Bank rethinking Mets deal
"Citigroup Inc. is exploring the possibility of backing out of a nearly $400 million marketing deal"
ahahaha, you think so? Also:
"It was the primary sponsor of the Rose Bowl last month, and is the sponsor of the 2010 BCS National Championship Game."
about 3 years ago
mazoboom
6 comments
0 recs |
Comments
What's ridiculous
is that I don’t care where the heck they put their name. Seeing it simply has no effect on whether I’ll bank there. That’s true of any company – not just Citi. I’d love to go back to the old days where a stadium had an actual name that meant something and wasn’t going to change next year.
meat
But,
I will say that if the Jackson Cty ever chooses to sell the naming rights (in order to boost Royal’s payroll only) I think that they really should sole source the name to be Chipotle Stadium.
meat
love it
enough money to keep Greinke a Royal forever.
plus maybe they can build a mini Chipotle beside Zack’s locker.
Founder of the Johnny Giavotella fan club.
It should be managed by Scott Elarton
Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary since sometime in 2008.
by Matt Klaassen on Feb 4, 2009 12:01 PM EST up reply actions
Well....YEAH
They obviously need the extra cash to pay their intellectual property lawyers for this incredibly important lawsuit.
I believe the pawn shop owner when he says he wasn’t trying to infringe on Citi’s trademark. I mean, honestly, why would a decent, hardworking, and legitimate business owner like that want to sully his business’ reputation by associating it with Citigroup?
"Now…put that in your [BLEEP]ing pipe and smoke it." -Hal McRae













