All-Time Greatest Ballplayer
*Note* This isn't necessarily Royals-related. However, I feel it's a topic relevant of extended attention on virtually any team-oriented medium.
Which ballplayer do you feel is the greatest to ever play? I ask this because we recently resumed an epic 121 player battle of All-Time Ballplayer Survivor over at Royals Nation, with - who else - Babe Ruth emerging as the "first annual" champion. The contest itself took 3 1/2 months to play. My gratitude to all RR readers and members who participated.
via www.zuguide.com
The great.....Bambi???
No! The Sultan of Swat! The Colossus of Clout! The Great Bambiiiinnoooo!!
Here is my shortlist of top twenty baseball position players of all time. (This list includes players accused of taking performance enhancing drugs.)
- Babe Ruth
- Barry Bonds
- Ted Williams
- Stan Musial
- Hank Aaron
- Willie Mays
- Lou Gehrig
- Joe DiMaggio
- Mickey Mantle
- Tris Speaker
- Ty Cobb
- Honus Wagner
- Rogers Hornsby
- Frank Robinson
- Jimmie Foxx
- Roberto Clemente
- Johnny Bench
- Jackie Robinson
- Ernie Banks
- Yogi Berra
Here are my top ten pitchers of all time:
- Greg Maddux
- Christy Mathewson
- Cy Young
- Walter Johnson
- Bob Gibson
- Bob Feller
- Sandy Koufax
- Warren Spahn
- Roger Clemens
- Pedro Martinez
Any thoughts?
0 recs |
61 comments
Comments
Not that I think he is the best player of all time...
but is there a reason why Pete Rose is not included on this list?
PS: FWIW, I voted for Ted Williams. All-time highest career OBP, 2nd highest career SLG (behind only Babe Ruth), and I think he still leads all-time in most walks per plate appearance. Plus, there is no telling how many more records he would have broken if not for his military service.
by DarthYoshi on Feb 23, 2009 8:05 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
i dont really feel rose belongs in the top 20 position players of all time...
definitely a HOF level player, but his career was outstanding much on the basis of longevity. Arod is the omission that is glaring to me. jackie robinson, ernie banks and joe d. over Arod?
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Feb 23, 2009 10:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Perhaps because
Pete Rose is the all-time leader in outs…
This space for rent.
by jonfmorse on Feb 24, 2009 1:37 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Neyer and Epstein are right, though
that if you play the “how much more would he have done…” game with Williams’ military service, you have to do the the same thing with Ruth’s years where he was primarily a pitcher, then there wouldn’t even be this conversation.
Bonds is probably top 5, and in the discussion, but as Musial said (and I’m ready for the accusation of being nostalgic and stupid and stuff), Ruth has to be the best, because he could dominate the game hitting and pitching, like a high school stud. Literally, a man amongst boys.
Leaving aside his immense extra-statistical historical significance, I think Jackie Robinson was a better player than Rose, FWIW. Rose was awesome, of course, despite being a sleaze (even among baseball players). But Robinson was an OBP monster, and underrated (and brilliant) baserunner, and played plus defense wherever you put him.
Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.
by devil_fingers on Feb 24, 2009 2:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think that necessarily computes
re: Williams’ military service = the Babe’s years as a pitcher, for a few reasons.
-Ruth was a pitcher at the very beginning of his major league career. He was very productive then, but those years weren’t his peak. He started pitching for the BoSox at 19, and by the time he was 23, the Sox were transitioning him away from pitching. Williams’ military service spanned 1942-1946, when he was 24-28 years old. He missed a couple of prime years of his career—the same cannot be said of Ruth’s work as a pitcher.
-During the seasons he was a pitcher, Ruth was at least involved heavily in the game and able to follow how it changed and developed during that time. The same cannot be said for Williams’ military service.
-Ruth at least still batted some during his years as a pitcher, and his pitching stats still speak for themselves (indeed, you use his dominance as a pitcher in making the case that he was the best of all time). Williams put up zero numbers, in anything.
The degree of separation is dramatic. Comparing Ruth’s years as a pitcher to Williams’ military service in the “how much more would he have done” game is pretty lopsided in favor of Ruth.
by DarthYoshi on Feb 24, 2009 4:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
oh
and I forgot that Williams was recalled to active duty for 1952-53 in the Korean War.
by DarthYoshi on Feb 24, 2009 4:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree to disagree
I had a long post up where I compared their offensive numbers, used a bastardized version of Bill James way to account for war years (very generous, though he still has Williams #7 and Ruth #1) with B-R’s lwts (which do a decent job, I think, of adjusting for eras, then used my own database to get Ruth’s pitching wins… and just scrapped it. It’s saved for later. It’s pretty close (as all the top guys would be), but I don’t want to get into it, especially since I would need to refigure positional adjustments (and maybe replacement level) for the eras. Also, there’s not a good way to deal with fielding, although I do believe that the general consensus is that in his prime before he let himself go, Ruth was actually a very good fielder with a rocket arm (as one would expect of a former stud pitcher), while Williams… well, seems to me Manny fit in perfectly at Fenway.
Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.
by devil_fingers on Feb 24, 2009 5:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
well, that last line isn't really fair
anyone else know how on any decent authority anything about Williams fielding? I’ve always read he wasn’t very good, but I don’t have the Win Shares book or any decent account around…
Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.
by devil_fingers on Feb 24, 2009 5:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No Ross Gload?
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Feb 23, 2009 10:16 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
In all seriousness
I can’t really quibble at all with your list. It pretty much reflects my thoughts as well.
Interesting there are no third basemen.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Feb 23, 2009 10:18 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Greatest of all time
just HAS to be Babe Ruth because he was an excellent pitcher as well as a hitter. His contributions as a hitter alone make him arguably the best, the fact that he could pitch makes him un-arguably so.
As for your pitchers list, much as I think Greg Maddux is incredible, I’d put him below all of the pitchers in your top 10 except perhaps Pedro. Not to mention Alexander, Ford, Palmer, Carlton and Ryan as well.
Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!
by cmkeller on Feb 24, 2009 12:25 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
its amazing how underrated....
Pedro is….he just absolutely dominated the most extreme offensive era ever…
Nolan Ryan and his 111 ERA+…you can have it…very very overrated
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Feb 24, 2009 1:23 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Nolan Ryan is by far the most overrated pitcher in baseball history
Probably the most overrated player.
The immoderate moderator
by NYRoyal on Feb 24, 2009 2:37 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Given that this is an absolutely terrible way...
to judge a players career, but the guy made 8 all star games in 27 seasons….this guys belongs nowhere near a top 10 of all time list. He barely had a winning record over his career (another bad way to judge). K/BB wasnt good…really the only thing he was great at was throwing no hitters, which involve a ton of luck, and being a mutant and staying healthy enough and motivated enough to pitch until he was 46…oh, and he threw fast
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Feb 24, 2009 3:27 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, that's sort of what I meant
I realize that Nolan Ryan didn’t have the pure stats that others of the greats had, but he had incredible tools.That speed, that stamina…assuming no Clemens-like revelations about him, the idea that a power pitcher can last and thrive into his forties is incredible. He could miss bats like no one else, over 1000 more strikeouts than the second place holder on the list. I understand why you might say he’s overrated as a pitcher, but his skills deserve a certain degree of admiration as well, and you certainly can’t say he didn’t use them well.
Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!
by cmkeller on Feb 24, 2009 10:55 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
for having all those tools...
its unimpressive that he was a below average major league pitcher for 7 seasons in his career. Really, the only thing that impresses me about his career is his longevity…and even that is beginning to shrink in comparison to Randy Johnson.
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Feb 24, 2009 1:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+1,000
James nails it in the BJNHSA
Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.
by devil_fingers on Feb 24, 2009 2:34 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Rose was overrated until the revelations
Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.
by devil_fingers on Feb 24, 2009 2:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Can we get a new era?
You know the modern era in baseball begins in 1901. Seems to me that the game way back then was so different that records are barely comparable today.
I’d call 1901-1945 the “early modern era,” and begin the “modern era” in 1946, with the end of WWII, the beginning of increased prosperity that allowed baseball to thrive, and most importantly, the end of the color line one year later. If we really wanted to, we could start the “contemporary era” in 1969 with the switch to the divisional system, the second expansion, and the rules changes that decreased the pitcher’s advantage.
My picks: Early modern: Player: Ruth, Pitcher: Johnson
Modern: Player: Peak value: Mantle, career value Musial, Pitcher: Peak value Koufax, career value Spahn
Contemporary: Player: Bonds, Pitcher: Peak value Pedro, career value Maddux.
I always thought Bob Gibson was overrated; as a kid I saw him pitch on TV, though his skills had declined by then. His one huge year was in “the year of the pitcher,” sort of like Hack Wilson’s huge year in the “year of the hitter,” 1930.
The guy I remember as being underrated was Luis Tiant. He gave everybody fits, and wouldn’t be an embarrassingly bad pick for the HOF.
Joe Morgan is a very underrated player. He was incredible, could do it all, but he doesn’t seem to be considered as the equivalent of Schmidt or Brett or Yount by most people. I wonder if his sportscasting has hurt his image as a player.
Most underrated group of players: The 1970s Dodgers infield of Cey, Russell, Lopes, and Garvey. Those guys were all solid, durable, and at least above average. Cey wouldn’t be an embarrassing HOF pick, either.
It's pronounced Poo-ZHOLS in Catalan.
by Juancho on Feb 24, 2009 4:00 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
one of the things i absolutely hate about cards fans...
is how defensive they get about their players. If you say Gibson was one of the best RHPs ever, they get pissed…like super pissed. If you say Pedro was better, which any stats will tell you is true, they flip shit. It is so easy to get under their skin.
Musial over ted williams?
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Feb 24, 2009 4:07 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
They were both great players
It’s very hard to choose between the two based on stats; though Williams’s stats are a little better than Musial’s, Musial’s are pretty awesome. On my team, I would certainly rather have Musial, said by everyone to be a great guy and a team leader, than Williams, said by many to be kind of a jerk. Not that I’d complain about having Williams.
Most admirable players: Early modern era Matthewson and Gehrig, modern era Jackie Robinson, Musial, Clemente, and Aaron, contemporary era Morgan, Maddux, Ripken, Quisenberry. Jim Bunning probably ought to be in here somewhere, since he’s so highly considered that he’s been elected to the Senate several times, even though he’s kind of a reactionary and is getting way too old.
It's pronounced Poo-ZHOLS in Catalan.
by Juancho on Feb 24, 2009 4:28 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Ripken
I’ve never been able to get over the fact that Ripken was always viewed as an ‘every man’ consummate team player, etc, yet never stayed at the same hotel as the rest of the team…its a very minor thing that has always bothered me…well, that and the fact that he was hurting his team by playing every single day
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Feb 24, 2009 4:36 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Feb 24, 2009 9:16 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
+2
Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.
by devil_fingers on Feb 24, 2009 2:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Maddux????
I will take Mathewson, Johnson, Feller, Koufax, Clemens, and Pedro & start them in a rotation against your Maddux over a full 162-game season.
I’d win 95+ games.
by RoyalsFan on Feb 24, 2009 9:58 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Wagner
Wagner is only #12?
Blasphemy! He’s #2 or #3 of ALL-TIME.
by RoyalsFan on Feb 24, 2009 9:59 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
he was the epitome of "grit"
"Things could always be worse." - Buddy Bell
by buddyball on Feb 24, 2009 11:58 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh yeah, Clemente?
You can’t tell me that there are only 15 all-time players who are better than Clemente was.
by RoyalsFan on Feb 24, 2009 10:00 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
certain players...
like Clemente and Jackie Robinson seem to get special points added onto their baseball abilities/accomplishments. Yes, Jackie Robinson broke the color barrier. Yes, Jackie Robinson was a great ball player. One of the top 20 of all time based on merit? No shot in hell. Clemente is another one. Worthy HOFer, first latino superstar, but belonging nowhere on this list.
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Feb 24, 2009 1:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Robinson is awesome, though
I agree based strictly on baseball accomoplishments, he isn’t top 20, but in a weird way, his historical significance also tends to make him underrated strictly as a player. He was incredible. Read my post above.
Clemente is really overrated. I’d take Reggie or Pete Rose (two assholes as opposed to Clemente’s well-known character) on my team over him any day.
Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.
by devil_fingers on Feb 24, 2009 2:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think we aren't being liberal enough with the term "ballplayer"
I know we’re talking baseball here, but I don’t like the use of "ballplayer’ as baseball-only.
I’m gonna say Jim Thorpe or Bo Jackson because they were good at multiple ball sports (including baseball), and also non-ball (but perhaps not puck) sports.
by mikewormdog on Feb 24, 2009 12:14 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
What about Muttiah Murilitharan?
Greatest cricket bowler of all-time.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Feb 24, 2009 12:51 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If we include women
Babe Didriksen, who excelled at a number of different sports.
It's pronounced Poo-ZHOLS in Catalan.
by Juancho on Feb 25, 2009 3:56 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
GEORGE BRETT
how could Brett not crack a top 25???
and is it me or did Rod Carew get the shaft here also???
by royalstern05 on Feb 24, 2009 1:54 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
no third basemen at all
Schmidt needs to be on there, too
Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.
by devil_fingers on Feb 24, 2009 2:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ricky!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111111111111111111111111
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Feb 24, 2009 2:23 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
yup
Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.
by devil_fingers on Feb 24, 2009 2:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow, forgot about him
Yea, he should definitely be on there, despite being a hot dog.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Feb 24, 2009 3:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I can believe we allowed Rickey Bell to be forgotten
Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.
by devil_fingers on Feb 24, 2009 5:36 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not to overstate it
and I’m not trying to be sanctimonious here, just to note that it might be a bit better to say that “great major leagers of all-time” due to segregation. Not wanting to start a debate or accuse anyone of anything. I hate it when white liberals (like myself) play the role of the Pharisee (and we’re really good at it), but I do think it is, at the very least, a helpful historical distinction. I’m not an expert, but even read James, and this list doesn’t make sense without Oscar Charleston, Josh Gibson, etc.
Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.
by devil_fingers on Feb 24, 2009 2:41 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Cool Papa Bell....Sadaharu Oh...
We always did feel the same, We just saw it from a different point of view, Tangled up in blue.
-Bob Dylan
by Royal Kingdom on Feb 24, 2009 2:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Satchel Paige definitely
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Feb 24, 2009 3:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Berra had a better career, overall, than Bench
Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.
by devil_fingers on Feb 24, 2009 2:41 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I never saw Yogi play
but Bench was awesome, the best defensive catcher ever and an excellent hitter, too. He was a dead pull hitter and lashed double after double down the third-base line. He was a good enough all-round athlete that sometimes on his days off he played third.
He’s also part Indian, by the way.
It's pronounced Poo-ZHOLS in Catalan.
by Juancho on Feb 25, 2009 4:01 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, he was the best catcher
But Berra’s overall career was better. Nothing against Bench, of course.
I believe Bench is also a fellow Oklahoman…
Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.
by devil_fingers on Feb 25, 2009 9:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll just refer to the comments in one post
- It’s true that Negro Leaguers (and, perhaps, even players in other organized leagues throughout the world) should be included. However, I limited it to MLB-only. We know MLB was tainted before 1947, and even after that – with regard to segregation, but my list was rigid. MLB-performance only.
- “+” is an important stat, I think, because it measures performance relative to era. We know this. Maddux absolutely dominated in an enormous hitters’ era. His career had amazing longevity and consistency. I think he is worthy of being discussed among the handful of all-time greatest pitchers.
- I should have included A-Rod; he falls somewhere in the top 20, if he retired today.
- “Ballplayer” vs. MLB Player. OK….but I’ve never been a fan of legistics or political correctness. It’s important to understand the context under which I’m reporting. This is a baseball forum.
- I didn’t see any 3B quite impressive enough to crack the top 20.
- How many catchers during the era of Johnny Bench could actually hit, at all? That’s why I felt he deserved special consideration. How valuable of a commodity was a player at the time. Chase Utley might fill a similar role, today.
- Agreed on Clemente, Mays, and Ryan being over-rated. Certain other players, I think, are over-rated….like Koufax. I understand horrific tragedies occur (Gehrig, Campanella, et al), but this is an assessment on what they accomplished during their career. It includes circumstances beyond the players’ control, unfortunately. Such as military service time.
- I’d love to find the calculations for VORP – and I know devil_fingers, you aren’t enthralled with this statistic – for every player in MLB history – and then assess the players accordingly. I wish other advanced statistics were available for these players (FIP, EqA, etc.). RC/G is a good metric, I think.
The Nation at large. I'll be playing the role of RR Resident Optimist this offseason. What role will you assume?
by Royals Nation on Feb 24, 2009 6:17 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
You can find all the VORPs at BP free stats section, they have them for every era at BP
By the way, they aren’t really my objections. With regard to the linear weights, frankly, BP has never responded, and its a devastating criticism. And the positional adjustments are messed up — one example is enough — did you know that in the 50s LFers were apparently more harder to replaceCFs? WEll, that’s what VORP tells you…
BtWins (no positional adjustments) or BP’s EqA/R would be better,. BP’s RARP has better weights (being basedon EqA) than VORP, although the positional issue is still there. Check this out.
Of your Top 20, stricly on their on-field performacne in the majors, Schmidt and Brett were better than at least the following:
Jackie Robinson (on-field, actual performance)
Roberto Clemente (by far)
James has Schmidt ahead of Foxx, as well, and I’m inclined to agree. Defensive monster best hitting 3B of all-time and one of the best defensive 3B of all-time? Yeah, that’s a player.
Wagner should be top 5. Maybe not the offensive force that A-Rod is… but he had the equivalent of Ozzie Smith or Adam Everett’s glove — maybe better. Also maybe one one the best “old” playres of all time, along with Ruth (of course), Schmidt, Bonds (of course) and a few others. Bill James puts it this way with reference to Win Shares: “The distance between the number one shortstop (Wagner) and the number two shortstop (whoever it is) is about the sam as the distance between the number two shortstop and the number 30 shortstop).” [Note that this was written before he was ready to really ank A-Rod, whom I still think should be considered as an SS, just as Ernie Banks [Another guy both Brett and Schmidt were better than], although A-Rod won’t catch him, probably.] #2 was Arky Vaughn, but could also have been Ripken #3, Yount #4, or Ernie Banks#5. #30 Is Dick Groat, about whom I know little, but who has an awesome name.
Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.
by devil_fingers on Feb 24, 2009 11:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, and the Babe has to be the best
Well above average pitcher for 6-7 years and a game-altering hitter? Check, please. #1 of all time, hands down, IMO.
The Nation at large. I'll be playing the role of RR Resident Optimist this offseason. What role will you assume?
by Royals Nation on Feb 24, 2009 6:18 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
All-Time?
If it’s not Babe Ruth then the one I like the most is Willie Mays.
Top notch defense at CF while being part of the Mt. Rushmore of all time homeruns for a long time.
by Royal from Queens on Feb 24, 2009 7:44 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Almost as good a hitter as Mantle with defense better than any of the Dimaggios
Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.
by devil_fingers on Feb 24, 2009 11:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Why do people think Willie Mays is over-rated?
I don’t get it…. two comments mention that.
Explain please!
by Royal from Queens on Feb 24, 2009 7:45 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
i think he's awesome...
and right there in that 2nd tier behind Bonds, Ruth, Arod in the futue, etc…anywhere between the 5th and 10th best position player of all time
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Feb 24, 2009 8:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
A-Rod's great
But to be like Mays, he’d have to be the same offensive player he is now, but with the defense of someone like Adam Everett.
Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.
by devil_fingers on Feb 24, 2009 11:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
we'll see....
Jeters selfishness really hurt Arod’s case in stuff like this…b/c he was an out of this world hitter playing very good defense at short stop
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Feb 24, 2009 11:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow
I stick up for A-Rod, and yes, he’s way better than Jeter (as if I even need to say that), but to blame Jeter for A-Rod not being as good as Willie Mays is weird.
He was a good defensive shortstop, yes, but he was never awesome — never the clearly best defensive SS in the league. He’s been decent at third, but if he was such a great defender at SS, he should be at least that good at 3rd.
He’s still a great player. If you consider him a 3B, he’ll probably end up the best of all-time by the time he’s done. He’s the second best SS of all-time if you count him there (and Wagner is #2 or #3, so don’t get uptight).
But he’s still 30 wins above average behind willie mays in offense. Can he do that in the next 7 seasons? Maybe, but it will be close.
And as far as defense, yes, SS is more valuable than CF. But Willie Mays is either the greatest or second greatest (Andruw…) CF of all-time…
Look, this isn’t a put-down to A-Rod. Willie Mays is one of the 5 greatest major leaguers of all-time. And A-Rod has had a bit of bad luck — leave aside all the B. S. with the press, but in his early years, he wasn’t the best player in the majors because of Bonds, and now, he isn’t the best because of Pujols… He’s a top 20 player for me.
But let’s not give Jeter “credit” where it isn’t due.
Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.
by devil_fingers on Feb 25, 2009 9:52 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I am glad Mickey Mantle is on this list.
Mostly so I can, once again, direct you to this note he wrote.
WTF, self?
by minda33 on Feb 25, 2009 12:31 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Where the heck does that come from?
Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!
by cmkeller on Feb 25, 2009 10:16 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know,
but I feel it would be irresponsible to not share it.
WTF, self?
by minda33 on Feb 25, 2009 11:37 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
One big omission: Joe Morgan
mentioned above. Hey, if we’re leaving personal stuff out of this, like the racism, drug use, domestic violence, etc. of some players , we can surely leave out his terrible annoucing. The guy is the best 2B of all-time. He’s 1975-1976 seasons were as good as anyone’s great seasons. Hornsby was a better hitter. Morgan was better at everything else.
Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.
by devil_fingers on Feb 25, 2009 9:56 AM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 















