Gobble to Texas
Rangers sign Gobble
The Texas Rangers announced late Saturday the signing of free-agent reliever Jimmy Gobble to a minor league contract.
The left-hander, who was released Friday by the Kansas City Royals, will be in big league spring training Sunday. Gobble, 27, is a six-year veteran who was 0-2 with an 8.81 ERA in 31 2/3 innings last year with KC.
The Rangers have two left-handers who are considered locks for the bullpen, former All-Star closer Eddie Guardado and 2008 closer C.J. Wilson. Both of them, however, have suffered from injuries recently.
Wilson had a blister on his middle finger but threw an inning Saturday against Colorado. Guardado has complained of a sore shoulder but has thrown bullpen sessions the past two days.
One mans trash is another mans treasure
0 recs |
18 comments
Comments
I thought he was an Astro for sure
Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary to Driveline Mechanics and elsewhere since sometime in 2008.
by devil_fingers on Mar 22, 2009 12:02 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Although the Rangers are no surprise.
The General Theory of Royaltivity
by kabrink on Mar 22, 2009 12:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep
They seem to have been after Gobble for years.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Mar 23, 2009 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
at least he doesn't have to move
now he just goes to the other side of the facility.
Founder of the Johnny Giavotella fan club.
by doublestix on Mar 22, 2009 12:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wonder if that really comes into it
It probably did, because on the face of it, the Rangers would be a strange choice to hook up with if he had a choice. Very little chance he makes the big league team there.
The Allard Baird of incisive internet discourse.
by kcbottom9th on Mar 22, 2009 3:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Texas has a large injury plague right now on thie lefites
Gurdado shoulder and Wilson’s blisters combined with Gabbard’s off season surgery give Gobble a shot to make he pen out of ST.
by laxtonto on Mar 22, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Rangers are the new Royals
I remember a few years ago the threads that used to pop up here at Royals Review when a guy like Gobble was DFAed.
Wow, did you see Luke Hudson was DFAed? We ought to grab that!
The team has come quite a way in the last two years.
Oh, and I object to Gobble being called trash! He is at worst “vintage” goods.
www.rockchalktalk.com for pretty good KU baseball coverage
by James Quinn on Mar 22, 2009 10:06 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If Yimmy is 'vintage goods'
what the hell is Sidney Ponson?
Jayhawk baseball - a tradition since Steve Jeltz
by JayhawkTom on Mar 22, 2009 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wide AND deep?
This man is so three-dimensional.
Kansas City Royals: your 2006 and 2007 NL Central champions!
by mazoboom on Mar 22, 2009 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
From LSB....
Posnanski on Gobble and Hillman
Joe Posnanski has an article up at SI on Jimmy Gobble, Trey Hillman, and the differences between good and bad managers…
In particular, he talks about how Gobble was successful at the thing he was supposed to do — get lefties out — and was terrible at the thing he wasn’t supposed to do — get righties out.
The problem, Posnanski says, is that Hillman didn’t utilize him properly, which highlights his bigger point:
In many ways, the Jimmy Gobble story is a perfect little synopsis of good managing and bad. A good manager has an uncanny way of consistently putting his players in positions where they can succeed. There are no perfect players, but more than that, there are very, very few players who do not have serious and easy-to-define weaknesses in their game. Some hit but don’t field, some field but don’t hit, some cannot catch up to hot fastballs, some cannot lay off the outside slider, some throw too many pitches, some cannot get lefties out, some do not walk, some are not aggressive enough, on and on and on and on forever. Seems to me that the part of managing that matters most — and maybe this is where Bobby Cox shines — is setting up game after game after game so that more of your players get to play to their strengths.
Thanks to Dirk Diggler for pointing out this story
by laxtonto on Mar 22, 2009 2:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I read that article and thought it a good piece.
Wish Trey would read it.
by Steve Hovley on Mar 22, 2009 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A good manager has an uncanny way of consistently putting his players in positions where they can succeed.
I think this is a key part of good managing. Bad managers will look too often at a players weakness and try to change them. Adam Dunn strikes out too much!!!11 Shorten his stroke and get him to hit for contact! Good managers will accept a player’s shortcoming but try to utilize him in situations where he can maximize his utility. Platoons are one effective way of doing this, moving a failed starter to the pen is another. Trey has done this at times I think with Robinson Tejeda or HoRam, or using Olivo as a lefty-masher, but I think most everyone would agree he badly, badly, badly mishandled Gobble.
I fully expect Jimmy to bounce back somewhere in the league and post a few decent seasons as a LOOGY.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Mar 23, 2009 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He'll get a key out against the Royals in the ALCS
Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary to Driveline Mechanics and elsewhere since sometime in 2008.
by devil_fingers on Mar 23, 2009 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shorten his stroke and get him to hit for contact!
You nailed it. What’s funny, it was the opposite approach that derailed Ken Harvey’s career — he was an excellent contact hitter, but the R’s thought they needed to get more power out of him, so they tinkered with his approach and he never hit well again.
Other similar managerial/coaching mistakes:
1. Asking your strikeout pitcher to “pitch to contact”
2. Demanding Greinke throw harder when he confessed his success was due to his control
3. Making Hochevar abandon his curve for a year to work on his changeup (potentially a mistake, anyway)
by marbotty on Mar 23, 2009 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
FWIW
Greinke has said multiple times that throwing harder, trusting his fastball, blowing it by batters as an out-pitch and not trying to rely on pinpoint control is what turned him around in 2007 and how he continued to pitch well in 2008. He often talks about how Riske helped him learn this.
Also, telling batters to “pitch to contact” is not telling them to actually try to induce contact. It is a way of telling them to throw strikes and not nibble. While strikeouts are, in general, the best outcome for a pitcher, trying to strike out every batter is not the best way to pitch. It’s just like hitting home runs. HR’s are the best outcome for a batter, but a batter shouldn’t be trying to hit a home run every time he comes to bat. This is a process training technique: teach pitchers to throw strikes and trust their stuff, and teach batters to wait for hitter’s pitches and then hit them hard.
And I have no idea if #3 was a mistake. I don’t think it hurt his curveball from what I’ve seen. And his problem was and is control and command. I don’t think that has anything to do with him not throwing his curveball in the minors.
The immoderate moderator
by NYRoyal on Mar 24, 2009 2:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs















