Jon Lester No-Hits the Royals at Fenway
Well thank goodness the long-suffering fans of Boston have something to cheer about now.
Contrary to what might be expected, sometimes I miss a game. Not that I usually have much going on -- baseball games are usually very convenient in that respect -- but there are 162 games after all, and even a hermit might be unavailable from time to time.
Tonight was one of those games. I was following until sometime in the second inning and then I checked out. I'd been grading for about five straight hours, and it looked absolutely gorgeous outside, with the fading sunlight set against a darkening sky (it's pouring now). About an hour later, enjoying a quiet library, I checked the score, and went on reading. The conclusion to this incredibly boring story is that the next I heard of the game was an update given while I was listening to Cubs-Astros, waiting in line at Taco Bell.
This actually almost happened last season, when the Royals were nearly no-hit by Scott Baker, although that time I had an excuse, as I had spent the day traveling across the country. I caught that game in the 8th, but had no such luck this time.
So that's baseball, which anyone obsessed enough to be on this site already knows. Game to game, anything can happen, and sometimes that anything is extraordinary. Tonight? I was roaming around a deserted Iowa City and reading I Want it Now by Kingsley Amis in the library.
As for the game, the Royals went into the contest hitting .264, which is actually the fifth best batting average in the American League. Looking at the lineup, Lester was essentially given two free innings of no-hit ball, thanks to the presence of Tony Pena Jr and Esteban German. So congrats on tossing a no-hitter through seven.
Alright, I'm kidding.
A little bit.
We can add that the only guy the Royals really have, beyond single-rific Grudz, is Jose Guillen who has been mashing for the last two weeks. That's it. No one else is doing a damn thing. Getting Grudz to go 0-3 was half the battle.
There really is nothing to say, other than cool, whatever, that kinda sucked, so yea... A few years ago it would have really upset me, but I'm only a few more ticks upset than I would be had the Royals simply been shutout again.
0 recs |
45
comments
Read Related
Comments
Well, that sucked
It’s embarrassing. But, a good pitcher had a great day. Let’s put it behind us and get ‘em tomorrow.
I probably disagree with you.
by NYRoyal on May 19, 2008 10:10 PM EDT 0 recs
+100
I was about to post (right after I went with a big ol’ “first!” that this place hardly needs a thread that will inevitably be completely (rather than just partially) dedicated to bitter fulmination, irrational calls for people to be shipped out/in, firings, and, of course, some enjoyable infighting and accustions of ship-jumping, bandwagonism, immaturaity, and everything else.
Not that I’m saying people can’t do what they want, but I need a little light with the shade.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on
May 19, 2008 10:12 PM EDT
up
0 recs
+100
I hope there is no overreaction over one game. Yes we have a lousy offense, but Lester was pretty awesome tonight.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on
May 19, 2008 10:31 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Still like our chances for a splitt..
Meche vs Masterson.. i think we can pull it off and Tomko vs Colon.. Colon has nothing left i think we will kill him.. of course we all thought the same thing about Sidney F’n Ponson too.. and Greinke vs Dice-K will be fun.. even that game is possible
Yasuhiko Yabuta is to Major League Baseball as Drew Carey is to The Price is Right
by focs on
May 19, 2008 10:12 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Heck
even Bannister might be due—seems like he’s on an “every other game” schedule at this point.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on
May 19, 2008 10:13 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Woops i did say Greinke vs Dice-K
I meant Banny vs Dice
Yasuhiko Yabuta is to Major League Baseball as Drew Carey is to The Price is Right
by focs on
May 19, 2008 10:27 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I like the matchups
Although we tend to do poorly against overweight washed up pitchers (see Ponson, Sidney; Hernandez, Livan)
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on
May 19, 2008 10:31 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I got nothing to say...
atleast we cant say we didnt see it coming.. as someone noted its just a miracle how it didnt happen in the last 4 years especially
Yasuhiko Yabuta is to Major League Baseball as Drew Carey is to The Price is Right
by focs on May 19, 2008 10:10 PM EDT 0 recs
If you had to pick a team...
If Vegas laid odds on teams most likely to get no-hit at some point in the 2008 season, let’s face it, it would have been San Francisco as the top choice, but Kansas City right up there as well. I can’t say I’m shocked that this happened and in fact I wouldn’t have been surprised if it had happened anytime over the last several years.
The Royals are, as presently constituted, a mediocre to poor offensive team. Not historically bad, but still, pretty bad, with lots of free swingers and poor on-base guys (perfect for a night like tonight and a pitcher like Lester).
Fortunately KC’s pitching is good and this season should still be fun. But tonight really sucked.
by cookierojas73 on May 19, 2008 10:29 PM EDT 0 recs
I would Say San Diego
would have the biggest odds. If it wasn’t for the amazing Justin Huber
sign Greinke a Evan Longoria type deal now.
by kcscoliny on
May 19, 2008 11:16 PM EDT
up
0 recs
its all about BA
that Yanks team that got no-hit actually had a low team BA (but high OBP and SLG of course)
the nats, padres and indians are all hitting in the .230s as a team, which is fairly remarkable
by royalsreview on
May 19, 2008 11:44 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Right
And this actually shows why the “no-hitter” is a red herring. Rob Neyer, a Royals fan, wrote right after than Yankees game that one couldn’t take too much from it. Not only were the Astros picthers (a pretty decent bunch of relievers at the time) on fire, but the Yankees lineup was a powerful one that was also a high strikeout lineup to begin with. So a no-hitter isn’t that much less likely for them. In ways, it’s more likely.
I would hope. at this stage, and particularly on this board, where people seem generally well-informed (avert your eyes from those posts where people think that closers are worth more than starters [winky face]), that no one needs to be told that batting average has very little significance for a teams offensive prowess, particuarly in comparison to OBP, SLG, OPS, and more precise measures. Take the 2003 Yankees, for example.
This no hitter is a red herring in that it should be not more disturbing, and, I might even argue, that it is less a sign of the current problems with the Royals offense than those games where the Royals got numerous singles but only ended up with 1 or 2 runs.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on
May 19, 2008 11:51 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I turned it off in the 6th
It was 5-0, and I had no idea the Royals had yet to get a hit, and my son was crying.
Can’t say I’m that surprised. Its still pretty cool. If you’re going to have a lousy offense, you may as well make history.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on May 19, 2008 10:30 PM EDT 0 recs
only thing I have to say is...
that TPJ and German should never be hitting in the ninth…I think Hillman has done one hell of a job managing the team…but he isn’t perfect, especially when taking out Tomko after he just struck out two on 6 pitches (which worked because bullpen), then leaving Bannister in after he walked a guy trying to sac bunt of four pitches (next dude HRed), and then leaving TPJ in to bat in the ninth…I understand Grudz was already used incase we tied or led and we didn’t have any MI left, but that wasn’t going to happen…show some fight…lay down a bunt!
Don't be lonesome for your heroes. Be your own hero.
by PhattStairs on May 19, 2008 10:44 PM EDT 0 recs
I get what you are saying
But German did draw a walk in the ninth. So you really can’t get too upset about that. TPJ hitting there was unblievable to me, though. Who was on the bench? Is Buck back with the team? I haven’t been paying attention. Oh well, shit happens. It’s one loss in the standings and I hope we can get them the next two.
by I need more Esteban on
May 20, 2008 12:57 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Not that it helps much
I posted this on the game thread, but since this superseded it, I thought I’d add it here: the 2003 Yankees were no-hit in a much more humiliating fashion. Facing the Astros in interleague play, Roy Oswalt left the game early because of an injury, having given up no hits. The Astros used 5 other relievers, for a total of 6 pitchers, to no-hit the Yanks. The Yankees ended the regular season with the 3rd most runs in the AL, and the 2nd highest OPS. They ended up in the World Series (this was the “Aaron Boone” team).
So the Royals are going to end up in the Series, right? Um, no. I’m just saying that teams get no-hit sometimes—even those with good offenses. And although there wouldn’t be as much public talk about it (given that it’s Lester, and its Boston…), would it mean the Royals had a better offense if TPJ had eked out a bunt single at some point?
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on May 19, 2008 11:00 PM EDT 0 recs
What's really amazing
Is that the Royals hadn’t ever been no-hit this decade. I figured it was inevitable the last few years, especially with us facing Santana so many times.
by raefzilla on May 19, 2008 11:14 PM EDT 0 recs
You know
the way German is hitting (kinda surprising) they might wanna give Aviles a shot. Maybe send down Yabuta. Or pull up Costa so they have another right handed batter in the outfield. DeJesus (although he has hit lefties well this year so far), Teahan (.220 clip with 18k’s in 50 Ab’s) and Gathright (.212 in 33 Ab’s) against the last couple lefties have not looked good. Be a nice option for Hillman to have and with the way Peralta has looked the last couple outings. The team might be able to get away with it for a bit.
sign Greinke a Evan Longoria type deal now.
by kcscoliny on May 19, 2008 11:23 PM EDT 0 recs
Didn't follow the game tonight but it's only one game
Sounds like Lester was dominant, got a lead early – 6 walks by the rookie Hochevar- nerves from Fenway? , and had good defense in the field. Yeah, too bad it had to be against the Red Sox – never hear the end of it.
Bottom line – KC lost, Meche is up tomorrow. I am personally more upset with losing to guys like Ponson than Lester. Silver Lining – if it causes Hillman and the Brass to rethink a few lineup changes (i.e. TPJ) than it may be a long term victory. Don’t think it will happen but we can hope.
When is the game tomorrow?
by daveyork on May 19, 2008 11:55 PM EDT 0 recs
espn
now espn will show Royals highlights
My wife is in love with Billy Butler!
by no games on tv in kirksville missouri on May 20, 2008 12:50 AM EDT 0 recs
ESPN
they’ll talk about this game for 30 minutes and analyze every pitch and degrade, chew up, and spit out this lineup. Can you imagine todays media reaction to a Royals World Series win?
Make powder blue the road uniforms!
by no games on tv in kirksville missouri on May 20, 2008 12:58 AM EDT 0 recs
nah thats a bit of an overreaction
I just fear some of the progress we’ve made in getting some recognition will at least be temporarily suspended as we again hear references to “the lowly royals” or the “perennial bottom feeders”. It isnt as if this recognition makes us better as a team than before today, its just kinda boring to hear over and over again.
Accidentally not thedude925 anymore. I do hate this new name.
by wildthang on
May 20, 2008 1:11 AM EDT
up
0 recs
and Todd Wellemeyer has a 3.25 ERA
I wanna know what love is, I want you to show me
by LeoBloom on May 20, 2008 1:10 AM EDT 0 recs
shut up.
i’m still eating that one from my stl people. sigh
The first thing I know about someone in a KC hat is that they're loyal.
by grantfunk on
May 20, 2008 9:10 AM EDT
up
0 recs
if that didn't sound
like a friendly, joking shut up, please know i meant it that way. stupid keyboard.
The first thing I know about someone in a KC hat is that they're loyal.
by grantfunk on
May 20, 2008 9:11 AM EDT
up
0 recs
I do remember saying that I thought wellemeyer...
was pretty decent on here…he looked like the best reliever ever one day and the worst the next…it doesn’t surprise me that he’s doing well in the NL
Don't be lonesome for your heroes. Be your own hero.
by PhattStairs on
May 20, 2008 2:28 PM EDT
up
0 recs
This is only the 2nd time KC has been victims of a no-hitter.
On April 26,1973,a California Angels righthander would pitch the 1st no-hitter against the Boys in Blue. In fact,it was at Royals/Kauffman Stadium,and this pitcher no-hit Kansas City for the 1st of his MLB record 7 career no-hitters. And by the way,he has also struck out 5,714 batters as well,another unbreakable record. That man’s name was Lynn Nolan Ryan,the greatest pitcher of all time,who was inducted into the Hall of Fame in 1999 along with the Royals’ very own GEORGE HOWARD BRETT. Just a little information on the other time the Royals were no-hit…
And by the way,as all of us in Royals Nation know,Kansas City still has a winning record in games involving no-hitters. Royals 4 wins (Steve Busby,1973 and ‘74;Jim Colborn,1977 and Bret Saberhagen,1991) Opponents 2 wins (Nolan Ryan,Angels,4/26/73 and Jon Lester,Red Sox,last night). Keep your chins up,Royals Nation-this is only the 2nd time Kansas City has been victims of a no-hitter! So let not your hearts be troubled…and I predict that Kansas City will win 8 of 9 from the (currently) last-place Yankees this season!
Philip Fitzsimmons says Padres rule,Dodgers suck!
by Philip Fitzsimmons on May 20, 2008 9:51 AM EDT 0 recs
On BBTN
they were actually trying to paint the Royals as a formidable young lineup. “Mark Grudzielanek, he’s leading the league in hitting!” “Jose Guillen, he’s been ON FIRE recently!” “Just look at Butler and Gordon, no way the Royals are gonna get no-hit in a few years!”
On the other side of the spectrum, Charles Barkley on the NBA halftime show said it should count as half a no-hitter because it came against the Royals.
by raefzilla on May 20, 2008 10:26 AM EDT 0 recs
barkley's just mad because he didn't put money on the game
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on
May 20, 2008 11:10 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Charles said it best here
http://youtube.com/watch?v=1exiioKfT78
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on
May 20, 2008 11:17 AM EDT
up
0 recs
SC said
“Royals won 6 of their last 7 so they’re a formidable hitting club” as if it were their hitting that carried them through our last few games.
by mazoboom on
May 20, 2008 11:30 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Miserable, but...
Remember, we are only 2 games under .500. This team is outperforming expectations to this point so we have to stay positive.
The miserable part is that it was against the Red Sox. If we had been no hit against the Marlins, it would have been front page news for 12 hours. Because it was the friggin’ Red Sox I will have to avoid all media for 7 days to avoid hearing about how great they are and how bad we are.
I hate teams from the Northeast.
Dubya
by Dubya on May 20, 2008 10:45 AM EDT 0 recs
If only Sweeney were still around
Just to break up the no-hitter in the 9th, like he did against the Twins’ Baker (while pinch-hitting for TPJ, of course.)
I would’ve loved to see Gathright bunt to break it up, Unwritten Rules be damned!
by andrewmiller on May 20, 2008 11:05 AM EDT 0 recs
Pinch-hitting for TPJ
what a novel idea!
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on
May 20, 2008 11:07 AM EDT
up
0 recs
I'm still stunned
I still can’t get over the fact that Pena batted in the 9th. At least make Lester work for it! Pinch hit Greinke!
by cookierojas73 on
May 20, 2008 1:19 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I'm just happy in wasn't a perfect game
With this team it was more than a better chance. You mean we got TWO walks?
I hate to say I called it since it’s such an easy call: http://www.royalsreview.com/2008/5/6/481605/game-32-open-thread-angels#5725846
Did anyone watch SC last night? I think that’s the most I’ve heard ESPN say so many Royals players’ names!
by mazoboom on May 20, 2008 11:16 AM EDT 0 recs
It's hard to go hitless, but the Royals found a way:
It’s a shame that the awesome heart and the gritty get-down-and-dirty attitude required to go hitless is being completely ignored by the mainstream media.
We’ve got it covered:
http://grittyandclutch.blogspot.com/2008/05/royals-show-solidarity-for-struggling.html
by Gritty&Clutch on May 20, 2008 1:12 PM EDT 0 recs
Nice
Glad to see the Royals perspective is being represented
by raefzilla on
May 20, 2008 1:51 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Nice...
Maybe the Royals should change their name to “The Rodney Dangerfields”???
by Grain of Salt on
May 20, 2008 5:28 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I might have heard something to that effect.
Sarcasm™. It's the new gravy.
by jonfmorse on
May 20, 2008 1:42 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Lester's been hot recently,
I’m afraid he really couldn’t have asked for a better situation to pull something like that. Let’s see…struggling line-up? Check. At home? Check. Pitcher on a hot streak? Check. Tony Pena Jr. on opposing scorecard? (Sigh) Check.
A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.
by NHZ on May 20, 2008 1:58 PM EDT 0 recs
Credit Royals for No-Hitter...
Shouldn’t the Royals get credit for "swinging" a no-hitter???
Granted, there aren’t any asterisks for a pitcher’s no-hitter – but the Royals didn’t make it very difficult for Lester. Our hitters looked like 5 year-old kids at a piñata party.
"Grudzy" even forgot to take his blindfold off before he took the field.
What’s up with managers shortening players’ last names and adding "-y", anyway? "Banny?," "Gordy?" What the hell do they call Teahen?... "TeaHee" or "Marky?"
Hopefully they won’t draft a guy named "Crapolski," or they’d have to call him "Crappy."
Wait a minute – that’s TPJr’s nickname.
Question to Kauffman Stadium Engineers: "How many HDTVs have you seen that are hung… VERTICALLY??!!!"
Sigh.
by Grain of Salt on May 20, 2008 5:26 PM EDT 0 recs










