Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Bill Stewart Dead From Apparent Heart Attack

Gotta Blame It On Something...

A whimperish opening of the shiny half-new K, to say the least.

The performer of the game was Sidney Ponson. Aside from a few irrelevant relief performances, everything else was bad. Bad defense, more bad at bats. Mental mistaes, everything. The last four or five innings had all the excitement of an Iowa winter.

Ponson wasn't terrific, but he wasn't bad either. Since he's still exciting such strong emotions from people, I'll say no more than that.

The word from Denny and other channels is that the mix of sun, shadows, and backdrop made it hard to hit. The game had a weird start time, to be sure. Maybe the K Crew was too distracting as well, or Sluggerrrr's gold mane too bright. I don't know.

Of course, this excuse, should we accept it, also means we must take something away from our own pitching heroes and their noble accomplishments, if this was the case.

I know that personally, I could use a day off from seeing Miguel Olivo bat. This is going to sound incredibly dickish, but it is legitimately amazing to watch Olivo at the plate and then remember that he is is the top 1% of baseball players on the planet right now. Sure, he's a catcher (bonus points) and has a good arm and some people think he calls a good game (which I find absolutely hillarious given how he bats) so everything almost balances out. Still, he's a Major League baseball player, and an established one, and he looks like a drunk college kid playing a video game at 3 AM. Swing, swing, swing. Why anyone ever throws him a fastball, I have no idea. OK... here comes the lamest cliche in the world, but its applicable... if you saw a ten year old doing what Miguel Olivo does each day in a Little League game, you would be disapointed.

I've become what I hate, thanks to Miguel. All that's missing is a rant about players not hitting free throws, NBA players travelling all the time, something about steroids, and a cup of coffee for me to get my certified angry white man degree.

Comment 101 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Ponson wasn’t that bad. If Jacobs fields that 1st inning grounder by Posada the Yankees don’t score. Petitte was throwing pitches 8 inches wide of the plate and still getting strikes called. It’s still disappointing the offense can’t get things going. It also would be nice to see Gordon and Olivo lay off pitches way out of the strike zone.

by roscoe52 on Apr 10, 2009 7:42 PM EDT reply actions  

Jacobs could have fielded that ball, but it was a freaking laser.

As was the ball that made it past Aviles.

If you were thinking, you wouldn't have thought that.

by Warden11 on Apr 10, 2009 9:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

if

Hillman puts Butler at first and Jacobs at DH

by BHWick on Apr 10, 2009 7:43 PM EDT reply actions  

No -

it was a hot shot that maybe a gold glover would have picked. Maybe. I don’t fault Jacobs on it.

I've got crazy flipper fingers!

by labbadabba on Apr 10, 2009 8:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

It wa a rocket

But he o’le’d (sp) it. He moved his body OUT of the way. It’s not like he couldn’t get to it.

BOOM! ROASTED!

by GoBabies!! on Apr 10, 2009 8:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

True

He COULD have made the play and a better 1B probably would have but it was still a high-difficulty play.

I've got crazy flipper fingers!

by labbadabba on Apr 10, 2009 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

no doubt it wasn't an 'easy' play

but I think you overstated its difficulty by saying “Maybe a gold glover picks it”…

It was off the bat of a Left handed hitter, which makes it that much easier. If that thing came off a RH bat, I could TOTALLY understand missing it because that thing would have been loaded with spin.

There were also 2 outs and it was Jorge Posada running. All he had to do was stick his chest in front of it and he coulda crawled to the bag w/ the ball & beat Jorge, that was what frustrates me with that play

BOOM! ROASTED!

by GoBabies!! on Apr 10, 2009 9:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

He also made a really nice diving play

Bloomquist. God? Or just an illusion? You be the judge.

by focs on Apr 10, 2009 7:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Horacio is due for a good start tomorrowI

It’s been what, 4 years?

realistically speaking

by slayor on Apr 10, 2009 7:43 PM EDT reply actions  

Well, he hasn't started a game since 2007

And his last good start was in 2007.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Apr 10, 2009 7:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Have to blame something....how about Pettitte?

He’s still a very good pitcher when healthy. He pitched very well. When a team doesn’t get a lot of hits, it isn’t necessarily merely the fault of the hitters. Someone is throwing those balls to them.

And Olivo isn’t good, but he usually hits lefties well. He didn’t today. He did on Opening Day. That’s baseball.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Apr 10, 2009 7:56 PM EDT reply actions  

and he seems to pitch really well against the royals

even as his overall numbers have begun to decline.

i’m sure there’s a stat out there to back this up/refute my comment

(or it could be that most every pitcher looks good against us)
(though typically not lefties)

by benfunke on Apr 10, 2009 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

a lot of guys

have pitched really well against the Royals the last 15 years.

If you were thinking, you wouldn't have thought that.

by Warden11 on Apr 10, 2009 11:34 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Pettitte was pitching great today

It wasn’t just the results. He had all of his pitches working and with that huge strike zone, he was unbeatable.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Apr 10, 2009 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

and he's a really good pitcher to begin with

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary to Driveline Mechanics and elsewhere since sometime in 2008.

by Matt Klaassen on Apr 11, 2009 12:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree Olivio sucks at the bat

But the eight others are doing so hot right now either. He’s what I’d expect of a nine-spot hitter.

by sal fasano on Apr 10, 2009 8:04 PM EDT reply actions  

Meant to write

Are not doing so hot. And the amount of strikeouts per nine innings is ridiculous.

by sal fasano on Apr 10, 2009 8:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

7 runs in 4 games

A ready example of NYR’s favorite rant – ST means nothing.

Same old Royals? Seems like it. No bats, mental errors.

The General Theory of Royaltivity

by kabrink on Apr 10, 2009 8:07 PM EDT reply actions  

So far they've hit poorly against some good pitchers

It’s too soon to say that they are the “same old Royals.” Sample size. But then again, maybe you were just talking about how they looked like the ‘same old Royals’ in just this one game.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Apr 10, 2009 8:10 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

we also are relying solely on BA (at least i am). for instance how’s our LD %? like NYR says, maybe we’ve gotten a bit unlucky (it sure doesn’t seem that we’ve been LUCKY).

by benfunke on Apr 10, 2009 11:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree on Olivo today

knowing that all players have bad days, he just looked bad today. How cranky will he be when Buck plays more? He does have a rocket arm though.

"Things could always be worse." - Buddy Bell

by buddyball on Apr 10, 2009 8:34 PM EDT reply actions  

Ya cause Buck looked SWEET yesterday

with that swinging bunt.

I don't know how to put this but I'm kind of a big deal.

by kcscoliny on Apr 10, 2009 8:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm just saying that Olivo looked awful today and has been "loose" with his swing

so far (small sample size, ya, ya, ya).

"Things could always be worse." - Buddy Bell

by buddyball on Apr 10, 2009 8:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

My thoughts on Game 4.

Ponson - If I posted on Thursday, that Ponson was going to throw 6 innings & give up 4 runs, 2 or 3 of which were flukey at best, 99% of you would have been calling me a homer & the other 1%, NY, would have written a 13 paragraph summation of his last 3 years stats & projections as to why that was impossible…

Farnsworth - As I wrote in the game thread, the fact that he has been written off for allowing a bunt base hit – when Gordon was out of position, a broken bat single and a HR to a HOF’er is laughable. I understand that he isn’t supposed to be a #1 option out of the pen, and the way he was used today was a better reflection of how he should be used in the future, but he looked AWESOME today. Was the ‘lack of pressure’ as some put it (which is also laughable, it’s the goddamn home opener v. former teammates in a 3 run game) a factor? I’m not smart enough to estimate that, and quite frankly, neither are you.

The Line-up -Everyone can be clumped in together, because unfortunately, nobody really stands out. Petite was good, he was getting Livan Hernandez circa 1997 calls, there were shadow issues and it is game #4, so some slack needs to be afforded, but it doesn’t look good. Aviles looks like he is feeling the weight of expectations especially, and that frightens me.

The Defense - Ugh. In their defense, both balls @ Aviles & Jacobs in the first inning were hit hard. To call them out, they both played it like Roger freaking Dorn. Jacobs made a nice play late in the game, a really nice play actually to ‘redeem’ himself, whereas Aviles did the same stupid shit he did last year, where he tries to throw behind that runner @ 2B. Last year it cost us a game 0 if memory serves, it was a game in the epic losing streak – with the same stupid play. Today it cost Ponson a run.

BOOM! ROASTED!

by GoBabies!! on Apr 10, 2009 8:38 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Ponson – If I posted on Thursday, that Ponson was going to throw 6 innings & give up 4 runs, 2 or 3 of which were flukey at best, 99% of you would have been calling me a homer & the other 1%, NY, would have written a 13 paragraph summation of his last 3 years stats & projections as to why that was impossible…

You’re funny. Just not ‘haha’ funny.

but he looked AWESOME today

He really did. The fastball velocity was up there (on YES’s gun, it was at 94-97) and his breaking ball was amazing.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Apr 10, 2009 8:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh come on that was definietly Ha-Ha funny!

And I’m glad to see you agree on Farny today…I think even w/o the shadows he would have been tough to hit today. The KC TV broadcast said he touched 98 on the pitch right before Olivo went out & talked to him (it did miss by about 2 feet high), I wasn’t expecting to see that velocity from him this year.

BOOM! ROASTED!

by GoBabies!! on Apr 10, 2009 8:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think anyone should be surprised by Ponson...

….having 6 ip, 4 er outings. I think 6/4, 5/3, and 5/2 outings are what pitchers like him usually do. Not a good ERA over the innings that he pitches, but he usually doesn’t get shelled and completely blow the game. Still think he’s about the 8th best SP on the Royals depth chart.

And I’m glad to see you agree on Farny today…I think even w/o the shadows he would have been tough to hit today.

That breaking ball was damn near unhittable. He faced some good hitters and they were just waving at it.
The KC TV broadcast said he touched 98 on the pitch right before Olivo went out & talked to him (it did miss by about 2 feet high)

On YES’s gun, that one was at 97, and while he overthrew it, it wasn’t that high. Probably a few inches over the top of the strike zone.
I wasn’t expecting to see that velocity from him this year.

Even if his average fastball velocity is down to 94 mph, he’s still likely to hit the higher 90’s from time to time (as well as the low 90’s sometimes).

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Apr 10, 2009 9:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

6 Innings- 4 Runs doesn't surprise

And you are right, SHOULDN’T Surprise anybody…

The fact that it EASILY could have been 7 or more innings and 2 or less runs does come as a surprise. The first inning burned up 10 or so pitches it shouldn’t have and the inning when Aviles tried to be cute burned another 5-10 or more.

BOOM! ROASTED!

by GoBabies!! on Apr 10, 2009 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Aviles did make a mistake

As far as other defensive plays, like Jacobs and Aviles failing to handle hard hit balls, I put that almost entirely on Ponson. It’s not like dribblers and dinkers were getting past defenders. Ponson gave up some really hard hit balls. It was just luck that those liners were anywhere near Royals defenders at all. A couple more feet towards the line or towards the gap and those are doubles. Other than Aviles’s mistake throwing to the wrong bag, Ponson really earned the runs he gave up.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Apr 10, 2009 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

I see your point

but it’s not like balls were banging off the wall either…Those plays COULD have been made…Is it wrong of me to classify one or both of them as SHOULD have been made? Maybe, but if even one of those plays IS made, he’s got a lot nicer ERA this evening (though we still lose)

BOOM! ROASTED!

by GoBabies!! on Apr 10, 2009 9:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

don't leave Callaspo out of this either.

The Yanks 2nd run should have been out before he got to second base. But Alberto decided to throw it to first instead of tagging the runner.

If you were thinking, you wouldn't have thought that.

by Warden11 on Apr 10, 2009 9:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

and who knows...

If they get 1st & 3rd instead of 2nd & 3rd, they may try to steal and Olivo throws him out, no runs score, that play was a huge factor in the game, I forgot to mention it…

BOOM! ROASTED!

by GoBabies!! on Apr 10, 2009 9:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not only that,

but it was the start of the mental blunders. Those things seem to snowball.

If you were thinking, you wouldn't have thought that.

by Warden11 on Apr 10, 2009 9:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Excuses

I know the offense hasn’t performed up to par or anywhere near where par is but going by what Denny was saying and seeing the shadows myself I’m sure it wasn’t the ideal conditions from the 5th inning on. The Yanks had two hits(gardner infield single) and KC had a weak Teahen infield single. If the Yanks were sluggin around on Ponson and Wright then I would be extremely worried but the unusual start time lead to some bad shadows.

I don't know how to put this but I'm kind of a big deal.

by kcscoliny on Apr 10, 2009 8:51 PM EDT reply actions  

I was lucky enough to be out there today. The stadium is wonderful, they did a really great job with it. It kind of felt like we were in a different city. Get out there as soon as you can.

The game was a little wah-wah, but the loss wasn’t Ponson’s fault. I’m pretty surprised to be saying that.

by sfeldkamp on Apr 10, 2009 9:02 PM EDT reply actions  

I definitely got that other worldly vibe, too

Just out of curiosity…why the hell were the men’s restroom lines out the door at every single one while there was absolutely no line for the women? I’m not used to such a set up and it kinda threw me off. Was there a need to have your friend Joe hold your purse while you went or something? Or just being awed at the difference between last year and now?

And now I feel like an awkward 2nd grader who tries sneaking peaks into the opposite sex’s restroom because it’s so mysterious and unknown…

Love is the most important thing in the world, but baseball is pretty good too. ~Greg, age 8

by loyal2theroyals on Apr 10, 2009 9:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Title IX states

The need to have = number of toilets for men & women despite a 75-25 (or so) ratio of men to women

BOOM! ROASTED!

by GoBabies!! on Apr 10, 2009 9:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

psh

don’t be a hater.

Love is the most important thing in the world, but baseball is pretty good too. ~Greg, age 8

by loyal2theroyals on Apr 10, 2009 9:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

i love the women

but that is a true law

BOOM! ROASTED!

by GoBabies!! on Apr 10, 2009 9:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

don't worry, our time to wait will come

on Girl’s Night at the K.

Love is the most important thing in the world, but baseball is pretty good too. ~Greg, age 8

by loyal2theroyals on Apr 10, 2009 9:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hear the issue with the men's restrooms are that

THEY TOOK OUT THE FREAKING TROUGHS and replaced them with individual urinals. So I guess we value privacy now over being able to run in, run out, get back to watching the game. BIG MISTAKE.

by AxDxMx on Apr 11, 2009 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

.....troughs?

What are you, horses?

Love is the most important thing in the world, but baseball is pretty good too. ~Greg, age 8

by loyal2theroyals on Apr 11, 2009 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

Nay...

Marriage is a great institution, for those that like being in institutions.

by fats on Apr 11, 2009 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, but most of us look like horses!

As for the troughs I think they aren’t allowed any longer, probably for health reasons. The lines were long but I think it was because the previous bathrooms you could get guys inside two or three deep while the new ones you can’t. Time-wise, it seemed the same to me.

The stadium is FANTASTIC!! We got our money’s worth despite the whining of Keitzman and Clinksdale about a downtown stadium. Same stadium for half the price.

by KCROYALS64 on Apr 11, 2009 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Strike Zone?

I didn’t get to see the game at all. Was Pettite getting the calls and Ponson not? Or was the strike zone just the size of a barn?

by sterlingice on Apr 10, 2009 9:16 PM EDT reply actions  

It was a big strike zone for all pitchers

It seemed really huge for Rivera.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Apr 10, 2009 9:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rivera is the biggest fraud of them all!

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary to Driveline Mechanics and elsewhere since sometime in 2008.

by Matt Klaassen on Apr 10, 2009 10:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

that's a joke

it’s early in the season

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary to Driveline Mechanics and elsewhere since sometime in 2008.

by Matt Klaassen on Apr 10, 2009 10:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

You're not in midseason form

…but you’ll get there.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Apr 10, 2009 10:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Some Commentary on the K

I’m going to try and get some photos up tonight while I’m at work (if I can find my USB cable at least). Didn’t take a whole lot, but the stadium looked pretty good.

Here’s a quick few snippets:

  • You can’t go into the dugout concourse (below the stands) unless you have a 100 level ticket. Yeah. The riff raff are not welcome.
  • Good luck getting a hot dog upstairs on a busy game. The lines are ridiculous and they have so many specialized consession stands (like the BBQ and KC Cantina, etc) that do not offer traditional favorites. I ended up going downstairs and paying a roaming vendor for one and I highly suggest you do the same. Not only is the wait shorter (especially if you grab it before heading upstairs), but you’re also directly supporting a working bum like my Dad. They only make commission, so I feel proud that I gave someone’s family an extra $0.90 of income. Add on the tip and he’s doing even better than he thought!
  • Did not get out to the outfield, way way way too crowded. I’ll take some shots over there Sunday.
  • You cannot get from 3rd base to 1st base and still be able to watch the game the entire time, but that’s not a huge deal.

Love is the most important thing in the world, but baseball is pretty good too. ~Greg, age 8

by loyal2theroyals on Apr 10, 2009 9:25 PM EDT reply actions  

Agreed on the lines being rediculous.

The wait for the john was unreal today. I missed an entire inning in the middle of the game because I took a leak.

If you were thinking, you wouldn't have thought that.

by Warden11 on Apr 10, 2009 9:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

And now you know what it's like for women

Try that times 21 years of your life and then see how it feels ;)

Love is the most important thing in the world, but baseball is pretty good too. ~Greg, age 8

by loyal2theroyals on Apr 10, 2009 9:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

awwwwwwkwarrrrrrrd :\

Love is the most important thing in the world, but baseball is pretty good too. ~Greg, age 8

by loyal2theroyals on Apr 10, 2009 9:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

My take:

I partially blame the Royals offense, but that had to be one of the worst umpires I have ever seen. I realize that Pettite is elite and has unofficially “earned” a larger strike zone, but he had more than one call that was nearly 10 inches off the plate. Ponson started getting similar [terrible] calls around the 4th, but did anyone see the pitch that hit dead center and went for ball 4?? I simply cannot criticize batters when they are dealing with a terribly ambiguous strike zone.

As far as Ponson, I think he was able to benefit from the umpire in the middle innings, but early on he couldn’t miss a bat. I can’t recall many swings and misses… everything that was hit was tattooed. Jacobs and Aviles did not properly field the balls that were hit at them, but they were absolute missles. Neither went for an error.

I hope whoever calls the game tomorrow calls a much tighter, consistent strike zone for the sake of our hitters, not HoRam. Tomorrow is going down as a loss, no question, but the offense needs to settle in. Someone remind ’em that these games count.

P.S. Why the hell did Trey stack the middle of the lineup with left-handed hitters against one of the best left-handed pitchers in the league? Someone please bitch-slap him.

by FretFriendly on Apr 10, 2009 9:35 PM EDT reply actions  

Tomorrow is going down as a loss, no question,

The game’s over already? I guess you’re not one of those “they play the games on the field” type of guys.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Apr 10, 2009 9:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Check out those career stats

Horacio Ramirez vs the Yankees 5 GS 3.00 ERA 1.48 WHIP

by Royal from Queens on Apr 10, 2009 9:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wasn't finished!

with 7 K’s! in 21 innings. .299 BAA
ha!
who knows what’s gonna happen

by Royal from Queens on Apr 10, 2009 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Believe me, I'm well aware of the stats

And I’m also aware that stats only create a likelihood of a loss, not that the game is over already. They do actually play the games on the field for a reason.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Apr 10, 2009 9:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

(and that was mostly for Fret)

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Apr 10, 2009 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well my reply was more or less a who knows what's going to happen

I mean, he’s given up alot of hits but only a 3 ERA against the Yankees isn’t too bad. If he pitches 6 innings and only give sup 2 runs, I’m happy.
Although I’m certainly not counting on it, not with this defense.

by Royal from Queens on Apr 10, 2009 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd be very happy with 6 ip and 3 er

A quality start against the Yankees is pretty good.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Apr 10, 2009 10:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

The lineup...

What other options did he have to get RH bats in there?

I guess he COULD have had TPJ @ SS, Aviles @ DH & Butler @ 1st?

He could have DH’d Bloomquist over Jacobs (who was 3 for 5 w/ a HR off Petite in the past before today)?

BOOM! ROASTED!

by GoBabies!! on Apr 10, 2009 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Buck?

I don’t know, but would he have been an upgrade over Jacobs against a lefty?

If you were thinking, you wouldn't have thought that.

by Warden11 on Apr 10, 2009 9:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Buck is the only one that makes a modicom (sp) of sense,,,

But, Jacobs had shown success vs Petite in the past…I guess you could have played B. Pena @ 1st too & DH’d Billy, but remember, this is baseball, and 75% of the reasoning behing the lineup today was to have your “Starters” play on opening day, regardless of matchup. I’d wager that of the 30 home openers, maybe one or two will have a starter benched in favor of a better matchup (Not saying that is the RIGHT way of thinking, but there is 100+ years of pomo & circumstance behind it)

BOOM! ROASTED!

by GoBabies!! on Apr 10, 2009 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fret has a good point on the lineup.

I was amazed to see LLLRL. Could have been a good game for Buck to DH and sit Jacobs.

If you were thinking, you wouldn't have thought that.

by Warden11 on Apr 10, 2009 9:48 PM EDT reply actions  

Today was the first example of

The Royals without the option to turn on Gload Mode.

Gload totally would’ve snagged that shot to 1B. If he was playing 2B, he would’ve made the smart play and tagged the lead runner. And is there any question that he wouldn’t have let that grounder get by him like Aviles did?

Losses directly caused by Gload trade: 1.

Farny being Farny.

by JobDDT on Apr 10, 2009 10:08 PM EDT reply actions  

And if he were the starting pitcher, he would have had a complete game shutout

and the Royals would have won 1-0. Maybe we can trade Hosmer for him.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Apr 10, 2009 10:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, but if we traded for Gload

We could trade the Marlins Zack. I’m sure they’d go for it

by sterlingice on Apr 10, 2009 10:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

....

I’m pretty sure I just disowned you :(

Love is the most important thing in the world, but baseball is pretty good too. ~Greg, age 8

by loyal2theroyals on Apr 10, 2009 10:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

its up to bloomquist now

to carry the tradition of Graffanino, Mientkiewicz, and Gload and be the guy nobody wants but will get a bunch of playing time

My stories a lot like yours only more interesting because it involves robots!

by AvilesRotY on Apr 11, 2009 12:19 AM EDT reply actions  

he can do it

catcher’s getting pretty dicey too, since there’s the vocal contingent of buck haters, and olivo… well, he’s not winning fans either

by Freneau on Apr 11, 2009 12:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

yeah, but buck was horrible last year!

he should be cut forthwith.

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary to Driveline Mechanics and elsewhere since sometime in 2008.

by Matt Klaassen on Apr 11, 2009 12:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

I know I mentioned it above

but the concept that Olivo calls a could game…

where do you begin?

either he should be calling for fastballs right down the middle (because this is what he’s expecting every pitch) or he should be self-aware and call for endless off-speed stuff in the dirt

by Freneau on Apr 11, 2009 12:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

Buck gets plenty of credit for calling a "Good Game" supposedly

and he aint exactly Joe Mauer. Both the catchers blow, it’s a catcher 22 do you want someone who doesn’t walk and can throw out a baserunner or do you want someone who will reach base via a walk and couldn’t throw me out at second base.

I don't know how to put this but I'm kind of a big deal.

by kcscoliny on Apr 11, 2009 8:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

it's the same old story

"Things could always be worse." - Buddy Bell

by buddyball on Apr 11, 2009 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

but as anyone who has ever had to draft two catchers

in a deep draft knows, this end of the pool is pretty shallow

"Things could always be worse." - Buddy Bell

by buddyball on Apr 11, 2009 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

it's actually unfortunate Ponson pitched "well"

I would actually disagree with the premise that Ponson didn’t pitch terribly — he was on pace for 6 runs over 9 ip. If he continues to pitch like this, the Royals are almost certain to lose every game in which he appears.

Since Pettite pitched so well, it would have been better that Ponson had given up like 12 runs in 2 innings — we were going to lose anyway, but this would hasten his departure from the rotation, and hopefully the 25 man roster. Instead, we’ll see him out there at least another two starts.

by marbotty on Apr 11, 2009 8:07 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Yeah its really dumb

i talked to two yankee fans last year who said Ponson wasnt’ bad, that he had some really good starts.

I looked it up and he gave up 3 or less runs in 15 of his 24 starts. He went 5 innings or more in all but one of those starts.

If he can be 4-1 with a 3.88 ERA his first 10 starts like he did last year EVERYONE ON THIS THREAD will be pretty ecstatic

by GobbleforCyoung on Apr 11, 2009 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Your unstated premise is that a pitcher's performance basically comes down to how many runs he gave up

ERA (or RA) trumps all…yet again. That is a horribly flawed way to evaluate pitching performance. You appeared to like tRA as a stat. HIs tRA after that start: 2.75 (tRA+ 141). So, breaking down what he actually did (K’s, BB’s, HR’s, LD’s, other batted ball data), as opposed to what his defense did, he pitched pretty well.

The immoderate moderator

by Scott McKinney on Apr 13, 2009 7:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sabathia vs Ramirez

My Simulator has the Yankees with a 60.19% win probability for today’s game, whereas Vegas is drinking the Yankee kool-aid and has them at around a 66% favorite. Vegas is also a little low on the over/under line. My simulator has it at 9.35 runs as opposed to ~8.7 from vegas. Good luck.

Here’s some more simulator output.
Top 5 most likely final scores from today.

1. KC 4-3
2. KC 3-2
3. KC 5-4
4. NYA 4-3
5. NYA 3-2

May seem wierd to see the underdog ahead in the three most likely final scores, but that’s just a function of run distribution and the fact that the home team wins way more one run games than the road team due to batting last.

Next… most likely to hit a HR.
1. Mark Teixeira
2. Mike Jacobs
3. Xavier Nady
4. Jose Guillen
5. Hideki Matsui

Most likely to hit a Triple
1. David DeJesus
2. Mark Teahen
3. Coco Crisp
4. Robinson Cano
5. Johnny Damon

Pitching Lines:
Sabathia: 7-IP, 5.9-K, 1.6-BB, 0.5-HR, 3.11-FIP
Ramirez: 6.5-IP, 2.9-K, 2.2-BB, 0.6-HR, 4.44-FIP

Note 25,000 simulations for this game were ran, and were based on my best guess lineup. Some of the stats may of course came out a bit differently if the lineup changed substantially.

vr, Xei

by Xeifrank on Apr 11, 2009 1:07 PM EDT reply actions  

Hey, Xeifrank, good to see you around

I’m going to go out on a limb and bet your $1,000 that Jose Guillen does not hit a home run today.

Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary to Driveline Mechanics and elsewhere since sometime in 2008.

by Matt Klaassen on Apr 11, 2009 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jose

Why is he hurt or something? :)
I just grabbed lineups from rototimes.
vr, Xei

by Xeifrank on Apr 11, 2009 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

i had the pleasure

of being in SRO, on the RF wall. interesting vantage point for $10, but i think i’ll take the hy-vee view level from now on. i’m sore, sunburnt and hungover, but had a blast.

"red bull is amaZing" -Coco Crisp

by grantfunk on Apr 11, 2009 8:48 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Funny-tattoos-hey-look-they-found-a-royals-fan_small
Mitch On the Bench
Royalsretro_small
Happy Mother's Day From Royals Review
952_small
Black.
Life_or_fiction_touchup_small
"The Royals Lose" Article Template

Recent FanPosts

1481395546_m_small
Why is our lineup so flawed?
Small
Fortune favors the bold
Sexy-beast-original_small
OT Friday: The first rule of Fight Club is NO FIGHTING
387504_small
Get to know a stop-gap starter - Vol. 2: Luis Mendoza
Small
Country Breakfast
Small
Who should be traded?
Small
sadly it's time
Dignan_small
OT: Zack Greinke career statistics up to today--upon which we shall ruminate and discuss
Knute_small
Chip Ambres Video Bleg

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Cimg0036_small Freneau

Editors

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

Authors

Royalsretro_small RoyalsRetro

Headshot_small Old Man Duggan