The 100 Greatest Royals of All-Time - #34 Paul Schaal
The 34th Greatest Royal of All-Time was a third baseman, but not THAT third baseman. It was Paul Schaal.
Tim Johnson. Sixto Lezcano. Darrell Brown. Bill Almon. Ken Reitz.* Paul Schaal. What do these players have in common? They were all replaced by Hall of Famers** - Robin Yount, Tony Gwynn, Kirby Puckett, Ozzie Smith and Ryne Sandberg, respectively. While it must be an enormous burden to be the player that follows up a Hall of Famer, there is far less pressure to be the guy that precedes one. You always have a handy excuse for why you lost your job.
*-Reitz preceded Ryne Sandberg, who I was completely unaware was a third baseman in his rookie season. Second base was occupied by Bump Wills in Ryno's rookie season. The previous year it had been filled most of the time by Pat Tabler, who I was completely unaware (a) ever played for the Cubs or (b) ever played second base. Also, did you know Gary Carter was a right-fielder his rookie season?
**-Don Money, a pretty good player in his own right, was replaced by two Hall of Famers - Mike Schmidt and Paul Molitor.
Still, having a hot prospect breathing down your neck while you try to maintain your grip on your position is no picnic. Paul Schaal was in the unenviable position of trying to hold onto his job with George Brett rising through the ranks in the minor leagues. Schaal was by most accounts a terrific fielder with a light bat, but could draw walks without striking out. He was no George Brett, but he was a much better placeholder than those other names mentioned.
Paul Schaal was a southern California kid who signed with his hometown Angels out of high school for a bonus of $4,000. In his second full season in the minors, he hit .328. In his third season, he hit .271 for AAA Hawaii and found himself in the big leagues for a cup of coffee. In 1965, at the age of 22, Paul Schaal was the everyday third baseman for the California Angels. He struggled with the bat, hitting just .224, but he did draw 61 walks and was renowned for his glove.
Schaal would have a solid season his sophomore season, with a .362 on-base percentage, but would slump the next season with a batting average under the Mendoza Line. In 1968, he was struck in the head with a fastball from Red Sox pitcher Jose Santiago, fracturing his skull and damaging his eye and basically ending his season. It would leave him with inner ear problems that would affect his balance the remainder of his career.
That winter, the Kansas City Royals made Schaal the 27th pick in the 1969 Expansion Draft. Schaal began the year in Omaha to regain his confidence following the beaning. He was leading the league in hitting at .374 when he was finally summoned back to the big leagues in July. He hit .263 with a respectable .346 on-base percentage in 61 games, mostly at third base. That winter, the Royals dealt veteran third baseman Joe Foy to the New York Mets in exchange for young outfielder Amos Otis, seemingly opening up the hot corner for Schaal. Schaal saw himself as a starting third baseman, but new manager Charlie Metro disagreed.
"Charlie said to the press that I'd never be an every-day player. It ticked me off but it also inspired me."
Schaal began the 1970 season on the bench with Metro moving slugger Bob Oliver from first base to third. When Metro moved Oliver back to first base in June, Schaal got a two week try-out, but failed to hit. The Royals then tried journeyman Bill Sorrell at third, with few results. Finally, Schaal got his chance in August. He hit .309 and was named Royals Player of the Month. He would start fifty of the last sixty-two games, and finish the year with a .268 average.
Schaal began 1971 firmly entrenched as the Royals slick-fielding third baseman. He hit .338 in April, erasing doubts about his bat. On July 9, Schaal was given a scare when Jim Perry brushed him back high and tight after a Fred Patek home run, bringing back memories of Schaal's painful beaning several years earlier. On the next pitch, Schaal dug in and homered off the Twins right hander.
"I somehow got out of the way; went down on my back. Even their catcher didn't know how I got out of the way. I hit the next pitch out of the park. Because of my injury a couple years earlier, it was such a great feeling to hit that homer after Perry about nailed me."
Schaal had the best season of his career that year, hitting .274 with eleven home runs, the only time in his career he would reach double digits. He finished third in the league in walks with 103, second in doubles with 31 and tenth in extra-base hits with 48. He would post a .387 on-base percentage and strike out just 51 times. He was one of just two players in the Majors that year who would play in every single game.
Most Walks in a Single Season, Royals History
1. John Mayberry 1973 - 122
2. Darrell Porter 1979 - 121
3. John Mayberry 1975 - 119
4. George Brett 1985 - 103
4. Paul Schaal 1971 - 103
*-only one other player in Royals history has drawn 100 walks in a season - Kevin Seitzer with 102 in 1989
Schaal got off to a slow start in 1972 and was never really able to get his bat going. He was barely able to keep his average about the Mendoza Line much of the year, although he did rally in September to hit .287 with 19 walks for the month. He would finish the year with a disappointing .228 average.
Schaal would rebound nicely in 1973 with a .288 average. His .389 on-base percentage would finish second on the club and his .399 slugging percentage would finish fourth on the club. In late July, Schaal would go down with an injury. A week later, the Royals would promote a young floppy-haired California kid named George Brett. He would go 1-for-4 that day against the White Sox, the first of 3,154 career hits.
Schaal would return just two weeks later, but the writing was on the wall. Paul was the starter at third for the first month of 1974, but hit just .176 to begin the year. In early May, the Royals promoted Brett and dealt Schaal back to the Angels for outfielder Richie Scheinblum.
"I've often told people that it took a Hall of Famer to take my job from me."
Schaal would just just .248 for the Angels, and was released at the end of the year. He retired from baseball at the age of 32. Upon retiring, Schaal returned to Kansas City and enrolled in the Cleveland Chiropractic Clinic. For the last thirty years he has run the Schaal Chiropractic Health Center in Overland Park.
5 recs |
45 comments
Comments
In case anyone was wondering
Carney Lansford preceded Wade Boggs
Doug DeCinces preceded Cal Ripken
The O’s had a parade of DHs before Eddie Murray, with Lee May and Andres Mora getting the most ABs.
Ken Singleton preceded Gary Carter – in right field. Barry Foote was the catcher.
Tommy Harper preceded Jim Rice.
Former Royals hitting instructor Mitchell Page preceded Rickey.
Leron Lee preceded Dave Winfield.
Duane Josephson preceded Carlton Fisk.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Feb 22, 2009 11:54 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
And hat tip to cmkeller
For the idea of a theme of “preceding Hall of Famers.”
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Feb 22, 2009 11:54 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks
and thanks for another great article.
BTW, I’ve been following Bluebird Banter’s Top 50 Jays – do you know that they declared Rance Mulliniks and Ernie Whitt to be # 18 and 17, repectively? Our Royals totally rule, man. I don’t know who’s precisely in that position, but I’m figuring it’s someone with no lower a career performance level than Larry Gura or Johnny Damon.
Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!
by cmkeller on Feb 22, 2009 1:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Rance!
He was a Royal, but he did not make our list at all.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Feb 22, 2009 4:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
gotta admit
did not recoginize the name
by royalsreview on Feb 22, 2009 4:26 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I only know him
Because his chiropractor commercials used to run in KC when I was a kid. He’d say he was former Royal thirdbaseman Paul Schaal. I remember thinking “he must’ve not been a very good player if he still had to work after his playing days”, thinking that all great players must’ve lived like millionaires after they retired.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Feb 22, 2009 4:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I Remember Schaal
From my days of collecting baseball cards and then as a Royal. Since I was still playing 3B, I paid a lot of attention to Schaal. I’m glad he settled in the KC area; he was my bridge from Ed Charles to Brett.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Feb 22, 2009 4:37 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
But what about
Danny Cater and Sal Bando?!?
This space for rent.
by jonfmorse on Feb 22, 2009 5:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I Liked Cater
But Bando never started until they moved to Oakland. They were dead to me by then.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Feb 22, 2009 10:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I went to him as a chiroprachtor in HS
I tore a ligament on my spinal chord (icky) my Junior year in HS. I just swung a bat once in practice & fell to the ground in a heap. I was sidelined for about a month, and my initial visit was to him, before pursuing P.T. to recover from it…
BOOM! ROASTED!
by GoBabies!! on Feb 22, 2009 4:38 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I do remember Schaal. I liked him. But your article reminded me that I didn't particularly like the Joe Foy/ Amos Otis trade at the time. What a fine evaluator of talent I was.
by Steve Hovley on Feb 22, 2009 4:41 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Foy Actually Had
A decent year in ’69, but he fell off the table after that. He still had a career OPS+ over 100.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Feb 22, 2009 4:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I’m no judge of talent either, as I was unhappy when Schaal was traded in ’74. He had been one of my favorite Royals.
I remember the sequence of events that year slightly differently from Retro’s account of them — I don’t think the Royals had decided to give the 3B job to Brett yet when they traded Schaal.
Schaal was the regular through April 19 and was either benched or hurt, because he was MIA for a week. Fernando Gonzalez got the next three starts at 3B and didn’t hit much. Frank White then got 2 starts at 3B and didn’t hit much either. The Royals then brought 30-year-old farmhand Bobby Floyd up and put him in the lineup for 1 game. Schaal got back into the lineup April 26-28 and didn’t hit at all. April 28 was his last appearance as a Royal, finishing up with no hits, 3 walks, 2 sacrifice flies, and a sac bunt in his last 21 plate appearances for KC. He was traded for Scheinblum April 30.
And on the day of that trade, I believe the Royals starting playing the guy at 3B regularly whom they decided was Schaal’s successor: Frank White. He started 4 games at third base, April 30-May 3, and had 3 singles in 11 at bats.
In the 7th inning of the game May 3, with the Royals down by a run and Hal McRae on 2nd, Scheinblum pinch hit for White, and White’s defensive replacement in the top of the 8th, making his season debut, was George Brett.
The next day, May 4, Brett started at third. I have a vague recollection of one of the Yankees’ announcers, probably Frank Messer, expressing surprise that the Royals were starting Brett that day so soon after they’d decided to give the job to White. Brett started again the next day, May 5, and got 3 hits, all singles. He started again in the Royals’ next game, May 8, and went 2-4 with a double and a home run.
But even then Brett may have been a little lucky to hold onto the job. He didn’t have much success at the plate in his next 3 games, and White was back in the lineup as the third baseman in the 1st game of a doubleheader May 12. Brett started the second game, batting ninth, and to give you a further indication of the team’s assessment of his skills at that stage of his career, Jim Wohlford pinch hit for him in the 7th. White entered the game as a defensive replacement. Brett was hitting .227/.320/.409.
White was back in the starting lineup for the next 3 games, but not for Brett. Instead he started in place of Fred Patek at short, for reasons that I don’t remember at all. In those three games, in which White was the leadoff hitter, he got on base only once in 12 plate appearances and was thrown out trying to steal second. At that point White was hitting .250/.250/.333 and Brett .226/.294/.355. The Royals stuck with Brett at third.
White resumed the role of utility infielder, and although he occasionally started at third to spell Brett during the remainder of ‘74 and even on a few occasions in ’75, he had his own appointment with destiny as the Royals’ regular second baseman, where he finally began to play regularly in ’76.
Meanwhile, Brett was still struggling at the plate into August. The Royals acquired Kurt Bevacqua from Pittsburgh in early July and platooned him with Brett. After the game of August 4, Brett was hitting .236/.281/.296 and not looking much like a future Hall of Famer.
August 6th was the day that the things Brett had been working on with Charley Lau began to start clicking for him. He went on a 12-22 tear with 5 doubles and 3 triples, and that’s when the future started.
by 2X2L on Feb 23, 2009 12:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Good to hear from someone
who remembers the early days in detail first-hand. I like to think I know a lot about the Royals, but having only followed them since the early 80’s, I would not have gotten the sense of this merely from printed statistics.
Thanks for helping flesh out the details on the 3B succession history.
Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!
by cmkeller on Feb 23, 2009 1:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You’re welcome. All the details come from Retrosheet and the game logs at baseball-reference; I had remembered only that White had a trial at third before Brett got the job.
I think it’s remarkable how little I remember, as I was probably following the Royals more closely than any other teenager on the East Coast in 1974 — I was in the habit of copying every box score from our local paper or The Sporting News into a scrapbook I was keeping.
Anyway, to Steve Hovley’s point about talent assessment by fans: I thought Wohlford was going to emerge from that group as the preeminent star, probably based on what I had read in The Sporting News. I wasn’t really convinced that Brett was the real deal until he went on his tear of consecutive 3-hit games in 1976.
by 2X2L on Feb 23, 2009 1:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow
Great summation. Yea, I only scanned Baseball-Ref briefly, so I didn’t have all the details right. Interesting stuff!
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Feb 23, 2009 1:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
According to kcroyalshistory, Schaal was traded April 30 and Brett was recalled May 3.
The best guess I can come up with now is that Schaal was considered expendable not because the Royals’ knew they had a Hall of Fame third baseman in waiting but because his solid 1973 season, which he wasn’t likely to repeat, gave them an opportunity to upgrade their overall talent base by trading him to a team that overvalued him. Cedric Tallis of course had been very successfully at making this sort of trade from 1969 through 1973.
Unfortunately the player Tallis got for Schaal was someone with an even more bloated valuation: Scheinblum, who had hit well in both 1972 as a Royal and 1973 as an Angel. Although Hal McRae had started the 1974 season very hot — I remember that by going 6 for his first 11, including 3 doubles and a home run, he was at or near the top of the league in batting average at .545 in the first Sunday listing of stats in the New York Times that year — his disappointing 1973 was clearly still a strong memory, as he was hitting in the bottom third of the order when they traded for Scheinblum, and the Royals must have thought they needed another professional hitter who could DH and pinch hit.
In May Scheinblum was sometimes the DH against righties while McRae played left or right, but he just didn’t hit. In fact he hit considerably worse for the Royals (.181/.253/.205) than Schaal did for the Angels (.248/.322/.315) after the trade. Scheinblum’s contract was sold to the Cardinals in September, and both Schaal and Scheinblum were out of baseball after 1974.
Even though the reacquisition of Scheinblum did nothing to improve the offense, and even though McRae continued to hit, the Royals still thought they needed another DH, so they signed Orlando Cepeda in early August and put him in the lineup at DH every day for about a month while McRae played the outfield. Cepeda’s contribution was mainly to nullify what Brett had begun to do for them. Cepeda hit .215/.282/.290, mostly in the 5th slot in the order, while Brett was still stuck in the bottom third of the order, mostly hitting 8th. John Mayberry, also hitting in the middle third of the order, went into a terrible slump at the same time, and then when Rojas, Patek, Wohlford, and Otis also stopped hitting in September, the Royals took a nosedive. They lost 27 out of their last 36 games. Ouch.
Having fared so poorly with Scheinblum and Cepeda, the Royals must have thought they were overdue, and in the offseason they signed Harmon Killebrew to DH for them. Did that go well? It did not.
Finally, in 1976 Hal McRae began his string of 10 consecutive seasons in which he was the Royals’ primary DH.
What-if dept: if McRae had hit well from the start of his Royals’ career, beginning in 1973, might the Royals have felt more comfortable with him as the designated hitter every day in 1974, keeping Schaal at 3B in KC and Brett in Omaha? Supposing that had happened and Brett didn’t begin to work with Lau during the All-Star break in 1974, after two months of frustration at the major league level convinced him he needed to change his hitting approach — how well would Brett’s career have gone?
by 2X2L on Feb 23, 2009 3:46 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Great stuff
I do think that the team held Brett in high regard. In interviews I read about Schaal, he mentioned in spring training of 1974 he kept hearing about “this kid Brett.” But when you look at George’s minor league numbers, they are less than impressive. I don’t know if he was considered a hot prospect or not. I don’t think they would trade a popular player like Schaal coming off a solid season unless they had someone to replace him, and they must have felt Brett was ready, or at least they wanted to see what he could do. I wish The Sporting News still had their archives up. They did a few weeks ago, and now they’ve disappeared!
Interesting “what if?” question on McRae. I think the 70s/80s Royals have a ton of “what ifs” that had things gone a bit differently would have changed the franchise considerably.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Feb 23, 2009 4:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, they obviously thought highly of Brett — they moved him from high A in 1972 to AAA in 1973, where at age 20 he more than held his own. He was clearly on a path to compete for the major league job fairly soon, but there are several indications that they didn’t think he was quite ready at the time they traded Schaal.
I also wish that The Sporting News had their archive online, because it would be interesting to read about what Jack McKeon and Cedric Tallis were saying in spring training that year. Whenever you look back it’s easy to treat things as they turned out as if they were inevitable, and there may be some of that in Schaal’s recollections.
Anyway, fun stuff. I look forward to #33.
by 2X2L on Feb 23, 2009 5:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Great point
About Schaal’s recollection. Its very possible that in retrospect he thinks it was set in stone, but at the time it was very much up in the air. Certainly hitting .176 in April didn’t help Paul’s chances of sticking around.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Feb 23, 2009 10:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Royals See Gold Already In Free-Agent Draft
by Sid Bordman
So far the Royals have landed 10 of their first 12 selections in the June free-agent draft. And if the 1973 catch is anything like he one in 1971, the farm system will be nurturing at least two or three new prime major-league prospects.
“The ’71 draft was a good one for us,” said Lou Gorman, the enthusiastic director of Kansas City’s minor leagues and scouting operations. “George Brett and Tom Poquette, our Nos. 2 and 4 picks, already are with Omaha and are outstanding prospects.”
Brett, a left-handed-hitting third baseman who became 20 years old last month, is swatting away at a .293 average and has collected five home runs and 40 runs batted in for the AAA farm club. Poquette, also 20, is playing right field.
“These are our top two, the two closest to being up here. We’re not the only club that thinks Brett and Poquette are almost ready. We haven’t talked to a club about trading in the last two or three weeks that hasn’t asked for Brett or Poquette.”
Jack McKeon, the Royals’ manager, agrees with Gorman on his evaluation of Brett and Poquette, a left-handed hitter.
“Yeah,” he remarked. “I got a pretty good look at both of them in spring training. Poquette doesn’t do anything flashy but he gets the things done. Brett has the tools to play up here, too.”
from the June 24, 1973 edition of the Kansas City Star, reprinted in George Brett: A Royal Hero, Sports Publishing, Inc., 1999
by 2X2L on Feb 23, 2009 8:56 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
One more. Steve Cameron’s book George Brett: Last of a Breed says that the front office wanted to replace Schaal with Brett in early ’74 but the manager, Jack McKeon, opposed the move.
pp 30-31:
I was still a puppy baseball reporter working for the Topeka Capital-Journal on August 2, 1973, when the Kansas City Royals were in Chicago and needed an emergency replacement at third base. so they summoned this kid Brett from their Triple-A affiliate at Omaha…
As it turned out, Royals manager Jack McKeon — who already had decided Brett was not a potential big-leaguer — nonetheless stuck him in the lineup against veteran White Sox right-handed Stan Bahnsen.
p 51:
When the Kansas City Royals’ front-office people wanted to promote Brett to the major leagues for good in 1974, manager Jack McKeon was against the move. McKeon liked veteran third baseman Paul Schaal — a solid, popular player who was about to be traded to California — and the manager went one step further. McKeon told one and all, including the media, that this prospect George Brett looked like nothing more than “…a career .260 hitter with no power.”
Of course, McKeon was overruled and Schaal was, indeed, shipped off to the Angels.
Perhaps the full archives of the Topeka Capital-Journal will be online someday and we can see for ourselves what Cameron wrote at the time. Of course it would be even better to have accounts of that period from the Star.
In any case it’s clear that the Royals’ decision-makers weren’t unanimously sold on George Brett’s potential when Schaal departed.
by 2X2L on Feb 23, 2009 9:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Great stuff!!!
Maybe for the Brett journal (wonder we’ll he’ll end up on this list?) I’ll head down to the library and look up old Star articles from when he was called up.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Feb 23, 2009 10:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I look forward to that. I’m sure there’s more to be uncovered about that 4-day gap between Schaal’s tenure and Brett’s.
But before you get to Brett, when it’s Piniella’s turn: I’d be interested to know more about how much Piniella and McKeon feuded in 1973 and whether their antipathy toward each other was seen as motivation for the trade that sent Piniella to the Yankees. Of all the what-ifs of the ’70s, that one rates very highly for avoidable damage in my mind.
McKeon was never my favorite Royal manager, and recalling that he didn’t get along with Piniella, was skeptical of Brett, and got Lau fired after Brett’s success was credited to him, and finding out today by reading some excerpts from Lou Gorman’s book High and Inside that neither Tallis nor Gorman wanted him for the job, he’s sinking even further in my estimation. He was apparently a what-if machine all by himself in his 2+ years with the club.
by 2X2L on Feb 23, 2009 10:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
no one with 100+ walks in 24 years!
your team, your town
i’m surprised sweeney never made it, but looking at his numbers, he never even got close
by royalsreview on Feb 22, 2009 4:53 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
sweeney
he never took a lot of walks, but he hit for such a high average it didn’t matter.
Founder of the Johnny Giavotella fan club.
by doublestix on Feb 22, 2009 5:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
sorta depends on the season
He wasn’t Rickey Henderson, but he took his share

Great K/B ratio, though

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.
by devil_fingers on Feb 22, 2009 10:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
man
I gotta say, Retro these really kick ass. I’m one of the younger Royals fans (relative to all you, at least), and I don’t know some of these names, but I learn something every time. Good shit man.
Founder of the Johnny Giavotella fan club.
by doublestix on Feb 22, 2009 4:53 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Schaal is tied for 10th in Royals history
In on-base percentage with a .360 clip as a Royal. Impressive, especially for a guy with very little power.
Who is he tied with?
David DeJesus.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Feb 22, 2009 5:15 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks again
These are always entertaining and never fail to remind me of my old baseball card collection.
by cookierojas73 on Feb 22, 2009 5:15 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Excellent work Retro.
If only he could transfer his obp talents with some of the current Royals.
by hunter s. royal on Feb 22, 2009 5:34 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
1969 - Don Denkinger
Since we are talking about some of the original Royals, I did some looking around and found out that Don Denkinger (the call in 85) was making major league debut as an umpire in 1969. He made his debut as the 3rd base ump in KC’s first game against the twins.
Good work Retro, I love your top 100
Mr. Weatherstone
by Mr. Weatherstone on Feb 22, 2009 9:17 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
That's fascinating
Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!
by cmkeller on Feb 23, 2009 9:02 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
great as always,
didn’t know who he was, either
I think we’ll (not) remember Emil Brown the same way — OK player who preceded greatness
Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.
by devil_fingers on Feb 22, 2009 10:07 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Great stuff as always
I was trying to think of other major leaguers that had rhyming names and…well, what would we do without this internet thing??
A member of the Baseball List of Rhyming Names, along with such notables as Don Hahn, Larry Sherry, Lu Blue, Still Bill Hill, Mark Clark, and Greg Legg.
We always did feel the same, We just saw it from a different point of view, Tangled up in blue.
-Bob Dylan
by Royal Kingdom on Feb 23, 2009 12:21 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
I really like these pieces
Royals history. Good stuff.
I’m impressed with people’s writing ability around here, the administrators / moderators and the posters. When Retro’s done with this he’s got a publishable book. Probably wouldn’t make the NY Times best-seller list, but would certainly sell a few copies around KC.
It's pronounced Poo-ZHOLS in Catalan.
by Juancho on Feb 23, 2009 3:49 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Many thanks
I have thought about combining these and my “looking back at” series into a book and self-publishing when I’m done.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Feb 23, 2009 4:23 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, yeah
My favorite bit of trivia about players who preceded greatness is that Steve DeBerg was replaced by Joe Montana at both SF and KC. At least I think that’s true.
It's pronounced Poo-ZHOLS in Catalan.
by Juancho on Feb 23, 2009 3:56 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Also played in Denver
Was he replaced by Elway?
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Feb 23, 2009 4:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He was actually replaced by
Dave Krieg in KC, but besides Montana and Elway, He was replaced by Steve Young in Tampa Bay, then got the starting job back at the end of the season. Tampa shipped Young to San Fran and drafted Vinny Testaverde. Deberg was the starter for the first half of Vinnie’s rookie year, then was replaced by him as well.
These 5 Quarterbacks averaged 41,906 yards, 268 Touchdown passes, and 109 wins (as starters) in the NFL. I think that makes him #1 as far as the skill level of those replacing him.
by KHAZAD on Feb 23, 2009 7:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Paul Schaal
was a player I fondly remember. He drove in the game winning run in the bottom of the 9th at my first Royals game. I was one of the kids in 1974 who thought that they should have kept him instead of Brett. (Kids don’t understand potential) I think I changed my mind sometime in 1975.
Paul also had a pizza place for at least a decade on 103rd street in South KC. The pizza was very good, and the crust was the Best. It is remembered very fondly by alot of people.
by KHAZAD on Feb 23, 2009 7:22 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Wow, what a great comeback, from 3 runs down in the 9th. That must have been very exciting.
by 2X2L on Feb 23, 2009 7:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 














