Five Interesting Lines: 2009 Burlington Bees
One of two low-ranking Royals affiliates located in a city named "Burlington" (let's just trust the process, ok?) the Burlington Bees of Burlington, Iowa are one of my favorite affiliates in the system. Burlington is a pretty small place (26,000) and it isn't particularly close to any big population centers. It isn't in a suburb and it isn't even in an town that's really growing. I'd like to think that southern Iowa was Royals country, even though it really isn't. Lastly, I like the name, "Burlington Bees", which sounds a little cute, but not too gimmicky.
Oh, we're here to actually talk about baseball... Here are five interesting performances from members of the 2009 Burlington Bees:
- Nick Van Stratten: Van Stratten hit .318/.393/.447 in his second season with Burlington, earning a promotion to Wilmington. Van Stratten isn't especially young, as the 2006 10th rounder was 24 last season, but the Royal system was so lacking in interesting position player prospects that Van Stratten generated a little buzz last season. With only one homer, Van Stratten needed a lot of doubles (20) and truples (5) to get to that .447 slugging percentage, but he managed a high enough batting average and on-base percentage that he merits watching in 2010.
- Nick Francis: Francis hit 16 homers for the Bees in 2009, en route to a .275/.320/.467 line in 113 games. Like Van Stratten, Francis is far from a top-notch prospect, but in the Royal system he stood out a little. Francis strikes out a ton (122 Ks) and doesn't walk much (28) but if he can improve his contact-rate and batting eye, which are related, there might be something there. Unfortunately, Nick's season ended early, when he was suspended 50 games for drug use.
- Tim Melville: Melville, a 4th round pick in 2008, made a strong debut as a minor leaguer in Burlington. Melville posted a 3.79 ERA with good strikeout numbers (8.9 K/9) and decent walk rates (4.0 BB/9). Melville has been highly regarded from the beginning, and he did not disapoint in 2009.
- Sam Runion: On the other side of the ledger is Sam Runion's 2009. It seems like Runion has been around forever, but he was only drafted in the second round of 2007. In his second season in Burlington, Runion allowed a 6.60 ERA in 28 starts, complete with 14 wild pitches. Runion just does not strike anyone out: as a professional he has a K/9 number of 5.0 in 275 innings, and that's inflated by his time Rookie ball. In 2008, at Burlington, he only struck out 2.4 per nine, and last season he only improved that number to 4.1.
- Patrick Norris: Recent Royals minor league teams have featured a number of prolific base-stealers, but Norris was really the only Bee who produced an eye-catching stolen base total. Norris stole 45 bases against just nine caught stealings. A 16th round pick from 2007, Norris' .244/.304/.272 performance was weak overall, and disappointing for an age-23 player with college experience. Still, he had a good season on the basepaths. (Fernando Garcia was second on the team with 29 steals, but was caught 15 times.)
4 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Prediction
Look for Art Stewart to call Norris “the next starting CF for the KC Royals”
I guess that would mean he has given up on Derrick Robinson already….
On a serious note – this post is further proof that the “Process” to restock the minor league system is still a LONG way from complete.
Mr Glass, this is a pro sports team, not a retail store - run it like one!
Runion
Suffers the same fate as Davies—“He’s a big kid, so he’s gotta be a starter.” My understanding is he came to the Royals with a good fastball and good slider, but he’s so “projectionable.” They made him dump the slider and switch to a curve which he still can’t throw. He’s been just terrible. as a starter in low-A Burlington 2 years in a row now. Reason says “Put him in a pen, let him find one other effective pitch to throw, and let him throw instead of insisting he’s got to be a starter.” Reason doesn’t get a lot of credit in the organization.
If you look closely, it really says "CentralChamps2012."
by CentralChamps2009 on Oct 6, 2009 7:40 PM EDT reply actions
What is this fetish the Royals have with banning the slider?
I know it is supposedly more of an injury risk if you don’t throw it right, but if a kid has a good one why take it away? Why set him back before he has even started his career? Hell, this is the organization with the best Starting Pitcher in the AL who gets by in part because he has an awesome slider. You’d think they’d notice…
eek...
4.0 bb/9 is a decent walk rate in this organization? That may be part of our problem
Fire Everyone















