Royals Review: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Along The Olentangy for Ohio State Fans!

An Open Letter to Royals Nation - Sign Barry Bonds

Star-divide

 

I write this letter with more excitement and optimism regarding our Royals than I’ve had in my entire life.  I was apprehensively excited in 2003, but I also couldn’t really believe that we could pull it out in the end.  I doubt any of you really believed either – even after a 10-1 start.  Today, however, I see real potential in our team, and I think we need to make a move in order to take advantage of this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity we face.

 

Sign Barry Bonds.  It makes sense.  Don’t fear negative media attention.  After decades of being a “AAAA” baseball team – a minor league team in the majors developing top-notch talent for the MLB powers – how can any Royals fan worry about being criticized by the rest of the baseball nation?  The Royals won the World Series when I was one-year-old.  They haven’t made the post-season since.  It’s time.  For the first time in my adult life, I can honestly say that I believe the Royals have a chance to make a run at October this year.

 

Our pitching is unstoppable.  No one can dispute that.  Barring injuries, our starting rotation, Soria, and our bullpen (excepting Farnsworth, of course – sorry Dayton, but this was one move I cannot believe you made.  $4.25 million?) will give us an opportunity to win almost every game we play.  What Greinke, Meche, Davies, and now Bannister have done thus far is nothing short of remarkable.  If they can stay healthy, we have a chance to win the AL Central.  I can’t believe I’m saying it, but it’s true.

 

However, our hitting is abysmal.  Embarrassingly bad.  I believe in Alex Gordon’s talent, dedication, and ability to eventually grow into a productive offensive player.  I know that Billy Butler can absolutely kill the ball – he just has to make contact.  Coco Crisp was a great signing, and I think that keeping Mark Teahan this year was the best decision Moore’s made since he’s been a Royal.  All that aside, we cannot produce enough runs to win in the American League.  Our lineup simply isn’t made for it.  Since Mike Sweeney, we haven’t had that dangerous bat in the lineup that could change any game with one swing.

 

This is why I’m making my plea today.  Regardless of what you may think about him as a person, there is no questioning that Barry Bonds is one of the single best hitters in the history of this great game.  He will come fairly cheap.  He will jump at the opportunity to prove that he can still play this game.  He is the hardest working baseball player I’ve ever seen, and I have no doubt that he can still hit.  He can still hit better today than any player the Royals have had since Bo. 

 

There is no skirting the issue – Barry Bonds used anabolic steroids.  Barry Bonds lied about this fact – even worse, he did so to a grand jury.  Barry Bonds is the last person I would ask to drive my mother to the doctor, or to be the Godfather of my eldest son.  Notwithstanding the fact that he may not be the most admirable human being ever to grace this planet, the man can play baseball.  I never had the good fortune to see Mays, Ruth, Williams, Aaron, or DiMaggio, but I have seen Barry.  He is the best baseball player I’ve ever had the pleasure to watch.  Despite his age, health, and legal issues, I have no doubt that he would be the best hitter in a Royals uniform the second we signed him.

 

Look at it this way – Barry Bonds has been effectively blacklisted out of baseball because people think that his accomplishments were unfairly attained.  I agree with this sentiment in general, but I also think that most everything about the way the MLB is run stinks of unfairness.  “Greenies” are and have been a staple of clubhouse life for decades.  Phil Neikro is a Hall-of-Famer.  No one in the national media will ever acknowledge how great Jeff Montgomery’s career really was.  Maybe worst of all, we Royals fans will probably never have an opportunity to love post-All-Star-break baseball the way that the Yankee, Met, Cub, Red Sox, Angel, or Dodger fan does.  MLB’s lack of revenue sharing is simply unfair to Royals fans. 

 

Further, not all known steroid users have been forced out of the game – only the very best of them.  Gary Sheffield is in baseball.  Miguel Tejada is in baseball.  Jason Giambi is in baseball – hell, he was re-signed by the team he won an MVP for while on steroids.  A-Rod is in baseball.  And don’t be shocked if we find out that even Kyle Farnsworth was juicing when he was pretending to be an effective relief pitcher.  It is hypocritical to claim that a player like Bonds doesn’t belong in the game because he did steroids, all the while we have Jose Guillen on our roster.  Bonds is one thousand times the player Guillen could ever dream of being, and since no one else is interested in signing the best player of this generation, why not us?

 

Here’s the point, Royals fans: the Steroid Era in Major League Baseball happened.  It’s still happening, though hopefully it’s on the decline.  We have an opportunity to be one of the elite teams in the American League in 2009, but we need at least a semblance of an offense to do it.  People will undoubtedly hoot, holler, and raise an all-out stink if the Royals were to bring Bonds on board.  You know what I say?  Let ‘em.  I’ve been ruthlessly mocked throughout my 25 years – in every part of the country – for being a Royals fan.  I’ve held on; I’ve stayed loyal; and I’ve dealt with years of emotional turmoil at the hands of David Glass.  It’s time.  Let’s make a move.  Let’s get some national attention.  Let’s make a run at the post-season.  Let’s sign Barry Bonds.

 

Go Royals.

 

4 recs  |  Comment 53 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Royals Review

First to Worst

Apr 2008 by Will McDonald - 6 comments

Comments

Display:

As A Giants And Bonds Fan I Say Go For It!

A Barry Bonds At Bat is the greatest show on earth. This is a guy that will still be able to hit when he is 50. You have a shot this year and your management would be foolish to not take advantage of such an awsome talent available so cheaply.

by giantsrainman on Apr 22, 2009 11:37 PM EDT reply actions  

I would have agreed with you last year

But I just don’t know how effective he could be this year. I certainly wouldn’t want him in the field. At DH we’re pretty “okay.” If he could play LF still and push Guillen out of the lineup, sure. But he’d be a horrible defensive liability at this point.

Kansas City Royals: your 2006 and 2007 NL Central champions!

by mazoboom on Apr 22, 2009 11:39 PM EDT reply actions  

yeah, but how much can such an old man move?

That’s my concern. I just don’t know what his condition is these days.

Certainly in a perfect hypothetical world, if he can field better than or as good as Guillen this year, then I would love to have Bonds in the OF because I think he can certainly hit better than Guillen even after such a long lay off.

Kansas City Royals: your 2006 and 2007 NL Central champions!

by mazoboom on Apr 23, 2009 12:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

Neither bUZR or TotalZone shows him as on a Dunn/Ibanez level of suck his last couple of season

more like a Guillen level. But he’s old, he’s been off a year…

I go back and forth. I’d be willing to be a not insigniificant amount of money he could out-hit Mike Jacobs still, for not much money: CHONE projects a .396 wOBA, ZiPS a .418. But a 45 year-old player after taking a year off, and is also maybe the greatest hitter (certainly one of the greatest) hitters in baseball history just doesn’t have too many comps.

I bet he could be an above-average player as a full-time DH, though, and there aren’t too many players who can say that.

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.

by Matt Klaassen on Apr 23, 2009 12:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'd like him to pull a Rickey Henderson

and play in a lower league to show his current stuff. Some non-major league team would almost certainly take him. Like that Independent League team that offered him a deal.

Kansas City Royals: your 2006 and 2007 NL Central champions!

by mazoboom on Apr 23, 2009 12:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

how many DH's are above average?

don’t we see even the slightest flaw in a system that judges a majority of DH’s to be significantly below average players?

by kcdc1 on Apr 23, 2009 1:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not saying everyone agrees

and I understand the perspective

on the other hand, is it that hard to accept that if a guy is so bad at defense that his team would rather not have him play in the field, that he’s probably not a average baseball player, unless he hits far better than average?

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.

by Matt Klaassen on Apr 23, 2009 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

or:

there are a fair number of players who would be average players at DH, but they’re decent enough in the field (or more than decent) that they don’t need to DH. Joe Mauer would still be a good player as a full-time DH. Mark Teixeira. A-Rod. Justin Morneau would be above average. Adam Dunn, probably, too (and he probably should). Chase Utley. Ryan Howard (another guy who might be better off, although the #s are all over the place).

As for some DH examples, David Ortiz does just fine (not last season, of course). Travis Hafner in his good years (and he was — the system wasn’t “unfair” to him). If Mike Jacobs keeps this up, he will be.

I guess (and this is probably just me being unfair) I think a player who helps his team on both offense and defense is much more valuable than one who just hits.

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.

by Matt Klaassen on Apr 23, 2009 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

that list isn't mean to be complete

in case anyone is wondering, or thinking, “that’s pretty short.”

A quick look at fangraphs shows about 50 out of about 175 qualified hitters would have been average or above as DHs according to the -17.5 DH adjustment. That’s without prorating and stuff, so again, this is a “rough estimate.” But is the adjustment unfair if it expects a player who only hits to be in, say, the top third of MLB hitters?

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.

by Matt Klaassen on Apr 23, 2009 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

and again

if a DH isn’t an average player, that doesn’t mean he doesn’t have value, which is the whole point of replacement level.

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.

by Matt Klaassen on Apr 23, 2009 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

one more thing

I guess this does sort of cut against my point that “very few” players could be a full-time DH and be above-average, although 1/4 to 1/3 of quaiified hitters is still a relatively small proportion. Still, no one on the Royals is likely to be that good this year, while Bonds might be.

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.

by Matt Klaassen on Apr 23, 2009 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

Amazing!

That may be the most repies to one’s own comment ever. I’m not judging or poking fun at. I’m just impressed. Of course the last 5 hours of red bull and vodkas could have something to do with the awe I am currently in…

Marriage is a great institution, for those that like being in institutions.

by fats on Apr 24, 2009 2:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

thanks, It's just that I have a very limited atten--

Hey, look, a squirrel!

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.

by Matt Klaassen on Apr 24, 2009 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, this idea is very 2008

I wasn’t too jazzed about it then. Not at all now.

The immoderate moderator

by NYRoyal on Apr 22, 2009 11:56 PM EDT reply actions  

To royalsreview/mazoboom

We had sh-t last year. Bonds would have been a waste. This is the year we can make a run. I didn’t buy into this idea last year at all, but last year 1.) we had no realistic chance, and 2.) Bonds’s legal issues presented a major problem. This year, on the other hand, we have almost all the pieces to make a run in a weak AL Central. Plus, Bonds’s legal troubles won’t resurface until after the World Series.

by Danvwood on Apr 23, 2009 12:22 AM EDT reply actions  

A couple questions

1. Bonds turns 45 in July. Can he still hit? How well?
2. Where does he play? Who sits? Who gets knocked off the 25-man roster?

Ok, it was more than a couple questions.

The immoderate moderator

by NYRoyal on Apr 23, 2009 12:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Barry Could Still Both Out Hit And Out Defend The Likes Of Ibanez Or Dunn In LF

Guillen wouldn’t even be a fair contest on either offense or defense. Bonds would wipe him out.

by giantsrainman on Apr 23, 2009 12:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm sure he'd out-hit Guillen

But I have to think that he’s at least as bad as Guillen defensively by now. I mean 45 is old for a baseball player. And by 2007, his defense had turned to pure shit. He hasn’t played for quite a while now and he’s older and slower than 2007. I’m sure he’s a DH-only by now. And you can’t guarantee me that he can still hit. Has he been staying in shape, working out, swinging a bat regularly? Old is old. Barry Bonds is not immune to the ravages of time.

The immoderate moderator

by NYRoyal on Apr 23, 2009 12:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Actually The Year Off Has Allowed His Knees To Fully Heal

When healthy Barry still has wheels. Just look up is SBs in 2006 and 2007. He was 12 for 12. Barry would be an average LF defender and an elite LF hitter this year if anyone gave him a chance.

by giantsrainman on Apr 23, 2009 1:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

How do you know his knee his fully healed?

Because he or his agent said so? Why should we believe them? Because they have a track record of honesty? He’s spinning, period. Maybe he’s healthy, maybe he’s not. But we know for sure that he’s 44 and will turn 45 in July. He’s slow and his range will be horrible. Why? Because he’s in his mid-40’s and his range wasn’t good in his last MLB season. Average defender? I’m sorry, but that’s fanboy nonsense. Elite hitter? I guess age has no effect on him. Has he found a new PED that they can’t test for? It must be a good one.

The immoderate moderator

by NYRoyal on Apr 23, 2009 2:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

he knows

because he is actually Pedro Gomez, and lives with Barry Bonds 8 months out of the year

by I need more Esteban on Apr 23, 2009 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

I was on board last year

not now, after a year out of baseball, he can’t have the same level of production.

by I need more Esteban on Apr 23, 2009 10:06 AM EDT reply actions  

+1

I really wanted the Royals to bring him in last year, but now? Meh.

I’m not even worried about the stuff that a majority of fans would be worried about:
  - Bad attitude? He’d fit right in with Guillen, Olivo, Ponson, and Farnsworth.
  - Defense? Our current RF is Willie F’n Bloomquist, and he’ll be replaced by a less-than-mobile Jose Guillen
  - Cost? Not my money
  - Roster spot? Have Dos Penas flip a coin – winner gets to keep their roster spot.

I don’t think he’d be able to hit as well since he’s had two years off, but he’d still hit pretty well. I just can’t get too worked up about it because I’m nearly positive the Royals won’t do it.

by Top Ramen on Apr 23, 2009 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Nope

We don’t need him or his baggage. A 45-year-old DH who is presumably off the juice now? That’s not how you build a team for the future, especially when you already have two DHs who attempt to “play” first base and another who “plays” right field when he’s not injured. Not to mention Kila, though I’ve heard he’s actually fairly competent at first and not a true DH.

And there would be a nationwide media circus, just when we want to be perceived as an up-and-coming franchise with promising young players. Bonds has a terrible image. Why would the Royals want to associate themselves with it? We want people to think of Zack and Soria and, hopefully, Gordon and Butler, not the poster boy for steroids, when they think of KC.

Which Royals do you figure were on the juice in the good old days? Jason Grimsley, of course. Jeremy Giambi. There were lots of Sweeney rumors. Neifi Perez, probably. Mark Quinn? At least we know David Howard was clean.

It's pronounced Poo-ZHOLS in Catalan.

by Juancho on Apr 23, 2009 11:13 AM EDT reply actions  

Really bad idea

Kansas City has the opportunity to become the underdog/darling that Tampa Bay was last year in the media. The little team that could with a lot of young, fresh players is could be very appealing for unattached/free agent fans. Bonds would completely destroy that story with the negative he brings.

Not only would the story shift from guys like Greinke and Teahen to Bonds, but he could also absolutely destroy the clubhouse. A guy like him, in a young clubhouse, with a weak manager = total mayhem.

Like the idea of a veteran bat, but “the tainted one” is not what this team needs.

Russ Gload = Doug Mientiewicz....without the pop

by Dubya on Apr 23, 2009 11:45 AM EDT reply actions  

Hey, Dev, you kidding or serious?

Except for Hosay, a notorious jerk, and Sir Sid and Callaspo, who have had legal problems, the clubhouse actually seems like a pretty healthy environment, and I doubt bringing Bonds in would help. There’s no evidence for this, it’s just my guess, but I’ll bet the more jerks you bring in, the unhappier your squad is, and the less likely it is to get fired up during a game.

If a jerk is good enough (Bonds, Kent, Belle), that more than cancels out his negative clubhouse effect (stability hit: -1, batting ability bonus: +5). But when he loses those high batting bonus points as he gets older, the stability malus outweighs what little ability he has left, and there’s no reason to want him around.

It's pronounced Poo-ZHOLS in Catalan.

by Juancho on Apr 25, 2009 3:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

Guillen, Ponson, and Olivo, at the very least

have all been described as “jerks” in the clubhouse. I don’t know whether it’s true or not. So has Barry Bonds. There’s a difference between Bonds and those guys: In his old age, Barry Bonds is better than any of those guys in their primes. Primes which are long since past for Guillen and Ponson.

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.

by Matt Klaassen on Apr 25, 2009 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Better ideas

Let’s sign Hank Aaron. No steroid issue there.

Maybe we could get Zombie Babe Ruth?

George Brett out of retirment?

by AxDxMx on Apr 23, 2009 12:23 PM EDT reply actions  

I'd take Brett over Bonds

Russ Gload = Doug Mientiewicz....without the pop

by Dubya on Apr 23, 2009 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

sign him with omaha

if he produces there, give ’em the minimum with a ton of guarantees for production and move ’em up.

"red bull is amaZing" -Coco Crisp

by grantfunk on Apr 23, 2009 1:09 PM EDT reply actions  

Terrible Idea

and Bonds would never sign a minor league deal. He is much too pompous for that. Be serious with yourself grantfunk.

by 2LegittoShit on Apr 23, 2009 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

never

serious is no fun. and when was he offered a minor league deal? was that this year or last?

"red bull is amaZing" -Coco Crisp

by grantfunk on Apr 23, 2009 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Before 2008 season started.

Kansas City Royals: your 2006 and 2007 NL Central champions!

by mazoboom on Apr 23, 2009 8:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Brett played today, he'd OPS about .750

But he is about 55 years old and a bit out of practice and all that.

It's pronounced Poo-ZHOLS in Catalan.

by Juancho on Apr 23, 2009 3:11 PM EDT reply actions  

although .750 wouldn't be bad at 3B

a bit below average, but not much. Depends on his OBP.

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.

by Matt Klaassen on Apr 23, 2009 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jump on the Bond Wagon

I think it’s an interesting idea, but from a completely different position. Let’s say we dump someone, anyone from the 25-man and put Bonds out there. Let him play one inning every game so the people can see him. And I challenge anyone to tell me different than this…people are going to come out to the ball park just to boo that man. I did the same thing when I lived in Texas in 2006. Let all those people come out and spend their money, and hopefully some of it will make it into next year’s payroll…

So that’s just a thought to keep in mind. It’s absolutely ridiculous, but there might be some upside. Just make sure they clean up the syringes that people will thrown in between innings…

by biancalana is my buddy on Apr 23, 2009 11:33 PM EDT reply actions  

absolutely

winning would be fun. So would the media attention.

by brokenbatsingle on Apr 24, 2009 11:03 AM EDT reply actions  

Whitlock

I emailed this letter to Jason Whitlock shortly before I posted it here. I just wanted to get the discussion going. Well, Whitlock used a lot of what I said in his article this morning.

http://www.kansascity.com/sports/story/1168353.html

by Danvwood on Apr 29, 2009 1:28 PM EDT reply actions  

Another example of why Whitlock shouldn't waste his time writing about baseball

He just doesn’t know baseball. And he loves his gritty veterans! Remember when he talked about how crucial it was that the Chiefs sign Ty Law?

The immoderate moderator

by NYRoyal on Apr 29, 2009 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

or Greinke's

“I probably wouldn’t mind it too much.” Can’t get much more enthusiastic than that.

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.

by Matt Klaassen on Apr 29, 2009 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed on Whitlock

The only sport he seems to know well is football, and I’m no expert so I’m willing to accept contradiction on that. And I’m really tired of race, race, race. There are other issues out there to write about.

It's pronounced Poo-ZHOLS in Catalan.

by Juancho on Apr 29, 2009 5:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

So I missed this until today

Are you saying Whitlock got your letter and then ripped you off for his article?

The only thing he did differently was interview players, Moore, and White which you had no access for.

Kansas City Royals: your 2006 and 2007 NL Central champions!

by mazoboom on May 1, 2009 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bonds in KC

Bonds was one of my favorite players growing up and i would love to see him in a Royals uni.

Really? Should the Royals “steroid era” endorsments be limited to Chuck Knoblauch and Jason Grimsley… Pathetic…

Happy Zack Grienke day to All

by kcfantasy on Apr 29, 2009 5:14 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.
Start posting about the Royals »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Rollinsliar_small
The fall and future of Jason IronMan Kendall
Royalsretro_small
The 100 Greatest Royals of All-Time - #28 Tom Gordon
Downtown-kansas-city-skyline_small
Two Weeks: Enough to Change Minds about Yuni?

Recent FanPosts

4-_wil_myers_small
Royals Review Community Prospect Rankings Who's #9?
Steve_balboni_pose_small
The Song of Kendall
Royconrad_fullthrottle_small
25 for 25: Royals
4-_wil_myers_small
Royals Review Community Prospect Rankings Who's #8?
Downtown-kansas-city-skyline_small
Wilson Betemit and his place in the Process
Small
Royals HRs vs LH pitchers
Royals_85_small
Minor League Playoff Races
4-_wil_myers_small
Royals Review Community Prospect Rankings Who's #7?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Chicago White Sox's Mark Teahan is congratulated by Gordon Beckham (15) after scoring on a single by A.J. Pierzynski in the second inning of a baseball game against the Detroit Tigers Monday, Sept. 6, 2010 in Detroit. (AP Photo/Duane Burleson)

White Sox Win Seventh In A Row On A.J. Pierzynski's 10th-Inning Single

NEW YORK - JULY 18:  Andy Pettitte #46 of the New York Yankees bends over prior to leaving the game in the third inning against the Tampa Bay Rays during the first inning on July 18 2010 at Yankee Stadium in the Bronx borough of New York City.  (Photo by Jim McIsaac/Getty Images) +6 updates

Andy Pettitte Reporting To Minors For Rehab Start Following Incident-Free Bullpen

New York Yankees' Brett Gardner, left, Nick Swisher, and Curtis Granderson, right, celebrate after the Yankees beat the Oakland Athletics 4-3 in a baseball game Wednesday, Sept. 1, 2010, at Yankee Stadium in New York. (AP Photo/Bill Kostroun) link

Beyond The Box Score's Week 22 Power Rankings

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Cimg0036_small Will McDonald

Editors

Dayton_small Jeff Zimmerman (TucsonRoyal)