ESPN's Best And Worst Teams Of The Decade
"...[T]he Royals finished with the decade's worst record (672-948), losing a dozen more games than the Pirates (no easy feat). They averaged 95 losses a year with four -- count 'em, four -- 100-loss seasons and finished in last place five times. They had a 19-game losing streak. Like the Pirates, they suffered from zealous belt tightening and incompetent management, continuing to make questionable moves right up to the end, when they traded a top prospect for Yuniesky Betancourt. C'mon, Yuniesky Betancourt?"
about 2 years ago
Boots 58
16 comments
1 recs |
Comments
I find it hard to believe...
…that we ranked above the Expos/Nationals. I guess that one magical year with Tony Pena did it for us. – TL
Stupid east coast bias
Not even aware of Yuniesky’s lateral movement.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Dec 18, 2009 4:27 PM EST reply actions 2 recs
I was oddly pissed about this
I mean, really – how could it not be us?
Mr Glass, this is a pro sports team, not a retail store - run it like one!
It was that magical 2003 season
that kept us out of last place.
It's pronounced Poo-ZHOLS in Catalan.
I Hate Puppies
That suck at baseball.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Dec 19, 2009 2:21 AM EST up reply actions
Dayton doesn't have time to explain the process to them
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
As someone else commented long ago
should be easy enough to explain by analogy with digestion, although it’s not a proper analogy both processes have exactly the same resi;result
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
by Matt Klaassen on Dec 19, 2009 6:26 PM EST up reply actions













