Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Roundtable: Which Draft Pick Is Most Likely To Bust?

The Rivalry Continues: St. Louis Cardinals

The I-70 series begins tonight with 3 in St. Louis followed by 3 more in KC next weekend.  I'm very pumped for these games because one of my close friends is a big Cardinals fan.  Plus, we always seem to play second fiddle to the redbirds in this area and it just feels so good to beat the most pompous fans in baseball. 

2007 was a 3-3 split between the two teams.  I'm hoping for nothing less than a 4-2 series win.  Let's take a look back at 2007.

 

The 2007 Royals came into the I-70 series with a 24-40 record.  I'm pretty sure I was at the first game.  An 8-1 win by the Royals.  The Royals scored 5 in the 1st, 2 in the 2nd, and 1 in the 3rd for all of their total runs for the game.  That is all they needed, though, as Brian Bannister pitched a great game, going 7.0 IP without giving up a run.  Mark Teahen had a great game, going  3 for 5 with a single, double and a triple.  A few annebriated friends and I swore that if Teahen hit a HR for the cycle that we would buy his jersey when we got home.  It didn't happen but the Royals still had a nice victory.

Game 2 was rediculous.  I was also at this game which was not fun at all.  The Royals lost 3-7 but the worst part about it was how we lost.  Adam Wainwright had a no-hitter going through 5 or 6, I think.  He went 8.0 innings, giving up only 1 hit.  The Royals managed 3 runs in the 9th.

The final game in KC was one that all Royals fans could really brag about.  Looking at the matchup before the game, you knew this was going to be a bad one, Kip Wells vs. Scott Elarton, resulting in a 17-8 Royals victory.  Everyone got into the act in this one.  After each team put up a run in the 1st, St. Louis took a nice lead in the 2nd with a 3 run inning making it 4-1.  Thanks to Kip Wells, the Royals took the lead back in the bottom of the inning, putting up 8 runs on Wells and reliever Flores.  The Royals went on to score 8 more runs over the game and Zack Greinke got his 4th win of the season by throwing 4 innings in relief.  Teahen went 3-5 with 2 3B and 5 RBI's.  Alex Gordon went 2-5 with a HR and TONY PENA JR. went 4-5 with 3 runs scored and an RBI (amazing).  What a game.

In St. Louis, our Royals didn't have as good a luck.

Game 1 was great.  The Royals avenged their Adam Wainwright beat down by beating the Cardinals ace 5-3.  John Buck hit his 13th homer of the year, and Odalis Perez had a nice outing, going 6.0 IP and only giving up 3.  The stellar 2007 bullpen took over form there, as Riske, Soria, and Dotel each threw an inning, giving up 1 hit each and nothing more.

The curse of Scott Elarton took over for Game 2 (what the hell were they thinking!) as he went 2.2 IP, giving up all 5 runs.  Musser and Peralta combined to go the rest of the game, giving up 0 runs.  (where is that this year?)

Game 3 was a heartbreaker that I still remember pretty well.  It was the first chance that the Royals had to face their old teammate, Todd Wellemeyer.  Gil Meche opposed him.  The Royals got to Wellemeyer in the first, scoring 3 runs and chased him out after the 5th with a 4-4 tie.  After scoring 2 more in the 6th, the Royals claimed a 6-4 lead.  Greinke gave up 1 run in relief and Soria went 2 innings without giving up a hit to turn it over to Dotel with a one run lead.  Octavio didn't have his stuff and gave up the lead, only to have Peralta save the loss by coming in and forcing extra innings.  With depleated bullpens and scoreless extra innings, the managers were forced to go to some starters.  The Cardinals went with Kip Wells and the Royals with Jorge De La Rosa.  Wells went 2.0 IP and didn't give up anything, and De la Rosa faced one batter, Ryan Ludwick who hit the ball over the fence to end the game.

So a tough ending to a series that the Royals could have easily won 4-2. 

This team has played well as of late and with no Pujols and a pitching staff littered with injuries, the Cardinals are very beatable.  Let's go out and do this.

Also, I'd like to hear any other Cardinal vs. Royals memories, from other Interleague series or the great one that I don't remember because I was 6 months old:  The 1985 World Series.  Let's get pumped!

Comment 30 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I was at the 17-8 game

And I think a week later I went to the 17 run game against Philly. I was like a 17-run lucky charm or something.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Jun 17, 2008 1:38 PM EDT reply actions  

My Royals-Cards memory

Attending my first game in the new Busch Stadium with my college roomate, a diehard Cards fan. Mark Teahen homered in the 8th to tie the game. The Cards then loaded the bases with one out in the bottom of the ninth. The Royals brought in Ambriorix, who I thought for sure would blow it. He looked awesome and struck out Spiezio and Miles, and even Cards fans around me were impressed – “who is this guy?” The Royals scored two more in the tenth (Joey Gathright double?) to win it, a glorious victory.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Jun 17, 2008 1:42 PM EDT reply actions  

They're winning me over, to be honest

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Jun 17, 2008 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Replying to your own comment = coolness

I just want to say that Tony LaRussa is has been moving up on my “I don’t care how much they did in baseball, or whether they’re Hall-of-Famers, they just assholes” All-Stars. Pete Rose is the captain.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Jun 17, 2008 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good calls

What is the significance of the “Larussa 093”?

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by Scott McKinney on Jun 17, 2008 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

.093 is surprisingly low.

Isn’t .08 the legal limit? I thought he was bombed out of his mind, that’s barely a DUI.

by djk royal on Jun 17, 2008 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Apparently he had

too much mouthwash.

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Jun 17, 2008 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

well...
What Madden fails to mention is that LaRussa’s .093 blood alcohol level was measured about two hours after his arrest, so that was likely not his alcohol level at the time he passed out behind the wheel of his car, endangering himself and the public at large. Madden, who’s a hardass about players behaving badly-regardless of whether anyone but the player himself was endangered-is now an apologist for a guy who could have injured a number of people if his foot had slipped off the brake pedal. Nice. I’m not the type to demonize LaRussa for his behavior, but I certainly don’t think it’s right to bend over backwards to excuse what he did, either, particularly when I’ve never heard a member of the press concoct a “shades over the legal limit” excuse or a “he must be exhausted from all the dinners and functions he’s attended” excuse for any player accused of this crime. At best, LaRussa was irresponsible in getting behind the wheel when he was in no condition to drive; at worst, the police gave LaRussa a break by giving him two hours to sober up before breathalyzing him. But if you’re going to simply absolve LaRussa for this, I don’t ever want to hear you talk about personal responsibility, ever again.

From some blog.

This incident made his post-Hancock accident spin all that much more repulsive to me. No, Tony, it isn’t “all sweet.” It’s disgusting, you piece of crap.

There’s a great article on the drinking problem in baseball (from before the Hancock incident, I believe) by Keith Law.

OK, Ok. /self-righteous overreaction.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Jun 17, 2008 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well done

I like that jersey. Unfortunately, its meaning would be lost on most Cardinals fans (and me, apparently)

I hope Larussa can finally turn his life around like Josh Hamilton did.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by Scott McKinney on Jun 17, 2008 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wonder who have killed/injured more people?

Drunk drivers? Or people doing illegal narcotics in private?

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Jun 17, 2008 6:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Apparently drug addiction sitting in your home is morally bankrupt...

...but getting drunk and jumping in your car and driving around is just a little mistake.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by Scott McKinney on Jun 17, 2008 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rose

Leave aside all the other stuff for he moment, here is something that made me really angry:

Two months flew by, and Rose assumed A-Rod had grown bored of his advice or was too busy to write. To get his baseball fix, he’d talk to his son, Pete Jr., who was still playing minor-league ball at 36. And while Rose enjoyed his chats with Petey, he and A-Rod simply had more in common.

“Well, I mean, Petey was in an 0-for-20 slump one time, and asked me what he should do,” Rose says. “So I told him, ‘Go call [Dave] Concepcion. I’ve never been 0-for-20.’”

Perfect for post-Father’s Day! I don’t know anything about Pete Rose, Jr., personally. It isn’t my place to speculate on why the hell he feels the need to play minor league ball at 36 (I hope it’s just for fun). But Charlie Hustle is OK with a national story going out that basically says he’d rather talk to A-Rod instead of his own kid, because his kid can’t hit? I know I’m overblowing it a bit, but it definitely comes off that way. And would it surprise anyone?

Rose doesn’t give a crap about anything but “getting himself back into the game.” I have no problem with A-Rod and Rose talking (although one wonders why the heck A-Rod would want this to come out in a story about their “texting” with “BFF”in the title—great work, PR flacks for A-Rod! Keep it up!) or whatever. I hope for A-Rod’s kids’ sake that he and Pete don’t have too much in common. The Concepcion crack is actually sort of funny… except that he said it to his poor son who’s still trying to get his worthless Dad’s approval on a crappy bus going from one lousy stadium to the next.

Sorry, I don’t know why I feel the need to post about this, I just can’t imagine my Dad saying that to me, much less making it public. Is A-Rod really sure this is the substitute Dad he wants?

Screw you, Pete. You should be in the Hall of Fame, but you’re the reason you won’t be in. If you do get in, I hope this quote goes on your plaque. Let JoPo shed tears for you, cause I sure as hell won’t.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by Matt Klaassen on Jun 17, 2008 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Funny on many levels

Minor league ball at 36.
Dave Concepcion.
Jose Guillenesque disrespect of his own son!.
BFF – really?
“he and A-Rod have more in common” – maybe people actually LIKE Petey?

Nobody will celebrate harder when the Royals make the playoffs!!

by juano on Jun 17, 2008 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

He might be hurt

Although I’m guessing its a phantom injury so he can weasel out of facing his former mates.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Jun 17, 2008 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

That pussy is running scared

Although, if I were an overperforming, house-of-cards SP in the NL, I wouldn’t want to face any AL team.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by Scott McKinney on Jun 17, 2008 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Let's beat these NL wussies

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Jun 17, 2008 3:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Best Royals/Cards memory

outside of the final 10 innings of the 1985 post-season, of course:

At Busch, when Charlie Liebrandt finally became hittable, the Cardinal fans started a mocking “CHAR-lee, CHAR-lee” chant. It was mildly bush league, and made the memory of the game more bitter than it otherwise would have been.

In Kansas City, the Royals fans turned it around, chanting “Char-LEE, Char-LEE” in a perfectly in-your-face show of support.

Sarcasm™. It's the new gravy.

by jonfmorse on Jun 17, 2008 5:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Go Royals!

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Jun 17, 2008 6:01 PM EDT reply actions  

Lovely

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Jun 17, 2008 6:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would not care whatsoever about this so-called "rivalry"

if those bastards didn’t steal Jason LaRue from us over the offseason.

For this transgression, we must make them pay.

by DarthYoshi on Jun 17, 2008 7:34 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Royalsretro_small
Happy Mother's Day From Royals Review
952_small
Black.
Life_or_fiction_touchup_small
"The Royals Lose" Article Template

Recent FanPosts

Dignan_small
OT: Zack Greinke career statistics up to today--upon which we shall ruminate and discuss
Knute_small
Chip Ambres Video Bleg
_mg_9876_small
A Sonnet for Danny Duffy's Elbow
Untitled_small
The Project Prospect Rotation - 2012-2013
387504_small
Get to know a stop-gap starter - Vol. 1: Vin Mazzaro
952_small
Who is your favorite Royal?
Small
The final piece of the Royal puzzle - Ryan Braun
Dsc01731_small
An odd inquiry for locals
_mg_9876_small
Statistically Emotional: A Meditation

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Cimg0036_small Freneau

Editors

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

Authors

Royalsretro_small RoyalsRetro

Headshot_small Old Man Duggan