Pine Tar game.
MLB has hit a home run with the MLB Network. This morning, I had a chance to watch The Pine Tar game. I was 19 at the time and watching the Royals and Yankees go at it – well, great memories. I was in awe watching George swing, Willie run and Otis in RF again.
One particular series of plays in that game caused me to reflect on the championship years of the Royals and the type of game they played versus our team today. Can baseball be won utilizing the Royals’ strategies of the late 70’s and 80’s? How different is today’s club and what would need to change to get back to those glory days?
I believe there were several specific characteristics of the Royals’ championship teams:
1 – Those teams were built to win in Royals Stadium.
2 – And as such, the teams were built around a specific blend defense up-the-middle, pitching, speed and the ability to hit doubles.
3 – The teams had MLB-best coaching (Lau of the 70’s, Herzog and Howser), support (Kauffman) and facilities.
That play series mentioned earlier was as follows: After Amos Otis grounded to first to start the second inning, John Wathan drew a walk from Yankees starter Shane Rawley. Bill White, the game announcer, mentioned how big of a lead Wathan was getting and sure enough, Wathan took off for second. Leon Roberts lined the pitch to center and Wathan never stopped taking third on the hit and run. Next up was Frank White. White hits a slow roller to second and hustles down the line to beat the relay and avoid a double play. Wathan scores. Next batter Don Slaught singles softly to right and again, the Royals take the extra base moving White over to third. Willie Wilson then grounds out to end the inning. Royals lead 1-0.
While this half inning may not seem that exciting, it gives an example of how adept the Royals were at manufacturing runs. That’s the key - every run counted and was earned! You had speed (Wilson, Washington and Wathan), OBP (Brett, McRae, Aikens), defense (White, Otis, Wilson) and good pitching (Splitorff, Black, Quisenberry). That’s a recipe for success.
While the 1983 Royals finished 2nd in the AL West, many of these players participated in the championships of 1976, 77, 78, 80, 81, 84 and 85. Here’s a breakdown of the 1983 Royals and our best in 2009. It’s not hard to see the differences.
C - Wathan Olivo, Buck SP – Gura Greinke
1B – Aikens Butler SP – Splitorff Meche
2B – White Callaspo SP – Black Bannister
SS – Washington Betancourt SP – Renco Davies
3B – Brett Gordon SP – Blue Hochevar
LF – Sheridan DeJesus CL – Quisenberry Soria
CF – Wilson Crisp RP – Armstrong Wright
RF – Otis Guillen RP – Hood Cruz
DH – McRae Jacobs RP – Castro Farnsworth
Other thoughts?
4 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Heh, the current brass
is at least paying lip service to a return to that style of play. Of course, Willie Wilson could actually hit the ball (if not draw a walk), in stark contrast to some of the guys being touted in the minors for their speed. (I’m looking at you, Derrick Robinson)
Yes, the possible end of the steroid era could help usher in that style of play again – but keep in mind that players are also stronger and in better shape nowadays, and that there are far more bandbox ballparks, with virtually no artifical turf left in them either.
I personally thought the baseball in the 70s was very interesting, as it offered distinct options for teams to score runs. Some teams went the Royals route, while others (Baltimore, Philly, for example) still emphasized the power game. Basically, some matchups represented an argument in itself on how to best play the game.
Throw in the advent of the slide step, and I think those days may not recur anytime soon. There is a strong correlation in today’s game between power hitting and winning – and I don’t see the Royals old approach as being practical. (So naturally, they are trying to go back to that approach, using the excuse that they can’t afford to compete for power on the open market. Good luck making that work, Royals)
Mr Glass, this is a pro sports team, not a retail store - run it like one!
It was also in the context of the 1970s
When offense was severely depressed. It didn’t take that many runs to win a game back then because pitching was so dominant. I’m not sure anyone can win with that kind of philosophy now. Sure made for exciting games back then though.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
Almost not memories of that kind of baseball
Bill James had some interesting suggestions to bring more variety into baseball in terms of bat size, pickoffs, and stuff, and that wouldn’t be so bad.
On another note, artificial turf is just horrible for sports. Not worth the injuries it causes. So I’d be opposed to that.
It’s also important to remember that those speedy Royals outfielders also played great defense, which was probably just as, if not more, important to the team’s success in that era than their basestealing.
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at FanGraphs.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
The big difference between those years and these years:
“John Wathan drew a walk "
Kansas City Royals: your 2006 and 2007 NL Central champions!
by mazoboom on Dec 8, 2009 9:38 AM EST reply actions 1 recs

by 











