Dayton Moore’s handling of Royal top prospects is hurting the organization
The Royals are a small market club living in a large market world (American League). One significant competitive equalizer between large and small market clubs is the ability to cost control talent for six full seasons, or almost 7 if you call a player up for good approximately 3 weeks into the season (i.e. how the Rays handled Evan Longoria). In order to maximize value that top prospects provide to the major league team it is important that players are called up only after having fully developed their skills in the minor leagues. This helps the player be ready to contribute right away when called up instead of having on-the-job training there-by maximizing value. An organization must also be wise & patient enough to factor in the cut-off dates for service time (both for free agency and arbitration eligibility) in determining when a player is ready.
The Royals have failed at this in their handling of top prospects Alex Gordon (24), Billy Butler (22) and Luke Hochevar (24).
Alex Gordon skipped AAA entirely. As a result of foregoing this step in the developmental process he struggled initially as a Royal and thus far has a career line of 254/320/414 after 179 games. The Royals would have been better served allowing him to spend at least half a season in AAA to get used to better off-speed pitching and delay his free agency by a full season.
Billy Butler spent 57 games in AAA last year primarily in left field before switching to 1b one month before being called up. As a result, he was not given a legitimate chance to develop defensively as a first basemen and has been used almost exclusively as a DH for the Royals. If Butler had been given a full season in AAA and perhaps the first three weeks of 2008 to improve his 1b defense, we may have a permanent 1b solution. At worst his arbitration would be delayed for a year (probable super 2 now) and perhaps his impending free agency as well.
Luke Hochevar struggled in 2007 in AA but was promoted to AAA where he made 10 starts with mixed results. Despite his un-even performance he was given a September call-up to the Royals. He started the 2008 season in AAA pitching in 3 games and is now with the Royals (possibly for good). Waiting 3 weeks to call him up would have delayed his free agency a full season.
To summarize, our three young players all had things to learn at the AAA level but were rushed up to the majors. This hurts the club in the short term by having non-ready players contributing . Most importantly though it hurts the club long-term by losing star players a year earlier than necessary.
3 recs |
76
comments
Read Related
Comments
I think Moore is looking at the team he has
and wondering he can’t compete right now
Gordon may have been a mistake, but I think Butler and Hochevar are more debateable
all three are gonna be arb-elgible soon enough anyway, and probably pretty well paid in arb
I wanna know what love is, I want you to show me
by LeoBloom on May 3, 2008 2:40 PM EDT 0 recs
None of them was rushed to the majors
Should they have been left in the minors another month or two so that we get a full 6 years out of them? Probably. But one can make a good argument that when you have top prospects like that, you should move them to the majors when you think it is best for their development, without regard to their service time clock. None were rushed. Their rookie season performance does not support the contention that they were rushed.
I probably disagree with you.
by NYRoyal on May 3, 2008 2:41 PM EDT 0 recs
What about...
Butlers defense? Both of you mentioned you don’t think he was rushed.
by djk royal on
May 3, 2008 2:45 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I think the Royals feel
that it basically is a lost cause
not that they are necessarily correct, but yea
I wanna know what love is, I want you to show me
by LeoBloom on
May 3, 2008 2:52 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Butler's defense
He can learn to play first base as he is now. He’s working out at that position everyday, making more plays on the ball, taking more balls and making more throws than he’d get in any game. In addition, he’s getting some PT at 1B. He can work his way into learning that position in that way. Or, if his skills don’t improve at all, they’ll learn that he simply can’t play a position in the field. In short, bringing him to the majors hasn’t prevented him from becoming an ok defensive 1B eventually.
I probably disagree with you.
by NYRoyal on
May 3, 2008 2:54 PM EDT
up
0 recs
A few points
1) I may be dead wrong on this, but part of the problem is that AAA has become a strange animal these days. I think many teams routinely field better AA teams than they have in AAA, which creates a strange situation. Again, maybe I’m wrong, but as for development, I’m not sure Gordon would have gotten much more instruction at AAA than otherwise.
2) I go back and forth on this topic. The rational side of me completely agrees with you: Butler should be debuting next year, and Gordon in another month.
3) Then again, the current system is shaped like a dumbbell, with top prospects getting huge signing bonuses, then basically no salary, then another RA payday. From a pure rational, business perspective, if you’ve already invested that bonus in Gordon, you probably want to see it effecting the bottom line and the ML product sooner, rather than later.
4) Finally, there may be an obligation, be it moral, professional, whatever, to field the best team possible. Hindsight is 20/20, but after Gordon’s 2006 minor league season, I don’t think much of an argument could be made that he wasn’t ready. (Remember, he’s also a college draftee.) Going by what you are suggesting, having him spend another 1.5 seasons in the minors just seems extreme. I think an extreme gaming of the system like that sends a really bad professional message throughout the entire organization and the industry. Now, Hochevar is another story, I fully agree. I honestly see no point in him being on the team right now.
I believe it was Sheehan at BP who suggest that what is really needed is a restructuring of compensation. The FA protection and salary control that the owners want is what is driving the push for ever higher signing bonuses, which is fucking up the draft and rewarding the big market teams even more…
by royalsreview on May 3, 2008 3:05 PM EDT 0 recs
Just to clarify one thing...
In the post I only intended to suggest that Gordon spend half a season in AAA before being called up (assuming he’s ready) not 1 1/2. Also Butler would be up already as well as I think he should have been called up 3 weeks into this season. Therfore both would be on the team now and hopefully more ready to contribute than they were when they were actually called up and both players would have had their free agency delayed by a year.
As for your point on AAA. I think you have more high ceiling prospects in AA but more marginal major leaguer types in AAA. For working on 1st base defense or learning to hit better off-speed pitches I think it is a relevant step in the developmental process.
by djk royal on
May 3, 2008 3:12 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Totally agree...
about the absurd draft signing bonuses btw.
by djk royal on
May 3, 2008 3:15 PM EDT
up
0 recs
dayton is about as effective as a brett tomko fastball...
by Billybutlerformvp on May 3, 2008 3:45 PM EDT 0 recs
70's, 80's, 90's, and now
You see all sorts of things over time. Once big $$$ FA came along, our GMs have been pretty poor performers. With that perspective, I can’t really agree with you. He has made some good pickups, and a few bad. Overall, this is a very much improved team than the ones of two, three, and four years ago. If he is as effective as Brett Tomko we’ll be on our way to .500 an eighteen game improvement over the last decade’s average win total. That’s about a 24% gain in two years time…..maybe he could manage my portfolio also…...
by kjfinkes on
May 3, 2008 4:13 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Dayton...
overall is very effective. His revamping of our pitching staff has been impressive. I just think his handling of top tier prospects is short sighted and not whats best for the franchise long term.
by djk royal on
May 3, 2008 5:51 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Are you kidding?
You must be, because no serious analysis of the job Dayton Moore has done can lead one to that conclusion? Where do you get stuff like this? Random, baseless player/manager/GM bashing is one of the lowest forms of fan communication. You can do better than that.
I probably disagree with you.
by NYRoyal on
May 3, 2008 5:56 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Aren't Soria, ...
..., Buck, Teahan, Bannister “top prospects,” in some sense of the word? Moore’s been involved in handling them. ...This whole post is “random, baseless player/manager/GM bashing.” Period. – TL
by timlacy on
May 4, 2008 10:47 AM EDT
up
0 recs
No, they're not...
top prospects. Gordon was minor league player of the year. Hochevar the #1 pick just two years ago. Butler was considered a hitting prodigy. All were very highly thought of. Buck and Teahen were here long before DM.
by djk royal on
May 4, 2008 10:56 AM EDT
up
0 recs
you know tomko never even won 15 games in a season right??
by Billybutlerformvp on May 3, 2008 5:30 PM EDT 0 recs
You know that pitcher's Wins is a truly horrible way to evaluate any pitcher right??
I probably disagree with you.
by NYRoyal on
May 3, 2008 5:57 PM EDT
up
0 recs
sounds like the kind of talk that would come
from a pitcher who cant win games.
by Billybutlerformvp on
May 3, 2008 7:14 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Really, you can't be serious here is a quick illustration
Player Date Opp GmReslt, Decision IP H R ER BB SO
Horacio Ramirez 2007-08-09 SEA @BAL W 13-8 W 5 5 7 7 5 4 1
Matt Cain 2007-06-10 SFG OAK L 0-2 L 8 5 1 1 3 8
Now who pitched better?
Proud father of a budding Royals fan.
by Skirra on
May 3, 2008 7:32 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Matt Cain just doesn't know how to win games apparently
I probably disagree with you.
by NYRoyal on
May 3, 2008 7:38 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Good lord. Now we're getting really silly
You’re serious aren’t you? A pitcher’s Wins is about his pitching, the defense behind him, the team’s offense and his bullpen. So, long story short, most of what is involved in a pitcher’s Win has nothing to do with the pitcher’s performance. It is a horrible way to evaluate any pitcher. No serious analyst pays any attention to a pitcher’s record. There’s no reason that anyone should.
I probably disagree with you.
by NYRoyal on
May 3, 2008 7:37 PM EDT
up
0 recs
i wasnt serious if you want concreate
proof wins dont matter look at steve trachsel in 2006. but you have to be kinding yourself if you think the royals have a remotely good starting rotation
by Billybutlerformvp on
May 3, 2008 7:41 PM EDT
up
0 recs
btw i think it is indicitive though that tomko hasnt had
a winning record since 04. when he still had an era in the 4s Pathetic
by Billybutlerformvp on
May 3, 2008 7:44 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Yet another bizarre statement
So, he has an ERA in the 4’s and yet HE is somehow to blame for not having a winning record? Do you think that had anything to do with his run support and his bullpen? Good lord.
I probably disagree with you.
by NYRoyal on
May 3, 2008 7:49 PM EDT
up
0 recs
an era in the 4s in the nl west is not good
by Billybutlerformvp on
May 3, 2008 9:04 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Seen his ERA+?
Do you know what a 95 ERA+ means? If you don’t then you really shouldn’t wasting your time attempting to interpret what is a good ERA in the NL.
I probably disagree with you.
by NYRoyal on
May 3, 2008 11:39 PM EDT
up
0 recs
You're not being serious now too, right?
you have to be kinding yourself if you think the royals have a remotely good starting rotation
Greinke
Bannister
Meche
Hochevar
Tomko
You don’t think that is a “remotely good starting rotation”? That’s a joke. I don’t know whether to laugh or cry at that bizarre statement.
I probably disagree with you.
by NYRoyal on
May 3, 2008 7:48 PM EDT
up
0 recs
totally serious actually.
bannister and meche pitched above their heads last. season and both will come back down to earth this season with bannisters era around the mid 4s and meches around 5.
hochevar is young and will be erratic.
and tomko is old.
by Billybutlerformvp on
May 3, 2008 9:06 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Wow, just wow
I hope you are still around at the end of season when you are proven entirely wrong with your unreasonable and baseless pessimism. Do you think the bullpen sucks too? And the defense? And the grounds crew? Complete nonsense.
I probably disagree with you.
by NYRoyal on
May 3, 2008 11:38 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I'm with you.
They players, especially the pitchers bandied about in this post and its comments, are actually exceeding expectations. Geez. – TL
by timlacy on
May 4, 2008 10:45 AM EDT
up
0 recs
deal i bet no pitcher wins more than13 games
by Billybutlerformvp on
May 4, 2008 12:16 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I will take that bet
ESPN projections:
Zack Greinke 16 Wins
Brian Bannister 16 wins
Now these are not the most accurate in the world but I think 13 wins is on the low side for either of these guys.
Proud father of a budding Royals fan.
by Skirra on
May 4, 2008 12:56 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Silly bet, but I'd take it too
Wins is such a nonsensical way to evaluate a pitcher’s performance. You might as well use HBP or IBB. You might want to read up on the subject of pitcher’s Wins and how nearly meaningless they are.
I probably disagree with you.
by NYRoyal on
May 4, 2008 1:11 PM EDT
up
0 recs
excellent winner at then end of the seaon
gets some royal brew. hey id like to be wrong about this I just dont think i will be.
by Billybutlerformvp on
May 7, 2008 6:30 AM EDT
up
0 recs
I agree on waiting three weeks on Hocheaver
that is not a long time to wait to save a full year. Gordon is debatable, but he wasn’t going to stay in the minors long anyway. He was drafted to be the next George Brett so his ticket to the majors was punched the day he arrived for all practical purposes. Butler and his transition to 1B can’t be put wholly on GMDM. The previous management had three years and they didn’t see what was painfully obvious to everyone else, Butler can’t play defense especially in the outfield. So your point is that because the previous management did not recognize that fact GMDM is short-sighted for not inserting a MLB ready bat into the line-up because he wasn’t ready at a position he will most likely never succeed at. I can’t buy that.
Remember that currently GMDM is on a plan to stockpile the product that has the greatest value in the current baseball market (pitching) in order to help the team long term I suppose that that is shortsighted as well.
Proud father of a budding Royals fan.
by Skirra on May 3, 2008 5:59 PM EDT 0 recs
question
if he gets demoted again, is that relevant, or is it totally a mute point now?
by royalsreview on
May 3, 2008 6:01 PM EDT
up
0 recs
If he gets sent down...
again for three weeks or so that will delay his free agency. So it is not a moot point.
by djk royal on
May 3, 2008 6:04 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Dayton Moore...
left Butler at LF for parts of two seasons so I’m not sure you can just let him off the hook entirely for that. Butler’s bat has not been so amazing thus far that a little more minor league seasoning wouldn’t have helped him. Gordon also only needed three weeks to delay his free agency.
I’m not sure where you decided that I said stockpiling pitching is short sighted but assume away. I’m not sure what stockpiling pitching has to do with my post anyway.
by djk royal on
May 3, 2008 6:04 PM EDT
up
0 recs
My point with that comment
is that has hurt our ability to acquire and develop position players. By emphasizing pitching and focusing on inequities in the market we may have created situations where guys like Butler and Gordon had to be moved to the MLB level to fill organizational needs during the transition from Baird to GMDM. This is not to say that we couldn’t have fielded a team without Billy or Alex, but more to emphasize the change in organizational philosophy and its effects on specific players. I apologize for not making that connection earlier , re-reading it that comment does seem like a non sequitor attack.
Lets also be realistic GM’s are under pressure to save their jobs from the minute they are hired, and don’t make decisions in a vacuum. Dayton has had to balance winning now and his talk of championships (probably mostly for the benefit of Glass) with the needs of the organization long term. I would say that he has done an excellent job at this even if you call the three examples that you provide mistakes.
The recent surge of long term deals that buy out free agency for young players probably makes the discussion irrelevant anyway because we will still have time to evaluate whether they will be successful at the Major League Level and sign them to deals that the Royals can afford. The worst case scenario would be to find out in 2 years that these guys are AAAA players and have to start rebuilding again just as the planned window of opportunity is supposed to open.
Perhaps if we were calling guys up from A ball I would agree (it has happened before), but for now I want to give GMDM one more trade deadline and off-season before I pick out specific “failures” to show a pattern. That looks like the definition of small sample size cherry-picking that most of us try to avoid.
Proud father of a budding Royals fan.
by Skirra on
May 3, 2008 6:32 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Sorry...
I misinterpreted your earlier comment. I disagree somewhat with writing off the promotion of these three players as a small sample size. It’s somewhat rare to have blue chip prospects like these three picks and all of them IMHO were called up a little too soon. You can defend any of them in a vacuum but take together it is an alarming trend.
by djk royal on
May 3, 2008 6:40 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I guess that I just see it as the potential for a trend
and not a full blown pattern yet. If Moose and Rosa are rushed for example I will agree wholeheartedly. I too would like to see better clock management in these situations I am just not ready to sound the alarm.
Proud father of a budding Royals fan.
by Skirra on
May 3, 2008 6:46 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I disagree with your premise...
Gordon, Butler, and Hochy… all were pushed into action because we didn’t have a choice. Granted Butts should have had more time at 1B in AAA. We traded for Shealy and thought he would be our 1B for a couple of years. That didn’t work out. Hochy is up in the bigs because of an injury. If Bales would not have gotten hurt…he would still be at AAA. On Gordon…my choice was to leave him at AAA last year or at least to send him back down after his April showing. But, again we really didn’t have a choice. The Royals sucked in 2006 with Teahen being one of the bright spots. Moore had to rush Gordon, because he didn’t have any other viable options.
Moore in my opinion has done an above average job in turning this team around. Hey, we could still have the Baird and Bell show. Enough said….
Tell 'em a hookah smoking caterpillar
Has given you the call. "
by grudz96 on May 4, 2008 12:25 AM EDT 0 recs
Ditto.
Moore has definitely “done an above average job” in shaping the MLB club. – TL
by timlacy on
May 4, 2008 10:44 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Rosa and Mousetaco
Both will have enough time in the minors to develope. Rosa will spend the rest of the season in AAA. He looked great in spring training but the Royals are going to give Tomko a very long look this season. I think Rosa will get a Sept. call up. Mouse will spend the entire season at Burlington. I see him maybe splitting time next season between Wilmington and Arkansas. He won’t be rushed …one, because he doesn’t have a solid position yet and two, because of his age. I give Moore’s handling of the bonus babies a 76%.
Tell 'em a hookah smoking caterpillar
Has given you the call. "
by grudz96 on May 4, 2008 12:30 AM EDT 0 recs
If you're talking...
...about this whole post, I agree. Ditto! – TL
by timlacy on
May 4, 2008 10:43 AM EDT
up
0 recs
if none of them had been called up when they were...
...we’d be complaining about how we’re not using all of our talent, and that they need to be called up.
by Royal Revival on May 4, 2008 9:38 AM EDT 0 recs
This whole post is...
...a joke. Dayton’s done the absolute best job with what he’s had available. Moreover, I don’t think that he’s doing anything different than is done in other organizations. The Cubs, for instance, have moved players from AA to the majors. The have made mistakes, but there’s been a lot of pressure in Chicago for the Cubs to prove that they have a viable, useful minor league system—-as much as KC or more. Top Cubs pitching prospects, for instance, do not spend a lot of time in AAA. But even when they do, such as Rich Hill, they don’t immediately produce in the Majors. Every player, no matter his talent or minor league experience, takes a one to one-and-one-half seasons to acclimate. This period is non-adjustable, and applies to Butler, Gordon, Buck, Gaithright, Pena, Hochevar, Soria, Callaspo, etc.
To make matters worse for your argument, the exact players you’re citing have actually performed faster than expected. Touche! – TL
by timlacy on May 4, 2008 10:43 AM EDT 0 recs
I think the...
tone of your comments is the joke. I tried to bring up a legitimate point (in my view) and support it. You decided to turn condescending. I like Dayton Moore. I just think this is an alarming trend.
by djk royal on May 4, 2008 10:59 AM EDT 0 recs
Please consider:
I’m usually quite reserved in criticizing the posts of others, but you used terms like “failed” and “rushed” and “hurt” to describe things that have not failed, been only slightly rushed in comparison to other clubs, and have definitely not hurt the players in question—-meaning Gordon and Butler. Both are doing fine, if not better than expected, for players with their MLB service time.
Since I felt your all of your analysis was wrong, especially in its overall criticism of Dayton Moore, I called your post a joke. It was a slight overstatement, but not off the mark entirely.
I promise, djk royal, that I won’t overstate my case in the future as long as you conduct more careful and truthful analyses. – TL
by timlacy on
May 5, 2008 11:27 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Everything...
in my analyses was truthful. I then presented my opinions on that analyses which you obviously don’t agree with. Fine. I think you would be hard pressed to find anyone who thinks Gordon has performed better than expected thus far.
Since you keep bringing up how other clubs handle top prospects lets look at two comparable 3rb basemen who were top prospects in the last year.
Ryan Braun played 34 games in AAA before being called up in 2007. Why do think that is? If you said to delay free agency a year your a winner.
How about Evan Longoria this year? He spent just long enough to delay his free agency a year. These are moves by similar small market clubs that are concerned about the long term.
by djk royal on May 5, 2008 11:49 AM EDT 0 recs
Sometimes prospects are handled that way and sometimes they are not
Actually, I don’t know if Longoria was in the minors long enough this year to delay his free agency a year. And it’s not like all small market teams treat their prospects like that. It isn’t always the obvious best way to handle a prospect. And I think it is way over the top to say that the Royals have “failed” in their handling of Gordon, Butler and Hochevar.
I probably disagree with you.
by NYRoyal on
May 5, 2008 11:57 AM EDT
up
0 recs
Longoria
I thought the Rays were trying to keep Longoria in the minors a little longer in order to put off his free agency but had to bring him up because of the injury to Willy Aybar. They lost the year of free agency when they did bring him up.
by Rhody Royals on
May 5, 2008 10:18 PM EDT
up
0 recs
It was a moot point
They were already negotiating with him on the long-term deal, which extends past his free-agency date anyway.
Sarcasm™. It's the new gravy.
by jonfmorse on
May 5, 2008 10:52 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Longoria...
Sent back to the minors by the Tampa Bay Rays despite having an outstanding spring training, Longoria was promoted from Triple-A Durham on Friday night when third baseman Willy Aybar went on the 15-day disabled list with a sore left hamstring.
By spending 13 days in the minors so far this season - thus not qualifying for a full season - Longoria’s eligibility for free agency was pushed back an extra year until after the 2014 season.
“I’m in the big leagues now, so it’s the least of my concerns,” Longoria said Saturday. “I’m trying to make an impact and stay here as long as I can, and not worry about free agency or arbitration.”
by djk royal on
May 6, 2008 3:23 PM EDT
up
0 recs
13 days in the minors does not guarantee that last year of team control
I probably disagree with you.
by NYRoyal on
May 6, 2008 4:33 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Are you saying that...
this article from the associated press is incorrect. http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/wire?section=mlb&id=3343915. I did not realize that. Where did you see something that shows it to be false?
by djk royal on
May 6, 2008 6:34 PM EDT
up
0 recs
That link doesn't work for me
I think I’ve read a couple of mentions that those 13 days aren’t necessarily enough. It’s not like you avoid a year of service time by being down in the minors for just any period of time.
I probably disagree with you.
by NYRoyal on
May 6, 2008 6:43 PM EDT
up
0 recs
About three weeks...
is the unoffical number. Don’t forget the minor league season doesn’t start until a full week after the major league season starts.
by djk royal on
May 6, 2008 6:44 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I've usually heard it referred to as a month
13 days does not a month or even 3 weeks make. I steal think he’ll qualify as a super-2. So, there you go.
I probably disagree with you.
by NYRoyal on
May 6, 2008 6:47 PM EDT
up
0 recs
According to Rany on the Royals..
“There are roughly 11 more days over the course of a season than are needed to be credited with a full year of service time”
by djk royal on
May 6, 2008 6:57 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Let's look at what Rany said around that quote:
But keep in mind that Hochevar came into the season with 27 days of service time. He was called up on 21st day of the season, which means that if he stays on the major league roster all year he’ll have a full year of service time, moving his free agency up a year. There are roughly 11 more days over the course of a season than are needed to be credited with a full year of service time, so Hochevar would have to go back to Omaha and stay there for about three weeks if the Royals want to keep him under contract through 2014.
Long story short. 13 days isn’t enough for Longoria.
I probably disagree with you.
by NYRoyal on
May 6, 2008 7:10 PM EDT
up
0 recs
So around three weeks...
I don’t think your taking into account the fact that the major league season starts before the minor league season which would help in that three weeks. Maybe I’m wrong. I’m tired of arguing so we’ll just say that you’re right and the associated press is wrong.
by djk royal on
May 6, 2008 7:17 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Could you repost the AP link so that it works
When you click on the link you posted, it just goes to a list of ESPN wire stories.
I probably disagree with you.
by NYRoyal on
May 6, 2008 7:20 PM EDT
up
0 recs
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/wire?section=mlb&id=3343915
by djk royal on
May 6, 2008 7:24 PM EDT
up
0 recs
I can't get it to work...
Maybe try searching “Evan Longoria arbitration”. That’s what I did and it was only one of three articles that were shown. Sorry.
by djk royal on
May 6, 2008 7:26 PM EDT
up
0 recs
The problem is, this isn't how the Super-2 rule works
By spending 13 days in the minors so far this season - thus not qualifying for a full season - Longoria’s eligibility for free agency was pushed back an extra year until after the 2014 season.
Clearly this AP writer is not an expert in the Super 2 rule. I’m not an expert either, but I do know that 13 days does not guarantee you the 6th year, as I said above. Here’s a brief primer:
What Players Are Eligible for Arbitration?
A player and club who cannot agree on a contract may agree to salary arbitration, provided that the player has enough service time in the majors. The following players are eligible for arbitration:(1) Players with at least 3 but less than 6 years of service in Major League Baseball;
(2) The top 17 percent of players with at least 2 but less than 3 years of Major League service. These are known as "Super 2" players. To qualify as a Super 2, a player must have accumulated at least 86 days of service in the previous year. Historically, the cutoff point for Super 2 status is 2 years, 128 days of service, though the requirement has been as high as 2 years, 140 days in years past.
I probably disagree with you.
by NYRoyal on
May 6, 2008 7:30 PM EDT
up
0 recs
You can be eligible...
for arbitration under Super 2 but still delay free agency a year. If I remember right it’s around three weeks to delay free agency and around July (guesstimate) to probably avoid Super 2.
by djk royal on
May 6, 2008 7:35 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Long story shorter
It. Doesn’t. Matter.
They signed him to a deal that made his free-agency date irrelevant. He’s signed for nine years, with team options.
Sarcasm™. It's the new gravy.
by jonfmorse on
May 6, 2008 8:09 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Just to throw in my 2 cents...
I believe that you have to do what is in the best interest of the club at the time. In which case you could say that Gordon and Butler were brought up in a time where the people of KC needed to see some kind of sign of hope. IMO they have matured very well and will keep doing so as they keep playing. Also, don’t you think that a club that is trying to be more respected by FA’s and such shouldn’t treat their young players baddly? Not saying that holding them back just to keep them from FA is horrible but you have to put yourself in the players position. They only have a small window of time to get their big money and if they are performing well enough to be promoted to the majors, how would you feel if you were kept down just to take one more year away? There is something to be said about treating players well and trying to use that to your advantage when their FA period comes around. I don’t have any stats for this theory of mine but I believe that if you just put yourself in Gordon or Butlers shoes, you might see how it could possibly help in locking these guys up.
MIZZOU baseball= CWS champs
by MooseTacos25 on May 5, 2008 1:24 PM EDT 0 recs
This whole post
really bugs me while I may not be as fully in touch as the rest of Royals Nation I believe Dayton has done an outstanding job. Look at the prospects that we have aquired since he has been with the Royals. Quality pitching prospects like Cortes, Hochever, Davies, Rosa, Duffy, Soria. He is really taking a Schuerholtz approach which I like with our limited budget. If he can build around Gordon, Butler, Bannister, Hochever, Soria I think we could have a midpack to upper echelon team in the near future. When you have the budget KC does that all you can hope for.
I think he is doing the best he can given his situation and the real key to the future now is the Glass family. Will they spend the money it is gonna take to keep Greinke? Sign another Top 3 draft pick? And pick up a better long term o


