fantasy league
Hi, fellow Royalitos.
I'm running a non-keeper fantasy league on ESPN for the third year, and was lookin fer folks to stock it a bit deeper this time. We have about 10 so far, and we're looking for 20 to get a bit of depth in the rosters and reward those who can see past the A-Rods and the G-Loads.
We also have a couple of interesting statistics for the rotisserie, including, on the position player side, pitches per plate appearance and (the obviously deeply flawed but still amusing) errors; and on the pitching side using K/BB, OBP-against, and both wins and win% to encourage starts but avoid the annoyances of the losses category.
If you'd like to participate, please email me at sean.strasburg at the google app which rhymes with "email".com. There are a number of AL Central-team fans playing.
(The current settings, like league-name and scoring details, are not final.)
I hope this is an appropriate use of RR!
Thanks.:)
8 months ago
Sean O Se
5 comments
0 recs |
Comments
why, yes, Sean,
it’s a very appropriate use.
by Sean O Se on Feb 24, 2009 4:04 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
no, just straight old fashioned rotisserie.
no head-to-head matchups, just as if a team was playing to accumulate stats and not really win games per se.
the rotisserie-accumulation formulation i think is more statistically accurate, but it doesn’t have the sort of heads-up action of head-to-head, i suppose. but i’ve never done the latter.
by Sean O Se on Feb 24, 2009 4:34 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I just don’t like roto leagues. After the first half of the season, there’s almost no movement in the standings. Things get locked in. Head-to-head leagues stay interesting all season long.
The immoderate moderator
by NYRoyal on Feb 24, 2009 6:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I actually like
roto, but pitches per plate appearance? Very weird. More of a traditional roto guy i guess.
by powder blues on Feb 24, 2009 8:45 PM EST reply actions 0 recs













