Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Carmelo Anthony, Amar'e Stoudemire Vow To Fit In With Lin

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Well

Ponson in the 4th spot, Ugh is right! Peralta released = celebration by me!!! Banny to Omaha is what it is, I think it will help him and the team a month or two down the road.

Now I’m glad that I’m out of town during the home opener, not sad about missing Sid pitch!

FKA "MileHighKCfan"

by JSouth on Apr 1, 2009 3:55 PM EDT reply actions  

Joel will need someone to help him pack

Minda?

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Apr 1, 2009 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

One last melancholy time.

The General Theory of Royaltivity

by kabrink on Apr 1, 2009 7:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Article says that they will keep 11 pitchers

since HoRam will be used mostly from the pen for the first month. That means five position players. I’m guessing they want to have more time to decide what to do with TPJ or Maier. I’m assuming Shealy has made the team.

I honestly think this is about Maier. I believe he is out of options. TPJ will probably clear waivers and Costa has run his course. I think they want to hold on to Maier to see if Teahen is capable at 2B. If he is then they may want Mitch as the 4th OF. We’ll see but he’s had a pretty good spring for whatever that’s worth.

Also, I’m not overly worried about the starters right now. DM has shown he is willing to cut players even they have guaranteed contracts. I think we will see one or both of Hoch and Banny this year – sooner than later. If the top 3 guys in the rotation perform to expectations, the 4th and 5th guy won’t matter nearly as much as in years past.

by jsolo on Apr 1, 2009 3:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Maier has options, Shane Costa does not

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Apr 1, 2009 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Damn the Star! It said Mitch was out of options that week!

That makes me feel better. So that makes it TPJ or Br. Pena then I guess.

by jsolo on Apr 1, 2009 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm trying to find the article where the Star said he was out of options

The site is down or busy right now. I’ll link it if I can find it. Is there a good site that lists player options out there?

by jsolo on Apr 1, 2009 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Okay, good. I must have been smoking crack that day.

I’m not ready to give up on Mitch yet. Also, crack is good. Want some?

by jsolo on Apr 1, 2009 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

The fifth bench player might be Pena as an extra catcher

With the money paid to Gobble and Peralta this spring due to the mistake of offering them arbitration last fall, the Royals could have paid for, what, half of Russell Branyan’s 2009 salary.

by Gopherballs on Apr 1, 2009 4:03 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

just an awesome offseason top to bottom from the front office

free agency, trades, roster management, tenders, they really did it all

Come back, Rob Neyer, all is forgiven.

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary to Driveline Mechanics and elsewhere since sometime in 2008.

by Matt Klaassen on Apr 1, 2009 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

At least we have the Greinke extension

and Cruz was a nice pickup despite the price of losing the draft pick. And Crisp, while no Franklin Guiterrez, is at least adequate as a placeholder centerfielder. Yeah, that’s all I got.

by Gopherballs on Apr 1, 2009 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah

one no-brainer move (Greinke resigning), and two okay moves, and then it’s Colletti time.

It’s like with the Meche thing — good contract, but Bill Bavasi wasn’t a moron all the time, either. He got Adrian Beltre.

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary to Driveline Mechanics and elsewhere since sometime in 2008.

by Matt Klaassen on Apr 1, 2009 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

woe is you

Cry for me Leo Nunez

I don't know how to put this but I'm kind of a big deal.

by kcscoliny on Apr 1, 2009 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dayton Moore is a lot like Madonna's movie career

people kept showing up despite the quality, so she kept making movies.

by Gopherballs on Apr 1, 2009 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I don't know that to think but I'm not it's all that bad

I think in the world of baseball that one really good move makes up for a bunch of crappy moves. Greinke extension aside (which was awesome of course) if Cruz is a stud this year then Farnsworth isn’t such a big deal. If Jacobs hits 30 HRs and Shealy still makes the team then it also looks reasonable.

What I don’t like are Ponson and HoRam but they are easy to fix with minimal damage. At least HoRam could be useful out of the pen. Ponson is easy to cut ties with if he doesn’t work out. No one special got released because of those two, so that’s good.

Have they wasted money? Of course. Have they wasted tons of money at a long term detriment to the organization. Nope. I’m not talking about Guillen here because that was two years ago and at the time it seemed like at least a decent gamble.

Frankly, if they are going to be in contention none of the moves they’ve made this off-season should really impact it all that much. The fact of the matter is (and we’ve all seen it before) that Butler and Gordon need to emerge for realz. Meche and Greinke need to be aces and Davies need to solidify the 3rd spot. Aviles can’t regress overly much and Soria needs to continue to dominate. If everyone else performs to expectations then there the team should be competitive.

Also, not enough statistical references in the last few paragraphs for my liking so I’m adding these key words: FIP, wOBA, and mean reversion.

by jsolo on Apr 1, 2009 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yikes! Too much coffee. Earlier in this post with Maier and options it was crack. Now caffeine.

That post is a mess with lots of grammatical errors. I need to get a job so I will stop sitting in front of the computer waiting for Royals news drinking too much coffee.

Somehow I managed to get a “then there” in a sentence. I need my grammatical license revoked immediately.

by jsolo on Apr 1, 2009 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

for the record

Guillen one one year ago (two years to go! Enjoy!), and it was not a “decent gamble” for any team, and especially not for the Royals. They overpaid even if he cuold be expected to repeat his 2007 (which would have been stupid). 3/18 might have been reasonable (although I wouldn’t have guaranteed a dude his age and with his injury history more than 2), although that would have ended being too much for his performance (and that’s before the market droped out). That’s a "smart’ gamble, because then at least you have a chance at unloading him.

That’s just one example, and I could go on, but even that one dumb signing snowlballs and the 2008-2009 offseason into being hamstrung, although that didn’t stop Dayton Moore from making more stupid signings to screw up future offseasons.

And the moves to make a difference — they ROyals are likely stuck with Guillen for this season and the next. Even if Gordon and Butler both “break out” (whatever that means) this year, that will probably only get the team to .500. The farm system won’t start producing talenet for a few years on the major league level. Any team needs a Gm with a clue on the free agent martket to compete, and the less money they have, the more they need that guy. Dayton Moore gives more evidence with almost every transaction he isn’t that guy.

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary to Driveline Mechanics and elsewhere since sometime in 2008.

by Matt Klaassen on Apr 1, 2009 6:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Great deal

turn in your fan card at the door and enjoy the Mariners.

I don't know how to put this but I'm kind of a big deal.

by kcscoliny on Apr 1, 2009 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

i know

i’m llke all those people who criticized President Bush — if you criticize the leader of a country/team, you obviously don’t care about the coutnry or team, and so should switch

Attention everyone: if you don’t approve of Dayton Moore’s moves, you obviously hate the Royals and should switch teams, because, deep down, we don’t cheer for the team, we cheer for the GM!

Check with kcscoliny for more details.

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary to Driveline Mechanics and elsewhere since sometime in 2008.

by Matt Klaassen on Apr 1, 2009 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm all for questioning people

but constantly bashing every move HAS GROWN OLD. He does as many things right with this club as he has done wrong but you don’t like the “prospect” side of the game so you fail to acknowledge that. He has loaded up in the draft, got KC involved in LA and got Glass to up the payroll, added great people in the FO/scouting staff, etc etc.

No all he has done in your opinion is overpay for Guillen, Jacobs and Farnsworth what a POS. This team isn’t gonna build a contender on FA signings it’s gonna be done thru the draft and LA and GMDM is the right guy for that job. Is he the best GM in the league, no but ALL GM’s make mistakes but yon can’t quit ballin about the Guillen signing.

WE ALL GET IT D_F DOESN’T LIKE JOSE GUILLEN. ALSO YOU WANT A 35 YO BRANYAN TO PLAY 1B. Sweet we’ll examine that after Branyan gets 500 +Ab’s this year.

I don't know how to put this but I'm kind of a big deal.

by kcscoliny on Apr 2, 2009 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

well, I'm sorry you find it old

Given that I’ve often acknowledged that he has done well with building the farm system, including this thread, you might want to acknowledge that. Or that I compliement he Meche or Soria signings.

Look, I’ve always thought we got on well. We don’t ‘have to agree, but I’m not going to tell you to go cheer for the Braves or something after your 4th fanpost (not just comment) or whatever about Mark Teahen, or John Buck’s footwork. And, again, I don’t hate Jose Guillen any more than you “hate” Mark Teahen or John Buck. Like you do re: Buck, Teahen, or whomever, I have an opinion about his value to the team. I don’t mind arguing about it and having a laugh at each other, but I’m not going to tell you to “get lost” if I don’t like what I’m hearing.

I’m sorry you feel that way. I hope Rowdy Hardy can help us put this ugliness behind us.

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary to Driveline Mechanics and elsewhere since sometime in 2008.

by Matt Klaassen on Apr 2, 2009 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

And I'd rather have a 35 year-old Branyan at 1.5M than a 34 year-old Guillen at 2/24

Is there some sort of fun bet we can come up with these two guys that would be fair for both of us?

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary to Driveline Mechanics and elsewhere since sometime in 2008.

by Matt Klaassen on Apr 2, 2009 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

darn my crappy math skills

I even looked it up, and simply did it wrong in my head

And that’s why they call me a sabermagician!

ILLLLUUUUUUUUUUUUSION, MICHAEL!

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary to Driveline Mechanics and elsewhere since sometime in 2008.

by Matt Klaassen on Apr 2, 2009 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Mark Teahen

and Jose Guillen are totally different animals. I’m not for Teahen in the corner outfield because I believe his defense is very overrated and I don’t think he is the ‘06 hitter but at best the ’07 hitter. If he can play 2b then he has value and I would love having him on the team. Guillen’s contract makes him untradeable but he has shown a flash of what he can be and that is a .800+ OPS and I’ll have to deal with that GMDM mistake. In the end if Teahen can hack 2b then I was wrong about getting rid of him. As for Buck, he is what he is, a up and down catcher who is good one half and bad the other with a weak arm. Opportunity to trade him slipped by and now KC is stuck with him. He is better at Olivo in a couple areas and worse in a couple others GMDM should look to trade either one who can bring something decent worth having when they have B. Pena who could at worst be a catcher fillin type.

I was all for Branyan on the team in fact I put him on my Dream Roster towards the end of the year last year with Mike Jacobs and Adam Dunn.

In all I like your opinions and you’ve taught me alot about the sabermetric side of baseball but I too don’t like the Guillen contract I just choose to stop complaining about it. It was over a year ago in a vastly different market move on to the Farnsworth deal and I’ll still be cool with you.

I don't know how to put this but I'm kind of a big deal.

by kcscoliny on Apr 2, 2009 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hate to even get into this, so I'll just dip my toe into the water
Mark Teahen and Jose Guillen are totally different animals. I’m not for Teahen in the corner outfield because I believe his defense is very overrated and I don’t think he is the ‘06 hitter but at best the ’07 hitter.

Let’s see if we can find some common ground. Can we agree that Teahen is a better defensive corner OFer than Guillen? If so, then let’s look at hitting. You say the true Teahen is more like his 2007 stats than his 2006 stats. I agree. He had a good OBP and light line drive power that year which amounted to a .333 wOBA. The average of Guillen’s projections have him with a 2009 wOBA of .330 for 2009. So it appears that we’re looking at similar offensive value, and with Teahen having a better defensive value. Doesn’t that make Teahen the better overall corner OFer?

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Apr 2, 2009 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

cool

we don’t have to get into it now. I was more just reaction to the “Cheer for the Mariners” thing.

I know that I tend to harp (although I usually don’t realize it until too late). Just tell me nice-like and I’ll be shamed into shutting up for a while. Doublestix and jonfmorse have both successfully pulled it off.

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary to Driveline Mechanics and elsewhere since sometime in 2008.

by Matt Klaassen on Apr 2, 2009 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

D_f doesn't constantly bash every move DM has made

He bashes the bad ones. And they deserve bashing. Does the frequency and snark-content of it get to be too much for some of us at times? Sure. Does my bullshit get to be too much and annoying sometimes? Sure. Does your schtick and that of other posters ever get to the annoyance level? Sure. It happens for all of us. But that doesn’t mean we’re not good fans or that we should abandon the team. D_f isn’t negative for negativity’s sake. He’s basically negative about the things we should feel negative about.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Apr 2, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm usually pragmatic and I usually agree with you D_F

But I tend to disagree with your above statement. Guillen was two off-seasons ago, not two years, but it doesn’t change my point. At the time he was the best hitter that would actually come to KC. Did they overpay? You bet. Was it worthwhile to try and bring in an impact bat and show KC was serious about free agents. I personally think so.

I also disagree that every transaction proves DM is not the guy. He has more crappy ones than good ones but not by a ridiculous margin. He also has some great moves in there and has proven that over time he will try to correct his mistakes. He’s still a young GM by any standard. Plenty of GMs sign crappy players along with good ones in order to find the crazy mix that will actually get you to the playoffs that year. While DM still has a ways to go, he’s definitely shown flashes of what this city really needs for its baseball team.

That being said I’m pissed about HoRam and Ponson and I hope we are all wrong about them or the team manages to win those games while the pitchers still earn tickets to the waiver wire.

by jsolo on Apr 1, 2009 8:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

we don't need to worry about Ponson/Horam

Now we can clobber enough home runs that it ain’t gonna matter. Teahen hitting .500 and all, etc.

The General Theory of Royaltivity

by kabrink on Apr 1, 2009 9:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Moore has built the farm system well

I vehemently disagree about “throwing money around and some guys wil be good.” Maybe that would lead a team with a big budget in a weak division with other, similarly clumsy GMs to contention, but it won’t work for the Royals. It works for Omar Minaya because he has craploads of money. The Royals don’t.

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary to Driveline Mechanics and elsewhere since sometime in 2008.

by Matt Klaassen on Apr 1, 2009 9:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, the thing is just about every GM now knows the importance

of building the farm system in order to produce a pipeline of players who the team gets through their club control years (the real currency in baseball). Even Brian Sabean has figured this out.

Teams like Oakland or Cleveland trade guys like Joe Blanton and Casey Blake to restock their minor league system, while the Royals actively seek the expensive mediocrities out to sign to full or above market multi-year deals. Meanwhile, the upper level of the minors is a wasteland. Thus, the plan seems to be wait three more years for Hosmer, Moose, and a few of the A ball pitchers to make the majors (and then maybe two more years for them to get good, just like Gordon, Butler, and Hochevar), hoping a bunch of veteran placeholders can push .500 and keep a fanbase use to .470 happy until the good prospects arrive.

by Gopherballs on Apr 2, 2009 12:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, the thing is just about every GM now knows the importance
of building the farm system in order to produce a pipeline of players who the team gets through their club control years (the real currency in baseball).

But not every team is good at it. Drafting well, developing well and knowing which prospects to trade, which to keep and which to acquire are all skills. Dayton Moore earns a “C” grade in large part because his FO has been good at those things.

Despite the hyperbole today (which is understandable given the day’s mistakes), Moore isn’t an awful GM. He does some things well and some things poorly. The problem is that an average GM probably doesn’t get the smallest market team in baseball over the top.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Apr 2, 2009 12:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Other than the draft, Moore has not shown those skills
But not every team is good at it. Drafting well, developing well and knowing which prospects to trade, which to keep and which to acquire are all skills. Dayton Moore earns a "C" grade in large part because his FO has been good at those things.

Moore has drafted well in terms of the players he has drafted in the high rounds have not seen their draft stock drop, but then again, not every GM gets the 2nd and 3rd picks in the draft. How well he actually drafted will depend in large part on how these players develop, and it is too soon to tell about that.

Moore has not shown any real skill in “developing well” yet — he has not developed any of the players he drafted yet given the short time frame and the fact that only a few have even reached low A ball. And the development of holdovers such as Gordon, Butler, and Hochevar have been anything but smooth.

Nor has he shown much skill in “knowing which prospects to trade, which to keep and which to acquire.”

Small markets like Oakland, Tampa Bay, and Milwaukee, and teams with smaller payrolls than the Royals have succeeded, so that excuse does not hold much water.

Moore might make a fine scouting director, but he has not shown any skills that would classify him as even an average GM.

.

by Gopherballs on Apr 2, 2009 2:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

I respectfully dissent

I think his drafts have been successful, but of course we won’t know for sure for years. I also like most of his trades involving prospects (of course there haven’t been many). One big positive is that he hasn’t been trading away many genuinely good prospects at all. Any “win now” moves have not included trading away prospects for short-term gain.

And, of course, just because some small market teams have ever had any degree of success for any period of time does not mean that payroll and revenue potential aren’t important factors for success. A small payroll makes it harder to succeed. So you have to have a good GM in order for a small market, low payroll team to succeed. Oakland, Tampa Bay, Minnesota and Milwaukee have all succeeded despite lower payrolls precisely because they had good GM’s and effective front offices. If you don’t have the money, then your front office has to be that much better in order for your team to succeed. And, as I said, it doesn’t look like Moore is good enough to overcome those structural obstacles to the success of small market teams. I didn’t use market size as an excuse for Moore at all. That’s a ludicrous misreading of what I wrote.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Apr 2, 2009 3:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

I was disagreeing with your point that Moore has been an average GM

not that an average GM doesn’t get the smallest market team over the top. Oakland, Tampa Bay, etc. have created a small market blueprint for success, but Moore has not followed it. And, no, not trading Billy Butler for Yuniesky Betancourt or similar foolishness does not count as doing a good job — that is basic competence.

by Gopherballs on Apr 2, 2009 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

JP Howell is the only player

I know of that shouldn’t have been traded. Most the others that he has traded away have been absolute flops I’m pretty sure he knows what he is doing on the prospect trading scale as Atlanta has made a living knowing who to trade and not for years prior to the Teix deal.

As far as development goes we are still in a wait and see period on that. GMDM inherited a weak organization from top to bottom. I’m sure the stadium renovation plans were in place so maybe that stuff forced his hand to put Gordon and Butler on the field a little too early. It’s not like they had guys holding them back. The TB, Oakland, Minnesota’s, etc have had major league talent so they could afford to hold their prospects back we’ll see how KC adjust now that they have at least deserving major league talent.

I don't know how to put this but I'm kind of a big deal.

by kcscoliny on Apr 2, 2009 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not doing something foolish is not the same as doing something well

Again, it is basic competency. These other teams trade expensive veterans to restock the upper level of their minor leagues, not sign them to multi-year deals. Plus, Moore has traded young, club control talent like Ramon Ramirez for older, more expensive placeholders like Coco Crisp instead of someone young, cheap, and talented like Franklin Guiterrez. And the glut of mediocre veterans on the major league roster take up roster spots that would be better used to audition free talent with upside like Ryan Ludwick or Nelson Cruz or young players that could be available in cheap trades.

by Gopherballs on Apr 2, 2009 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Start the season with a 11 man pitching staff

since Bale is on the DL.
Roster will look like this until Bale comes back
C Buck Olivo
1b Butler Jacobs Shealy
2b Callaspo Teahen Bloomquist
SS Aviles TPJ
3b Gordon
CF Crisp
LF DDJ
RF Guillen
SP Meche, Greinke Davies Ponson HoRam
RP Soria Farnsworth Cruz Mahay Tejeda Waechter or Colon

I don't know how to put this but I'm kind of a big deal.

by kcscoliny on Apr 1, 2009 3:58 PM EDT reply actions  

What a horrific

1-2 punch for the opening weekend. Ponson and Ramirez. Ugh.

The Allard Baird of incisive internet discourse.

by kcbottom9th on Apr 1, 2009 4:03 PM EDT reply actions  

Oops

Meche will sandwich in between. But still, yuck.

The Allard Baird of incisive internet discourse.

by kcbottom9th on Apr 1, 2009 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

i say over

The Alex Gordon era - www.number4thesmirk.com

by CollininCalifornia on Apr 1, 2009 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

With Meche starting?

I’ll take the under

"Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue."

by Joseph Landis on Apr 1, 2009 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

meche starts game 2 of the series...

Ponson Game 1, Meche Game 2 Ramirez Game 3… vs the NY Yankees at the K

The Alex Gordon era - www.number4thesmirk.com

by CollininCalifornia on Apr 1, 2009 4:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

as per the Royals website
SURPRISE, Ariz. — Sidney Ponson will pitch the first game at renovated Kauffman Stadium, manager Trey Hillman said on Wednesday in completing the Royals’ starting rotation.

here

The Alex Gordon era - www.number4thesmirk.com

by CollininCalifornia on Apr 1, 2009 4:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

That sick bastard

"Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue."

by Joseph Landis on Apr 1, 2009 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

What the hell

At this point, I hope they just turn it into a complete spectacle. Might as well. Sir Sidney needs to come enter the game by flying down a zip line (extra thick cable probably needed) from the new crown on top of the scoreboard directly to the mound. While wearing an outfit like this:

<img src=“”visibility:hidden;width:0px;height:0px;" border=0 width=0 height=0 src=“http://counters.gigya.com/wildfire/IMP/CXNID=2000002.0NXC/bT*xJmx*PTEyMzg2MTk4MDUyOTgmcHQ9MTIzODYxOTgxNjQ3MCZwPTE5MzI2MSZkPSZnPTEmdD*mbz*5NWEyNjA2MDIxYTQ*NjdkOGU4NTIzMzhhMjAwZWI3Ng==.gif” />
Create your own FACEinHOLE"/>

"Now…put that in your [BLEEP]ing pipe and smoke it." -Hal McRae

by Sweep_the_Leg on Apr 1, 2009 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

The General Theory of Royaltivity

by kabrink on Apr 1, 2009 9:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good thing Krispy Kreme ended their promotion

Ponson would put them out of business

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Apr 1, 2009 4:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wait...

because of the promotion? Or because of his own personal Krispy Kreme rampage? Because that could definitely still happen.

"Now…put that in your [BLEEP]ing pipe and smoke it." -Hal McRae

by Sweep_the_Leg on Apr 1, 2009 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'll still take under

Ponson gives up six runs in four innings, and Farnsworth three in 1/3 inning. See there’s optimism.

"Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue."

by Joseph Landis on Apr 1, 2009 4:47 PM EDT reply actions  

In fairness

Most of the “lecturing” that I saw was about how picking up Ponson for minor league depth and maybe some starts in the 5th spot of the rotation was not a bad thing. I don’t remember anyone saying that he should be the 4th or 5th starter. I still say it’s not a bad pickup to have him for depth and possibly some occassional starts. But I am not advocating slotting him in the 4th spot of the rotation to start the season.

FKA "MileHighKCfan"

by JSouth on Apr 1, 2009 5:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think I did, but if I did, I'm sorry

This front office seems to be goingn above and beyond to disillusion me… Gload, well, okay, one bad move, then Guillen, okay, he jumped the gun, Jacobs, well, it’s just temporary, but it won’t get worse, Farnsworth… well, even NYRoyal lost it with Moore after that, enough said..

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary to Driveline Mechanics and elsewhere since sometime in 2008.

by Matt Klaassen on Apr 1, 2009 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm glad you got lectured too

You deserved it.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Apr 1, 2009 7:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ponson is our Opening day starter at the K

HAH. he will slay the yankees

Bloomquist. God? Or just an illusion? You be the judge.

by focs on Apr 1, 2009 5:27 PM EDT reply actions  

He's an ex-Yankee!

He should know their weaknesses!

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Apr 1, 2009 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hideous.

But we all should’ve seen it coming. HoRam and Sid the (fat) Kid as our final two starters, two of the worst pitchers of the last two years, is another “gift” from “Dayton Claus”.

Banny being Banny.

by JobDDT on Apr 1, 2009 6:18 PM EDT reply actions  

I remember saying at some point

that HoRam felt like this year’s version of the Brett Tomko experiment. Now it feels like we have two Brett Tomko experiments, each potentially as catastrophic as the first.

I seriously don’t get why Ponson and/or HoRam got rotation spots at the expense of Bannister. Hoch, I get, if for no other reason than a month in the minors puts off his service clock by a year. But if Bannister pitches like a train wreck, then Ponson and HoRam are like the freaking Hindenburg.

by DarthYoshi on Apr 1, 2009 6:18 PM EDT reply actions  

All this talk about the moves made today

and no one is going to mention Gload!? I think we have something to rejoice about.

Besides, the more I think about it, the less worried I am about the back end of our rotaion. Hooch is going to be back in a month as the number 4 and Banny will soon follow and by that time, HoRam will have only seen one, maybe two starts.

by FretFriendly on Apr 1, 2009 6:21 PM EDT reply actions  

Divisions and Wild Cards are sometimes won by one game

Unless GMDM doesn’t think we’re going to be contenders this season anyway.

Which he should just fucking say then.

The idiocy this off-season has been off the charts.

Banny being Banny.

by JobDDT on Apr 1, 2009 6:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Babies 1, NY 0

On the Peralta argument

BOOM! ROASTED!

by GoBabies!! on Apr 1, 2009 6:40 PM EDT reply actions  

Well, true

But for your argument to be correct, you’d have to be right, and GMDM, Trey, and other talent evaluators for KC would have to be wrong.

I like my odds.

That and the fact that no other team in MLB coveted him enough to offer even a PTBNL for him, despite the fact that all he had going against him was a run of crummy luck last year, kind of speaks volumes. He’ll get picked up by someone on a MiL deal, and he’ll be in the league again, but not in a substantial role

BOOM! ROASTED!

by GoBabies!! on Apr 1, 2009 9:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, because Dayton Moore always does a great job with talent evaluation

Sometimes he does. Sometimes he doesn’t (see the curious cases of Sidney Ponson and Horacio Ramirez). You sure like declaring yourself right and/or vindicated. I would suggest you wait to do that until times in which you are actually proven right.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Apr 1, 2009 11:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

LOL

OK, so you are basically saying your knowledge of Sabermetrics and your ability to read between the numbers is superior to GMDM’s talent observation AND his Sabermetric ability.

That’s funny. And how could him being RELEASED and not traded, or even attempted to be moved to AAA not be seen as a signal of him losing something?!?!?!?! You really think somewhere in your mind that EVERY team in baseball just missed your argument, that his pitch movement didn’t change at all last year, and he just had a run of crummy luck with a higher % of Fly Balls leaving the yard & so on & so forth?

Like I said, he’s not done. Someone will give him a MiL contract and he may even get a taste of MLB again, but good ol’ fashioned baseball watchers, not number crunchers were right on this one – come to think of it, I believe you were the only number cruncher on this site that ever came to JP’s defense, and I know Sweeptheleg and other shared my opinion of JP’s ‘losing something’ because we actually watched the guy pitch last year

BOOM! ROASTED!

by GoBabies!! on Apr 2, 2009 8:57 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

OK, so you are basically saying your knowledge of Sabermetrics and your ability to read between the numbers is superior to GMDM’s talent observation AND his Sabermetric ability.

I’m saying that Moore, like all GM’s, makes mistakes. Because he has a certain opinion of Player X doesn’t mean that he is right. For instance, what is your opinion of Ponson and HoRam? Do you think they are the best choice for the Royals rotation? No? Does that mean you’re saying you are a better evaluator of pitching talent than Dayton Moore? How dare you!?

Dayton Moore is a MLB GM and you’re just a fan. So that means any time your opinion of a player differs from his, then you’re wrong. It’s so simple, isn’t it?

Let’s take this unbelievably ridiculous argument further. Let’s say that a couple of years ago some fan thought Ross Gload was a really good player. He liked his skill set, his versatility, his character and more. And then Dayton Moore apparently agreed with this fan by signing Gload to a 2-year contract. Does the fact that Moore’s action apparently agreed with the fan mean that the fan was right? I hope you see now that the “Dayton Moore agrees with me so I must be right” argument is horribly weak and laughable.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Apr 2, 2009 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, and let me deal with your "every team in baseball missed my argument" argument

Let’s say some team or teams like Peralta as a potential reliever for their bullpen. As we get late into ST, it looks more and more like the Royals aren’t going to put him their 25-man roster. And they know that the Royals are saying they are still over budget and that there is a deadline where the Royals can get out of 75% of the money they owe him. So, it looks like the Royals are going to have to release him. Knowing that, why would a team trade something for him, and then owe him $640K, when they can just wait for him to be released and negotiate either a minor league deal or a $400K major league deal? Get it?

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Apr 2, 2009 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

Correct on him being released

But if a team truly coveted him, they wouldn’t take the chance of someone else beating them to the punch. And since he is such a quality reliever thta just had a run of bad luck, how could they even count on a team like the Royals simply cutting him loose? The only way they could really count on him being cut loose would be if they were fairly certain that he WASN’T GOOD ENOUGH TO MAKE THE TEAM, as opposed to say, just had a run of crummy luck, correct?

My opinion of Ponson/Ho-Ram is like this…They are not the 4th & 5th best startes in the organization, but the difference between 4/5 & where they lie (somewhere in the 7-9 range) is really not that vast. By starting them in KC, they get the ability to keep another year over Hoch, and bannister had options remaining, so he wasn’t at risk to be lost.

Neither one of these guys, well, especially Ho-Ram wouldn’t have made it through waivers, so moving the 2 guys that we have no risk of losing down, despite the fact that they are marginally better than the 2 guys that remained in KC doesn’t bother me greatly. It’s not exactly like we sent down Cy Young & Cristy Matthews here. bannister has struggled mightly and Hoch could use some more seasoning.

I didn’t mind the Ho-Ram signing on the basis that he was effective out of the pen last year, and again, I really don’t care how much he gets paid. I don’t like him as a starter, and I don’t think he’ll last in the roation past May 15 (the date that Hoch needs to stay in AAA until so KC gains another year of control). Being that he will be the #5 starter, that gives him, what 6, maybe 7 starts?

I’m not ecstatic about Ponson – how could one be ecstatic about a guy that hasn’t been an effective starter since ‘03 -but as I believe you pointed out in one of your posts (it may have been RR), he basically has the same avg #’s as a 4.5 starter.

BOOM! ROASTED!

by GoBabies!! on Apr 2, 2009 1:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

But if a team truly coveted him, they wouldn’t take the chance of someone else beating them to the punch.

Um, ok, but did anyone say that other teams would be “truly coveting” him? It’s not like I described him as some great reliever. I just thought he made sense as an 11th or 12th man in the bullpen, a lot like Farnsworth.

And since he is such a quality reliever thta just had a run of bad luck, how could they even count on a team like the Royals simply cutting him loose?

Did I describe him as some great reliever that every team should be desperate for? Uh, no. Not even close. And how did they know there was a good chance that the Royals wouldn’t keep him? Well, because the KC media was saying it on a nearly daily basis and because the Royals could save some money that way. It’s not rocket science.

I don’t like [Ramirez] as a starter

You don’t? GMDM does. So you are basically saying your knowledge of pitching and ability to evaluate pitchers is superior to GMDM’s?

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Apr 2, 2009 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, I see

So now you think that teams in other markets are watching with baited breath Jack Henry on KCTV5, or listeing to Petro on 810 to hear who may be released? Give me a break.

And I’m not disagreeing with GMDM. I can 100% see the reasons behind WHY he is going w/ Ho-Ram in the 5 slot, as I laid out in the rest of the paragraph, of which you culled 1/2 sentence.

And no, I don’t believe you ever uesd the term ‘great’ in reference to JP, but you sure as shit tried to make me look ignorant for saying his Curveball went to shit (amongst other pitchers), and he wasn’t going to be an effective reliever, which would be a little silly to do over a “11th or 12th” bullpen arm

BOOM! ROASTED!

by GoBabies!! on Apr 2, 2009 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bloomquist. God? Or just an illusion? You be the judge.

by focs on Apr 1, 2009 7:27 PM EDT reply actions  

I hate Horacio Ramirez

just hate him. Atleast Gload is gone and TPJ is sure to follow him close behind

by Royal from Queens on Apr 1, 2009 8:15 PM EDT reply actions  

By the way

Dayton Moore has now been downgraded to ‘C+’, in my book. I had been wavering between a B- and a C+ for awhile, but ultimately still chose the above average score, ‘B-’. Now….it’s ‘C+’…even with the Gload loss (which was more or less an expectation, not a bonus).

by Royals Nation on Apr 1, 2009 8:35 PM EDT reply actions  

Gload LOSS?

think GAIN, GAIN, GAIN!!

The General Theory of Royaltivity

by kabrink on Apr 1, 2009 8:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

No t-shirt for me in the Ponsonorama

Good thing I bought one last year.

Although I never got it.

Hope Will got his $2.

by 2X2L on Apr 1, 2009 10:33 PM EDT reply actions  

Was your backyard...

like a beach? You know, from all the extra grit flying off of Ross?

"Now…put that in your [BLEEP]ing pipe and smoke it." -Hal McRae

by Sweep_the_Leg on Apr 1, 2009 11:40 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.

Managers

Cimg0036_small Freneau

Editors

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

Authors

Royalsretro_small RoyalsRetro

Headshot_small Old Man Duggan