Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: More Televised Winter Baseball, Please

A modern day Brett Vs. Boggs?

You're probably all familiar with the nearly 20-year old debate over which 3rd baseman was the better player.

But what you might be familiar with is that its possible that we could quite possibly have the exact same situation brewing today, only this time the battle has switched from the hot corner to the gritter middle infield.

Star-divide

Two players every Royal fan is undoubtably familiar with is this years Royals player of the Year Mike Aviles, and this years ALMVP Dustin Pedroia. Alot of people felt that Pedroia's MVP case wasnt the best in the league, while a lot of people thought that Aviles had an equal case for Rookie of the year as eventual winner Evan Longoria.

But what a lot of people may not realize is that the two players might be much closer in terms of talent than they appear at first glance.

Take their lines this year:

Pedroia:

.326 .376 .493 .869
Aviles 
.325 .354 .480 .834

Thats pretty close, not close enough to really spark a debate, but close enough to warrant a second look.

The first thing you would probably notice is that both players have some decent platoon splits, Pedroias are a little wierd as he hits righties more often, but hits the ball harder against lefties. Aviles on the other hand just crushes lefties, making more contact, being more selective, and hitting it much harder.

The second (and possibly most controversial) thing is their home/road splits. Much like in the historical rivalry, the parks the players call home seem to have a significant impact on their hitting ability.

Aviles manages to hit just .311/.339/.420/.759  in 219 ABs at "The K" with only 10 doubles compared to .340/.370/.545/.915 in 200 AB with 17 doubles.

On the other side Pedroia, our reigning MVP hits .344/.393/.519/.912  in 320 ABs with a whoping 35 doubles under the shadow of the green monster, but fades to just .309/.359/.468/.827 in 333 ABs  with a more pedestrian 20 doubles away from Fenway.

Lets also not forget the often overlooked area of defense. While advanced defensive metrics were not in place for the historical rivalry, we now benefit from being much better able to judge the quality of our two performers.

And this is where the situation gets VERY cloudy. While never really considered a great defensive shortstop, Aviles apparently didnt get the letter, posting a very solid 32.0 UZR/150 rating at shortstop this season. Dustin Pedroia however attempts to defy advanced rating by relying more on his grit and posted a 10.4 UZR/150 at 2B, improving over last years 4.0.

So what does this boil down to? To put it very simply Mike Aviles, in about 2/3 of the playing time of Dustin Pedroia(and playing 1/4 of that time at a position he is not proficient at) put up almost EXACTLY 2/3 of the WAR of the Reigning MVP (4.4 WAR to 6.6)

*Edit cause I suck at polls....

Poll
So I ask which player do you think is better RIGHT NOW, Mike Aviles or Dustin Pedroia?
Mike Aviles
20 votes
Dustin Pedroia
47 votes

67 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 18 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Hopefully Aviles can keep Pedroia's high BABIP average

although Dustins is little more legit with his higher LD%

I don't know how to put this but I'm kind of a big deal.

by kcscoliny on Feb 12, 2009 7:35 PM EST reply actions  

Is this even a fair question

Lets have Aviles have one full season in the majors first..
This question should be atleast a little more interesting next year, assuming Aviles stays on course.

by Royal from Queens on Feb 12, 2009 10:08 PM EST reply actions  

career big league PAs

Aviles: 437
Ped: 1366

I’d say Aviles needs to have another good season before we start talking about this

by Freneau on Feb 12, 2009 10:08 PM EST reply actions  

or two

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.

by Matt Klaassen on Feb 12, 2009 11:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Pedroialanche

Does not sound nearly as cool.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Feb 12, 2009 11:57 PM EST reply actions  

I saw Boggs in the Denver airport last year.

Lets just say the years have not been kind to him or maybe it was the roids. With all his money you would think he could afford a toupee that didn’t look like horsehair and maby a facelift. He didn’t look a day over 60… and the gut wasn’t good either.

by grudz96 on Feb 13, 2009 12:08 AM EST reply actions  

I voted Aviles

First, out of loyalty. Secondly, bald athletes remind me of my future appearance, and I despise that. Especially Trent Dilfer. Pedroia gets extra loathing for being bald in college.

"Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue."

by Joseph Landis on Feb 13, 2009 12:51 AM EST reply actions  

I think most people expect Aviles to regress from his 2008 line

…as the league starts to put together the book on him and whatnot. I doubt he’ll put up the same numbers as either Pedroia or Longoria, but he plays a more valuable defensive position than either of them. I think the jury is still out.

by DarthYoshi on Feb 13, 2009 11:16 AM EST reply actions  

I don't give a shit

I ain’t ever voting for some damn RedSox slag.

Feb 13!!

by kabrink on Feb 13, 2009 10:11 PM EST up reply actions  

i like it

Founder of the Johnny Giavotella fan club.

by doublestix on Feb 14, 2009 3:55 PM EST up reply actions  

since you brought it up...

What DO defensive metrics say about Brett Vs. Boggs?

Kansas City Royals: your 2006 and 2007 NL Central champions!

by mazoboom on Feb 14, 2009 8:22 AM EST reply actions  

There wasn't PBP data for their careers

but the available TotalZone stuff (incomplete, particularly for Boggs) since there aren’t RetroSheet stuff, at least inthe file I have) has them about the same on average, defensively. Looking more closely, in their respective primes, Brett was the far superior defender, with monster defensive seasons in 1977 and 1979 that dwarf any of Boggs’ best. I would imagine this would confirm the general opinion of their respective defensive abilties…

Yes, Mike Schmidt and Graig Nettles were awesome, too.

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.

by Matt Klaassen on Feb 14, 2009 9:26 AM EST up reply actions  

Interesting note

According to former Mets GM Joe McIlvane, the Royals were on the verge of acquiring Wade Boggs before the 1989 season in a four team blockbuster that would have sent Danny Tartabull to the Mets, Howard Johnson and Sid Fernandez to the Mariners, and Mark Langston to the Red Sox.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Feb 14, 2009 3:56 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

The_laz_small
RRCCA Vol. IV -- Before You Was Born
293205_10100249842300990_16917861_47946787_6111553_n_small
8 Items You Might Not Know Existed but Probably Need from The Official Online Store of the Kansas City Royals
293205_10100249842300990_16917861_47946787_6111553_n_small
6 Items You Don't Need From The Official Online Shop of the Kansas City Royals
Nacho_small
Interview with Royals Review Editor Jeff Zimmerman
Small
OT: Determining the exact date of Ice Cubes "Good Day"

Recent FanPosts

Cimg0036_small
Valentine Poem of the Week: An Arundel Tomb
Small
Jonathan Sanchez and the blogosphere that can never be pleased
Nyroyal3a_small
PECOTA, the 2012 Royals and a Mega-Projection
Small
OT: Fantasy Baseball Keeper League
952_small
Bandwagon Fans and the Royals
293205_10100249842300990_16917861_47946787_6111553_n_small
Friday OT Thread
The_laz_small
More player name anagrams

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Cimg0036_small Freneau

Editors

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

Authors

Royalsretro_small RoyalsRetro

Headshot_small Old Man Duggan