Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Mid-Year Draft Update

2009 Mid-Year Draft Update:

We are about 7 weeks away from Draft Day and the amateur seasons are at least half way done.  Also, with the NFL Draft coming up, you can't help but think about its baseball counterpart.  How great would it be if teams were allowed to trade picks?  That would be exciting.  The draft is really lacking hitters so you are going to see a lot of pitchers on this list.  Of the hitters it does have, it seems to have a good amount of catching depth.  Now would be a good time to check in and see what the ol' draft board looks like. 

 

Star-divide

 

 

Rankings:

1.       Stephen Strasburg RHP-San Diego State 1.28era 8-0 63.1ip  41h 12w121k

Just sick numbers.  Washington will take him pretty much regardless of price.

2.       Dustin Ackley OF/1B-North Carolina 399/508/709

Hasn't been able to play much CF, but doesn't matter, his bat is great.

3.       Grant Green SS-Southern Cal  371/440/561

Started off kind of slow, but has come on of late.  Some questions about his D but I think if he slips, a team gets a steal.

4.       Tyler Matzek-LHP-HS

From all accouts, has not disappointed this spring.

5.       Alex White-RHP-North Carolina 3.14era 6-1 63.0ip 49h 23w 72k

Had a great game against a very good Miami team last week.  Could be drafted as high as #2 or 3

6.       Aaron Crow-RHP-Independent League

Independent league doesn't start for another couple of weeks.  He's a big question mark.

7.       Kyle Gibson-RHP-Missouri 3.00era  6-3 69.0ip  11w  90 k

Very good numbers, some concern about workload and stressful delivery.

8.       Donovan Tate-CF-HS

Haven't heard much about him this spring.

9.       Shelby Miller-RHP-HS

Rising up draft boards, threw 3 straight no-hitters earlier this year.  Throws mid-90s, with good offspeed stuff.

10.   Matt Purke-LHP-HS

Concern about delivery has dropped him just a bit.

11.   Mike Leake-RHP-Arizona State 1.61era   9-1  72.2ip  45h 15h  83k

The college breakout performance.  Great numbers playing in a hitters park.  Ground ball pitcher.

12.   Zack Wheeler-RHP-HS

The big riser in the HS ranks.  Word from BA is he won't make it out of the top 10.

13.   Max Stassi-C--HS

Having a great senior season-also on the rise

14.   Luke Bailey-C-HS

Athletic HS catcher who does a lot of things well but nothing great

15.   Mychal Givens-RHP/SS--HS

Still hear he is liked better as a pitcher with a very good fastball

16.   Austin Maddox-C-HS

Haven't heard much about Maddox either this spring.

17.   Jacob Turner-RHP-HS

Polished HS right hander from Missouri

18.   Tony Sanchez-C-Boston College 360/449/680

Excellent hitting, not sure about his defense.

19.   Josh Phlegley-C-Indiana 378/480/652

Excellent hitting, questionable D.

20.   Andrew Oliver-LHP-Oklahoma State 5.81era 52.2ip 23w 62k

Has really flopped this year--but lots of potential still there.

Just Missed: Matt Davidson, Tanner Scheppers, Tyler Skaggs,  Kentrail Davis, Mike Minor

After Strasburg, you could pick names out of hat for the next 9 players and I wouldn't argue much.  The more advanced college players tend to rise to the top when all else is about equal.  So, I expect that we'll see the top college players fly off the board early. 

Draft Strategy

Looking back at the past two drafts, it isn't hard to see the draft strategy the Royals have used: first, take a great HS hitter, then take as many HS arms as you can sprinkled with some HS athletes.  Its worked pretty well as the 2007 draft looks very good and the 2008 draft could be great (consider that a teaser for my upcoming reviews of those drafts, but first we have to get through the less inspiring 2006 draft).  But Derick Ladnier is no longer running our drafts, so will that make much of a difference in strategy?  I don't think so.  I think Dayton has already put his stamp on the draft process and Ladnier was pretty much redundant at this point. 

I think the post-1st round part of the draft will look very similar to the past couple of years, but we could go any direction for that 1st round pick. 

I think it most likely that we take a HS pitcher.  I think the draft shapes up as having several arms that could be taken in the  #8-15 range.  There are 4 very good HS pitching prospects: Matzek, Purke, Miller and Wheeler.  There haven't been 4 HSers taken in the top 12 since 2002 (also the last time we took a HS pitcher in the 1st round, a young lad by the name of Zack Greinke).  Shelby Miller has been pitching great this year showing a good amount of present stuff coupled with potential in the future.  He may be there at #12 and would be a good pick.  Matt Purke would be another option-a left hander with very good stuff but questions about his delivery have dropped him some over the Spring. 

We could also take a college pitcher with that first pick.

Quick Fact:  The Royals haven't taken a pitcher from a 4 year university until round 10 in 2007 (Greg Holland) and round 16 in 2008 (Derrick Saito)

Arizona State's Mike Leake has had a phenomenal year.  He pitches in a college bandbox but gets groundballs.  He doesn't have a huge ceiling but could be here perhaps in the later half of 2010.  He would probably sign quickly and while he may not be an ace-I think he's got more potential than most give him credit for.  The Royals have a lot of young arms but Leake could be someone who fills out a rotation of Greinke, Meche, Davies, Hochevar and Leake-that could be impressive. 

The last route would be the familiar one of a HS bat.  (I don't see any college bats that will be available that will tempt us).  A player like Max Stassi could be this year's Mike Moustakas.  A good player whose stock has rocketed up with a great senior season.  A baseball rat who, despite relatively small stature, has a great bat and is known a "leader" who plays against good competition in California-sound familiar-and he's a catcher (Keith Law, eat your heart out).  The Royals have 3 young catchers at Low-A Burlington but that isn't enough reason not to take this guy if the Royals think he's the best option.

My Mid-Year prediction:

At the beginning of the year, I suggested/predicted that the Royals would take Tennessee CF Kentrail Davis.  Kentrail has had a rough year so far and that prediction looks highly unlikely. 

The Royals are going to have be flexible with this choice and see how the first 11 picks play out.  Somebody will slip and right now I predict we will take Shelby Miller.  If its true that you can never have enough pitching, then Miller would be a good choice.  The Royals could use some hitting depth in their system--but we can always use the pitching depth for that.  Also, we really need to help Mark Grudzielanek find a job--maybe we can help polish his resume.  We could really use that supplemental 1st round pick.  Otherwise, we don't pick again until the 3rd round.  The Royals are supposedly planning on being more active in the international market and they could always take a player like Tim Melville in the later rounds and grab some talent that way.  This draft has some depth in it and with teams looking for ways to cut costs there could be some talent available later on.  

What direction do you think the Royals should go with their 1st pick?  Are their any players I'm overlooking?

 

Comment 31 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Royals Review

Draft Notes

Jun 2009 by nwroyal - 48 comments

2010 Top 20 Royals Prospects

Mar 2009 by nwroyal - 50 comments

Major League Baseball Draft Preview

Feb 2009 by nwroyal - 76 comments

Comments

Display:

just saw this yesterday on ..??? I forget.

But there was a kid in a high school somewhere in Florida who’d just thrown his fourth consecutive no-no. I can’t remember his name, but it’s a different kid I think than Shelby Miller.

And, I have absolutely zero info on the school.

MF'ing six consecutive GIDP's gave me aneurisms

by BillyMojo on Apr 22, 2009 11:11 AM EDT reply actions  

Schuster

Can’t recall the first name.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Apr 22, 2009 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

I heard that too

He’s committed to play at Florida next year, but he hasn’t ruled out the possibility of signing if drafted. I think he is a Lefty.

Where did we hear that? Was it on 810?

BOOM! ROASTED!

by GoBabies!! on Apr 22, 2009 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

I was in Applebee's in Raytown

and it was on the TV there it was one of those Direct TV Sports channels and it may have been ESPN, and yes he’s a southpaw

MF'ing six consecutive GIDP's gave me aneurisms

by BillyMojo on Apr 22, 2009 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

a lefty?

If he slips to the Royals, I predict he’s in the starting rotation by September 15, 2009

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.

by Matt Klaassen on Apr 22, 2009 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's true

Baseball America is a little more optimistic about him, putting him in the back half of the top 100.

"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it." - Mark Twain

by JM Barten on Apr 22, 2009 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

oops forgot

to say I see them drafting pitching as well.

MF'ing six consecutive GIDP's gave me aneurisms

by BillyMojo on Apr 22, 2009 11:12 AM EDT reply actions  

I really like Mike Leake

Supposedly he is very polished and will require very little minor league time. His upside is limited, but he can be a solid middle of the rotation guy. He’s a strike thrower, which I love.

If you want a guy with more upside, I really like Mychal Givens. He’ll either be an All-Star or fail to make it past A ball. Boom or bust kid.

There are a lot of good catchers in the middle of the first round, but with McCauley, Perez and Bonilla, I don’t think that should be much of a priority. Maybe if you want to grab a Josh Phlegley from Indiana in the second round if available, that would be super.

But the guy I see DM grabbing is a high school pitcher with upside that is from the area. That seems to be the Braves way. And that means Jacob Turner. Who I love. Very fluid delivery, tons of upside, very polished for a HS kid. I would be very pleased if we landed him.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Apr 22, 2009 11:19 AM EDT reply actions  

I also predict

We go with a lot of hitters after the first round. I think DM realizes how thin we are in the hitters department.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Apr 22, 2009 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

We're pretty thin everywhere

except for our Studs in Waiting in Moose and Hos.

by AxDxMx on Apr 22, 2009 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

I've got a friend out there...

I’ll ask for a scouting report! ;0

The 2009 Official You Got Rocked by the Royals and Sent to the Minors List
1. Josh Rupe TEX April 17

by 306008 on Apr 22, 2009 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like everything I've read about Keyvius Sampson

but it seems like the only way we could end up taking him is with the sandwich pick we don’t have. although i could see him taken before that.

I hope we don’t take a college pitcher. I doubt we’ll be in a position to draft the best college pitcher available when there isn’t a better-looking high school arm.

by 9il on Apr 22, 2009 11:27 AM EDT reply actions  

I like him too

Seems to be rising up charts. Doubt he’ll be there in the second round.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Apr 22, 2009 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

On the subject of draft trades

Yes, it would be nice to trade, but they would only arise in a few small situations, and may actually be detrimental to the game.

  1. Losing a Type A or B free agent could become a sign and trade situation if a team wants the player but will be unwilling to give up the first/second round pick. Maybe somebody would have taken Grudz from us, if instead of the high draft pick, we just got a 3rd or 4th rounder in trade for him.
  1. The only picks that make sense to trade would be the higher picks, as it is a crapshoot pretty much throughout the draft anwyays. Although, we could have traded our next 2 picks to move in front of St. Louis and take Pujols I guess.
  1. You could have a situation where a rich team throws money and a semi-prospect at a poor team that has the #1 pick. You don’t think the Yankees would love to get their grimy paws on Strasburg? This would probably further escalate first round bonuses for draftees as well.
  1. The Type A/B free agent system already addresses the richer teams by trying to give some talent back to the poorer ones.

In conclusion, I’m not against trading picks, but baseball is the sport where it will probably least benefit a team. Every other sports’ drafting process sends kids directly to their major league teams for the most part.

by AxDxMx on Apr 22, 2009 12:02 PM EDT reply actions  

I like it

it makes each of your points feel good because no one point is better than any of the others. They’re ALL #1!! Isn’t that what we teach kids these days? Everyone deserves a gold star?

"Now…put that in your [BLEEP]ing pipe and smoke it." -Hal McRae

by Sweep_the_Leg on Apr 22, 2009 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

lol

Everyone gets a trophy….

The 2009 Official You Got Rocked by the Royals and Sent to the Minors List
1. Josh Rupe TEX April 17

by 306008 on Apr 22, 2009 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

a couple of things

You’ve got some good points but some other things to think about:

to point #1—a team won’t lose any draft picks signing Grudz, so that isn’t preventing him from getting offers

to your third point #1—if you were to trade draft picks, you would have to get rid of compensation picks all together—that would allow you to set bonus limits on the draft—then you could have a slot system. actually, I don’t mind the system now b/c it favors teams who are willing to spend. We spent a record $10+ million and I think it was money well spent. Washington will spend the money for Strasburg but what could they get from the Yankees in a trade? yeah, the Yankees would want him and they would have to pony up big-time to get him—and not cash—it would have to be talent. It wouldn’t give Strasburg any additional leverage—just Washington.

to your last point #1—the A/B system is deeply flawed and doesn’t do what it is supposed to do. the ranking themselves are a joke and smart teams have been manipulating the system for a long time. again, I’m not against it right now b/c it is one of the few areas I think the Royals are somewhat progressive in their thinking.

by nwroyal on Apr 22, 2009 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Let's try the numbering thing again

1. I guess I was thinking Grudz was Type A and that’s why no one signed him. I was really surprised he turned us down to get to this point. That had to have been a gentlemen’s agreement.

2. Then maybe instead of the current system, the first few rounds could be run in an auction format. Anyone willing to spend could load up within some kind of limit, like you may only sign 8 guys in the auction phase. But then a team like KC pre-2005 or so would have just punted in the auction and chose no one to save money, or drafted some chump no one wanted.

3. I don’t like the A/B system either, but I don’t see it being changed soon.

by AxDxMx on Apr 22, 2009 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like Stassi or one of the high school pitchers in the first round

Stassi is a very polished high school catcher with a good family background at the position. I really would like KC to take a catcher early.

A sleeper pick that I like is Dan Black out of Purdue. Black is a switch hitter with light tower power and a great eye at the plate. Purdue had said they were gonna use him behind the dish this season but haven’t used him a whole lot there this season although he has tossed out 2 of the 5 guys that have attempted to steal against him.

Blacks 6’4 220 lbs stats .333/.538/.718 12 hr 46 bb 27 k he’s a junior that KC should be able to grab in the mid to later rounds. He’s definitely not a Royals type guy as he isn’t athletic and offers great plate discipline so expect him to end up on the Rangers or Indians roster.

I don't know how to put this but I'm kind of a big deal.

by kcscoliny on Apr 22, 2009 12:35 PM EDT reply actions  

I want the best available high school hitter...

And we won’t find out who it is for a few more weeks…

The 2009 Official You Got Rocked by the Royals and Sent to the Minors List
1. Josh Rupe TEX April 17

by 306008 on Apr 22, 2009 2:27 PM EDT reply actions  

all things being equal, i'd rather it be a college player

that way, he’ll be more likely to be on the big club around the same time that hosmer and moustakas make it. that could make a huge difference

by marbotty on Apr 22, 2009 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Best overall, yes, if you can get who ever that is

But after maybe the first 5-10 picks (depending upon the draft), players stock seems to depend as much upon whether an organization prefers HS players v. college as upon their talent. I think it is a good model to say that we are going to bring HS players in and oversee their development (long-term development) rather than just refining college players. Especially with pitchers. You can control their pitch-counts (rather than inheriting them after 3 years of college use). Hitters: hopefully it gives you more time to identify weaknesses in their swing and find their proper positions. Just some thoughts.

by Chyladin on Apr 22, 2009 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

What's happened to Oliver?

He’s washed this year….

The 2009 Official You Got Rocked by the Royals and Sent to the Minors List
1. Josh Rupe TEX April 17

by 306008 on Apr 22, 2009 2:32 PM EDT reply actions  

Stumbled upon this today...

http://www.minorleagueball.com/2009/4/21/847653/2009-amateur-draft-mock-2-round-one

The 2009 Official You Got Rocked by the Royals and Sent to the Minors List
1. Josh Rupe TEX April 17

by 306008 on Apr 22, 2009 8:32 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Royalsretro_small
Would Royals Review Make Better Decisions Than Dayton Moore?
Funny-tattoos-hey-look-they-found-a-royals-fan_small
Mitch On the Bench

Recent FanPosts

Dignan_small
Friday Game 43 Open Thread
Funny-tattoos-hey-look-they-found-a-royals-fan_small
MORE Mitch on the Bench
Sexy-beast-original_small
OT Friday: The generic boilerplate template desert island gambit
Tumblr_lwfiy4qkgv1r204zxo1_500_small
RR Poetry Contest
Small
Extrapolating the First 43 Games over the Full Season
Small
Is Dave Eiland doing ... anything?
Small
Alcides Escobar's Bat
Download_small
Was Dayton Moore Right on Bruce Chen?
Chalmers2_small
2012 Royals vs 2012 Ex-Royals

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Cimg0036_small Freneau

Editors

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman

Authors

Royalsretro_small RoyalsRetro

Headshot_small Old Man Duggan