Meaningless stats yield positive trend
What I am about to say here is not worthy of a diary, but it's interesting to me so I'll post it anyway:
The Royals pitchers' K/BB ratio in 2006 was 1.42, last in the majors. Last year it was 1.91, good for 20th in the majors. This spring, the Royals K/BB ratio has been 2.13, which would put them around 10th.
Spring training caveats apply, of course, as do sample size caveats, but the trend is encouraging. And in this case, the stats match my observations that the Royals pitching staff is much better at both striking guys out and preventing free bases.
The emergence of high K/BB guys like Greinke, Bale, Hochevar and Soria portends very good things for the Rs. Does McClure get most of the credit for this improvement or is it simply a matter of good pitchers maturing? Probably some combination, but it sure is encouraging.
Right now I take the Royals rotation over any AL Central team not in Cleveland. Am I crazy? FYI, I'm a believer in Bale (as a potential league average innings muncher) and think that Tomko is a very servicable fifth starter. If the Royals are on the fringes of contention in July/August, the headlines will be about Royals pitching. That's my prediction...
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Strikeout leader for the spring...
yeah...
by Billex Gordler on Mar 27, 2008 11:31 PM EDT reply actions
In other pitching news....
I believe he'll be going on the DL
by Scott McKinney on Mar 27, 2008 11:41 PM EDT up reply actions
The nice thing about ...
I suppose, however, that one could reverse this on me and say ALL teams throw more strikes via fastballs in ST, hence every team probably has a higher K/BB ratio.
So, again, perhaps AZ stats on K/BB are nothing to get excited about. - TL

by 













