Rany likes that the Royals offered arbitration to Grudz
He thinks that Moore and Grudz have a gentleman's agreement that Grudz won't accept arbitration, so he can look for work elsewhere. But Rany thinks this is a good mini-gamble, regardless for some pretty compelling financial reasons involving the value of a supplementary round draft pick and the value of an old second baseman.
Given all that we know about the numbers and what Grudz has said about his likelihood of accepting arbitration, Rany concludes that, "This is a low-risk, high-reward move."
about 1 month ago
NYRoyal
42 comments
0 recs |
Read Related
Comments
As do I
As do I
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Dec 3, 2008 9:21 AM EST 0 recs
Makes me sort of surprised that the Yankees
Threw away all those draft picks by not offering any arbitration when they had had seven players that were type A or B.
Go Royals!
by BabyBlues on Dec 3, 2008 9:40 AM EST 0 recs
They were in higher risk situations
Abreu and Pettitte were going to make in excess of $15M in arbitration.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Dec 3, 2008 10:06 AM EST
up
0 recs
True, but...
they were type A’s or worth about 8 million in the draft vs the 1/6 of the salary you spend on the arbitration, or aotu 2 and a half million, which nets you 5 and a half million to the good apiece.
Go Royals!
by BabyBlues on
Dec 3, 2008 10:10 AM EST
up
0 recs
So they just threw away
JoGui’s salary for nothing, and that is just for two of the seven.
Go Royals!
by BabyBlues on
Dec 3, 2008 10:11 AM EST
up
0 recs
I'd take Pettitte on a 1 year $15 million deal
And Abreu on such a deal wouldn’t be the worst thing in the world.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on
Dec 3, 2008 10:31 AM EST
up
0 recs
I would think the same thing about Abreu
but there are rumblings he won’t see much in FA. His defense is dreadful, but even so, he’s still a good hitter, and if $8M/yr is his number, the Royals should try to get in for 2, assuming they can dump Guillen.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on
Dec 3, 2008 10:37 AM EST
up
0 recs
I'd rather have more money to spend on signing CC or Teixeira
…which is what they have their sights set on. Even the Yankees have a budget, and I don’t think it includes Pettitte and Abreu at $15M+ as well as a huge FA like CC or Tex. They want one of those FA’s, and not the rapidly aging Pettite or Abreu. I think they chose wisely.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Dec 3, 2008 10:52 AM EST
up
0 recs
Can't they just print money?
I thought part of the new Yankee Stadium was an elaborate new printing press.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on
Dec 3, 2008 10:56 AM EST
up
0 recs
They could
But apparently they don’t want to. Unless they are lying (which is possible), they are saying that they actually have a budget. And they are acting like they have one too.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Dec 3, 2008 11:08 AM EST
up
0 recs
Budget?
After all the money you and other NY taxpayers handed them? For shame! Hank is disgracing his father’s legacy.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on
Dec 3, 2008 11:27 AM EST
up
0 recs
Hank wants to be a judicious spender of the taxpayers' money
It’s only fair.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Dec 3, 2008 12:37 PM EST
up
0 recs
"you can’t be a utility player if you can’t play shortstop."
Unless your name is Tony Graffanino
by Top Ramen on Dec 3, 2008 9:46 AM EST 0 recs
Or Esteban German
I mean, he can stand between 2B and 3B, but so can I.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on
Dec 3, 2008 10:02 AM EST
up
0 recs
Excellent gamble by Moore.
Also, Grudz re-enforcing why I’ve liked him so much by being a stand-up guy and actually caring about winning more than getting every last nickel.
by djk royal on Dec 3, 2008 10:27 AM EST 0 recs
Yeah, but let's see he he actually turns it down first
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on
Dec 3, 2008 10:38 AM EST
up
0 recs
Mark Probably Can
Afford to take a pay cut to be on a winner.
Salaries Leaders
1995 Montreal Expos $109,000
1996 Montreal Expos $135,000
1997 Montreal Expos $220,000
1998 Montreal Expos $350,000
1999 Los Angeles Dodgers $1,900,000
2000 Los Angeles Dodgers $3,000,000
2001 Los Angeles Dodgers $4,000,000
2002 Los Angeles Dodgers $5,000,000
2003 Chicago Cubs $5,500,000
2004 Chicago Cubs $2,500,000
2005 St. Louis Cardinals $1,000,000
2006 Kansas City Royals $4,000,000
2007 Kansas City Royals $4,000,000
2008 Kansas City Royals $4,500,000
Career (may be incomplete) $36,214,000
I’m surprised he never made more than $5M a year.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on
Dec 3, 2008 10:48 AM EST
up
0 recs
the Royals got great value out of him, even with all the injures
nice signing by Baird, actually
2006: 2.2 WAR
2007: 2.5 WAR ($10M value)
2008: 1.3 WAR (5.2M value)
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on
Dec 3, 2008 11:07 AM EST
up
0 recs
The signing of Grudz has worked out so well...
that I usually forget that he was a Baird acquisition.
by DarthYoshi on
Dec 3, 2008 11:09 AM EST
up
0 recs
But Moore should have traded him for a good prospect
I’m sure he was offered many different good prospects for Grudz!!!!!!!111
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Dec 3, 2008 12:38 PM EST
up
0 recs
But were those good prospects from the Braves?
If they weren’t, then Moore was totally justified in keeping Grudz.
by DarthYoshi on
Dec 3, 2008 12:56 PM EST
up
0 recs
I don't think they were Chrisitian enough
Moore does not acquire atheists, agnostics, Muslims, Jews or any other heathens.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Dec 3, 2008 12:58 PM EST
up
0 recs
But I heard that Mike Jacobs is facebook friends with Christopher Hitchens
by DarthYoshi on
Dec 3, 2008 1:04 PM EST
up
0 recs
That is a LIE!!!!!!!111
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Dec 3, 2008 1:35 PM EST
up
0 recs
2003--he made $5.5M
If there is, as Rany speculates, a gentleman’s agreement between Moore and Grudz, then thank you very much for the draft pick, Grudz. You were always a stand-up guy when you played for us, and the way you are likely leaving confirms that as well.
by DarthYoshi on
Dec 3, 2008 11:08 AM EST
up
0 recs
I've never understood
Why it is so much more admirable to go play for a contender than to take the most money. Why does winning matter when you are mostly going along for the ride while other guys do all the winning for you? If he would rather take a pay cut to watch a winning team play that’s fine, but it doesn’t make him any more of a stand-up guy that the one who takes more money to play for a bad team. Both are selfish decisions, and both are totally valid, but I don’t think you can make any judgements based on it.
by PopeSoria on
Dec 3, 2008 12:15 PM EST
up
0 recs
It has to do with the purity of the game
Not that I’m naive enough to think that baseball is pure, but to play for the joy of winning gives the impression of someone who is thankful for the gift he has and wants to use it in the naturally proper way. Going for the most money is not a bad thing in and of itself, but it is unnatural to a game/sport and, therefore, connotes that such a person is not concerned about the game itself. That’s why people have issues with A-Rod.
by BrRoyal on
Dec 3, 2008 1:27 PM EST
up
0 recs
I just don’t see a difference between opting for the most money or the championship that you do very little to earn. Like I said, I think both are reasonable choices, but I don’t see any reason to respect someone who makes one choice over the other.
by PopeSoria on
Dec 3, 2008 1:50 PM EST
up
0 recs
Well, I it's certainly not a requirement
Look how it backfired with the Sweeney extension. He was both loved and hated.
by BrRoyal on
Dec 4, 2008 11:25 AM EST
up
0 recs
2006 should be about $7.5M value or so
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Dec 3, 2008 11:08 AM EST 0 recs
Question not worth its own fanshot
All Baseball Prospectus readers out there: is the BP version of Speed Score available somewhere on the free side of their site? I was happy to find the baserunning stuff (although Teahen had a bad year even on that)… but I can’t find the Speed Score (SPD) stuff
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Dec 3, 2008 11:54 AM EST 0 recs
Answer
I can’t even find Speed Score on the pay side of BP. I found it in the glossary (a very general description saying it is a proprietary metric) but I haven’t found it among the reported stats.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Dec 3, 2008 12:39 PM EST
up
0 recs
EqBRR
They do have this, and its on the free side. Don’t know if its what your looking for though.
Equivalent Base Running Runs. Measures the number of runs contributed by a player’s advancement on the bases, above what would be expected based on the number and quality of the baserunning opportunities with which the player is presented, park-adjusted and based on a multi-year run expectancy table. EqBRR is calculated as the sum of various baserunning components: Equivalent Ground Advancement Runs (EqGAR), Equivalent Stolen Base Runs (EqSBR), Equivalent Air Advancement Runs (EqAAR), Equivalent Hit Advancement Runs (EqHAR) and Equivalent Other Advancement Runs (EqOAR).
by wt on Dec 3, 2008 12:39 PM EST 0 recs
That's a good base running metric
But Speed Score (both Bill James’s original and BP’s newer version) contains more baseball speed elements, and doesn’t isolate the base running skill.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Dec 3, 2008 12:41 PM EST
up
0 recs
thanks, already found it
although their basestealing runs are weird…
as NYRoyal said, I’m looking for the Speed Score
I may start doing my own, anyway… it’s going to be one F-ing complicated SQL, though.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on
Dec 3, 2008 2:13 PM EST
up
0 recs
of course it was a good idea
more draft picks = good.
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
by doublestix on Dec 3, 2008 2:07 PM EST 0 recs
A lot of teams don't seem to get this
Lots of questionable calls on declining arbitration to certain players.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on
Dec 3, 2008 3:16 PM EST
up
0 recs
paranoia about the economy and ticket sales
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on
Dec 3, 2008 3:27 PM EST
up
0 recs
They should have invested
In Barack Obama commemorative plates like I did. Those things are guaranteed to rise in value.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on
Dec 3, 2008 3:32 PM EST
up
0 recs
it was a good idea as long as he doesn't accept
then it becomes a horrendous idea
This space intentionally left blank.
by marbotty on
Dec 4, 2008 12:26 AM EST
up
0 recs
oh, wait, didn't see this
Teams must pay only one-sixth of a salary if they release a player with 45 or more days remaining before opening day."
"
But would that happen? We didn’t release Gload, like, ever. We didn’t send Pena down until about 3/4ths of the season was over. So, I’m hopeful but skeptical.
This space intentionally left blank.
by marbotty on
Dec 4, 2008 12:30 AM EST
up
0 recs
But would this happen?
We don’t know. No, we didn’t release Gload or send down Pena, but neither of them was making $5M. But we do know that this team has a limited payroll budget and Moore has already added about $8M net in salary. So I think if Grudz accepts there’s a good chance that Moore lets him go. But I don’t think he’ll accept.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Dec 4, 2008 12:26 PM EST
up
0 recs













