Late Night Royals Links
Really interesting to think that the Brewers may be headed for dark times again. Bring back the Seligs!
- Royalscentricity: Royals Rumors: Guillen To Greener Pastures? Bedard To Don Blue?
- The Royal Tower: TRT's 2010 Prospect List - #22 and #23
- Royally Speaking: Inaugrual Royal Reflection
Baseball:
- Top Prospects, part 1: The Injured - Let's Go Tribe!
- Talking Chop Top-25 Braves Prospects: 1-5 - Talking Chop
- Another Look at the Bargain Bin...or patching holes with duck tape - The Crawfish Boxes
- One museum at a time - SweetSpot Blog - ESPN
- Brewers Facing Tough Times Ahead - Bucs Dugout
- NL MVP Retrospective, or Why Chase Utley Will Never Win Anything in His Lifetime - Beyond the Box Score
- 2010 Top 10 NL Prospects - December - MLB Daily Dish
- Video scoreboard update " Chukars Corner
Grab Bag:
- There’s no way out of Nunavik - Canada - Macleans.ca
- Royals Radio Affiliate Profile: Fordyce, Arkansas [1590 KBJT-AM] - Royals Review
- YouTube - Joe Ely & David Grissom - "Behind the Bamboo Shade"
- Deborah Hill Cone: Actually dude, life is a competition - Opinion - NZ Herald News
- Haochi DC- The Delicious District Dish: Hooray Poor Impulse Control- Dark Chocolate Thin Mint Cheesecake
3 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm a little lost as to Cone's meaning here -- did she just mistype "un"likely?
This is a decidedly middle-class conceit – working-class people don’t agonise over wanting a better life. They are unlikely to say: “Life is not a competition” as one bourgeois Herald reader commented. Er, sorry dude, but yes it is.
1. It is incorrect to assume that “working-class people don’t [want] a better life” (understood)
2. The reader’s comment is sort of a double-negative, which essentially reduces to “they are likely to say that ‘life is a competition’.” (odd, though it’s unclear whom “they” is referring to)
3. But if that was really the essence of the comment, then why does she respond to the quote by restating it, i.e. “yes, [life is a competition]”?
I get the point of the column is that greed/striving for personal success is an important component behind a thriving business world, but this paragraph (really the article’s would-be-defining paragraph) seemed a bit jumbled — confirm or deny?
Blank














