With the Royals having so much trouble getting runs on the board, one of the things I hear most is "sit Pena in favor of Callaspo." True, TPJ can't hit well, and who wants a black hole in their lineup? But the Royals' recent woes can't be pinned on him. Check out the difference in these Royals hitter before and after the west coast trip that had started on April 14:
April 13 and earlier:
Royals W/L: 7-5
Mark Grudzeilanek: .308/.333/.386
Mark Teahen: .286/.452/.400
Alex Gordon: .333/.604/.360
Billy Butler: .386/.477/.449
Tony Pena: .033/.033/.064
After April 13:
Royals W/L: 7-13
Mark Grudzeilanek: .241/.310/.379
Mark Teahen: .236/.306/.304
Alex Gordon: .246/.287/.337
Billy Butler: .222/.292/.291
Tony Pena: .220/.254/.233
The Royals were not expecting major offense out of Tony Pena. He is what he is, a light-hitting shortstop with great defensive skill. As it is, his hitting during the team's down period is light-years better than it was when the team was doing well, so how could he be held responsible for the problems the Royals have had lately?
The problems here are Gordon, Butler and Teahen, and to a lesser extent (only because he's not big in the future plans), Grudz. And of course, Guillen, but he was bad in both the before and after periods. What could have caused these guys to collapse like this? It's not just regression to a mean from an early small sample size, it's an en masse slump. If the guys we're really counting on as hitters don't hit, what can we possibly do? Callaspo replacing Pena is a band-aid, not a cure.




There are 55 Comments. Load Now.
Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.
C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read
R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next
Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read
Comment Settings
Live comment alert: Hide it!
Comments for this post are closed.