Shocking News: The Royals aren't good at baserunning
The 5 best and worst baserunners from 2005 to 2009 doesn't include any Royals, but as a team...we're uh...not very good.
9 months ago
dejackso
5 comments
0 recs |
Email
PrintComments
That works out to what?
About 5 losses from baserunning or something like that?
Go Royals!
If 10 runs amounts to a win, and 4 bases = 1 run
Then roughly 2.5 wins. Though, the baserunning doesn’t count to first base, so maybe it should be divided by 3, which is 32 1/3 divided by 10, so 3.2? But I’d say the majority were lost on 1st to 3rds and 2nd to homes, so maybe even divide by 2, which is roughly 5 wins. So 2.5 to 5 wins, somewhere in there would be my guess.
Guess this is what they need to practice at Trey's ranch this winter.
I used to work with an old man that told me. Son, every workplace has a dumbass, if you don't have one where you work, then I'm afraid you're it.
Hot Tub!!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.livevideo.com/video/F67BCB8D1BC04B0BAA4730A0B6D213E9/eddie-murphy-james-brown-s-c.aspx
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Dec 1, 2009 12:05 AM EST up reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recommended FanPosts
Recent FanPosts
In Association With
Big League Stew - MLB - Yahoo! Sports
- Padres just scratch their heads as losing streak reaches 10
- The Juice: Marlins get off the deck, stun Braves in extras
- Papelbon's implosion, comment, make Red Sox want to scream
- Rangers fall after Young gets touchy feely with third base coach
- Tony La Russa vs. Colby Rasmus: Who ya throwing overboard?
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
