Roy Halladay for Cy Young
by Freneau on Sep 29, 2008 3:18 AM EDT
Email
PrintOf AL pitchers with at least 180 innings pitches in 2008, guess who faced the weakest competition according to BP's Quality of Hitters Faced Report?
Cliff Lee.
26th out of 26th. Lee's average challeger was a .262/.330/.405 hitter.
At play here is the unbalaced schedule and an additional dose of good fortune. Lee faced the Royals five times, his most common opponent. His second most common foe was Minnesota, who he battled with on four occasions. Lee also snuck in two starts against both Oakland and Seattle each, as well as matchups against Oakland and San Diego. Really, all that was missing was a game against the Nats.
Halladay on the other hand, faced the second toughest set of hitters out of the 26 ALers who had over 180 IP. Slogging through another season of hell in the AL East (even Baltimore had a weirdly good offense this year). Halladay's average hitter was a .266/.342/.425 guy. Sure, that's not hugely different, but remember, we're talking about hundreds and hundreds of individual pitcher-hitter confrontations over five months.
Just something to think about when you cast your nonexistent Cy Young ballot.
53 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
i'd vote halladay anyways
i’m too tired to remember all the stats he was better than lee in, but it was quite a few. most notably innings pitched (i think, not looking it up).
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
come on now
Cliff Lee faced AL hitters, Roy Halladay faced AL hitters. You can say Cliff Lee faced the Royals 5 times, so maybe those numbers should mean less, but as Rany pointed out the other day, the Royals have been death to lefties this year, so maybe Lee should get extra credit for doing so well against them. If you’re in the Majors, you’re facing MLB competition. You can break it down into AL/NL level competition if you want, but for most awards, that’s irrelevant. Beyond that, it doesn’t make sense to try to adjust for level of competition any further. Cliff Lee got to face Mark Teahen a couple extra times, but who knows, Mark might have been feeling great those days and Lee just shut him down. Full credit to Lee for getting an AL hitter out.
sure you can break it down more than AL/NL. there are better and worse ways to do it, but it's fair to do
just like park adjustments are fair.
I do agree that a R/L analysis is in order.
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
Lee still wins in VORP,
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/statistics/sortable/index.php?cid=204030
…which can be a bit of blunt stat when it comes to evaluating pitchers. Lee faded a little (relatively speaking) in the second half, and his small VORP lead might well be totally negated by what RR is talking about above. By the way, Johan Santana is still good.
A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.
Just because you're not allowed to use VORP on MVP discussions
doesn’t mean you’re allowed to drag it into Cy Young talks, you dirty VORPy.
Kansas City Royals: your 2006 and 2007 NL Central champions!
I'll drag VORP
into whatever discussion I want. I use it in pickup lines, actually.
A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.
...and the myster unravels!
But let me tell you about why +/- is better than FRAA!
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Sep 29, 2008 9:13 AM EDT up reply actions
VORP is based on RA, which like ERA, isn't a great stat
Beyond the Boxscore // Calling BJ Upton lazy is lazy.
I prefer SNLVAR for starting pitchers
And clearly BP does too.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Sep 30, 2008 6:23 PM EDT up reply actions
What's the best BP stat for relievers?
My interest in how BP rates Soria in relation to Ramirez this year. As you and I have discussed (to a resounding silence from the rest of RR), NYRoyal, FIP, xFIP, tRA+, and pRAA all say Ramirez was better than Soria this year.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Sep 30, 2008 7:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Their premier reliver stat is WXRL
Wins Expected above Replacement, Lineup Adjusted
In the AL
3. Soria
20. Ramirez
However, the way this stat is computed (relying on win expectancy) inherently favors closers. Being the guy who gets the ball with the lead in the 9th really helps you with this stat.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Oct 1, 2008 7:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Does that mean it incorporates something like WPA?
(which I also don’t quite get)
(baby steps)
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Oct 1, 2008 10:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Not exactly, but kinda
I’m not an expert on WXRL. But whether or not the team could/would/should win given the situation the pitcher comes into is important to that metric. And if you’re coming into a lot of games in medium-to-low leverage situations, where you also have the opportunity to lock down a win (such as to start the 9th inning with a 2+ run lead), you are in a situation where the team is likely to win and no other pitcher can change the team’s win expectancy. I think that’s one reason that so many closers are in the top 10 and top 20 in that stat.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Oct 2, 2008 1:19 AM EDT up reply actions
Hmmm...
I’ll have to read up on it more.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Oct 2, 2008 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions
2. Lee
3. Lester
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Sep 29, 2008 5:12 AM EDT up reply actions
Those three are pretty much
head and shoulders above the competition. I can’t believe how high Dice-K’s value turned out. After watching him walk a tightrope this year, it boggles the mind he ended up with a sub-3.00 ERA.
A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.
Next year
10.54 ERA as he lets all those baserunners score?
Although, I guess he really does have the stuff to get out of the situations, maybe he just won’t get into the situations.
Kansas City Royals: your 2006 and 2007 NL Central champions!
Not that extreme, (duh)
but he’s got to fall back a bit.
A mind without purpose will walk in dark places.
Numbers games
More evangelism for Stat Corner and their park-and-league adjusted version of FIP, tRA+
CLIFF 158 tRA+ (1st in the AL although this doesn’t take into account quality of competition, to it’s Doc for me, too)
Doc 140 (2nd)
“Choker” Vazquez 131 5th in AL, has been in top 6 last three years)
Beckett 129 (7th)
Lester 124 (8th, tied with Danks, who is listed 9th due to a lower pRAA)
Greinke 123 (10th)
ol’ Gil 119 (13th out of 60 makes him the best no. 2 in the league, or for the less optimistic, OMFG Dayton Moore gave 5/55 for the worst no. 1 in the AL!!!1111)
Scott Baker 119 (15th due to lower pRAA)
Dice-K 113 (19th)
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
Defending Lee
Good case can be made for both Halladay and Lee (and probably Lester as well), but I think discounting Lee for having to face the Royals 5 times is a gross misjustice. Yes, the Royals are a weak offensive club, but VERSUS LEFTIES, they had the FIFTH highest OPS in the American League this season. (I’ve been pointing out the outlandish team platoon gap with the Royals all year; finally somebody elsed noticed too – see Rany’s column this weekend). Royals also finished 36-24 against lefty starters this year, so perhaps Lee should receive CREDIT for beating them five times!
rany made a similar point
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Sep 29, 2008 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions
hmmm... weird
i’m not used to the royals being good at anything
I wanna know what love is, I want you to show me
Or ever recognizing or admitting it
Ever
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Sep 29, 2008 5:25 PM EDT up reply actions
The delayed game gets delayed further with a rain delay
Woo baseball on an offday! Anyone watching? This game is important to all the teams in the Central except for the .500 Cleveland team. Especially us: ending in 4th and second-to-last is much better than ending in 4th and last.
Kansas City Royals: your 2006 and 2007 NL Central champions!
I hope it gets rained out
And then I guess the Sox would have to play a potential double header tomorrow against the Tigers and Twins?
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Sep 29, 2008 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions
They said it's clearing up I think
But theoretically they could do the tiebreaker on Wednesday right? I mean, the Rays series is the the one that doesn’t start until Thursday.
Kansas City Royals: your 2006 and 2007 NL Central champions!
That wouldn't be fair
to the White Sox at all. Minny has a fresh bullpen, and Chicago theoretically could have several bullpen guys unavailable because of the 1st game.
I hate the White Sox, but would have to agree with them bitching if this were to actually happen.
I still think Selig needs to build in more off days between the end of the season and the 1st round of the playoffs. Start the playoffs on the weekend after the last Sunday, and surely this would eliminate all potential scheduling disasters. In addition, it would ensure all teams can lineup their pitching rotation the way they want, regardless of whether they clinched in the middle of Sept or on the last day.
And, no – I don’t care if this drags the World Series into the 1st week of November. As one who has worked in baseball in both the spring and the fall, I can assure you the weather in late March/early April is more likely to be bad than it is in late October/early November.
I think the World Series goes into November next year if it goes the full 7.
Kansas City Royals: your 2006 and 2007 NL Central champions!
I don't care what's fair to the White Sox
I hope god hates the Sox as much as I do and let’s it rain (frogs and locusts) on Chicago all day long.
The schedule is the schedule. They can bitch all the like, but the schedule was created long ago and it only as so much flexibility. And the weather is the weather.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Sep 29, 2008 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions
Well, if they want
they could just not play the game. And forfeit the division.
Kansas City Royals: your 2006 and 2007 NL Central champions!
That'd show Selig!
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Sep 29, 2008 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions
I still give it to Lee
What about MVP? I can think of a good case for about 6-7 guys.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
AL MVP?
Only considering position players, frankly, both sheer batting runs above average and VORP, A-Rod is frankly way ahead. Scary, considering he has about 150-200 less plate appearances than most other contenders.
Nick Markakis is actually second in bRAA (which corrects VORP’s OBP issue), but that doesn’t adjust for position. Also up there in bRAA and VORP depart from each other rapidly after A-Rod, though, due to positional adjustments in VORP (the advantage of that stat) and bRAA’s better accounting for OBP. VORP says Sizemore, Pedroia, Huff (!!), Hamilton, Bradley, Mauer, and so on up there. bRAA has Markakis, Bradley, Youkilis, Quentin, Huff, Cabrera, Mauer, Abreu, and so on. Pedroia is up there.
I guess if you don’t care about who is contending (and I don’t know what to make of WPA yet, I’m an idiot), I guess A-Rod is still the clear choice.
If you care about contenders, I’d say Mauer or Pedroia, due to the positions they play.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Sep 29, 2008 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions
I lean towards Pedroia
But I can see a really strong case for Mauer, Hamilton, Sizemore, Youk, and even Quentin and Bradley.
A-Rod though is a bid choke-arist!
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
i'd still vote A-Rod
I know he missed a little time though. How much might affect the vote.
Rowdy Hardy Fan Club member.
that's what's scary
well, of course, what’s scary is that the voters will go Hamilton or Morneau
what I meant to say is that by “counting” stats like bRAA and VORP, A-Rod still had the best offensive season in the AL, despite the time he missed…
Holy shit.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Sep 29, 2008 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions
Alex Rodriguez
Highest VORP by more than a little. And I don’t think MVP awards should have anything to do with how many games the players team won or whether they are in the playoffs or not.
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Sep 29, 2008 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions
I thought my "holy shit" summed A-Rod's oddly under the radar performance quite well
Seriously, look at his VORP and/or bRAA, and then notice how many plate appearances he has relative to the people right under him…
He’s sort of the Mantle/Mays of this generation — could win MVP almost every year, but they just won’t do that.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Sep 29, 2008 10:05 PM EDT up reply actions
But he didn't get his team into the playoffs
If his stats didn’t translate into sufficient wins for his team to get into the playoffs, then apparently his stats really weren’t that valuable. That’s why it is called the Most Valuable Player. You stat geeks with all of your stupid acronyms just don’t get it.
[This message brought to you by the channelled spirit of Joe Morgan or more than 90% of MSSM commentators.]
This is just my opinion. I could easily be wrong.
by Scott McKinney on Sep 30, 2008 12:42 AM EDT up reply actions
sho' 'nuff
If A-Rod was really that great, he could have healed Posada and Wang by faith alone.
I’m beginning to think that Kabbalah shit doesn’t work at all.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Sep 30, 2008 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions
that said
I don’t think Pedroia or Mauer winning would be all that bad, certainly not as bad as the year Morneau won it.
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Sep 30, 2008 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions
also, there would be
a certain sublime beauty to Aubrey Huff winning it
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Sep 30, 2008 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions
"Audrey" Huff sounds like a porn starlet
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Sep 30, 2008 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Man, I wanted to watch a BASEBALL game
2.5 hour delay so far. I mean, I guess they have all day to wait for it to stop raining.
Kansas City Royals: your 2006 and 2007 NL Central champions!
I blame Wall Street!
And those fat cat execs getting golden parachutes!!!!
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
Halladay for Cy Young?
I dunno. I don’t think the Blue Jays would go for that trade on account of Cy Young being dead and all.
"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it." - Mark Twain
Ned Collettii is itching to give up Matt Kemp and Andre Ethier for him, though
OMG Banny. FWIW I am only crdtng u w/3 runs allwd bc of DDJ OMFG
by Matt Klaassen on Oct 1, 2008 10:07 PM EDT up reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
