An Early Look at the Royals' 2009 Schedule
Concerned that the coverage and discussion of baseball hasn't been NFLicated enough? Well, I'm here to help.
Two Games I Bet the Royals Will Lose: The Royals play the Orioles at home on May 14th. Although the Royals seem to have lifted their weird inability to beat Baltimore -- The Curse of Amber Theoharris -- this could be a tough game for the Royals, despite the home field advantage. Why? The Royals will play in Oakland on the night of May 13th, and will have a long, late, flight back to KC to play the Birds. Then again, Baltimore will be flying in from Maryland the night before as well... Likewise, on August 27th, the Royals will take on the Mariners in Seattle (Battle for Grass Creek!) on the heels of a day-game in Cleveland on the 26th. Cleveland to Seattle is a long flight, and by my quick glance, it looks like the longest flight of the season for the boys in blue. The honorable mention tough game comes on June 5th, when the Royals play in Toronto after a day-game in Tampa the day before. (In truth however, the Royals get something of a minor benefit by being so centrally located, as they very rarely have any truly long flights.)
Two Potentially Difficult Series: The Royals play the Yankees and the Twins, on the road, to end the season. There's good odds that both teams will be playing for something at that point, and the Royals likely won't get the benefit of playing against September callups. Both teams will likely be desperate. Of course, this also means the Royals have a golden opportunity to play spoiler, especially to the Twins, who also play the Royals at home during the last homestand.
Easiest Month: Well of course, we all know this one: June, when the Royals get to play the National League. Better still, the Royals interleague slate looks especially weak this year, and in June the Royals will play the Reds, Cards, Astros, Pirates and D'Backs. The American League games in May don't look too murderous either, aside from a few battles with Cleveland.
Longest Home-Stand: For good measure, all those interleague games in June also coincides with the longest homestand of the season, a nine-gamer from June 12-21. (Although there's a second nine-gamer in late August.)
Second Easiest Month: The Royals have a great opportunity to be over .500 by the end of June, because their May schedule is also very favorable. The Royals play a season-high seventeen games at the K in May, against just eleven road games. If you extend it further, with April looking reasonable (this is classic NLFication, since we don't actually know how good half the divisional opponents are going to be) the Royals legitimately could be little better than last season, and something like 10 games over .500 at the end of June.
Hardest Month: September looks to be pretty rough: no NL teams, seven games against the Red Yankees, four with the Angels, and three against the Tribe & Twins.Get ready for a story about how the Royals "ran out of steam" or "didn't know how to finish a season yet" in early October.
Longest Road-trip: The Royals don't really have any terribly long roadies. There's one nine-gamer in August where the Royals take on the Twins, Tigers and ChiSox. Yes, its August, but its also three easy flights and three so-so (in aggregate) teams. A slightly tougher nine-gamer comes in early June, which is a Tampa to Toronto to Cleveland haul, the team's really only tough stretch of games in May & June.
Intercine Battle in the Midwest: The Royals play 72 games against their AL Central foes, a full 44% of their schedule. It won't play out like this on the field, because individual team v team results are pretty random, but in true NFLication spirit, lets look at it this way: We have no idea really about how the Central will play out, considering how hard to predict everyone looks. The most likely scenario is that, like last season, two of these four opponents will go bad, and two will have good seasons. If that happens, the Royals will have a reasonable schedule. However, if it breaks one way or the other -- with three playing well or three playing poorly -- then the tenor of the Royals' slate could significantly change. Think about the Tigers, for example, we really have no idea what all those games against Detroit (18) will mean yet.
Quirks: The Royals play two four-game series against Boston, which is fairly weird considering that the four-game series is a thing of the past. It isn't ideal to match up against a team who has great offensive and pitchig depth over four games... The Royals play the Mariners five times at home, four times on the road. The Royals only play the Rangers six times, while drawing the Angels ten times. The Royals play an equal number of weekend series at home as on the road, which is of course not a quirk.
0 recs |
24 comments
|
Comments
Wow
Other than the Cardinals, I can’t see how those interleague matchups are going to generate any revenues for the MLB. Reds, Astros, Pirates, D-Backs?
Might as well throw the Nationals, Padres and New Orleans Zephyrs in there for good measure.
Waiting for April.
by DC Royal on Mar 5, 2009 4:52 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
most interleague matchups are pointless
but yes, the NL central minus the cubs is a giant ball of suck
by royalsreview on Mar 5, 2009 4:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
They are as pointless as interdivision matchups
The immoderate moderator
by NYRoyal on Mar 5, 2009 7:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
ALL THE STARS COME OUT FOR INTERLEAGUE PLAY!!!
McLouth! Guillen! LaRoche! Jacobs! Its a battle between two long-time rivals when the Royals and Pirates battle in interleague play TONIGHT ON FOX!!!
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Mar 5, 2009 5:08 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
Are you excited by the Royals playing the Blue Jays, Orioles and Rangers?
The immoderate moderator
by NYRoyal on Mar 5, 2009 7:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I get tingly for every game.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Mar 5, 2009 8:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I like playing some different teams every now and then
The immoderate moderator
by NYRoyal on Mar 6, 2009 1:33 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
now imagine if one of those teams had a stud pitcher from south africa
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Mar 6, 2009 4:06 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The impossible dream lives
The immoderate moderator
by NYRoyal on Mar 6, 2009 4:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'd like to play the AL East and West teams more often
I think the league schedules should be more balanced. I also think its unfair some teams play a weaker NL division, while other teams play a stronger NL division.
We were sold on interleague play because it would present such interesting matchups. Well once in awhile we get an interesting matchup, but the vast majority of matchups are Royals-Pirates. I am very underwhelmed by interleague play and would rather go back to the old schedule (and old divisional alighment while we’re at it!)
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Mar 6, 2009 9:35 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It provides additional different matchups
Playing games within your league provides some good and interesting matchups and some bad and boring mathchups. Interleague play provides the same thing. At least it provides more variety. I’d rather see a Royals-Pirates series than yet another Royals-Orioles series. Is there really any reason to not play any games against 50% of major league baseball teams?
The immoderate moderator
by NYRoyal on Mar 6, 2009 4:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Tradition
I like tradition. I’m a stick in the mud traditionalist when it comes to many things baseball.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Mar 6, 2009 4:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That's cool
I can understand that. There are traditions that I like as well. I just find that the tradition that would include not playing against half of the teams in MLB to be more negative than positive. I’d actually prefer more interleague play. As it stands, there are some teams in the AL that the Royals only play three series against and some they play four series against. It is quite random and can lead to some unfair strength of schedule disparities. So, I’d have teams teams in the league, but not in their division for only three series and use the freed up series to lay additional teams from the other league. By spreading around the inter-league games and equalizing the number of games against opponents within the league, you’ll have more fair and equal schedules.
The immoderate moderator
by NYRoyal on Mar 7, 2009 7:14 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think we agree on that
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Mar 8, 2009 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes...i actually get excited about seeing good baseball players...
and maybe in the future, we’ll be seeing some south africans.
Wieters very much interests me. Halladay is always fun to watch. Wouldnt mind seeing Snider hit. Feliz and Holland seem like they could be entertaining.
I apologize for liking baseball
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Mar 6, 2009 12:17 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I forgive you
The immoderate moderator
by NYRoyal on Mar 6, 2009 1:33 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Please throw the Zephyrs in
While, I’m happy to see Omaha come to town every once in a while, I’d like to see the big boys too!
Kansas City Royals: your 2006 and 2007 NL Central champions!
by mazoboom on Mar 5, 2009 7:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Reds, Astros, Pirates and D'Backs
I am sure fans of those teams are saying the same thing about the Royals, but that is not an interleague schedule to get excited about, though seeing the awesomeness that is Brandon Webb would be cool.
by Gopherballs on Mar 5, 2009 4:53 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
It'll be worth it
just to enjoy the absurdity of trash-talking Pirates fans.
Chaim Mattis Keller New York City's # 1 Royals fan!
by cmkeller on Mar 5, 2009 5:18 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Moskos over Weiters and WE should be contracted?
TPJ...you're dead to me
by billybeingbilly on Mar 6, 2009 12:18 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
you should like in DC...
she’s on MASN constantly, which is baltimore based, but on DC cable
by royalsreview on Mar 6, 2009 12:48 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
are the R's scheduled to play DC this year?
for whatever reason, they didn’t get to play them last time the AL Central took on their division. it was maddening
by marbotty on Mar 8, 2009 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nope
St Louis x2, @Pittsburgh, Cincinatti, Arizona, Houston
The Allard Baird of incisive internet discourse.
by kcbottom9th on Mar 8, 2009 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 














