Help Me Determine the Greatest Kansas City Monarch of All-Time
I have been working on ranking the greatest all-time Kansas City Monarchs. I have hit a snag and would like some help from you. I have narrowed the list down to 4 players that deserve the top honor:
- "Bullet" Joe Rogan - (16 seasons as player or manager) - Best pure player (two way threat and eventually managed the team) to have the longest career with the Monarchs. All-time Negro League leader in wins and is 4th all-time in batting average.
- Buck O'Neil - (14 seasons as player or manager) - Not the most talented Monarch, but contribution to baseball (first black manager) and Kansas City baseball was extrodinary.
- Satchel Paige - (8 seasons as a player) Possibly on the 5 to 10 greatest players of all time.
- Jackie Robinson - (1 season as a player) If you don't know his contribution to baseball, please don't vote.
The problem I am having is how to base who is number one. Should it be on field contributions, off field contributions or a combination of both?
I have an idea of how I plan on ranking them, but I don't want to be too far off the general consensus. In addition to the top player, could you please rank the 4 in order and let me know why you ranked each. Thanks for your time and I hope to roll out the entire list soon.
24 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Satchel....easy.
Then bullett , jackie and buck. Jackie didn’t play here long enough and buck just wasn’t very good god rest his soul. Check out the Satch mem at paige k8 sometime.
Turning Kool-Aid to Jesus Juice since 2009.
Have to go with Satchel Paige
By just about all accounts, he was the best Negro League pitcher of all time. If given the opportunity to play in MLB for his entire career, he likely would have been remembered as one of the best pitchers of all time.
The immoderate moderator
by Scott McKinney on Dec 20, 2009 11:23 PM EST reply actions
Satchel
same reasons as NYRoyal. BUck is the sentimental favorite, and that’s fine. Robinson didn’t play long enough for KC to be the best Monarch…
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
Pretty Easy Choice
In 1965, 60 years after Paige’s supposed birthday, he took the mound for the last time, throwing three shutout innings for the Kansas City Athletics.
Being old has its privileges. I remember that well. There’s probably not another resume in pro baseball that comes close. Ruth was great, but he wasn’t doing it at 60.
http://www.satchelpaige.com/bio2.html
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Dec 21, 2009 12:31 AM EST reply actions
If it wasn't for Buck...
…a lot fewer people would know about the Monarchs in particular- and the Negro Leagues in general.
Was Paige a better player? He was. When all is said and done, did he have the impact Buck O’Neil did in terms of keeping the memory of the Negro Leagues alive? He did not.
I agree but...
…if you are voting for greatest Monarch that says player to me. Buck had an greater overall contribution to the Negro Leagues, and obviously Jackie to baseball as a whole, but this says best player as a Monarch to me, so I went Satchel.
They are all greatest in their own ways
If you go purely as a KC Monarch it’s rather obvious how the list should go:
Bullet Joe
Satchel
Buck
Jackie
If you want greatest baseball player that happened to be a Monarch at some point:
Satchel
Jackie
Bullet Joe
Buck
If you want contributions to the game of baseball, legacy, ambassador for baseball, etc.:
Jackie
Buck
Satchel
Bullet Joe
I mean it really just depends on how you personally view the question. Quite honestly, I would probably neither care nor have knowledge of the Monarchs without Buck, so while he obviously isn’t the greatest Monarch ever, he helped keep the memories alive, and has forever enshrined them in KC baseball lore.
I think I’d give them all the #1 position. 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D.
by AxDxMx on Dec 21, 2009 1:45 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Satchel
He could very well be the greatest pitcher of all time. Not only did he dominate the Negro Leagues, but he also tore up Major leave talent in exhibitions. I love Buck. His autographed 8×10 is my favorite piece in my bar. But, Satchel was the man. Even Buck would tell you that.
Yes, I'm still alive. Sorry to disappoint you.
by royaldaddy on Dec 21, 2009 1:56 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Satchel
He could very well be the greatest pitcher of all time. Not only did he dominate the Negro Leagues, but he also tore up Major leave talent in exhibitions. I love Buck. His autographed 8×10 is my favorite piece in my bar. But, Satchel was the man. Even Buck would tell you that.
Yes, I'm still alive. Sorry to disappoint you.
by royaldaddy on Dec 21, 2009 1:57 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Sorry
Damn iPhone!
Yes, I'm still alive. Sorry to disappoint you.
by royaldaddy on Dec 21, 2009 1:58 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Satch
He’s probably my favorite Negro League player of all-time though, so I’m biased. But he was terrific as a Monarch, easily the best pitcher in the Negro Leagues, and probably one of the top ten pitchers in baseball history. He also was a fixture in Kansas City long after his playing days much like Buck O’Neil was, even winning an election as Sheriff and he is currently buried in KC.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
??
and he is currently buried in KC.
Are you expecting the return of Zombie Satchel? He’d still be better than Carlos Silva.
And Our Middle
Relief corps(e) last season.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Dec 21, 2009 4:22 PM EST up reply actions
His will calls for him to be exhumed in September each year
And reinterred in Florida somewhere. Still hates those KC winters.
"Now…put that in your [BLEEP]ing pipe and smoke it." -Hal McRae
"I was doing this when BJ was in his father's nutsack." -Renzo Gracie
by Sweep_the_Leg on Dec 21, 2009 4:44 PM EST up reply actions
That's one of those crazy things that people will believe you on
It’s so crazy, yet sort of plausible. My first reaction was disbelief, then I did a Google search to see. :)
But if I used the sarcasm font
then it wouldn’t be as much fun. You would have never had such an interesting Google experience.
"Now…put that in your [BLEEP]ing pipe and smoke it." -Hal McRae
"I was doing this when BJ was in his father's nutsack." -Renzo Gracie
by Sweep_the_Leg on Dec 22, 2009 12:28 PM EST up reply actions
tough call
I think “on the field stuff” should dominate. The only reason you wouldn’t give it to Satchel is because he wasn’t a Monarch for so much of his career. However, the Monarchs are the team he is “most” associated with, and he has to go somewhere, so I say declare him the best Monarch of all time. I wondered if the Monarch logo was on his hat on his Hall-of-Fame plaque, but I found an image of it, and the logo is conspicuously out of view. That would have sealed the deal.
After that, I think it has to go Rogan and then O’Neil. I’m not sure Robinson is even 4th. He’s not well-known as a Monarch.
by Trey Hillman's Chin on Dec 21, 2009 9:54 PM EST reply actions
Hilton Smith
Was a better pitcher than Satch in his prime. Satchel Paige was like a wide receiver in football today. He got talked about more because he talked about himself more. He then cemented his legacy by pitching well in his 40’s in the majors. There was no doubt that he had great talent as a pitcher, but The best player on the monarchs was Bullet Joe Rogan, and there is really no question. Throw in the managing and you have a #1. Paige 2nd, Buck 3rd. Jackie not in the top ten.
Is it safe?
Sorry
I meant to mention that Rogan was the best 2 way threat in history. I know Ruth was a very good pitcher and greatest hitter, but they only overlapped for a couple of years. But Rogan was a fantastic pitcher who was also Joe Morgan as a hitter.
Is it safe?
This makes me wonder about something
What happened to the dual-threat players? The DH rule has all but eliminated pitchers hitting at nearly every level of baseball. Personally, I’m not a big fan of the DH… not a discussion to get into here, and I know it’ll never go away now… but it’s not like NL pitchers are hitting the cover off the ball these days either. There are some who are okay, like Wainwright with St. Louis, Carlos Zambrano with the Cubs, D-Train back when he was with the Marlins. Those guys aren’t even in the neighborhood of guys like Ruth and Bullet Joe, though. So what happened? Did ballplayers get less athletic? Are they too focused on one aspect of their game to try and learn to branch out? Are the best athletes going to other sports like football and basketball? Are contracts so high now that everyone is paralyzed with fear about injuries and so ballplayers are not allowed to experiment with things deemed out of their expertise?
by Soria's Unibrow on Dec 23, 2009 4:39 AM EST reply actions
And that's only one side of it
What about position players who can pitch? I think that transition might be a little easier. Shortstops, third basemen, catchers, right fielders… there are a bunch of positions on the field that require a strong, accurate arm. How often do you read about an everyday player who could throw gas in the 90s in high school and college but decided to give up on pitching entirely upon becoming a pro? And who can forget great moments like TPJ striking out Pudge and Wade Boggs showing off a filthy knuckleball in a relief appearance? A lot of times, guys who make it up to the big leagues were the best hitters, pitchers, and fielders on their teams growing up. It takes ridiculous talent to become a major leaguer. I don’t think it’s implausible for some of that to stick and for there to be a few good dual-threat guys, but there really aren’t. I just think it’s weird.
by Soria's Unibrow on Dec 23, 2009 4:46 AM EST up reply actions
I think it would just take a simple change in the DH rule
You could change it so that pitchers aren’t the only player capable of using the DH, but due to money and injury concerns it probably wouldn’t change much except for late game defensive strategies.
I've Often Wondered
The same thing. I think the skill level in MLB is so high that very few have the ability to either pitch or hit without focusing on it full time. Without the constant practice, the neglected skill atrophies.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Dec 23, 2009 4:51 PM EST up reply actions

by 












