Royals Review: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: The Boxing Bulletin for Boxing Fans!

The Royals traded right-handed reliever Horacio Ramirez to the White Sox after Saturday night’s 7-3 loss to the Twins. In exchange for Ramirez, the Royals received minor-league outfielder Paulo Orlando.

Orlando will be assigned to the Royals’ Class A team in Wilmington, Del. To replace Ramirez, the Royals will recall left-handed reliever Josh Newman from Class AAA Omaha.

about 1 year ago Rollinsliar_tiny BHWick 122 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Interesting flip.

Sarcasm™. It's the new gravy.

by jonfmorse on Aug 9, 2008 11:26 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

What? Why?

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Aug 9, 2008 11:27 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Sell high on HoRam?

Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.

by doublestix on Aug 9, 2008 11:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He was ranked as the White Sox fastest baserunner and best OF defense in the Sox operation. I am still disappointed to see HoRam go. I thought he did a good job for us and would continue to do a good job. Does this make Gathright a fill in until some of those guys are ready or expendible?

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Aug 9, 2008 11:29 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

AVG G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI TB BB SO SB CS OBP SLG OPS
.262 112 451 73 118 15 12 9 42 184 22 97 28 9 .308 .408 .716

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Aug 9, 2008 11:31 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

gathright round II

but ho-ram was not a favorite

by royalsreview on Aug 9, 2008 11:46 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Yea, dealing Ho-Ram is certainly no bigs...

He is the definition of a dime-a-dozen reliever, and he has just as much chance of being crappy again next year as continuing this random stretch of decent pitching.

But the guy we got back is no great shakes. I mean, I certainly don’t expect a good prospect for a reliever like Ho-Ram, but a no-hit, good defense fast 22 year old in High-A isn’t exactly anything to get excited about. Like, at all. Plus, we already have like a billion of those guys.

So the deal is just whatever…

by rockchalk on Aug 9, 2008 11:58 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't understand this trade

HoRam was doing a decent job and you trade him for a guy who is worse than what you already have at A+. Does GMDM realize the goal is to make the ML playoffs not strengthen your A+ roster for their playoff run. This guy is a long shot to make it to the bigs. He’s already 23 and still in A+ lacks plate discipline 22k’s to 97 Bb’s and doesn’t hit for much power either. This is a worse trade than the Gathright deal. I know HoRam isn’t a world beater but he is a ML player and a decent bullpen/6th starter option.

Every fight is a food fight when you’re a cannibal.
-- Demetri Martin

by kcscoliny on Aug 10, 2008 12:03 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

at least trade for someone who resembles a player with some plate discipline.

I’m growing tired of the fast no power high k outfielders.

Every fight is a food fight when you’re a cannibal.
-- Demetri Martin

by kcscoliny on Aug 10, 2008 12:04 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

When the Gathright deal went down EVERYONE was so excited…. are we overracting?

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Aug 10, 2008 12:06 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Just for the record, I do not question GMDM. I think he’s done an incredible job so far. I was frustrated at the posts above that question GMDM. I tried to put this deal in perspective for everyone. Let it play out and then we’ll judge it after the season or halfway through next.

We don’t know how long HRam can be solid. He’s done a good job. We don’t know anything about Orlando. But our scouts do. I think this was GMWilliams approaching us saying, here, I need a lefty that can get people out. What do you want for HoRam? (I bet he used HoRam rather than Horacio Ramirez)

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Aug 10, 2008 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

31% extra base hits for Orlando

That’s not “no power”.

Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.

by doublestix on Aug 10, 2008 2:18 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Orlando could be the #3 guy

while Dyson does leadoff and Robinson bats second

by BHWick on Aug 10, 2008 2:34 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hardy har.

Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.

by doublestix on Aug 10, 2008 3:50 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Jose Contreras ruptured his achilles tonight. Do they make HoRam a starter?

What’s the reprecussions of the new OF in high A? Robinson? Ortiz? Who moves where? Or does he play a few games and move up to AA? I don’t think you’d trade for a 22 year old without thinking he’d be ready to move up soon….

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Aug 10, 2008 12:03 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Orlando Hudson

looked like he injured his wrist tonight… to bad EXPLOSION took out our 2B. We could maybe have moved him to a contender for a pitcher.

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Aug 10, 2008 12:04 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ya the whole deadline lack of movement is starting to look like a bad idea.

Mahay is injured and likely isn’t gonna help much in the second half. Likely he gets traded at the deadline next year so I think they could’ve got more at his great stats no one knows about the injury yet status rather than waiting for a half of a season. Grudz gets immediately hurt thats bad luck but in reality if someone would’ve told you Grudz would get hurt in the second half would you have been all that shocked. Now this trade you essentially bring back not much I probably would’ve tried to hold out another week or two and seen if you could’ve got something from the Yanks or Rangers for their last push. Who knows maybe you bring back Melky for HoRam in a desperate Yanks situation.

Every fight is a food fight when you’re a cannibal.
-- Demetri Martin

by kcscoliny on Aug 10, 2008 12:09 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hindsight is awesome

Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.

by doublestix on Aug 10, 2008 2:17 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know that suggesting we should have dealt Grudz or Mahay

qualifies as hindsight. I think that was pretty much an assumption of what was going to go down at the beginning of the season.

The real surprise is that they’re still both with the team.

This space intentionally left blank.

by marbotty on Aug 10, 2008 9:55 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Everybody loves to second guess the GM

And that’s fine. But it’s really hard to say “he should have traded Player X” when you have no idea what he could have gotten for him. There was no market for Grudz. I wish a team that played on a natural surface would have needed a 2B, but there wasn’t one. We have no idea what was offered for Mahay. There were rumors, but we have no idea if they were accurate. I’m sure he could have traded Mahay for something. Should he have just traded him away for anything? Just dumped him? He’s not just a rental. He can help the Royals again next year. I didn’t want Moore to just get rid of him. Without these important pieces of information, should we just assume that Moore screwed up?

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

the answer to all of your above questions

is “yes”.

Maybe there wasn’t a market for Grudz. But there surely was one sometime in the last two or three years, which ideally would have been the best time to try to trade Grudz (or let walk and then receive comp picks.)

I don’t know what sort of offers, if any, Moore would have received for Mark this year. Ray Durham was able to change teams, although one could say he was a more attractive pick up, and the prospects he received weren’t anything special. If there’s still a chance Mark signs elsewhere and we get some sort of prospect as a compensation pick, then there’s no problem with holding on to him. I don’t know that this will be the case, and all he really was doing up to this point was blocking Callaspo, effectively stunting his development.

The one rumor that I most vividly recall linked to Mahay was that Moore wasn’t interested in trading him. Now, there’s no way to substantiate that, but if true, that seems a bit short-sighted (unless we’re ready to make the big jump in 2009, which may very well be the case.)

Still, I’d rather dump Mahay for Paulo Orlando (he clearly was available) and then use that $4 million to sweeten our offer to whatever free agent slugger we’re targetting this offseason. Maybe we would have had to eaten the contract this year to get somebody to bite on Mahay, I dunno.

The thing I do know, and that Moore has proven he’s adept at, is that it’s possible to get good relief pitching off of waivers or from minor league trades. So, while it may hurt to see Mahay leave the team, we could probably find a passable replacement for a fraction of the cost. Case in point: I was pretty much against the Horacio Ramirez and Tejeda pick ups, but it seems now that Moore’s moves were the right ones. Throw in RamRod and Soria and you’ve got four excellent relievers that we’ve gotten more or less for free. So why do we keep blowing money on guys like Bale, Yabuta, and Mahay?

(And yes, we didn’t exactly blow money on Mahay—but you don’t spend $8 million on a reliever when you’ve got below-replacement level guys manning 1B and shortstop. The other thing is that even if Mahay were to continue to perform well through his second year of his contract, odds of him breaking down are high. Short term help, even for a bad team, can work out well (see David Riske) if there’s a chance that they’ll sign with another team at the conclusion of their contract, netting the team with a prospect. This is something the Yanks have had a lot of success with in recent years, and part of the reason their farm system has rebounded. But it makes a lot less sense if the short-term help comes in the form of a 38 or 39 year old reliever.)

This space intentionally left blank.

by marbotty on Aug 10, 2008 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe there wasn’t a market for Grudz. But there surely was one sometime in the last two or three years, which ideally would have been the best time to try to trade Grudz (or let walk and then receive comp picks.)

First, you only get comp picks if you offer arbitration and the player declines. Second, I essentially agree with you about not re-signing him, but we were talking about this trade deadline, weren’t we? I know you are always frothing at the mouth to tear into Moore for his incessant dumb moves, but can we stick with one issue at at time? There was no market for Grudz, so he really couldn’t trade him, period.
The one rumor that I most vividly recall linked to Mahay was that Moore wasn’t interested in trading him. Now, there’s no way to substantiate that, but if true, that seems a bit short-sighted (unless we’re ready to make the big jump in 2009, which may very well be the case.)

First, yes it is a rumor so we don’t know if it is true. Second, if you’re Moore, would you say “we’re having a fire sale, everyone over the age of 33 must go! We’re selling, just make your offers. Everyone must go.” Doesn’t it make more sense to act like you are not a motivated seller?
Still, I’d rather dump Mahay for Paulo Orlando (he clearly was available) and then use that $4 million to sweeten our offer to whatever free agent slugger we’re targetting this offseason.

Maybe you’re willing to go with a bargain basement bullpen, but Moore isn’t. If he gave away Mahay, he wouldn’t have just put that money into the big bat. It probably would have gone into another Riske or Mahay.
The thing I do know, and that Moore has proven he’s adept at, is that it’s possible to get good relief pitching off of waivers or from minor league trades. So, while it may hurt to see Mahay leave the team, we could probably find a passable replacement for a fraction of the cost. Case in point: I was pretty much against the Horacio Ramirez and Tejeda pick ups, but it seems now that Moore’s moves were the right ones.

You don’t get someone performing at Mahay’s level from the waiver wire or a minor league deal. H.Ramirez and Tejeda have been competent. I guess H.Ramirez has been good, not just competent, but I think we all know that what one can expect from him going forward is basically mere competence (or perhaps regression back to suckitude). So, from the waiver wire and minor league deals (the scrap heap), you can get a fill in 6th or 7th man in the bullpen, but you sure as hell can’t get a dominant setup man (according to metrics from both BP and THT, Mahay has been the 7th best reliever in the league this year and the best non-closer reliever). Think he can get that off the waiver wire?
Throw in RamRod and Soria and you’ve got four excellent relievers that we’ve gotten more or less for free.

Oh come on. Exaggerate much? R. Ramirez and Soria have been excellent relievers. Are you actually trying to say that H.Ramirez and Tejeda are excellent relievers? Please. And, as you have pointed out many, many times, Moore is not always right on his pitcher picks. Yabuta has been awful. So it’s not like it doesn’t matter how good Mahay is because Moore can find someone cheap who is nearly as good. That simply isn’t true.
So why do we keep blowing money on guys like Bale, Yabuta, and Mahay?

Because you can’t just rely on the scrap heap. You can’t build a bullpen where you rely on guys like that. The are complementary players, not key, high leverage pitchers.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

First, you only get comp picks if you offer arbitration and the player declines.

All the more reason to trade these guys.

Doesn’t it make more sense to act like you are not a motivated seller?

Sure, but if you don’t end up selling, it sort of looks like you weren’t being coy, and instead really weren’t interested in selling. Maybe that’s not a problem if you think you can contend in 2009. I’m just saying you can’t contend without another big bat, and now we have $4 million less to offer for said bat. I guess that’s a catch 22, but I think it’s easier to find a guy who can pitch well out of the pen than it is to get someone to hit 30+ hrs or post a .900+ OPS. It’s especially damning when all of our top prospects in the high majors are pitchers. If we had a bunch of hitting prospects in AAA, then it would make sense to spend cash on relievers.

Maybe you’re willing to go with a bargain basement bullpen, but Moore isn’t. If he gave away Mahay, he wouldn’t have just put that money into the big bat. It probably would have gone into another Riske or Mahay.
If Moore dumped Mahay and then were to think his priority next season should be acquiring another Riske over 1st Base/DH, he deserves to be fired. Sacrificing Mahay would be one way to get extra cash, and he’s replaceable. Sure, maybe his replacement wouldn’t be as reliable, but you’d still have Soria, Nunez, Ramirez taking up the bulk of the high-leverage innings, and presumably the replacement for Mahay would be someone like Rosa. We’re likely only talking about 40 innings here, anyway.
Oh come on. Exaggerate much? R. Ramirez and Soria have been excellent relievers. Are you actually trying to say that H.Ramirez and Tejeda are excellent relievers? Please.
Well, I’m not trying to say that.
but i appreciate the sarcastic tone.

What I am trying to say is that they’ve all done a good job, and we got them for free. In many ways, better than Mahay has (based on hits/9, k/9, whip, k:bb, ERA.) Are they excellent relievers? I dunno - they are performing excellently, which was the point that I was trying to get at - that you can get decent performances from guys you’re paying league minimum. I have no faith at all in Tejeda continuing to succeed, but as a converted starter who has had some previous success, H. Ramirez might continue to pitch pretty well. Perhaps he just needed to be placed in another role, and as a lefty, he’s at the age where he would start to perform better, anyway.

Because you can’t just rely on the scrap heap. You can’t build a bullpen where you rely on guys like that. The are complementary players, not key, high leverage pitchers.
Fine. I don’t know what our budget is for 2009, but I imagine it’s finite. I don’t know how attracted free agents are to our team, but I Imagine it’s limited. I don’t know how much we have to overspend to get players to play for us, but I imagine it’s somewhere in the range of +$3 or +$4 million/annually. If we can still keep Mahay and sign Burrell or Dunn or whoever the best slugging option is, then Moore’s done a good job. If we open up camp with Jason Smith or Ross Gload manning 1st Base/DH, because we couldn’t land somebody decent because we had too much more money tied up in in other contracts, then I’ll see what you have to say then.

This space intentionally left blank.

by marbotty on Aug 10, 2008 6:14 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

In an effort to upgrade the speed in their farm system

This line makes no sense does anyone realize that Wilmington is trying to break the record for most SB in a season already. I don’t think speed is a problem.

Every fight is a food fight when you’re a cannibal.
-- Demetri Martin

by kcscoliny on Aug 10, 2008 12:17 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

So what about Josh Newman?

What’s his story? His record shows some MLB time. Who did he play for?

by Shooter on Aug 10, 2008 1:01 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Colorado.

Probably a decent pitcher.

by rockchalk on Aug 10, 2008 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Orlando has fewer stolen bases than

Robinson and Dyson.

Jarrod Dyson went to the Joey Gathright school of hitting, producing a .251/.332/.275 line with 37 steals

by BHWick on Aug 10, 2008 1:10 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I like this move

I think the Royals realize that they need more speed prospects. The Royals need one of these guys to work because they really need a leadoff man and more speed in “the K”’s big outfield. They are trying to find the next Willie Wilson.

Go Royals!

by BabyBlues on Aug 10, 2008 4:57 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

This is a very minor move and I think it is hard to very up or down about it

H.Ramirez is/was a scrap heap acquisition who performed at a competent level as a front-to-middle of the bullpen guy. He’s just a 1 2/3 month rental of a very minor piece. So, while it would have been great to get great plate discipline, power hitting OF prospect for him, that’s not quite realistic. I’d love to trade TPJ for Evan Longoria too.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 5:04 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

How about just trading for one of those 2 plate discipline or power

as opposed to more speed which we have a ton of at that level.

Every fight is a food fight when you’re a cannibal.
-- Demetri Martin

by kcscoliny on Aug 10, 2008 8:59 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're not going to get a good prospect for H. Ramirez, period

But do you think we’d be getting a better prospect if we got a guy who had no speed or athleticism or power, but who draws a lot of walks? That’s no better than what we got.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 9:09 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would rather have a Dallas McPherson type than the scrap that they got.

HoRam while not a good or great player is a decent player to have in the organization. He serves many flexible type rolls that alot of teams need. LOOGY, long relief, 6th starter, allows you to shorten the number of relievers you carry in the pen his value to the major league club is much larger than a low minors high strikeout lack of power that KC received for him. While this isn’t a make or break type move it also is a move that didn’t need to be made right now.

Every fight is a food fight when you’re a cannibal.
-- Demetri Martin

by kcscoliny on Aug 10, 2008 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What in the world are you talking about?
I would rather have a Dallas McPherson type than the scrap that they got.

So you would have rather Moore traded H.Ramirez for a guy like Dallas McPherson than Paulo Orlando? You know what, I think Moore would have liked that too. But no one would have traded someone like Dallas McPherson for H. Ramirez. No one. His trade value wasn’t anywhere near that. I would have liked to trade him for Lincecum. Why do you think Moore didn’t make that trade?
He serves many flexible type rolls that alot of teams need. LOOGY, long relief, 6th starter, allows you to shorten the number of relievers you carry in the pen his value to the major league club is much larger than a low minors high strikeout lack of power that KC received for him.

Are you trying to argue that H.Ramirez is a valuable commodity and that Moore could and should have gotten more for him? Do you realize that he was a minor league contract signee who no one wanted? Do you realize that he cleared waivers before this trade was made? His contract expires at the end of the season. He’s only under contract for 1 2/3 more months. He’ll be gone soon. Why the hell not trade him? So that maybe the Royals can win one more game than without him? Hell, the difference between him and a replacement is likely less than 10 runs, so it doesn’t even mean losing one more game.
While this isn’t a make or break type move it also is a move that didn’t need to be made right now.

Turning a mediocre minor league contract guy into a minor leaguer when you’re not in contention definitely makes sense.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Have go agree

I don’t get a lot of DMGM’s moves, but again, turning HoRam (a guy suck has sucked and got signed for next to nothing) into any sort of living, breathing ballplayer after a couple months of decent performance seems pretty impressive to me.

Although I still think HoRam and Gload should have been

packaged together for Jason Bay.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by devil_fingers on Aug 10, 2008 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

BUT YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND

HO RAM IS AWESOME

A CORNERSTONE OF OUR FUTURE

Sarcasm™. It's the new gravy.

by jonfmorse on Aug 10, 2008 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Turning a mediocre minor league contract guy into a minor leaguer when you’re not in contention definitely makes sense.

It didn’t have to be done. Look at the bullpen next year you need to move someone into that roll you need another lefty back there besides Mahay. The Yankees and Rangers both are in the wildcard race and are both in need of 5th starters. One is likely to get Washburn the other will need to make a move. I would hold out for that and risk the chance of getting a more upside player as opposed to reproducing something you already have loads of. Who knows maybe the Rangers who are FULL In the OF would give up a guy like Nelson Cruz. He might be a Shealy type trade but the chances of him making the ML roster are far higher than that of Pauly Orlando. Worse case scenario you do nothing and resign HoRam would that be that bad of mistake as opposed to what you got in return now.

Every fight is a food fight when you’re a cannibal.
-- Demetri Martin

by kcscoliny on Aug 10, 2008 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It didn’t have to be done.

You keep saying this. What are you talking about? No deal “has to be done.” You do the deals that make the most sense for your team. This deal made the most sense for the Royals. There is nothing going on for the Royals this season. They are contending for nothing. I don’t want them taking a nosedive, but losing H.Ramirez isn’t going to sink them. The difference between him and some replacement like Newman is likely less than one win.
Look at the bullpen next year you need to move someone into that roll you need another lefty back there besides Mahay.

Next season is irrelevant because H. Ramirez will become a free agent whether he stays with the Royals for the rest of the season or gets traded. He wouldn’t have been on the team next year anyway. But if you really think he’s great, then Moore could sign him as a FA in the offseason still (which is not a good idea unless it is for peanuts).
The Yankees and Rangers both are in the wildcard race and are both in need of 5th starters. One is likely to get Washburn the other will need to make a move. I would hold out for that and risk the chance of getting a more upside player as opposed to reproducing something you already have loads of.

Do you know that a player can only be traded in August if he has cleared waivers? This means he cleared waivers. No other team put a claim in on him. They could have had him for free and didn’t take him.
Who knows maybe the Rangers who are FULL In the OF would give up a guy like Nelson Cruz.

You forgot to use the sarcasm font. Are you kidding me? A guy with Nelson Cruz’s ability and upside for H.Ramirez? That is absolutely nuts. Maybe they would have thrown in Kinsler too. H. Ramirez had very, very, very little trade value. I’m surprised Moore got anything for him.
Worse case scenario you do nothing and resign HoRam would that be that bad of mistake as opposed to what you got in return now.

We can still sign him if we really want to (but we shouldn’t). The return Moore got was very good for a guy like H. Ramirez. Your dreams of getting a pretty good prospect like Cruz for him are bizarre (at best).

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You are probably right after thinking about the waiver situation. I didn’t take a look at the standings I was under the impression that the Yankees were ahead of the White Sox in the standings and NY would have the later claim but they wouldn’t. I am still not in favor of the trade as he is a similar player to the ones KC already has in the system.

Every fight is a food fight when you’re a cannibal.
-- Demetri Martin

by kcscoliny on Aug 10, 2008 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Strange move

It’s hard to see why Moore bothered to make a move like this. Apparently he sees Orlando as a possible future 4th OF?

by cookierojas73 on Aug 10, 2008 7:35 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Ho-Ram for Gathright clone >>> J. P. Howell for Joey Gathright

Not that the latter was te end of the world, but spinning a scrap-heap guy who performed for a couple of months for someone who might turn out to be useful seems like a good move. If the new guy ever sniffs the majors, I thinks counts as a very smart move for DMGM.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by devil_fingers on Aug 10, 2008 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I didn't have high hopes for Ho-Ram

but he proved me wrong. Still, this seems to be a better trade than it appears at first glance. The guy can at least hit homeruns, and he’s got a whole lot of speed. This one may actually work out well for the Royals.

Has anyone noticed his teammate in Wilmington, B Correll? This is the guy I’m excited about. He’s really, really old for the league, but he absolutely mashes, 7 hrs in 121 at bats this year, with excellent discipline, and more of the same last season (23hr in 250 at bats).

I’m sure the organization views him as filler at this point, but it would be nice to see if he could put up similar numbers in AA or AAA.

This space intentionally left blank.

by marbotty on Aug 10, 2008 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

To those of you who run the site

is there anyway to put a Hosmer/Melville countdown clock post up?

Every fight is a food fight when you’re a cannibal.
-- Demetri Martin

by kcscoliny on Aug 10, 2008 12:49 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm sure there will be a deadline day post and discussion thread

But it is a little early for that now. I don’t know if there is a way to put up a running countdown clock.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

sure there is...

but i dont know how to do it

by royalsreview on Aug 10, 2008 10:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Poor trade.

Ho-Ram was pitching really well for us. His WHIP was only 0.90, and he had 11:1 K/BB.

And we traded him for another Joey Gathright it seems.

Banny being Banny.

by JobDDT on Aug 10, 2008 1:13 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Good lord, what do you think Ho-Ram was worth?

And how valuable do you think he was to this team for the next 1 2/3 months?

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Worth more than we got back.

He has been great for us and if we could’ve locked him up for a while he could have filled a hole that we now have.

I guess GMDM is fully confident Peralta has turned the corner after two outings, though.

Banny being Banny.

by JobDDT on Aug 10, 2008 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

At least Ramirez is/will contribute in the Major Leagues

....for the remainder of this season. Paulo’s MiLB numbers are pretty pathetic, overall (obviously, he possesses great speed, something we already have a multitude of in our run-deprived Wilmington affiliate).

Ramirez could have been a damn fine reliever for the remainder of this season, and even if he regressed significantly next season, he would have still been a durable 6th/7th reliever. That is more than this bum will ever be.

by Royals Nation on Aug 10, 2008 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's a free agent

and he passed through waivers for the trade. So if the Royals really think he can they need him to contribute next year, I imagine he’ll be available in the off-season.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by devil_fingers on Aug 10, 2008 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

YES!

5 years, 50 million, HORAM NOW—- errr HORAM AGAIN!

by I need more Esteban on Aug 10, 2008 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly.

I’d rather have the so called “one win” we would’ve gotten with HoRam on our team than the nothing that this minor leaguer projects to contribute to us.

Banny being Banny.

by JobDDT on Aug 10, 2008 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm growing tired of being a seller

Neither Mahay nor Grudz would have netted us anything at the deadline, and apparently neither did Horacio Ramirez. This looks like a career Minor Leaguer at best. A Chip Ambres, or poor man’s Joey Gathright. I like the propensity of trading Jose Guillen for 3 prospects, including one A prospect. However, these trades make zero sense and neither help us in the short term or long term.

Horacio Ramirez will have contributed more (VORP-wise) the remainder of this year than this Minor League project ever will.

Pitching is the currency of baseball…...sigh

.....but we still need to evaluate trades on a case-by-case basis. The ‘currency’ that Moore has used has not netted us much of value in return, offensively. Sisco for Gload? Buckner for Callaspo? Cordier for Pena? All poor moves at best, and all made for slappy bench players.

by Royals Nation on Aug 10, 2008 1:46 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I still think Callaspo might turn out to be a decent starting MI

although his “other issues” (speculatio) might have held him back this year.

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by devil_fingers on Aug 10, 2008 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's a 2B option, only

We have a multitude of 2B options in our organization, right now and for the future. Mertins, Johnson, McConnell, Bianchi, Aviles, Grudzielanek, German, Giavotella, etc. etc. He’s clearly a big leaguer, but he’s limited to one position, and we have a manager who refuses to grant him an opportunity anywhere.

Oh, and he’s also an alcoholic woman-beater.

by Royals Nation on Aug 10, 2008 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry, should have typed "2B"

thought about it right after I typed it in.

Character issues aside, I guess we’ll have to wait until next year to get an idea of how that trade pans out. I would speculate Hillman/Moore’s plan was for Grudz to get most of the PT until the trade deadline and then get Callaspo in there full-time, but then the DUI happened…

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by devil_fingers on Aug 10, 2008 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Alright, I don't get it

The same people who were bashing Moore for picking up HoRam, are the some of the same who are up in arms about trading him. How can anyone say this is a bad move right now? It is not possible to know. Does anyone know that HoRam will continue to pitch this way? No. Does anyone know that this minor leaguer we got won’t be good? No. It is a day after the trade, there is no way to evaluate it yet. Next year, if HoRam is the next Johan Santana then maybe we can start getting upset about it, but right now it’s pretty rediculous.

by I need more Esteban on Aug 10, 2008 1:49 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

-1

I gave the HoRam pickup a thumbs up.

Banny being Banny.

by JobDDT on Aug 10, 2008 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

good

you didn’t overreact then to something you couldn’t know (whether HORAM would be helpful to us), so you shouldn’t overreact now to something you don’t know (whether he’ll continute to be good or not).

by I need more Esteban on Aug 10, 2008 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed, and I was wrong

Obviously, Moore has done a commendable job evaluating pitching, overall. The Ramirez signing I was pretty ‘meh’ on. However, I loathed the promotion of Ramirez to MLB, because I feared he would be used in high leverage situations (i.e. not used strictly as a ‘7th reliever’). However, I freely admit that I was wrong. Failed starters can be converted into damn good relievers, any time. Ramirez was an awful starting pitcher….even an awful #5 option. He is a damn good reliever in any role.

Tell me, where does Paulo Orlando project? Where does he fit in the organization’s future?

by Royals Nation on Aug 10, 2008 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He has some talent and some upside

He’s no lock for the majors. He’s just a mediocre prospect. H. Ramirez was worth a mediocre prospect. Orlando’s tiny chance of being something decent in the majors was worth more than the small value a middle reliever has for the final 1 2/3 months of season when the Royals aren’t in contention. There was no reason to hang onto Ramirez. Moore got what we could get for him. It was a wise move.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Orlando’s tiny chance of being something decent in the majors was worth more than the small value a middle reliever has for the final 1 2/3 months of season when the Royals aren’t in contention.

I disagree. Ramirez could have been retained for next season. The wins he contributes for us now are worth more than Orlando’s. (By the way, how does ‘0’ extra wins sound?) We need to take advantage of this system, which favors prospects heavily over veterans in trades. Teams are overprotective/reluctant to trade their prospects now more than ever, because of escalating salaries emphasizing the importance of cost-controlled players. By the way, Ramirez is 28….he’s not exactly falling off a cliff in the coming seasons in terms of production. Do we want a prospect boost in our organization? Trade Meche. Trade Guillen. Don’t trade veterans with upside who will very likely net us more value, overall, than anything they net in return.

I was eager to trade vets for prospects in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and maybe early 2008. However, now…it is time for this team to put up….or shut up. We’re close enough to contention that we shouldn’t swap excellent relief pitchers for Minor League projects.

by Royals Nation on Aug 10, 2008 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Correction

We are close (should be close) enough to contention that we shouldn’t swap excellent relief pitchers for Minor League projects.

by Royals Nation on Aug 10, 2008 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't get this at all

H.Ramirez’s contributions have been minimal. The contributions of middle relievers usually are. So you’re saying maybe one more win this year is worth more than a mediocre prospect? That’s short-sighted at best. And if we want to re-sign Ramirez, we can still do so in the offseason when he becomes a FA. But, unless it is for pennies, there’s no reason to. He has a poor track record, so we don’t know if he’ll be able to do this again. And Moore can pick up guys like him off the scrap heap to perform like that all the time. It’s not easy to find a Mahay off the scrap heap. It is pretty easy to find a H.Ramirez or Tejeda if you have good pitching scouts (and the Royals do).

Don’t trade veterans with upside who will very likely net us more value, overall, than anything they net in return.

Staying stocked up in mediocre veterans is not the way to build a winner. That’s a loser’s strategy.
However, now…it is time for this team to put up….or shut up. We’re close enough to contention that we shouldn’t swap excellent relief pitchers for Minor League projects.

He’s going to be gone. He doesn’t help the team much. There’s no reason to keep him. Mahay and Grudz have some real value to the team (although I would have dealt Grudz if there was an offer out there). But H. Ramirez is a mediocre player at best who isn’t of much value to the Royals.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I Dredged This

Up on Google:
“Orlando was hitting .264 with 15 doubles, 12 triples, nine home runs, 42 RBI, 73 runs and 28 stolen bases in 37 attempts with Class A Winston-Salem in the Carolina League. The Royals assigned the 22-year-old to Class A Wilmington. Orlando, from Brazil, has stolen 77 bases in 2 1/2 seasons in the White Sox organization. He may be a keeper prospect at some point, but not yet. Avoid him in Fantasy. ”
(Updated 08/09/2008).

If Gator ever approached those numbers on any level he’d be a valuable commodity. Orlie is listed as 6’3”, 165; he could fill out another 20 pounds easily. He doesn’t sound like Gathright 2.0 to me.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Aug 10, 2008 1:54 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

You don't get it. H. Ramirez is a great reliever and we needed him so that we could win 76 games this season instead of 75!

Culture of winning requires a good middle reliever.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You ignore that HoRam could have been retained....

...for next season at the right price. You know what? I’m fairly confident Moore will find adequate replacements for Ramirez. But why even risk this trade? As a rule, mid relievers are just not good quantities to trade. You just simply let them ride out their tenures with your ballclub. If they pan out, great, and if they don’t, too bad.

by Royals Nation on Aug 10, 2008 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why even risk the trade?????

There is no risk whatsoever. First, if Moore wants H.Ramirez for next season he can sign him as a FA. It’s not like there are going to be many bidders for this guy (he cleared waivers). What’s the risk? That the prospect might turn into something? That we won’t have a mediocre pitcher like H.Ramirez on the team? That’s a good risk.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wouldn't it be nice

If we sign Ho-Ram in the off-season to a minimum contract, he pitches well, and thus we have him and another fringe prospect in the system?

Of course, I don’t think we’ll re-sign him unless it is a minimum/minor league deal. Moore’s not dumb.

by BrRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Culture of winning requires a good middle reliever

How is it you post this but yet you take me to task for suggesting that we should have also traded Mahay?

This space intentionally left blank.

by marbotty on Aug 10, 2008 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I believe he was being ironic

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Aug 10, 2008 6:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i know

he’s suggesting trading a middle reliever has little effect on the team’s performance, but then up above he seems to be suggesting our most expensive middle reliever is inexpendable

This space intentionally left blank.

by marbotty on Aug 10, 2008 7:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I missed that, apparently

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Aug 10, 2008 7:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Differences

There’s a difference between just another middle reliever and the guy who has been the best setup man in the majors this year. There’s also a difference between a guy whose contract is up at the end of the season and a guy who is under contract for next year. And yet, I’d still trade him, but I wouldn’t just give him away. H.Ramirez is easily replaceable. Mahay, not so much.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Think there's a difference between H.Ramirez and Mahay?

The stats sure think there’s a big difference. But I would have been willing to trade Mahay for the right return. But I wouldn’t just give him away for a mediocre prospect like Orlando, as you suggest. Mahay has a lot more value and has performed at a much higher level than H. Ramirez. And Mahay is under contract for next year, while Ramirez had an expiring contract. The difference in their value to the Royals is huge.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 7:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1 Phil

in the history of baseball, 22 yr old A ballers have turned out to be more than people thought they would. I’m not saying it will happen here, but we just don’t know.

by I need more Esteban on Aug 10, 2008 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

One thing we do know from this

Dayton Moore is putting together a pretty shitty fantasy team.

:(

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by devil_fingers on Aug 10, 2008 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

HoRam's Value

I really don’t know why so many people are so upset about this trade.

I admit I was a little disappointed at first, but that was because I wasn’t sure how minor league contracts work. Now that I know HoRam would have been a free agent anyway, I think this is a pretty good trade. It’s essentially a no-risk trade with a low chance of turning out to be a really good trade for the Royals. Worst-case scenario is that Orlando flops and no one really cares because we gave up nothing as far as the future of the team is concerned.

However, I don’t think it’s fair to say HoRam had no value. He said he changed his offseason routine to rehab from his injury and he had cut down on his walk rate tremendously. His FIP and ERA are relatively close, so his performance wasn’t fluky a la Kyle Davies. I don’t expect him to continue to pitch like this, but it is possible. Teams don’t claim players that they know the other team won’t just let them have unless they are trying to block someone. Just because he cleared waivers doesn’t mean that nobody wanted him; it just means nobody cared enough about him to try and block another team from getting him.

I don’t see how this trade hurts the Royals in any way.

by KCBear on Aug 10, 2008 2:04 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

+1

I can’t understand anyone being upset about this trade. Even if you care a lot about how many games the Royals win this year, there is no reason to believe that losing H.Ramirez means more than 1 additional game lost this year. And, quite likely, it means less than 1 loss.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

75.34-86.66

YES WE CAN!!!11

OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG

by devil_fingers on Aug 10, 2008 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

But 75.96 wins would change the culture of losing!!!!!!!!!!111

We must

win that additional .62 of a game.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Change the Culture

22 year old Brazilian kid with 80 speed and a K-BB ratio that is the way to change the culture.

Every fight is a food fight when you’re a cannibal.
-- Demetri Martin

by kcscoliny on Aug 10, 2008 8:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Getting a kid with some talent for a minimal value rental like Ramirez is smart

Sure it would have been great if Moore could have gotten a power hitting prospect for him, but of course no one would have given that up for the remains of H. Ramirez. Moore got max value for this guy. You should be happy that he got anything for him instead of complaining that he didn’t get a good power hitter. Do you not get that no GM could have gotten a power hitting prospect for a guy like Ramirez?

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 8:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I understand what you are saying I'm just disappointed in the philosophy of Moore

thus far. It seems he leans to athleticism over plate discipline. This kid could develop some power and be Beltran Jr. I understand that but getting a guy who develops into a 5 tool player is rare. Even more rare when you lack the plate discipline to become that.

Every fight is a food fight when you’re a cannibal.
-- Demetri Martin

by kcscoliny on Aug 10, 2008 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nobody thinks that Orlando is a 5-tool player or that he has Beltran upside

He has limited upside, but he has some. I’m glad we got someone with at least a couple of decent tools for H. Ramirez. I think the criticism that Moore likes athletic guys too much (at least in the minors) and doesn’t focus enough on getting genuine hitters is very legitimate and I agree with it. I just don’t think that the Ramirez-Orlando trade is good support for that criticism. He got what he could get in this trade. One could argue that in the two drafts that Moore has overseen he’s focused too much on athletes and not enough on hitters (with regard to position players).

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 9:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Moustakas And Hosmer?

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Aug 11, 2008 1:08 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He did very well to go after legitimate power in the first round

But it seems like the other position players he’s drafted have been primarily athletes long on speed and short on bat.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 11, 2008 1:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This culture of losing stuff

really bugs me. Who gives a damn? Let’s get some more good players sometime, then we’ll listen as this “culture” crap slowly disappears from the discussions.

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Aug 10, 2008 9:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, the culture follows the talent

The Royals haven’t been losing for years because of a bad “culture” or institutional mindset. They’ve been losing because of a lack of talent. One of the ways you rebuild an organization is by dumping mediocre vets for prospects at the deadline. Of those kinds of moves, this was a very minor version. This move isn’t going to make the Royals a winner, but it is more of a positive for the organization’s future than keeping HRamirez for another 1 2/3 months.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 9:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes

and really, I know HoRam was on a nice little run here, but the guy’s production is completely replaceable. I have very little doubt that Musser or Newman can play his role as the Jimmy Gobble Eraser.

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Aug 10, 2008 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, he's very replaceable

Or the Royals can sign him for $600K.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 9:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

On the cheap

Did you ever get my second e-mail to you? The one about our brain leaking?

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Aug 10, 2008 9:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think the second e-mail was about busy schedules and GRE's

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 10:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Twas, twas

It was also asking if you had a Blogger ID or not.

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Aug 10, 2008 10:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh yeah

No, I don’t. :(

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 10:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Happily,

for the low, low price of NOTHING, you could fix that situation.

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Aug 11, 2008 1:45 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure I can afford it

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 11, 2008 1:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Institutional Mindset very well plays into it.

Glass traded away Dye, Beltran, Damon because he didn’t want to pay him then he forced Baird to draft $1000 signers. If that doesn’t play into a losing team then I don’t know what does.

Every fight is a food fight when you’re a cannibal.
-- Demetri Martin

by kcscoliny on Aug 10, 2008 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think so

I very much doubt that, given that the Royals are trying to turn things around, we’re going to sell off our best players.

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Aug 10, 2008 10:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well not now

but half of the hole that KC finds themselves in now is due to Glass.

Every fight is a food fight when you’re a cannibal.
-- Demetri Martin

by kcscoliny on Aug 10, 2008 10:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's hard to say how much was Glass and how much was Robinson and Baird

They all deserve criticism. Thankfully, by all accounts the Glass’s are not meddling anymore and they are also willing to spend (and have been spending). So again, I don’t think it is fair to criticize this FO for mistakes made by prior GM’s.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The "institutional mindset" I was talking about...

...was referring to the group psychology argument embodied in the “culture of losing” theory. There were institutional philosophies and practices which hurt the team. But they hurt the team because of the affect they had on talent, not on the organizational culture.

But, for the record, the real problem wasn’t trading away Dye, Beltran and Damon. The problem was what we got in return (with the possible exception of the Beltran trade). I don’t mind trading away young players when you can’t afford to re-sign them and you can get a good haul for them. Hell, if I knew the Royals were going to keep Soria as a closer, I’d trade him this offseason without hesitation.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Being too cheap is a slippery slope

Trading away the majority of your young talent as KC did at that time will get you in trouble eventually I believe. As we know all young players are a crap shoot and eventually I think you might run into a bad group which can set your team back a few years. Trying to hit on one resigned player and a group of prospects is hard to do as KC and the current Oakland A’s roster has shown. I like a mix similar to what the Twins have done.

Every fight is a food fight when you’re a cannibal.
-- Demetri Martin

by kcscoliny on Aug 10, 2008 10:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like a mix similar to what the Twins have done.

The Twins haven’t excelled based on a better philosophy or on being willing to spend more than the Royals. They haven’t spent more than the Royals. For a long time, they had a great GM and a tremendous FO staff. That’s why for years they just kept calling up prospects who kept succeeding. Year after year their draftees would pan out, their trades were great. But they can’t sign all of their best young players. They will sign some of them. The Royals will sign some of theirs too. But let’s say that Greinke, Gordon and Butler all develop into stars before they hit free agency. Do you think the Royals will be able to afford all three of them? Probably not. And not because Glass is cheap, but because small market, low revenue teams can only afford so much. A $100M payroll simply isn’t realistic.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know why it is so unrealistic

according to the numbers with no increase in attendance (which is unlikely) that would put the Royals from a +3($mil) figure to a -32 and that doesn’t take into consideration the raise in value the team is about to take on by the increase value of the team after renovations. The Yankees already run in that zone as do the Anaheim Angels. The raise in attendance/selling of luxury suites increase in add revenue would help combat that those losses and probably counter them closer to the -10 range which many teams function under.

Every fight is a food fight when you’re a cannibal.
-- Demetri Martin

by kcscoliny on Aug 10, 2008 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know what you're saying here
that would put the Royals from a +3($mil) figure to a -32

What is a +3 and a -32?
The Yankees already run in that zone as do the Anaheim Angels

What zone? Are you talking about revenues from attendance?
The raise in attendance/selling of luxury suites increase in add revenue would help combat that those losses and probably counter them closer to the -10 range which many teams function under.

I don’t know what -10 means either.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Profit Margins

I’m taking all the figures from Forbes. KC has a 3 million profit margin and have been in the black the last few years.

Every fight is a food fight when you’re a cannibal.
-- Demetri Martin

by kcscoliny on Aug 10, 2008 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

A couple of things

Forbes is estimating. They aren’t using publicly available data. So we don’t really know how close that number is to accurate. And it is widely understood that the Yankees, Red Sox and pretty much every other large market team operates on a profit when you take into account all revenues, including RSN’s.

Also, even if Forbes is right and the Royals are operating with a small profit, that doesn’t mean they would be able to afford the market rate for multiple young stars. While the Royals revenues are increasing, every other team’s revenues are increasing also. And the Royals do not and will not have the massive revenue stream from RSN’s that large and medium market teams have or will have. These revenues are already leading to larger salaries for players and that inflation is just going to go up. Market size determines revenue potential. Large markets have large potential (and they usually realize that potential). Small markets have small potential. Even if the Royals sell out every game, their revenue is going to be a small fraction of the revenue realized by the Yankees, Red Sox, Cubs, Dodgers and Angels (to name a few). Because the biggest revenue sources are radio and TV. Because of market size, the Royals will never be able to compete with the revenues large market teams bring in from radio and TV.

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 10, 2008 11:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes but Glass should be able to take on a few

years of losses with an Increase in the overall value of the team thanks in part to the tax payers. He owes the fans a quality product on the field for fitting that bill. While the profits are unknown I would say they are on the lower side and that is exactly why they aren’t released by the teams. KC while not having the large market has a loyal base. They currently have the third worst attendance figures I think it is very reasonable to see a 1/3 increase in gate receipts (24 million in ‘07) alone just by boosting the product on the field. A contending team for multiple seasons would increase figures largely.

The problem in the past has been Glass’s overall commitment to this team. As many writers have written in the past he is not a local guy is rarely in the area for games and overall has in the past lacked any sort of commitment to this team. Hopefully that is changing now as he has got the stadium deal he wanted moved the AA affiliate to a desireable local for him. He is starting to put his own personal footprints on this organization hopefully that also means opening his checkbook.

Every fight is a food fight when you’re a cannibal.
-- Demetri Martin

by kcscoliny on Aug 11, 2008 12:25 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think he proved his commitment to the team...

...by agreeing to shell out the money for Meche and Guillen (as well as the money offered to Hunter, Jones, Kuroda and Silva), increasing draft spending (including over-slots), adding another minor league team to the system, creating a new baseball academy in Latin America and increasing spending on Latin American FA’s. He gets the blame for his stinginess and stupid meddling in the past. He also deserves credit for the increased spending and lack of meddling since Moore was hired. Now let’s see if he gets the MLB payroll up into the $75-80M range for 2009.

And again, while the Royals revenues will increase, every other team’s revenues are going to increase to (as they have been in recent years). And the Royals have structural limitations on revenues that large market teams do not have. This will keep small market teams like the Royals at a decided disadvantage and will almost certainly keep them out of the top 10 in MLB payroll. I’d be overjoyed if they can be in the 11-15 range for the next several years. Given the massive revenues that teams have to spend and the salary inflation which comes with it, I really doubt the Royals would be able to keep multiple young stars by the time they hit free agency. That’s why trading some of them at the right time makes sense for small market teams. (See the Minnesota Twins).

This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.

by NYRoyal on Aug 11, 2008 12:35 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Does anyone do any research before reacting?

31% XBH

That isn’t “no power”. Or a “Gathright clone”.

The guy has upside. Whether he reaches his ceiling or not? Who knows…probably not. But we have no idea. I think it’s a good idea to trade freakin Horacio Ramirez for a guy with tools and upside while he still has value.

Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.

by doublestix on Aug 10, 2008 3:05 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Not really sure I get the negativity over this trade

We flip Ho-Ram for something of value before he turns back into a pumpkin. Orlando is no great shakes, but you’re not going to get anything that great for a guy that was outright released in spring training.

Orlando is NOT Joey Gathright redux. This guy has a modicum of power. He can’t draw walks, but to dismiss him for that is to focus too much on his weaknesses without looking at his strength. He can steal bases and at least hit for respectable power. That’s what you want out of a fourth outfielder. I don’t think he has a great chance of reaching the big leagues, but he’s the kinda upside guy you acquire. The old regime woulda signed HoRam to a 2 year deal, then watched as he imploded into his old non-strikeout, hittable self. At least Dayton had the wisdom to sell HoRam while his value was high.

Not a major move, but an encouraging one. It’ll probably amount to nothing, but it at least has the potential to be a great steal, one we look back and say “what were the White Sox thinking?”

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Aug 10, 2008 3:38 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

good post

I want to see the kid play before we make judgements. Maybe he comes up when he is 26 and becomes a superstar.

Let’s focus on what we can do. Not what we can’t. When you focus on the negative you enhance the culture of losing. When you focus on what you can do you enhance the culture of winning. Interesting how negative things follow negative people and positive things follow positive people.

Don't forget to send your broken maples to the US Forest Service.

by 306008 on Aug 10, 2008 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I can't believe Moore got anyone alive

for HoRam.

A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.

by NHZ on Aug 10, 2008 4:02 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Minor League Depth is Good

And we got some for a guy that didn’t have a job a couple months ago. I like it.

If you don't understand it, kill it.

by Discodave on Aug 10, 2008 4:40 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Nice Sig

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Aug 11, 2008 1:16 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am both glad that HoRam is gone

and glad that I missed this thread.

by Gopherballs on Aug 11, 2008 11:51 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

it was for the best, i assure you

This space intentionally left blank.

by marbotty on Aug 11, 2008 5:22 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This Thread Is

Dead.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Aug 12, 2008 1:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.
Start posting about the Royals »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Stadium-sellout-450w_small
Early projection on 2010 Royals roster
Small
Fixing the kansas city royals
_41153080_gallerysanta_small
Are you good enough?
Trust_small
Denny Matthews at Plaza Library
Royalsretro_small
Royals sign P Jorge Campillo
Stash1_small
Kansas City Fails To Pick Up Option On Royals
Royalsretro_small
Royals sign P Brad Thompson
Tu_small
What would be an appropriate haul for Greinke?
Small
Shane Costa and Ryan Shealy Eras Officially End
Royalsreview_small
Predictions: Will Greinke Win the Cy Young?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Royalsreview_small royalsreview