore acquires or how successful the Royals are in 2009 and/or 2010.

(posted from my parents’ home in Derby, KS – I feel much better blogging from my parents’ house. That’s how blogging is supposed to be done)

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Nov 26, 2008 10:48 AM EST   0 recs

I should have been

I think I’ll take their desktop computer down there. Hope they don’t mind.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Nov 26, 2008 10:57 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

and if you somehow managed to form a band down there

…that sang about your low credit score, that’d be pretty sweet.

by DarthYoshi on Nov 26, 2008 11:42 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

Don't forget...

to pop “The Karate Kid” in the DVD player down there when the band isn’t practicing.

And one of the band’s first orders of business is to work on a cover of “You’re the Best.” My mom gets annoyed with how often my band plays it, but we can’t get enough of it.

"History repeats itself
Try and you’ll succeed

Never doubt that you’re the one
And you can have your dreams!

You’re the best!
Around!
Nothing’s gonna ever keep you down!"

by Sweep_the_Leg on Nov 26, 2008 12:46 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Tears of joy, welling up. . .

No one will ever give the Karate Kid enough praise.

by BrRoyal on Nov 26, 2008 10:42 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

NYRoyal,

did I mention I have this great idea for a song?

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Nov 30, 2008 11:39 AM EST to parent up   0 recs

wow

Derby… is that what that Cheeseburger song was about?

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by devil_fingers on Nov 26, 2008 7:29 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

Would everyone want a longterm contract based on the '09 projections

Marcel/James Projections

both have him declining is pretty much every stat not huge dropoffs but considering I think most in here expect another step forward would you do the longterm deal?

It takes 46 muscles to frown but only 4 to flip 'em the bird.

by kcscoliny on Nov 26, 2008 1:43 PM EST   0 recs

The projections

true… but those projections are based on the last three years, one of which he spent almost completely in double (Marcels doesn’t use any data other than the last three years), and last year, most of which he spent in the bullpen.

Now, within limits, I think that’s what computerized projections should do (especially Marcel, since it is intended to be "dumb"). They can’t go through and make “exceptions” for each player. It’s better to not adjust at all than too much… That doesn’t mean we through the projections out, but this is where scouting/individual evaluation comes in. PECOTA probably would be more helpful here, perhaps ZiPS, too.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by devil_fingers on Nov 26, 2008 7:32 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

This should aid the analysis.

Here are four trades to look at:
(1) I’ll start with what I think is the least relevant analogy. Johan Santana, 1 year away from free agency to the Twins for a bundle of solid players. I think it’s least relevant because Johan Santana was, pretty much hands down, the best pitcher in baseball when he was traded. I have a lot of love for Greinke, a lot of love. But Greinke would have to rise to the Santana level over the next year, and while he’s got the chance, I’m not putting him on that pedestal just yet.
Here are the players the Twins got:
Carlos Gomez, Deolis Guerra, Kevin Mulvey, Phillip Humber. I think Mulvey, Guerra, and Humber are all upper-middle class pitching prospects, and Gomez, of course, has quite the high ceiling.
(2) The Sabathia trade might be closer to what we could expect for Greinke if we waited until his free agent year. Here’s what the Indians got:
Matt Laporta, Robert Bryson, Taylor Greene, Zack Jackson.
Laporta has a ton of upside, he was rated the #23 overall prospect by BA at the time of the trade. Think Billy Butler with a tad more defense. I understand that Bryson and Greene are B-level pitching prospects with good upside, and Jackson is a throw in. So one very good player and two decent players. Makes me think waiting one more year might not be so bad. Of course, Greinke would have to equal not only Sabathia’s pitching numbers, but also his house-hold-name prestige. Rember, Sabathia is one of the youngest pitchers to win 100 games.
(3) The following two trades are a good indicator of what we could expect if we were to trade him right now (or before the deadline this year):
The first is Erik Bedard to the Mariners for:
Adam Jones, George Sherrill, Tony Butler, Chris Tillman, and Kam Mikolio.
Adam Jones is an even better return than Matt Laporta. The Mariners must have been out of their minds to make this deal, but that’s my opinion. The guy plays a good center field, hit 25 homers and had a .968 OPS his last AAA season. How many CF prospects do that? Then you have Sherrill, who had an outstanding season. He’s a prototypical closer. Tillman was Seattle’s #3 prospect (for the sake of argument, let’s say he’s Danny Duffy), Butler was their #12 prospect, and God only knows who Kam Mickolio is. So that’s a stud CF, a major league closer, a Danny Duffy, a Chris Nicoll, and an experiment. I will take that return faster than Greinke can say "show me the money."
(4) Dan Haren to Arizona for:
Brett Anderson, Dana Eveland, Greg Smith, Chris Carter, Aaron Cunningham, Carlos Gonzalez.
Greg Smith and Carlos Gonzalez became two-thirds of Matt Holliday-for-one-year (kind of a puzzling trade if you ask me). But, forgetting that, Gonzo is probably better than Carlos Gomez, and Greg Smith has good upside. Then you have Chris Carter who is mashing his way through the low minors Mike Moustakas-style. We all know Dana Eveland pretty well, a solid MLB-ready #3 starter. Brett Anderson is intriguing, and Aaron Cunningham is a good fourth outfielder (probably Mark Teahen-level player).
While I like the Orioles’ take better, I think blurring your eyes between the Haren and Bedard trades gives you an idea of what we get for Greinke before next year’s deadline. Add to this soup the fact that the Cubs are now in talks with the Padres for Peavy, and the players that were mentioned this morning included Josh Vitters, Sean Marshall, and about five others.
Sooo…. Once again, how much is a season of Greinke worth? Some of my colleagues—avid, informed baseball fans—believe Greinke’s value will increase significantly with even just another half-season. But beyond July ’09, Orioles-type offers may not be on the table.

I'm about to change my username to DannyDuffyfan

by jackie ballgame on Nov 26, 2008 2:05 PM EST   0 recs

I worry about how much Greinke's value will drop next offseason when he has only one more year of team control

That’s why I think that if he is to be traded, this is the time to trade him.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Nov 26, 2008 6:16 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

How about a trade-deadline comparison... since it appears that Greinke will be retained until, at least, July...
Mark Teixeira and Roy Mahay
 - for -
Jarrod Saltalamacchia, Elvis Andrus, Matt Harrison, Neftali Feliz and Beau Jones

Using Baseball America’s 2007 Top 100 Prospect Rankings as the measuring stick, the Rangers got back two prospects that ranked in the 30 – 60 range (Saltalamacchia, Andrus), one prospect in the 90 range (Harrison), a very young, unranked prospect prospect with huge upside (Feliz), and a throw-in.

Those rankings updated:

Saltalamacchia – not ranked, has yet to make an impact, still very young, has a lot of upside
Andrus - will rank in the 25 – 40 range on this year’s Top 100, still very-very young, bat is getting better, defense is awesome
Harrison – not ranked, played half-a-season in the bigs, impressive at times, not so impressive at others, now projects as a No. 4 or No. 5 starter.
Feliz - will rank in the Top 10 of this year’s Top 100 list, off-speed pitches need development, but, very young for his level, projects as a No. 1 or closer
Jones – … a throw in.

Greinke and Teixeira are comparable… with their service time and their demand at the deadline. You can make the case that Greinke would be more valuable, age regarding…

So, supposing, Teixeira’s was responsible for 75% of that deal… I would think Greinke’s return would be comparable to the first four players that came back from Atlanta – Saltalamacchia, Andrus, Harrison and Feliz.

For Greinke, I think a realistic return would be one can’t-miss Top 20 prospect, and two 30-60s… anything else won’t have as much upside.

meet me at the mawwl... it's goin dowwn...

by oc on Dec 6, 2008 7:48 PM EST to parent up   0 recs

$

What if Greinke really is what he says he is? A person who is already sufficiently wealthy by his own standards, and doesn’t really give a crap about money. Zack’s a very good pitcher but there are alot of unknowns and adverse possibilities involved with him. He is one player; who could become 3 or 4 difference makers, like any pitcher he could become injured at anytime, he might become unmotivated, etc. I admire the man for being different, it is refreshing, but again it provides a level of uncertainty about performance. Trade him now, whether he’ll sign long term or not, just don’t miss on who you get in return.

by Scutch on Nov 27, 2008 12:01 AM EST   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Vina_small
"Who Said It?" Quotation Challenge Answerzzzz
Bbtf_logo_small
ZiPS Projections for Gordon, Teahen
Profile_pic_update_small
OT - Favorite gameday recipes
Vina_small
2008 KC Royals "Who Said It?" Quotation Challenge
Royalsretro_small
The 100 Greatest Royals of All-Time - #37 Bo Jackson

Recent FanPosts

N30314657_30826435_5022_small
Team Local Number 54 (all-grit team)
31049_small
Is Dayton Moore determined to make our middle infield worse?
Royalsreview_small
Bowl Pick 'em Contest Update
Small
Christmas gifts II
Butler_small
Royal Scouting School with Joe Hamrahi of Baseball Digest Daily
Steve_balboni_pose_small
Moore Has to Win Now, and He Knows It
Royalsretro_small
Your Hall of Fame Ballot
Kansascity_small
I Pick Apart Trey Hillman's Proposed 2009 Lineup
_41153080_gallerysanta_small
OT: What did you get for Christmas?

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Site Meter