Secrets of the AL Central, II
Offensive numbers allowed by the pitching staffs of the Central since the All-Star Break:
| BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | |
| Twins | .269 | .313 | .406 | .721 |
| Royals | .283 | .348 | .419 | .767 |
| Indians | .288 | .338 | .460 | .798 |
| White Sox | .293 | .348 | .472 | .820 |
| Tigers | .267 | .347 | .491 | .838 |
Is it just me, or does everyone with a microphone always get the Twins wrong?
Have you heard they "do the little things" like bunt and hit and run and steal bases and bunt and tip well and bunt and move runners over and leave mint drops on pillows and bunt and support our troops and steal bases and bunt and put pressure on the defense and speak French fluently and bunt and can fold clothes neatly and bunt?
I guess that is just a more interesting story than the fact that they can generate #3 starters who don't walk anyone as if they own a Brad Radke mold?
As we used to say in debate, you can cross-apply this to the Angels. (I haven't watched an Angels broadcast with the sound on in three years, no lie.) Somehow, sluggardly teams are easier to understand: no one goes on and on about the Rangers winning because of their pitching staff featuring old-school athletes, though that makes about as much sense.
Finally, the Tigers are losing, obviously, because they have a station-to-station offense that doesn't do the little things.
Obviously.
0 recs |
12 comments
Comments
.348 OBP?
Treyball!
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
by doublestix on Aug 8, 2008 12:47 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm actually quite impressed
How high that is.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Aug 8, 2008 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
D'oh
That’s numbers against.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Aug 8, 2008 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
for the curious
Royals hitters since the ASB:
.264/.325/.417
by royalsreview on Aug 8, 2008 12:51 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ah...
You tricked me.
Argh.
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
by doublestix on Aug 8, 2008 12:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
still not sure how the umbers arethat low
given the White Sox series… but alas
by royalsreview on Aug 8, 2008 1:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm in NESN country
and during Game 3 they mentioned that the Royals’ offense is (still?) tied for last in the AL in OBP because the young hitters swing at everything. Maybe. I couldn’t help but notice, though, that Alex Gordon and Mike Aviles are leading the team in OBP (with DDJ on the bench, of course). That night, with a righty starting, the Royals had this at 4-5-6: 4) Hoagie (.290 OBP) 5) Butler (.329 OBP) 6) Gordon (.351 OBP). I know batting order isn’t THAT significant, but I can’t help feeling that it might be good not to have the OBPs in _reverse _order—and it’s even worse, since this is the overall OBPs, not adjusted for facing righties, against whom Gordon is OBPing .381and Guillen .266… But that’s just me. Good to know that Owens is following the sacred tenets of Treyball.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by devil_fingers on Aug 8, 2008 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good commentary
Don’t usually look at the numbers from this angle, it shows quite a bit.
Those Twinkies….
Alex Gordon in '08
by RoyalJHWKR on Aug 8, 2008 1:44 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
how 'bout those royals!
I wanna know what love is, I want you to show me
by LeoBloom on Aug 8, 2008 2:17 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
so do these numbers mean we're going to win the world series?
go royals!
where tpj happens.
by blue bandwagon on Aug 8, 2008 2:22 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Not if we have to go through the Red Sox
But a division title will still be nice.
Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!
by cmkeller on Aug 8, 2008 9:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's the...
...BA and OBP against us that are keeping us below .500 and making all us RReviewer fans nervous. Along with our own offense of course—-obviously. ;) – TL
by timlacy on Aug 8, 2008 1:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 













