Quick hits on status of Royals season
Just a quick summary of some seasonal predictive indicators.
First, the Royals (20-18) are one game behind their pythag (21-17), in large part due to their horrible record in one run games (2-7). The Tigers (20-16) are also slightly behind their pythag (21-15).
However, the Royals have, right now, a stronger 3rd order wins number than the Tigers: the Royals should have 21.3 wins, while the Tigers should have only 20. (Baseball Prospectus.) Third order wins are adjusted for opposing pitching and hitting faced so far. (I should note that the Indians have 20.2 3rd order wins, with a win% just behind the Tigers and us, so if they perform at ability it's not a two-way Royals-Tigers race. The White Sox and Twins appear to be as flawed as their records indicate.)
On this note, the Royals have a fairly easy season schedule. Our Strength of Schedule is 0.492, putting us in the bottom third of baseball. (ESPN stats.) Also, our Relative Power Index, so far, indicates we've played teams of strength 0.501, indicating that we might have easier days ahead to dip down to 492.
These easier days are likely to come in the form of what seems to me a very easy interleague schedule. Although the Cardinals are never pushovers, and the Reds are a decent team this year, we are also playing Pittsburgh, the Astros, and the Diamondbacks. This probably contributes significantly to our 0.492 SoS.
We are also doing well on some little predictors. The Beane Count (measuring walks taken, home runs hit, and walks given up and home runs given up, and named after Billie Beane's style) puts us as the 4th best team in MLB, with only Toronto ahead of us in the AL. Detroit is 7th, although the gap between us in absolute points is not large. We don't seem to be lucky or unlucky on BABIP for our hitters or our pitchers as a team, so our success, such as it is, is real. (So is the Tigers', though.) The Dartboard really likes us, putting us at 91 wins and taking the division (although it doesn't regress skill sets to preseason evalutions, and so many of its guesses are really questionable: see the AL East). ESPN's power rankings put us as the 13th best team in baseball, after only Detroit at 10th in the AL Central.
In summary, our current post-season odds are given as 19.6%, well behind Detroit's 39.9%. But we legitimately are the second most likely team to make the playoffs from the AL Central, and I didn't feel that way even at the height of 2003. Some good baseball, and we're in. If Soria comes back and Cruz slots in before him so that we can beat our pythag by a few games, and if we wallop the NL, I think we should be playing meaningful baseball in a few months.
2 recs |
24 comments
Comments
Tigers interleague
They play St Louis, Pittsburgh, and the Astros, just like us.
But they also play Milwaukee and the Cubs, which are, together, quite a bit tougher than Arizona and the Reds.
Also, we host Detroit later this month. If we can play well in that series, we might be able to put a very good tenor on the season going forward.
by Sean O Se on May 18, 2009 6:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
that is going to be a big series
it will be fun to have meaningful inter-division games
by I need more Esteban on May 19, 2009 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This kind of thinking
Although the Cardinals are never easy, and the Reds are a decent team this year, we are also playing Pittsburgh, the Astros, and the Diamondbacks.
never seems to pan out. We are quite capable of playing down to the level of our supposedly poorer competition. See the A’s last week.
However, we did do well against the NL last year.
"Well, if we destroy Kansas the world may not hear about it for years." Blofeld
The General Theory of Royaltivity
by kabrink on May 18, 2009 8:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think that's largely because
the Royals are essentially an NL style club. Run manufacturing vs. big Power Innings.
by CaseyRoyal on May 18, 2009 9:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
we've dominated interleague even when we were horrible
I see us winning every series of interleague
by I need more Esteban on May 19, 2009 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Cardinals are wrecked with injuries right now
So perhaps, our best interleague opponent will be below their usual standard this week. I watched the entire Milwaukee series, and they’re looking lost at the moment. If we do as well against the NL as last year, that will work and I doubt that we lose any games with Detroit facing the Cubs and Brewers. It is true that we have played some bad teams, but we did take three of four from the “best team in baseball” (ehhh…maybe not) and did not succumb to our usual Baltimore woes.
"It’s not about the guacamole itself," Greinke said. "I just don’t want to let them win."
by lobes on May 19, 2009 3:31 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The Baltimore series sort of turned it around for me,
and put me on a quest for some optimistic indicators. I think of the recent past as now being a West Coast five game losing streak, followed by going 2-2 with the Orioles. (Six sounds so much worse to me than five: I don’t know why.) And even better, we should have gone 2 L, W, 2 L in California, if we had spread even our meager offense out a bit more.
I also was worried at first that we were 7-1 when Zaqq pitches, and 3-25 when he doesn’t. I don’t think you can divide things out this way: I think Devil_Fingers’ writing on chaining props me up a bit. It’s not like we’d put in someone sure to lose 8 games if Zaqq were mowing lawns: we’d move Meche up, and everyone else would ladder up, and we’d have some new weak fifth starter who we might go 2-6 or 3-5 with.
So with Zaqq we’re a team that’s slightly above 500 to well above 500 (depending on our mood). Without Zaqq, we’re still a 500 team.
by Sean O Se on May 19, 2009 10:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And the Cardinals do look very confused, as you say.
My brother is a huge Cardinals fan (we both grew up in KC, but he went to college in Rolla, and then Washington U for his PhD, and lives there now).
They have tons of offense, but a lot of it is injured. They also have some great prospects for next year, not quite ready for this year. And their bullpen is a mess, and their starters are unreliable. (Carp and Wainer are great; Lohse and Pineiro are average; but Welly and their other fill ins aren’t even replacement right now.)
It’s probably a good time to play them. We’ll be missing Carpenter, Ankiel may not be back, and Ludwick certainly won’t.
by Sean O Se on May 19, 2009 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting
Looks like this team is more or less for real, and the playoffs are not an impossible dream. I’ve raised my hopes since the beginning of the season; I’ll now be disappointed if they don’t go at least 81-81.
I’ve noticed that there haven’t been any calls for a lynch mob to hang Trey off the right field foul pole around here recently. Are y’all going soft on him or something?
It's pronounced Poo-ZHOLS in Catalan.
by Juancho on May 19, 2009 10:05 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No, just intimidated by George "Crazy Old Man" Brett
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
by devil_fingers on May 19, 2009 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I completely agree.
I think we should now set our sights and expectations on a 500 season. I won’t be too disappointed if we don’t make the postseason but we show that we’re an average team with up and coming talent.
But how I long, long, long for a chance to have my heart broken in the playoffs.
by Sean O Se on May 19, 2009 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
BABIP as a team.
It’s true that we are exactly average in BABIP as a team, in both hitting and pitching (301 and 304, I believe—the Tigers are basically the same).
But a reason for optimism might be how we average out players to get to that mean. If Bloomie and Callaspo regress, but DeJesus (276) and Gordon (083) progress, I think I’d take that tradeoff. (Butler, Guillen, and Jacobs are more or less average right now.)
Our offense is a bit off because the Strat-o-Matic dice have favored our weaker players, and punished our better hitters.
by Sean O Se on May 19, 2009 10:35 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
speaking of alex,
there has been shockingly little discussion or pining for him. i know he was a liability at the start of the season, but i thought by now there would be a post a day recapping his comeback, and revising timelines.
by Sean O Se on May 19, 2009 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you obviously missed all the
“team is better off without him” and “choker” and “sucks” posts
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
by devil_fingers on May 19, 2009 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was suprised
I looked at what he actually did and was shocked he only played in 7 games, and only 5 before they rested him hoping his hip would feel better. I don’t remember exactly when he hurt his hip, but he can’t have been healthy for more than 3-4 games.
My point: I can’t see any reason to base an opinion off of what he’s done this year at all. If folks thought those things before, it’s fine to still believe them. If they were optimistic about what he might do this year, there is also little reason to not be optimistic now.
I think the injury was good for the team, in the sense that Callaspo might not have ever gotten a chance to perform like he has and Teahen might have gotten frustrated enough at 2B to have reduced his offensive production. However, I think this team will be better with Teahen as a better OF option, Guillen DHing more and Maier back in AAA. Granted, this assumes Gordon will hit better against lefties than Maier has,
by Big Guy on May 19, 2009 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
Bingo
well put guy
by MarioVanPeebles Republic of China on May 19, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
well,
04-07-09 Chicago Game 1 = 1 for 4, HR, FC grounder with RBI. So a hand in both runs.
04-08-09 Chicago Game 2 = 1 for 3, with one BB and one K.
04-09-09 Chicago Game 3 = 0 for 3, with one K and this is the game he booted that GB
04-10-09 NYY Game 1 = 0 for 4, with 2 K’s
04-11-09 NYY Game 2 = 0 for 1, (GIDP) and pulled, Teahan relieved.
04-14-09 CLE Game 2 = 1 for 3, with 3 K’s.
04-15-09 CLE Game 3 = 0 for 3, with one BB and one K, the BB got an RBI
My guess is the third game at Chicago if not before. Tape would tell the truth before anyone in the clubhouse.
Yeah? From what I hear, you couldn't hit water if you fell out of a f@#%ing boat.
by BillyMojo on May 19, 2009 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Greinke pitches against the Diamondbacks, God help them
He will get 15-20 strikeouts while throwing a complete game no-hitter. Arizona’s team BA is currently .234 and they are 7th in strikeouts.
by AxDxMx on May 19, 2009 2:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
But if Haren pitches against us...
I’m most worried, right now, about Cinci (since we’re avoiding Carp for the Cards).
The Reds have a spectacular rotation, with Volquez, Cueto, Harang, Micah Owings, and … Bronson Arroyo. That means we have a 4/5 chance of facing an ace or near-ace. And the Reds offense is pretty tough, too.
I think, right now, the NL Central is maybe a little scarier than the AL East.
by Sean O Se on May 19, 2009 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's a mirage
Owings is not an ace. Cueto and Volquez are as likely to post a 10K game as they are 10 walks. Plus, Owings doesn’t get to hit, since they play us here.
by AxDxMx on May 20, 2009 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And they're lucky that they are coming to KC, rather than the Royals going there...
and Zack being able to hit. He’d probably go 4-for-4 with 4 tape measure shot HR’s. Which he would have cued up and ready to go in the Royals’ video room for Gordon whenever he comes back.
"Now…put that in your [BLEEP]ing pipe and smoke it." -Hal McRae
"I was doing this when BJ was in his father's nutsack." -Renzo Gracie
by Sweep_the_Leg on May 19, 2009 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hope inter-league this year doesn't
make Zack wish that he played in the NL where he can bat.
by I need more Esteban on May 19, 2009 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The eternal optimist in me
sees a couple of things have happened lately that can be taken as good omens
Even though there was a five game losing streak followed by a 2-2 split with the O’s, (thanks Sean for that insight) none of those games were against division foes. It could have been a whole lot worse had those games been lost within the division
We still hold a winning or tie record vs three of the four division rivals. Currently, we are tied 3-3 with the Indians, have a 2-1 advantage over Minn, a 4-1 advantage over Chicago, and 1-2 record with the Tigers. At this point in the season, this is not bad at all IMO.
I’m stating the obvious I’m sure, but these things stand out to me as positives right now.
Superstitious? I'm not superstitious
*draws crown on floor in front of tv in gold chalk
*spins Frank White bobblehead conterclockwise three times
by topekaroyal on May 19, 2009 4:36 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 













