My official lineup
It's really alot easier this season compared to years past.
LF Dejesus
SS Aviles
3B Gordon
RF Guillen
1B Jacobs
DH Butler
2B Teahen
C Olivo
CF Crisp
I don't get the idea of batting Gordon and Aviles low in the lineup. Aviles was our best overall hitter last season and Gordon had a great OPS against RHPs and teams face RHPs more often. No reason for those two to bat behind anyone else in the lineup.
I don't take great stock in Spring Training numbers. Most pitchers are trying to get their stuff together. I'm happy Teahen and Crisp had great springs, but it shouldn't make Hillman forget about last season. If Seitzer can work wonders with Teahen, why not with Gordon?
Overall, I don't mind the 9 guys starting and the 4 backups, assuming TPJ is waived and sent to Omaha. I don't mind the 4th and 5th starters as well. But I would do the lineup differently. That's just me.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
all things considered,
this isn’t a bad lineup. I’d switch Butler and Guillen, and for tough LH starters, I’d take Gordon out of the 3-hole and Jacobs out of the lineup altogether.
If I had a chance to set the lineup...
1. Crisp CF – S
2. Dejesus LF – L
3. Aviles SS – R
4. Jacobs 1B – L
5. Guillen RF – R
6. Gordon 3B – L
7. Butler DH – R
8. Teahen 2B – L
9. Olivo C – R
Starting Pitching:
1. Meche – RHP
2. Grienke – RHP
3. Davies – RHP
4. Soria – RHP
5. Hochevar – RHP
Long Relief:
1. Ho Ramirez – LHP
2. Bale – LHP
3. Wright – RHP
Short Relief:
1. Waetcher – RHP
2. Mahay – LHP
3. Farnsworth – RHP
Closer:
1. Cruz – RHP
2. Soria – RHP
a. This maximizes the Left / Right order in the lineup, as well as stacking the first three spots with high on base percentages
b. Aviles needs to get as many at bats as possible, so batting him 9th is foolish.
c. Crisp needs to lead off and use his speed, just like Willie Wilson in the glory days.
d. Batting Teahen third may look good now after a big spring, but I don’t think he can continue it into the regular season.
e. Is there a better 6-7-8-9 in baseball than Gordon, Butler, Teahen, Olivo?
f. Soria should be a starter to maximize his impact; he could also close on off days if necessary. Juan Cruz is capable of being a closer.
by david.lowe on Apr 5, 2009 12:47 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I'm all for Soria in the rotation
but to expect him to do both start and occasionally close is totally unrealistic.
The General Theory of Royaltivity
He could do it,
but to be safe, I’d say rest him the day after starting both games of a double-header.
by Trey Hillman's Chin on Apr 5, 2009 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Yes! I like complete games.
The question is, what would Nolan Ryan do?
The General Theory of Royaltivity
One problem
no lefty in the rotation!!1
Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary to Driveline Mechanics and elsewhere since sometime in 2008.
by Matt Klaassen on Apr 5, 2009 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Best Linups
I used the Baseball Musings tool with CHONE projections, and here is what it came up with for the best lineups (assuming we use the nine guys that you’ve used and have been announced as opening day starters).
These all give 4.854 runs per game:
- DH Butler
- 3B Gordon
- CF Crisp
- 1B Jacobs
- 2B Teahen
- RF Guillen
- SS Aviles
- C Olivo
- LF Dejesus
- DH Butler
- 3B Gordon
- CF Crisp
- 1B Jacobs
- 2B Teahen
- SS Aviles
- RF Guillen
- C Olivo
- LF Dejesus
- LF Dejesus
- DH Butler
- 2B Teahen
- 1B Jacobs
- 3B Gordon
- RF Guillen
- SS Aviles
- C Olivo
- CF Crisp
- LF Dejesus
- DH Butler
- 2B Teahen
- 1B Jacobs
- 3B Gordon
- SS Aviles
- RF Guillen
- C Olivo
- CF Crisp
Personally, I like the following order. It is worth one one-thousandth of run per game less, but it feels a little better:
- LF Dejesus
- 3B Gordon
- 2B Teahen
- 1B Jacobs
- DH Butler
- SS Aviles
- RF Guillen
- C Olivo
- CF Crisp
by Trey Hillman's Chin on Apr 5, 2009 2:34 PM EDT reply actions
For comparison,
it says that grimsley’s lineup is worth 4.778 runs per game and the announced opening day lineup is worth 4.739 runs per game. So that’s what, roughly two wins difference over the course of the whole season? I’d say it is worth getting right.
by Trey Hillman's Chin on Apr 5, 2009 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions
further comparison
Last year’s edition scored 691/162 = 4.27.
So, is it realistic to believe that big a jump when many of the guys are the same guys?
The General Theory of Royaltivity
well, the lineup simulator assumes the starters start every game,
when in reality, they don’t, and shouldn’t
Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary to Driveline Mechanics and elsewhere since sometime in 2008.
by Matt Klaassen on Apr 5, 2009 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions
And,
many of these same guys are projected to improve…
by Trey Hillman's Chin on Apr 5, 2009 11:49 PM EDT up reply actions
Projected to improve: Gordon, Butler
projected to be about the same: Guillen, Teahen (well, Teahen is projected to improve over last season, ’cept by PECOTA), Buck
Projected to be worse: everyone else
Bringing you more-or-less replacement level analysis and commentary to Driveline Mechanics and elsewhere since sometime in 2008.
by Matt Klaassen on Apr 6, 2009 12:32 AM EDT up reply actions
Of course everyone is going to equal their projections NO MATTER WHAT.
Everyone's recruits look better than ours.
And, looking again,
maybe it isn’t the best thing to go LLLLRRRRS, but I still like it better than Trey’s lineup.
by Trey Hillman's Chin on Apr 5, 2009 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions
whatever you want.
He could hit 1.000 or .000…. but it’s probably around .288
Everyone's recruits look better than ours.
Butler can't lead off
the only way the guy outruns a throw to 1st is if we put a sandwich on the bag every time he’s up.
by Your_Moms_Boyfriend on Apr 6, 2009 2:18 PM EDT reply actions
Oddly, By Googling
“Billy Butler” images, this came up.

Kind of like last year’s Butler and this year’s Butler.
I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.
by philofthenorth on Apr 6, 2009 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Butler went on the crack diet too?
The immoderate moderator
by Scott McKinney on Apr 6, 2009 10:39 PM EDT up reply actions

by 













