Royals Review: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Sean Keeley's Week 12 College Football Buffet

Secrets of the AL Central VII - What is Ron Gardenhire Doing?

Admit it, you've recently lost sleep wondering which AL Central team had the best, and worst, #9 hitters in 2008. In fact, you've considered tabulating the numbers yourself, by hand if necessary.

The wait is over.

Star-divide

Here are the cumulative numbers for the #9 hitters of the AL Central last year, sorted by OPS.

  1. Minnesota: .286/.340/.420 (.760)
  2. Detroit: .255/.337/.423 (.760)
  3. Cleveland: .276/.343/.407 (.749)
  4. Chicago: .270/.311/.391 (.703)
  5. KANSAS CITY: .233/.281/.285 (.566)

Amazingly, that .566 OPS by #9 Royals in 2008 was not the worst in the AL. Somehow, the Orioles were worse, ending up with a .220/.257/.297 line. Frankly, I'm astounded that a full lineup slot averaged a .285 slugging for them Treyboys last year. Damn, just damn. Thank you TPJ, Gathright, Maier, German and assorted pitchers. You showed those Orioles a thing or two. Sadly, the Cubs & Brewers both managed higher slugs using the pitcher the majority of the time.

I really don't understand the Twins. Minnesota's #9 slot was more productive than both the 8-hole, which managed just a .672 OPS and the #7 slot (.719). That isn't all, it was also better than both the #1 and #2 slots as well (.688 and .717 respectively). I know the Twins play the game the right way, but I did not know that having your fifth or sixth best hitter hit 9th, with much worse guys at leadoff and second, was part of the right way. Then again, I never played the game and was born after 1955.

3 recs  |  Comment 39 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

The O's SS hole

would explain them somehow getting worse production out of the #9 spot. As to Gardenhire….I have no idea. I walked too much in high school so my coach hated me.

Stathead, Zack Greinke fan, and Rock Band 2 singer extraordinaire.

by NHZ on Feb 10, 2009 7:11 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I'd like to see a...

…similar calculation for our 7-9 holes overall. To me this is where the bad, mediocre, and excellent organizations are made. It shows the depth of your farm and your free agent pockets. – TL

by timlacy on Feb 10, 2009 2:51 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Royal #7 hitters hit .245/.288/.364 last season, good for a .652 OPS, last in the AL
Royal #8 hitters hit .252/.310/.357, good for a .667 OPS, and 12th best

the horrible #7 slot — look at that OBP — really looks awful

what a team

by royalsreview on Feb 10, 2009 4:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

royal #4 hitters OPSed at .718 last year

also dead last in the AL

all these stats are on ESPN’s stat page btw

by royalsreview on Feb 10, 2009 4:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

so they say who hit in those spots the most?

I need to weasel my way onto the Gregg Schaum DudeCast so when he brings up Guillen and Jacobs “protecting” Gordon, I can ask him about the game were the As walked Gordon 5 times in front of JoGui. That was awesome, because I’d just been arguing with someone here who claimed that Guillen was the only “feared” hitter in the Royals lineup the day before that happened.

Sadly, that’s probably the best thing that happened for me in 2008.

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.

by devil_fingers on Feb 10, 2009 4:14 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

My Lord

Cleveland, Detroit and Minnesota’s #9 hitters had a higher OPS than did Jose Guillen the Royals clean-up hitters.

www.rockchalktalk.com for pretty good KU baseball coverage

by James Quinn on Feb 10, 2009 6:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I could see the Royals improving quite a bit in this area next year,

and still have the worst OPS in the division. I assume we are going to see Callaspo/Bloomquist getting most of the #9 plate apperances next year. I can see those two putting up about a seven hundred.

The Royals have some offensive problems. I think they will score a few more runs in 2009 than they did last year, but still have one of the worst offenses in the AL. Only Gordon, DeJesus and Aviles would be getting regular playing time on a good team.

www.rockchalktalk.com for pretty good KU baseball coverage

by James Quinn on Feb 10, 2009 3:03 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Although I go back and forth about the trade

I think I would add Crisp to that list. He’s a good defender that could help a lot of teams. The Yankees could use him in CF, for example. So could the White Sox — oh, wait, we were talking about good teams.

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.

by devil_fingers on Feb 10, 2009 3:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't understand the Crisp love

The Red Sox were trying to give him away all last year and had no takers. I see him as a below average CF starter. A good 4th outfielder. I don’t think he degrades the Royals roster, but I am not sure he will be that much better than Maier, and he certainly will cost a lot more.

Personally I would much rather have Teahen and Butler getting the at-bats he will be feed next year.

Well, maybe Crisp will suddenly start playing as well as he did back in 2004 and 2005 again next year for some random reason. That would be nice.

www.rockchalktalk.com for pretty good KU baseball coverage

by James Quinn on Feb 10, 2009 4:44 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The numbers suggest that Crisp is a league average CFer

When you take his likely offense and defense into account, he comes out as average for the position. Of course his defensive numbers have been kind of all over the place, but if you average them out (as d_f has done), you get a CFer who is above average defensively and below average offensively. And, given the positional difference between Crisp and Teahen, Crisp is better. More specifically, DDJ in LF/RF and Crisp in CF makes for a better OF than Teahen in LF/RF and DDJ in CF. Of course the OF would be better overall with DDJ, Crisp and Teahen than with Guillen in there, but that’s another discussion.

The immoderate moderator

by NYRoyal on Feb 10, 2009 4:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It's his defense

He’s a below average hitter, but he was a legit defensive monster in 2005 and 2007. Not so much in 2006 and 2008. Who’s the real Crisp? Scouts says he’s a stud in the field. If you buy the numbers, and use weighted average and stuff, well, his monstrous +2 win year in 2007 gets mitigated a fair bit to the point where he’s more like above average, but enough to at least balance out his crappy offense.

Defensive numbers and projections aren’t as reliable as offensive ones, of course. And some see him as average at best. I in a discussion right after the trade, when I was trhing to get a handle on it, MGL said he had Crisp projected as about 1.25 WAR next season —if this is the case, the Royals did get screwed, particularly when salaries come into play. But that was just one guy’s projection (although that guy is one of the bets sabermetric minds out there).

My point just being that I can definitely see what you’re saying, but that there are also reasons to think Crisp will be at least average, overall, this season. And that’s a valuable thing.

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.

by devil_fingers on Feb 10, 2009 4:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

valuable to a lot of teams

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.

by devil_fingers on Feb 10, 2009 4:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

how ere his Cleveland #s?

I know that was awhile ago, but I just don’t trust defensive #s from Fenway that much

I wanna know what love is, I want you to show me

by LeoBloom on Feb 10, 2009 5:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Generally excellent

although most of that was in left field, and a few years and injuries ago.

UZR, at least, tries to adjust for parks. I’m not sure about plus/minus.

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.

by devil_fingers on Feb 10, 2009 5:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Hmmm...

well, the truth is, batting order doesn’t matter all that much. teams could optimize it better, but who knows. I guess one thing we could look at is the baserunning numbers of each slot, maybe they made up for it there…

Or maybe, just maybe, the Twins were incredibly fortunate re: situational hitting last season.

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.

by devil_fingers on Feb 10, 2009 3:59 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

its really just a matter of # of PAs
  1. ends up getting over 100 more PAs over the course of the season than #9

by royalsreview on Feb 10, 2009 4:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

true, but

even the stupidest single move, like hitting your pitcher #4 int he NL, only costs about 16 runs a season

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.

by devil_fingers on Feb 10, 2009 4:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

yea

its really like a lot of other things, more to be used as evidence of how your management thinks or if anyone is even paying attention to details and the fact that guys suck

by royalsreview on Feb 10, 2009 4:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

well, it does matter

A truly optimized lineup might mean an extra win a year, or what teams pay about $5M on the FA market. A team would have to decide if the headache of, e.g., the public reaction hitting A-Rod or Teixeira 2nd would be worth it.

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.

by devil_fingers on Feb 10, 2009 4:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

There's a theory

…that the #9 hitter should be a decent hitter who will get on base more for the good 1-2-3 hitters to knock in. This theory sometimes refers to the #9 hitter as a “second leadoff hitter.” This is the same theory which leads Tony Larussa to sometimes bat the pitcher 8th.

The immoderate moderator

by NYRoyal on Feb 10, 2009 4:03 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

indeed

but i’m not sure the theory says that #9 should be better than #1 & 2

by royalsreview on Feb 10, 2009 4:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, it's bizarre

The immoderate moderator

by NYRoyal on Feb 10, 2009 4:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I see you haven't got your copy of "The Book" yet!

heh heh… It’s funny, I constantly obsess over batting order, although it matters the least.

It is true that in a league where pitchers hit, that the pitcher (the worst hitter) should hit 8th, and the “second leadoff hitter” thing does work. But the studies they did showed that it doesn’t really work in the AL, becaue the worst nonpitcher just isn’t as bad enlough hitter for it to make a difference.

Having said that, Tony Pena, Jr. wasn’t in the majors in the period they drew from for their research…

According to them, the best hitters should hit 1, 2, and 4, with the 3rd and 5th best hitting in the #5 and #3 spots. Generally, the “worst” hitter of your best 5 should be in the #3 spot.

I might do an “optimization” post at Driveline for crappy lineups. It’s tough because for the Royals, their best hitters against RHPS are all lefties, so you can’t hit them next to each other, and you end up with them going 1, 3, and 5, and with Crisp or Callaspo hitting 2nd. Which is freaking depressing, since that’s the “money” spot.

Maybe later I’ll do my “5 reasons Alex Gordon should lead off vs. RHPs in 2009” post. I’m sure you’ll be refreshing constantly in anticipation.

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.

by devil_fingers on Feb 10, 2009 4:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Whoa, I didn't say that I agreed with this theory

I was just trying to explain where Gardenhire’s odd choice may have come from. I think Gardenhire is a shitty manager and this is another example of shitty managing. There are all kinds of batting order theories and most of them are bunk.

The immoderate moderator

by NYRoyal on Feb 10, 2009 4:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

the royals take all the fun out of lineup construction

even from an old school perspective, because other than DDJ, Gordon and Butler, its all the same guy, another BA dude with varying degrees of power

by royalsreview on Feb 10, 2009 4:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

but baserunning matters!

a very, very little bit… of course, not too much, because the Royals don’t have very many good baserunners (although Crisp is really good, apparently. Gordon, DDJ, and Teahen are all decent, but sadly, Teahen is going to be sitting on the bench watching Guillen limp out DP balls). Getting good baserunners in front of DDJ, for example, would be a really good idea, because while he’s a good hitter, he doesn’t have a ton of power and good baserunners are more likely to be able to go first-to-third, score from first on a double

The other interesting thing is that you can save two runs a year (which is a lot relative to most of these changes) by putting a good hitter who has a really bad GIDP tendency in the leadoff spot. See, now you’ve got me started… Other than the “gordon leading off” theory, here’s another suggestion for the first four hitters vs. RHP… look out AL Central if Hillman does this:

1. Butler
2. Gordon
3. Crisp
4. DDJ

Both CHONE and PECOTA see Butler as the Royals’ best hitter in 2009. He doesn’t have enough of a record for us to project such a heavy platoon split for him… Anyway, so he hits first because of his GIDP problems (although hopefully those will decrease), and also because he doens’t project for a ton of power yet, but just a good OBP.

Gordon hits right behind him because he projects for the most ISO on the team, so he is more likely to be able to drive Butler along the basepaths. Of course, he also has good OBP stuff. If you read the book, Ks are the least “harmful” in the #2 spot among the top 5, and Gordon has plenty of those… so that minimizes that problem. Hitting him in front of Crisp and DDJ, who are low power hitters, also leverages his baserunning and basestealing better, since they don’t have much power.

Crisp hits 3rd because, well, we’re pretty much at the end of the string of guys who can hit righties well and aren’t lefties… And hitting in front of DDJ takes advantage of the things he does excel at (baserunning and basestealing).

DDJ hits 4th because he’s probably going to be the best hitter outside of Alex against RHPs, and his relative lack of homers means that Crisp and Alex’s skill on the bases are well leveraged…

Just something I thought about. there are other variations. It was just a fun variation on the more predictable Crisp/DDJ/Butler/Gordon lineup, which isn’t the end of the world, either. But Butler in the #3 spot puts him in too many DP situations. Yeah, I know it won’t happen, but a nerd can dream.

Yes, I do have many other lineup suggestions, but I’m going to dole them out, so don’t beg…

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.

by devil_fingers on Feb 10, 2009 4:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

so who would be the "right way" choice for 9th position?

Aviles? Teabag?

"Things could always be worse." - Buddy Bell

by buddyball on Feb 10, 2009 4:51 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Hmmmm

Statistically, probably Aviles. But Gardy would want lots of speed in the 9-slot. That doesn’t leave many options. Teahen might be who he’d choose. Crisp would be faster, but might not hit well enough for the 9-slot. Gardy knows how important speed is at #9 and #1.

The immoderate moderator

by NYRoyal on Feb 10, 2009 4:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

the AL Central is weird

The two worst (lately, anyway, now that Ryan is gone and Kenny is back in Krazy Kenny mode) run teams with the most bizarre (offensive-strategy wise) managers place first and second… again…

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.

by devil_fingers on Feb 10, 2009 4:57 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah

The latter part shows how unimportant managers are. They contribute to their team’s wins and losses, but only to a very small degree. And as far as being “well run,” I think the Twins are still living off of the largesse of the prior administration, which the current GM is chiselling away at. And Kenny is schizophrenic. He vacillates wildly between very good moves and very bad ones. He appears to be in a down cycle right now.

The immoderate moderator

by NYRoyal on Feb 10, 2009 5:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

the only explanation is cutting payroll

which is understandable… except Swisher didn’t cost that much. ON the other hand, Konerko and Thome are pretty untradable, and from the sound of things, Dye is, too. And trading Quentin is insane.

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.

by devil_fingers on Feb 10, 2009 5:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, they are clearly cutting payroll

But of course the way they have chosen to cut payroll was horrendous. They gave up the not overpaid Swisher for a handful of shiny beads. And they gave up the not overpaid Vazquez for a small bucket of shiny beads.

The immoderate moderator

by NYRoyal on Feb 10, 2009 5:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

its all about the pitching

I wanna know what love is, I want you to show me

by LeoBloom on Feb 10, 2009 5:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Gardenhire

is managing the most boring good franchise in sports history

by BeauJackson on Feb 10, 2009 8:18 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Despite what you think about Crisp or Jacobs

Is this years lineup quite possibly the best we’ve had in years? or atleast the “deepest”?

Crisp
Aviles
DeJesus
Jacobs
Guillen
Butler
Gordon
Teahen
Olivo/Buck

or switch Teahen with Callapso… whatever. But compared to last year, I think having someone whether its Butler, Gordon, Jacobs, or Guillen batting as late as 7th isn’t too shabby… right? Not world beaters but they’re not dead weight.

Last year Buck/Olivo, Pena Jr., Gathright, and Gload were the main guys batting in the end there.

by Royal from Queens on Feb 10, 2009 9:20 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

the Twins had a revoloving door when it came to the 9th slot last year until Carlos Gomez solidified it at the end mid season point

Gomez:
leadoff: .246 /281 /.345 /.626 (415 Plate appearances)
9 hole: .286 /.328 /.400/ .728 (190 PA)

also seeing significant time in the 9th spot: Denard Span (.333 .429 /.517 .945 . 72PA), Brenden Harris(.281 /.347 /.375/ .722. 73 PA) , Adam Everett (.213 /.268 /.333 /.602 .83PA) and Nick Punto (.308 /.360 /.397 /.758 . 86PA)

by DedicatedFollowerOfFashion on Feb 11, 2009 9:43 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.
Start posting about the Royals »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

_41153080_gallerysanta_small
Are you good enough?
Trust_small
Denny Matthews at Plaza Library
Royalsretro_small
Royals sign P Jorge Campillo
Stash1_small
Kansas City Fails To Pick Up Option On Royals
Royalsretro_small
Royals sign P Brad Thompson
Tu_small
What would be an appropriate haul for Greinke?
Small
Shane Costa and Ryan Shealy Eras Officially End
Royalsreview_small
Predictions: Will Greinke Win the Cy Young?
Small
Saturday in the AFL
Royalsreview_small
Royals Links: DeJesus Rumors, Chunky Moose, Gold Glove Outrage, Pete Rose's Galpal, Bill Simmons, Lech Walesa and Rany's Return

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Royalsreview_small royalsreview