A Quick Look at the Royals' Defensive Numbers
Given the obvious caveats regarding sample size and the oft-repeated problems with defensive stats, it may be incredibly foolhardy to put too much stock in sixteen games worth of defensive data. Then again, this is a blog, not congressional testimony. Plus, as long as the men in the manager's chair use stats with even smaller samples ("Player A is 3 for 5 against Johnny Pitcher, so he's hitting third today") I can't feel too bad about being a modern day Socrates and corrupting the youth of the world with my ill-handled stats.
Throughout the season I'll try to post these numbers every few weeks.
Here are the Royals' positional ranks in the AL using UZR. Although using ranks is itself incredibly fuzzy, in a way its a nice corrective to putting too much stock in minuscule data.
| Position | AL Rank |
| Catcher | 1st |
| First | 10th |
| Second | 11th |
| Shortstop | 8th |
| Third | 5th |
| Right | 13th |
| Left | 2nd |
| Center | 3rd |
| Pitcher | 1st |
| Overall | 6th |
These numbers reflect about what thought heading into the season: good (minus right) in the outfield, average to bad in the infield. According to these numbers on Fangraphs, Bloomquist was even worse than Guillen, so maybe we can dream big and hope that the Royals can move up to 11th or 12th in right-field defense soon.
I'm sure Luke Hochevar is dying to pitch in Kansas City, but he could have some nightmare starts with that infield behind him.
Individual stats can be found at Fangraphs.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Unless I missed something in the post or at FanGraphs
or, most likely, the joke: there are no defensive stats at FanGraphs for catchers or pitchers.
Fun stutt with small samples sizes. Off the top of my head, 16 games of defensive data (assuming a player played all 16 games at the same position) is about the same as a weeks’ worth of batting stats.
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
my bad
not sure exaclty what RF/9 measures for catchers. Does it deal with passed balls and stuff?
doesn’t seem like it would be that hard to do catcher stats, but I assume people like Rally do a WOWY-type analysis at the end of each season with Retrosheet data.
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
by Matt Klaassen on Apr 25, 2009 10:54 PM EDT up reply actions
This summer
I have an internship working with John Dewan. I’m pumped.
congrats
make sure not to ask him why people should pay for plus/minus when UZR is free and includes more stuff
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
by Matt Klaassen on Apr 25, 2009 10:54 PM EDT up reply actions
dont like the proprietary statistics?
Fire Hillman
by billybeingbilly on Apr 26, 2009 12:40 AM EDT up reply actions
nah, it's fine
just making a lame joke
I do like free stuff
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
by Matt Klaassen on Apr 26, 2009 12:42 AM EDT up reply actions
Plus, as long as the men in the manager's chair use stats with even smaller samples ....
That whole Aviles thing just didn’t work out.
"I'll be the first one to tell you, Don't follow me. I'll let you down. Follow Jesus." Trey Hillman
OK, got it.
The General Theory of Royaltivity
















