The Brett Tomko Era Comes to a Close
Brett Tomko was placed on irreversible waivers Friday night, ending his brief tenure in Kansas City. In sixteen games, Tomko was 2-7 with a 6.97 ERA in 60 2/3 innings. His strikeout-to-walk ratio was excellent at 40-13, but he was hittable, oh he was hittable. Opponents hit .314/.344/.529, meaning he pretty much turned every hitter into Magglio Ordonez.
For his trouble, Brett will walk away with $3 million and a Playboy-model wife.
Brett and Julia will laugh all the way to the bank.
How will you remember the Brett Tomko era? Let us take a look back.
Opening Day - March 31 vs. Detroit
Trey Hillman manages his first game in a Royals uniform. His plucky young Royals take a 4-3 lead against the heavily favored Tigers as we head into the bottom of the seventh. Gil Meche had given us a strong outing, but was hitting 100 pitches. With the entire bullpen at his disposal, Hillman turned to the gritty veteran Brett Tomko, much to the howls of Royals Reviewers. After a leadoff walk, Tomko silences his RR critics by inducing a double play and getting out of the inning unscathed. Undeterred, Trey Hillman leaves Tomko out for the eighth where he promptly gives up a game-tying home run to Carlos Guillen.
Tomko gives the grittiest, guttiest veteran performance in a Royals uniform as he blanks the Twins over five innings. Local artists are commissioned to create a Tomko statue to stand next to the George Brett statue in the renovated Kauffman Stadium.
Tomko proves he is a Twin-killer, giving up two runs in six innings. However, he also shows "he doesn't know how to win" to paraphrase Joe Morgan, by not motivating his teammates to score any runs as the Royals lose 2-0.
Brett yields five runs, but guts his way through seven innings in the loss.
Its the first game of a doubleheader, and Brett understands how badly Trey wants to use his bullpen for the eighteen innings of baseball, so he graciously pitches just four innings, giving up eleven hits and seven runs.
The Royals spot Brett five runs in the first two frames, and the wily veteran understands "pitching to the score" and gives up five runs of his own. Again unselfishly, he bows out in the fourth inning, content to let reliever Ron Mahay pick up the victory.
May 5 vs. that team from Anaheim
Sleeping in his own bed with his hot, hot wife, Tomko is motivated to toss seven shutout innings, giving up just two hits.
Tomko, king of the great peripherals, but lousy BABIP, strikes out eight and walks none. Great outing, right? He also gives up nine hits and six runs and uses 110 pitches to get through five innings in the loss.
Tomko recalls how inferior the NL is and dominates the first place Marlins, giving up two runs in six innings in what would be his last win as a Royal.
Tomko shows proper respect to Red Sox Nation by bowing out in the fifth after allowing just five runs. Red Sox fans whine about how bad they've had it anyway.
Brett fails to understand that his ERA, converted to Canadian dollars, is even worse. Damn you weak American dollar! He gives up seven runs, but grits through six innings. Despite the guttiness, Trey demotes him to the bullpen.
On Memorial Day weekend, Brett performs as most Royals fans will remember him by. He coughs up a 4-3 lead and takes the loss to fall to 2-7. In fairness, Gil Meche was the starting pitcher, and the Royals offense and bullpen are contractually obligated to suppress Gil's win total as much as possible.
The Tomko Bullpen Experiment rolls on with a 1-2-3 inning.
A wild game in which Tomko is called on in the 5th. He pitches well for the first 1 1/2 inning, before giving up a two run homer to decidedly unclutch A-Rod in the seventh.
My son's first ever game. I didn't tell Brett I was coming, but its almost like he knew it was my son's first game. The Royals built up a 5-1 lead in the eighth. With two outs and one one, a Mark Teahen error extended the inning and caused Trey Hillman to pull the cruising Ron Mahay in favor of Brett. Tomko allowed a double to big jerk Milton Bradley and a single to David Murphy before Trey decided to Yasuhika Yabuta would be more reliable. The Royals lost 6-5. I wouldn't have it any other way for my son's first game! He must be indoctrinated into Royals baseball!
Tomko's days are numbered.
The Royals were already trailing 8-5 in the 9th, so Tomko got some garbage time. And he sure pitched like it. After David Murphy homered on the first Tomko offering he saw, four more Rangers would collect hits, and Tomko would yield three runs.
On June 12, the Royals designated Brett for assignment, effectively ending his Royals career. They called up Carlos Rosa to replace him, but after Rosa showed he was overmatched by allowing a 2.70 ERA and a .677 OPS against, he was demoted for Horacio Ramirez. Who is like, totally way better than Brett Tomko.
Brett ends his Royals career 151st in franchise history in innings pitched, tied for 156th in wins, and tied for 142nd in strikeouts. He will be eligible for induction into the Royals Hall of Fame in 2011.
All he will have to console himself will be the $17 million he has earned in his professional career, his Playboy model wife, his house in Southern California, and the memories of a twelve-year Major League career.
Brett, you will be missed.
1 recs |
62 comments
Comments
FAIL!!!!!!!!!!
"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it." - Mark Twain
by JM Barten on
Jun 23, 2008 11:02 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
His wife
Earned him extra Win Shares in my book.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on
Jun 23, 2008 12:30 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
A procedural issue
For his trouble, Brett will walk away with $3 million
If I understand it correctly, if he’s claimed by another team, they pay the remainder of his MLB salary. If not claimed, the Royals can assign him to a minor league team. If he accepts the assignment, the Royals still owe him all of the $3M. If he refuses the assignment, it voids the contract and the Royals don’t have to pay the rest of his 2008 salary.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Jun 23, 2008 12:18 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
They've already released him
They’re on the hook to pay him the rest of his salary. It what you said were true, guys like Richie Sexson, Barry Zito and Mark Mulder would have been DFAed a long time ago if teams thought they could get out of the contract that easy.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on
Jun 23, 2008 12:24 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It only gets them out of the contract if the player refuses the minor league assignment, which guys with really huge contracts would never do
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Jun 23, 2008 12:49 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
So
Why doesn’t Seattle demote Richie Sexson to get him to Tacoma?
The contracts are guaranteed unless someone else agrees to pay them.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on
Jun 23, 2008 12:51 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yes, the contract is guaranteed
They don’t demote him to Tacoma because that wouldn’t help them any. He’s not going to refuse the assignment and give up all that money. So, demoting him would only get him off the roster, and that doesn’t help the Mariners. It’s better to have him up hitting his occasional HR’s and hoping that he can improve somewhat.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Jun 23, 2008 12:54 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not quite right
The rule is that players with five or more years of service time who refuse an outright assingment are still entitled to the full amount owed on their contract. As players with five or more years of service time, Tomko and Sexson can reject the minor league assignment but keep their money.
Players with less than five years of service time, like Ross Gload, could not reject an outright assignment without giving up their salary.
by Gopherballs on
Jun 23, 2008 12:58 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Thanks for the clarification
I stand corrected.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Jun 23, 2008 1:11 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Costly mistake
Dayton Moore gambled $3 million that this guy’s performance last season wouldn’t be an accurate predictor of what Tomko would do this year. He lost.
This was a costly mistake on Moore’s part. The Royals can’t afford to be bringing in a guy like Tomko (coming off a season like he had in 2007) unless it’s for a minor league deal or minimum salary-type thing. If someone else is willing to do it, let them. That’s far too much of a financial risk for a scenario like Tomko’s.
by cookierojas73 on
Jun 23, 2008 12:20 PM EDT
reply
actions
1 recs
Yeah, but the Gload contract makes up for it
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on
Jun 23, 2008 12:25 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's amazing...
...who Dayton shows the money to…I just looked up Gload and not only is he making $1.3 million this year, but the club actually has a 2010 option (which will no doubt cost them a few $ when they release him sometime in the next year) in addition to his guaranteed 2009 salary. WHY? Just, why the faith in Gload?
Oh, by the way, he’s currently hitting .241 right now, with no HRs, 10 RBI, .276 OBP and .277 SLG.
These are the things that temper my expectations for the Dayton Moore era, despite the progress the club has made under him.
by cookierojas73 on
Jun 23, 2008 12:41 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
1 recs
Why does the existence of an option cost them more money?
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Jun 23, 2008 12:50 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Buyout
I may be wrong, but I was under the impression that usually when there is a club option, in order to decline it they fork over a designated piece of whatever the salary would have been that year.
by cookierojas73 on
Jun 23, 2008 1:01 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
There often is a buyout
...but, according to Cots, there is no buyout on this option.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Jun 23, 2008 1:12 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ok
Then that’s not a factor, obviously. Thanks.
by cookierojas73 on
Jun 23, 2008 1:13 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ross Gload contract incentives
award bonuses: $50,000 each for All Star, Gold Glove, Silver Slugger, LCS MVP, $0.1M each for WS MVP, MVP ($50,000 for 2nd-5th)
It doesn’t look like the 2010 option requires a buyout though.
by Top Ramen on
Jun 23, 2008 12:52 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Those award bonuses
Crack me up.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on
Jun 23, 2008 12:53 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
They may as well have included incentives
for winning the triple crown, setting the all-time home run record, and batting .400.
Royals, NBA, Golden Hurricane, Hawkeyes, Chiefs, and KU basketball, in that order.
by Rowyal on
Jun 23, 2008 1:11 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
1 recs
It's Too Late
For the Triple Crown this year, but next year there’ll be no Big Brown to compete with. Maybe then he can do it.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on
Jun 23, 2008 1:24 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If he fails to win it
Can we put him down?
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on
Jun 23, 2008 1:31 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
hmm
gload
glue
this can’t be a coincidence!!!
This space intentionally left blank.
by marbotty on
Jun 23, 2008 1:40 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
1 recs
As In "His
Feet were seemingly Gload to the ground”? What tense is that.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on
Jun 23, 2008 2:08 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Bigger bust for the money
Juan Gonzalez or Brett Tomko?
I’d lean towards Tomko. He’s been one of the biggest pitching busts we’ve had in a while—even John Bale may provide more use for his 2yr/4M deal than Tomko did for his 3M.
by Top Ramen on
Jun 23, 2008 12:40 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
big bust
Tomko pitched predictably poorly based upon his prior performance. The only reason he’s such a bust is the ridiculous contract Moore gave him. He would’ve actually been a good gamble for the major league minimum and instead of calling him a bust, we’d be saying things like, “it was worth a try bringing him in.”
I can’t remember what the Royals paid Gonzo, but he was also a guy who was a reach, with all the injuries he had prior to coming to KC.
by cookierojas73 on
Jun 23, 2008 12:45 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Gonzo - 1 yr/4M
And I admit to being excited at the time. Tomko, I never was.
by Top Ramen on
Jun 23, 2008 12:50 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
And that $4M was a considerably higher percentage of the Royals payroll back then
Acting like $3M is a huge amount of money ignores the realities of current MLB payrolls.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Jun 23, 2008 12:52 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Do you realize that $3M is only 5% of the payroll?
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Jun 23, 2008 12:51 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
5% of the payroll that went completely down the toilet
by Top Ramen on
Jun 23, 2008 12:53 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed
But every team has some minor vet FA’s that fail. The Royals needed another starter. For similar money (or more money in many cases), they could have signed Matt Clement or Kris Benson (still haven’t pitched in the majors this year due to injury), Jason Jennings (worse pitching than Tomko in 27 ip before going down with a season ending injury and surgery), Bartolo Colon (33 ip before going on the DL). There weren’t a lot of good options out there, and the Royals were well under their MLB payroll budget.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Jun 23, 2008 12:58 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
money isnt a big deal
its the performance
Juan Gone wasnt around to hurt the team, like Tomko was
by royalsreview on
Jun 23, 2008 1:10 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It's not the money so much as who they chose to spend it on
It’s true that there weren’t many free agent options out there. So why go ahead and blow three million on Tomko, who also was not a good option? Tomko had pitched for two teams last year in what we’d all agree is a weaker league. Neither team was interested in his services for 2008. His combined ERA in 2008 was 5.55. The Royals had a number of other in-house fifth starter options (admittedly, none of them great) in Davies, Bale, de la Rosa.
Again, I had no problem with bringing Tomko in a for a look, but at $3M? KC may be doing better financially but they can’t afford to give way that kind of coin on a guy who was pretty unlikely to succeed. That’s not smart management.
by cookierojas73 on
Jun 23, 2008 1:12 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
They probably spent more than they could/should have
But they liked his stuff, had many millions sitting in the budget going unused and didn’t see a better alternative out there. In retrospect, they didn’t make the right call, but given the financial situation at the time and the fact that they needed another SP, I don’t mind taking a small risk which doesn’t hurt the team financially, or impact the team at all beyond 2008.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Jun 23, 2008 1:24 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
+1
Tomko wasn’t a terrible one-year flyer based on what was out there.
I thought Juan Gone was owed an apology by many fans and media folk after it was discovered that he had been trying to play through a herniated disk. That wasn’t a bad move on Baird’s part since the Royals’ medical staff at the time should have been able to notice a herniated disk, but they didn’t.
MLB teams probably flush at least 5% of their payroll on unproductive players most years anyway.
by Stat Ninja on
Jun 23, 2008 2:04 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
1 recs
Juan Gone was a bigger bust
But honestly, neither was that bad of a risk to take.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on
Jun 23, 2008 1:15 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Juan Gone vs. Tomko
...tried to play through a herniated disk! The medical staff blew that one. It was a good gamble by Baird based on the info and other options available to him at the time.
I think the fact that Tomko’s non-injury-related ineffectiveness rendered him useless on the MLB roster (even as a 12th pitcher in a garbage/long relief role) makes Tomko a bigger bust.
by Stat Ninja on
Jun 23, 2008 2:08 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
In one angle
I guess you could say Tomko was the bigger bust because the upside was much, much lower than it was for Gonzo. With Gonzo, the upside was a possible MVP-type year. The best I think we could ever hope for with Tomko was a 12 win, 4.00 ERA, 200 IP season, notwithstanding JoPo’s scouting friend’s prediction of 15 victories.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on
Jun 23, 2008 3:00 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don't get it
If the guy with less upside fails, how could that be the bigger bust? Wouldn’t that make Gonzo the bigger bust?
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Jun 23, 2008 3:08 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
My head hurts
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on
Jun 23, 2008 3:22 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Which I never thought would happen when contemplating large busts
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on
Jun 23, 2008 3:22 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Lack Of Oxygen
Due to burying one’s face in them could induce a headache, but it’s a small price to pay.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on
Jun 23, 2008 4:08 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
When I die, that's the way I want to go
I think George Carlin wanted to go that way too. I hope he did.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Jun 23, 2008 4:12 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Carlin's Character On
His Fox sitcom always had a magazine called “Shaved And Shining”.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on
Jun 23, 2008 4:32 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
"Bigger bust" may be the wrong term
Maybe “bigger waste of money.”
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on
Jun 23, 2008 3:42 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Perhaps
But one has to take salary inflation into account. $4M then is a lot more money than $3M now. Gonzo had upside, but also age, injury, and an inconsistent performance history in recent years. It sure seemed like a likely waste of money going into the season (at least to me).
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Jun 23, 2008 3:45 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Let's say
$4 million then is like $7 million now. A one year $7 million deal for an oft-injured two time MVP coming off a 122 OPS season would be a fantastic deal now.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on
Jun 23, 2008 4:13 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Perhaps
But then he would be a massive bust if he only played 33 games. I’m talking Dolly Parton here.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by NYRoyal on
Jun 23, 2008 4:16 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
No
That would be Reggie Sanders, who earned about the same salary a couple of years later without Juan’s upside.
by Stat Ninja on
Jun 24, 2008 12:11 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agreed
Nothing wrong with taking a flier on a one-year deal. Unless its Joe Mays, that is…
People make out Juan Gone as this huge, franchise-crushing mistake, but it wasn’t. It was a one-year deal for a few mil the Royals had burning holes in their pockets anyway.
by raefzilla on
Jun 23, 2008 4:16 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If Tomko had been on a minor league deal
Then this probably wouldn’t warrant more than a passing mention. It’s amazing that a guy that can pitch as poorly as Tomko has for the last couple of years and still get guaranteed money.
by Top Ramen on
Jun 23, 2008 1:06 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
When does Tomko appear in a ML game again?
I say… July 5th
by royalsreview on
Jun 23, 2008 1:12 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
For the Nationals?
Alongside our old friend Odalis?
by cookierojas73 on
Jun 23, 2008 1:15 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
True
I think if anywhere, it’ll be the N.L. I just thought the Nationals on July 5 would be sort of, you know, patriotic.
by cookierojas73 on
Jun 23, 2008 1:21 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Don't count the Dodgers out
The Yankees also seem to have a thing for washed-up pitchers (Ponson), although Tomko might go 8-2 for them or something down the stretch (Chacon, Small), so be prepared to scream.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on
Jun 23, 2008 1:35 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
ah, so many memories
it feels like just the start of the season i was calling this a terrible signing, only to recant a few days later, only to return to my original analysis a few days after that.
it was a rollercoaster ride of excitement and mystery
This space intentionally left blank.
by marbotty on
Jun 23, 2008 1:36 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
In other words
We got our money’s worth, right?
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on
Jun 23, 2008 1:40 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
In other words
you’re a fan, just like the rest of us.
Isn’t it fun? Count me for a self-mocking “I’ve always loved Jose Guillen and never doubted him for a second .”
Until his inevitable cold spell. Then I told you so.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on
Jun 23, 2008 1:41 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
in other words
i agree with both of you
This space intentionally left blank.
by marbotty on
Jun 23, 2008 1:42 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs














