The 2008 offseason explained in relation to Jason Kendall
It's been a while since we've been able to unearth anything groundbreaking from the Royals. After the Yuni-Gate transcript was released, many of our contacts dried up (or we been busy, and haven't had a chance to make something up).
In any event, we've finally discovered an internal document that was presented to David Glass as a part of the 2008 end of the year review. This lead to the massive amount of money spent on players like Mike Jacobs, Kyle Farnsworth, Juan Cruz and Willie Bloomquist in the offseason leading up to 2009.
As part of the year-end review, we're told that Dayton Moore holds a meeting with David Glass and all of the other high level executives within the company. We've learned that the following slide was a huge success at the meeting, which directly lead to the increased budget (and subsequent spectacular failure) in 2009.
We're told the slide was presented again this offseason, but that it didn't go over nearly as well. Which is why we're now considering offering Scott Podsednik and 2 years to Jason Kendall.
1 recs |
28 comments
|
Comments
The "for internal use only" is what put me over the top. Good stuff

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Dec 10, 2009 4:08 PM EST reply actions 2 recs
Speaking a little more seriously...
I think it’s clear, from the Royals’ inactivity at the meetings, that GMDM has learned his lesson about trying to jump ahead of the market with wild and crazy offers and is instead measuring how the market values the players he wants to go after. Maybe we still get Jason Kendall, but for much less money than we might have to pay John Buck in arbitration.
Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!
by cmkeller on Dec 10, 2009 6:00 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
I hope that is the case
because if we come anywhere near the Pudge 2/$6M offer for Kendall, DM will be back in the dog house. I really like this offseason so far. No bad surprises, some good surprises on small pickups. Getting something for Teahen. It’s nothing great, but it’s a start.
2/4 for Kendall
Would be worse than going to arb with Buck
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
by Matt Klaassen on Dec 10, 2009 6:47 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
minimum
and he backs up Pena
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
by Matt Klaassen on Dec 10, 2009 8:41 PM EST up reply actions
I could live with $1M for 1 year
he’s barely above replacement level.
Buck is, at worst, 1 WAR. Not really worth his likelly arb award, but not a waste of time, either.
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
by Matt Klaassen on Dec 10, 2009 8:42 PM EST up reply actions
Used to be, I'm not sold on that in 2010.
I used to work with an old man that told me- Son, every workplace has a dumbass. If you don't have one where you work, then I'm afraid you're it.
yes, he's better than BUck, but not as much as you'd think
And he’s probably two wins worse offensively over a full season… and his defense doesn’t come close to making that up. I think the defensive difference is more like 5 runs… but even if it’s 10 runs, Buck is so much better with the bat it’s not funny
Seriously, it’s pissing me off.
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
by Matt Klaassen on Dec 10, 2009 10:37 PM EST up reply actions
how can you possibly worse offensively than Buck?
Kendall has had several good seasons in his career, even as late as 2006-2007.
Buck has never been good and never will be. Wasn’t his OBP below .300 this year????
by GobbleforCyoung on Dec 10, 2009 11:46 PM EST up reply actions
In terms of slugging percentage
Their averages were about the same. Kendall gets on base more often but can’t hit for power.
by AlanSimpson on Dec 10, 2009 11:58 PM EST up reply actions
Seriously, Kendall has what?
2 MLB homers? The guy has no bat whatsoever. You though Joey Gathright was bad, this guy’s worse.
Three year wOBA (2007-2009)
John Buck .311
Jason Kendall .286
To be fair, I haven’t taken into account Kendall’s probable age 36 breakkout.
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
by Matt Klaassen on Dec 11, 2009 12:46 AM EST up reply actions
Why Jacobs?
I agree with Bale with all my heart! However, Jacobs? I give him a pass after coming over from the NL. Most players that change leagues need a full season to get used to the pitching. Jacobs is pure power and we definitely need that. I can live with Butler at first and Jacobs at DH; well could have.
Mike Jacobs could improve by two wins and still be overpaid in arbitration
“getting used to the AL when coming over from the NL” means “wow, these pitchers are a lot better, I never realized how much I sucked!”
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
by Matt Klaassen on Dec 10, 2009 10:39 PM EST up reply actions
So when you say that the Royals "need power" and should get it by retaining Jacobs...
are you referring to his .401 SLG last season? Because if that’s the case, then I’m not sure I understand your definition of “power.”
"Now…put that in your [BLEEP]ing pipe and smoke it." -Hal McRae
"I was doing this when BJ was in his father's nutsack." -Renzo Gracie
by Sweep_the_Leg on Dec 10, 2009 10:54 PM EST up reply actions
This Is Power

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Dec 10, 2009 10:57 PM EST reply actions
Must.Locate.Reply.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Dec 10, 2009 10:57 PM EST up reply actions
Can we change the p in spark to an n?
Maybe make up a different rhyme for the 2nd line?
I’m so full of snark
____ _ _ ______ __________ ________ _______!
It won't leave the park.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Dec 11, 2009 12:28 PM EST up reply actions

























