Royals Review: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Cottagers Confidential for Fulham FC Fans!

Time to trade Soria and Meche...

to all who care, and that may just be us few, proud , and brave....The delusion of competing for the pennant this year is long passed.  Thus the only thing left to compete for is the future.  So, who on this team is our future---Gordon, Butler, DeJesus, Grienke, Hoch, Kila, Callaspo?  Maybe Teahen; maybe not. But is Meche or Soria in our plans for 2012?  Soria is useless to a team who is never in a game in the ninth and he may yet be the solid gold chip that we could get true value for.  WTF.  Trade deadline:  Trade Meche and Soria for solid CF, SS, and RF prospects who can  actually play defense and have an offensive upside.  The Bourbon may be talking, but is there some merit in this line of thinking?   


0 recs  |  Comment 65 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

definitely yes on meche....

he could bring back quite a haul…two and a half years of a legit 1/2 starting pitcher signed to a reasonable contract is quite valuable.

in order to trade soria, i’d need to be blown away by the offer i think. however, i’m also starting to worry that he might be very injury prone down the road

Fire Everyone

by billybeingbilly on Jun 22, 2009 10:32 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Better to win 40 now and contend in 5 years,

than to continually win between 55 and 75, like we have done for 2 decades.

Mr Glass, this is a pro sports team, not a retail store - run it like one!

by loyal2sdad on Jun 23, 2009 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

trading either will never happen

i don’t totally see the point in trading meche, yet would trade soria in a heartbeat

by Will McDonald on Jun 22, 2009 11:06 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Bland answer

anyone, even Greinke, should be available for the right price… of course, Greinke would command a ridiculously high price for me

I wonder if teams still overvalue closers? If so, Soria should be available — his contract is also attractive. In addition, if concerns about his mechanics are valid, then trading him before injuries snowball is smart. Again, it would have to be the right kind of player (or groups of plaeyrs) — young, cost-controlled, upside-ey and, if not in the majors already, at least one who is ready to be soon.

Meche is clearly more valuable than Soria, but also us older and with a bigger contract. Same sort of situation. I like Meche, and he’s been a good deal for the Royals, but he isn’t going to be better than he is now, and every game he pitches (like for all pitchers) makes it more and more likely that he will have “that” injury. No fire sale, of course, just see what can be had for him.

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.

by Matt Klaassen on Jun 22, 2009 11:40 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Meche is pretty much irreplaceable

Soria isn’t

of course, probably most people probably think the opposite at this point

by Will McDonald on Jun 23, 2009 12:00 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It oughta be obvious

that it’s not hard to find a closer, or make one, and that’s all Soria’s done well, or been allowed to do well.

Yeah? From what I hear, you couldn't hit water if you fell out of a f@#%ing boat.

by BillyMojo on Jun 24, 2009 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

glad to see that people are

beginning to come around…

http://www.royalsreview.com/2009/5/23/884929/should-dm-blow-this-team-up

Kansas City Royals - rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic since 1994.

by Home Run Tony Cogan on Jun 22, 2009 11:42 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

really what?

Kansas City Royals - rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic since 1994.

by Home Run Tony Cogan on Jun 23, 2009 12:08 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not really talking about blowing the team up,

just trading two pieces that have enough value on the market that we could get some real talent in return.

by Steve Hovley on Jun 23, 2009 7:04 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree,

although there are many more players than that which need to go, such as Guillen, Pena, and Jacobs. Others should/could be traded if we can get the right value, including but not limited to DeJesus, Teahen, Callaspo, Buck/Olivo.

The more I think about it, the more I think we need to trade Soria before his arm/shoulder blow up.

Kansas City Royals - rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic since 1994.

by Home Run Tony Cogan on Jun 23, 2009 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Everyone but Greinke should be on the market

But I don’t see any way in hell Soria or Meche gets dealt

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Jun 23, 2009 9:59 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Trade Meche, use this lost season to slowly move Soria to the rotation

Mr Glass, this is a pro sports team, not a retail store - run it like one!

by loyal2sdad on Jun 23, 2009 10:21 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

big +1 to that

Of course, if the Royals brass are dead-set on keeping Soria in the closer’s role, might as well trade him, too.

The problem is I’m not exactly sure what the best strategy is to improve this team at this point. Seems like we need a starter, an OF, a 2B, SS, and probably at least one new catcher.

by marbotty on Jun 23, 2009 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

While we're asking for things like that

We may as well ask for a unicorn.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Jun 23, 2009 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

oooh, a white one with sparkly stars

my daughters would like that

My feelings on Soria are that if we had a manager who understood how to use a bullpen, he would be much more valuable to the team as the closer, but as long as Trey is in charge, his value to this team is lessened. So, if Trey stays as manager, either trade him or stretch him out. If Trey goes, keep Soria as lock-down closer.

"Things could always be worse." - Buddy Bell

by buddyball on Jun 23, 2009 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

do they grow ugly goatees and chew tobacco?

Yeah? From what I hear, you couldn't hit water if you fell out of a f@#%ing boat.

by BillyMojo on Jun 24, 2009 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

As much as I hate to say it

Soria yes (for the right deal), Meche no right now

by I need more Esteban on Jun 23, 2009 10:21 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Why is that?

Because Meche is a starter and more valuable? I agree with that but this is a lost season and I’m not high on 2010. If you can get a great package of prospects, that will probably help the next competitive Royals team more than Meche will.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Jun 23, 2009 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

sure any deal would be great

but yeah that is exactly it, for what we are using them for, Meche is more valuable. Could Soria be more valuable? Sure, this season has somewhat soured me on Soria as a starter to be honest with you, I know there are a lot of factors in him getting injured (under-usage, WBC, etc.) but I just don’t see his fastball holding up a 2nd and 3rd time through the order. I’m definitely no expert, though.

by I need more Esteban on Jun 23, 2009 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

side note:

none of are experts! say whatever you want.Seriously.

Except for me. I definitely an expert. that’s why I’m sitting in a hot room at home trying to decide how many leftover burgers to eat for lunch.

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.

by Matt Klaassen on Jun 23, 2009 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

easy answer: all of them

"Things could always be worse." - Buddy Bell

by buddyball on Jun 23, 2009 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

At the very least, Moore should let it be known that both are available

before the deadline and see what he can get for one or both. There will definitely be takers for them. 3-5 quality-to-excellent prospects at the AA or AAA levels, with at least one or two being ready to step into a MLB starting role immediately, should be the target. Position players in this order: SS, CF, C. And a projected quality starter wouldn’t hurt either.

"Now…put that in your [BLEEP]ing pipe and smoke it." -Hal McRae

"I was doing this when BJ was in his father's nutsack." -Renzo Gracie

by Sweep_the_Leg on Jun 23, 2009 10:46 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

that's exactly what I've been saying

I don’t WANT to get rid of either one. I genuinely like both players and I LOVE soria, he’s nails. but, the fact is that 1) we need several players, 2) he’s one of our most attractive chips, and 3) he has some injury risk.

Kansas City Royals - rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic since 1994.

by Home Run Tony Cogan on Jun 23, 2009 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think the only reason to look to trade Soria is injury concern

Which seems like trying to read tea leaves, anyway. I’m going on the assumption that his WAR outpaces his salary, and isn’t that the type of player that you want ON your team, not the player you want to trade away, rolling the dice on some prospects? (Of course everyone has a price, and if we started talking with Texas about their young catchers, then I might be interested….)

by benfunke on Jun 23, 2009 11:56 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Question to Rob Neyer: "Rob, do you think the Royals should look to trade Meche or Soria? What kind of return would each bring?"

Rob Neyer
They should trade everyone except Greinke, but the point is moot because the Royals don’t trade veterans for prospects, because they are perpetually unwilling to admit that they’re not about to win 85 games.

by The #1 Bockel on Jun 23, 2009 12:27 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Key question is when do we (or DM more importantly) see the team as truly competitive?

If it’s not until 2012, deal anyone of any value who doesn’t project to be adding value to the team in 2012. If it’s sooner, then don’t deal guys like Meche, or anyone else who’s good and locked in through 2011.

I’m waving the white flag on the season, but not on 2010 and 2011 and it’s difficult to imagine Moore doing that. What happens between now and the deadline will tell us what Moore thinks of the subject. Based on the off-season moves, he seemed (incorrectly) to think that we could compete this season. Everyone reading this blog still believed that in April. We’re in the depths of a historically bad stretch of baseball, but I don’t see Moore giving up (and thereby admitting that he sucks as a GM) on 2010 and 2011.

Nevertheless, the more lopsided losses we experience, the farther and farther away seem the chances of fielding a contender. And everyone’s got their price, so if the amount of ready-now prospects showed up at the door, and projected to equal more value than Meche in say 2011 and beyond, well…we do have tons of glaring holes.

by Royal Revival on Jun 23, 2009 12:36 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think some of us don't see 2010 or 2011 as realistic anymore,

primarily because of the sheer number of holes left to be filled in the lineup:

A shortstop, a CF (assuming Crisp is not renewed), a catcher (assuming Buck is no longer adequate with his now bad back), a DH (assuming they never give Kila a chance, which appears more and more likely), and at least 2 SPs, along with 2-3 bullpen pieces.

Hell, the best GM in the history of the game, making all of the astute moves he could in one offseason, couldn’t possibly dream of fixing all of that at once!

Solution is to trade what valuable chips he does have for as many good prospects as possible, combine them with the talent currently playing in A ball, and hope for contention, say, around 2013 or 2014.

Mr Glass, this is a pro sports team, not a retail store - run it like one!

by loyal2sdad on Jun 23, 2009 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why give Kila a chance right now?

They have 3 DH’s on the team in Butler, Jacobs, and Guillen. They’d be wasting a 4th spot on a DH and you only have three spots to fill with one (playing one in RF and one at 1B right now.) Two of the other DH’s play the same position as Kila. Kila has all of his options left.

by stlfan on Jun 25, 2009 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think this is extreme panic button

Meche is signed for another 2.5 for a reasonable contract. I’ll take a “#2” for $12M per the next two years. You put him and Greinke on a staff and that’s at least 35, possibly 40-45 wins if they have career years. You need about that many from the other 3 on your staff and you’re in the playoffs.

Soria’s ridiculously well cost controlled until 2014- the longest of anyone on our MLB team. But does someone back a Brinks truck of prospects up to us for a perceived closer no matter how good he is? And if so, is it going to be better than the production you’re going to get from his 1/3/4/6/6/8 contract?

Hell, if you really want to blow it all up, why not everyone including Greinke? He’s only under contract until 2012 and I’m sure he’ll bring back a collection of some of the best prospects in the game.

Do you guys really think Moustakas and Hosmer are can’t misses? I had better feelings about Gordon/Butler than I did about them. Are we really ready to just chuck everything away again and start over?

*I see some pieces that you can win a title with as key members of the team: Greinke and Meche. I think Gordon could still possibly be a piece- we just don’t know because he’s been injured this year. Similarly, Butler is still too early to tell.
*Similarly, there are quite a few pieces on the team you could win a title with- DDJ, Crisp, Teahen, Cruz.
*There are also some pieces we just don’t know about- Callaspo, Bannister, Hochevar, Tejada- they could be valuable pieces or they might be useless soon enough

If you could guarantee me that one of the guys we got back in a trade for, say, Soria would be a middle of the order bat not on this team but on more than half of the teams in baseball, then, yeah, I’d consider that deal. But we know baseball doesn’t work like that. And just continually blowing it up doesn’t get us any closer to the goal.

by sterlingice on Jun 23, 2009 1:49 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

that's why I say it always depends on who you get back

Meche is a stud…. but getting a 3 WAR payer back from him (just hypothetically, I don’t know whom I have in mind), well, he wouldn’t by himself be as valuable, but if that player is young and at the minimum, then you have the remainder of Meche’s salary left over to acquire players, etc.

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.

by Matt Klaassen on Jun 23, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

But here's the problem

First, a lot of the holes that we were bitching about last year (another starter, a SS, a CF, a COF) were holes last year as well. Now, we’re 12+ million in payroll higher and were still in the same goddamn place.

Second, a lot of teams have holes – look no further than the Cardinals, for example. We’re going to have holes. Part of the problem, I think, is that some of the players that we perceive as being legitimate really aren’t.

I would submit that right now, there isn’t a single spot where we couldn’t stand an upgrade, save for our #1 and #2 starter and closer. I’m sorry, but a .750 OPS isn’t going to get it done out of LF or 1B or 3B. There are too many “just guys” on this team and nobody that can really provide the necessary production we need. Sure, it could change if Butler or Gordon break out, but I’m not holding my breath. They are complimentary pieces when you’ve got a ManRam or A-Rod in your lineup.

Look, I realize I can be schizo when it comes to the team, but I am really trying to look at this with my head and not my heart. I see a bunch of complimentary players on this team and no go-to guy, at least from the hitting side. On top of that, the hitters don’t field especially well as a group or individually.

I just don’t think that people realize how far away we really are from being a legitimate contender.

Kansas City Royals - rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic since 1994.

by Home Run Tony Cogan on Jun 23, 2009 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And I think it's the opposite

Not that I think we’re right there at being a legit contender. But, I don’t think we’re nearly as far off as everyone wants to bury us because we’re in the middle of a bad losing streak.

I don’t want to just take one line too out of context but I think this illustrates our problem in a nutshell:
“Sure, it could change if Butler or Gordon break out, but I’m not holding my breath. They are complimentary pieces when you’ve got a ManRam or A-Rod in your lineup.”

Yes, but if we had just a ManRam or ARod or whoever in the lineup, doesn’t it suddenly get a lot better? Suddenly, guys who are overmatched for their role aren’t nearly as much when they have better protection. Unless you’re New York or Boston or someone like that, you don’t have those guys 1-9. Most teams have 1, if that, 2 or 3 if you’re a huge market team.

What is the Cardinals lineup without Pujols? You think Ryan Ludwick at the #5 is looking real great this year? Sure, he had a great year last year, but this year he looks a hell of a lot like Mike Jacobs only at a corner OF spot instead of 1B/DH. How about their other “corner” spots with Rick Ankiel and Chris Duncan combining for 10 homers and a .250 average. Is it that Skip Schumaker/Colby Rasmus top of the order what scares you? No- in fact, they look a hell of a lot like the Royals lineup plus Albert Pujols. And there they are with pitching and hitting similar to ours and it’s just one player, admittedly a supernatural freak of nature, that has them in 1st while we’re trying to avoid the basement.

Not only that, but while we have a lot of complimentary MLB parts on the roster- we don’t have any near the majors and those aren’t automatic, particularly from an organization not adept at developing hitters, we have to consider those as assets, not just “replaceable players”. Or at least something that would need to be replaced that we can’t count as automatic. So if you blew it completely up, you’d have to replace those, too, as well as the stars.

We could have had Adam Dunn and Orlando Hudson in this offense without too much tinkering this past offseason. How does the lineup and bullpen look with Hudson at SS, Dunn at 1B, Nunez in the pen, Jacobs in Florida, and Farnsworth blowing games somewhere else? That wasn’t that hard (I know that’s being a tad glib and it’s more complicated than that). But, a bunch of us were screaming for it months ago. One offseason with only a couple of moves that aren’t ridiculously outside the realm of possibility and suddenly we are probably in contention this year.

So, we’re both close and far. But it’s not an extreme like we’re making it out to be.

by sterlingice on Jun 23, 2009 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Good points

Don’t know what I think overall,b ut taht’s good perspective

I’m not sure Judson can handle SS, given that he he’s been a below average 2B defensive for a couple of years. Also, Adam Dunn is one of the few players as bad as Jose Guillen in the outfield, and can give Mike Jacobs a run for his money at first.

Having said that, let’s put Dunn at DH over Jacobs and Hudson at 2B (i’ll leave the bullpen alone — also the issue of whether KC could have afforded both Dunn AND Hudson).

Crudely: Dunn’s been about 16 runs better than Jacobs with the bat this season, and Hudson is probablyl about 15 runs better than Callaspo offense + defense so far this season. 31 runs is about three wins. Leaving aside the issue of how these guys would have transitioned to AL pitchers… that makes the Royals more of a 32-36 team rather than 29-39.

Make of that what you will.

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.

by Matt Klaassen on Jun 23, 2009 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And if you bought Dunn and Hudson

we’d still have Nunez in the pen, so nix the deal to one of Farnsworth/Cruz

by Top Ramen on Jun 23, 2009 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

probably Farnsworth cause he's making more

and Dunn/Hudson would well make up the difference.

If you have Nunez, Cruz, and Soria out there instead of Farnsworth, Cruz, and Soria…that’s a big improvement in my book.

by stlfan on Jun 25, 2009 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wasn't sure what Meche or Soria would bring in return but I know that there are teams that would love to have them.

Maybe enough to part with 2 or 3 MLB ready players at spots we really have to fill before we can be respectable. Watching this team, at this level of incompetence at the plate and in the field is just painful. As a fan, I can follow and cheer for a losing team if I feel they are growing, learning, and improving; but this current streak has me convinced that they are not moving forward. I’m sure I would not feel this way if we hadn’t had the injuries to Gordon and Avilas and Crisp.

by Steve Hovley on Jun 23, 2009 2:19 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Mark Shapiro is supposedly in trouble in Cleveland

Maybe we could rent him for an hour and get him to trade Meche for us. He did land Grady Sizemore, Brandon Phillips and Cliff Lee for Bartolo Colon.

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Jun 23, 2009 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Even after his miserable last start

Meche is better than a solid #2 — he’s still in the top 10-11 staters in the AL, probably one of the top 7-8 before the last start

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.

by Matt Klaassen on Jun 23, 2009 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Very true...

I was viewing him from the eyes of a contender who might already have one of those top 10 guys…greedy bastards. As well as a conservative estimate of his future from now thru 2011.

by Royal Revival on Jun 23, 2009 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

the best is what the Expos managed to parlay Colon into...

I just researched this out of boredom but it is hilarious. Not only did the Expos give away Sizemore, Phillips, and Cliff Lee and one more player for Colon and one other, they managed to parlay Colon and one other not 7 months later to the ChiSox for Rocky Biddle, Orlando Hernandez, Jeff Liefer, and cash.

by Royal Revival on Jun 23, 2009 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I remember Soren ranting that the Royals could have matched that deal easily

Which they could have. What a laughable deal. Course, Colon wouldn’t have helped us much…

Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com

by RoyalsRetro on Jun 23, 2009 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Is It Possible

That our #1 draft pick will be ready by 2011? He projects as high as a 1/2 starter, no? Thus, if we could get a good package of position players (CF, COF, C, 2B) for him, Crow might be ready to step in by then.

I also agree with Royals Revival, we have had a lot of bad luck. Everyone expected Aviles to regress, but not like this. Now we find out he’s injured, so we still don’t know what we have in him. Gordon will be above average if not stellar; I believe. I’m not a big Crisp fan, but his injury has been a big blow to us. Crisp>Maier, no question.

I still think Hochevar will be at least a 4, and either Bannister or Davies will be as good a 5 as most everyone else has. The pen situation can be resolved fairly easily; we saw GMDM do it once, and though he kind of made a hash of it this year, I think he can do it again.

It’s not as bad as it seems.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Jun 23, 2009 3:35 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Him In First

Paragraph=Meche, not Crow.

I used to be an A's fan until they left town and got good.

by philofthenorth on Jun 23, 2009 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would think that Crow would be ready by 2011

Don’t know much about this stuff, but he’s what, 23 now? With all the hype… I mean, who knows, that would be like Hochevar pitching in 2008, right?

I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.

by Matt Klaassen on Jun 23, 2009 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

We just don't have much margin for error

Our lower-tier payroll (even though it’s higher than the past, it’s still lower half to lower third of the league)/small-marketness, coupled with a decade of incompetent front office bungling, has left the organizational depth such that there is absolutely no margin for error, even with a new regime in office for a while now. We can’t have numerous key players on the DL and we absolutely have to have the majority of our high-upside prospects pan out, and pan out quickly. Right now, numerous key players are on the DL, and the majority of the prospects are either not panning out, or for those who still could do it, they’re taking a while to do it (Gordon/Butler).

This marks a huge fork in the road for the GM though. It might just make sense for the long-term to “blow it up” if we can get a huge haul for Meche and Soria, and whoever we can get for Guillen, Jacobs, etc., but I don’t think Moore is in the mindset to rebuild for 2012, even if it might look like the right thing to do roster-wise. Even if it makes perfect sense “on paper,” reverting back to rebuilding mode sends a horrible message to not only the players on the team (or what’s left of them) like Greinke, who signed a long-term deal just this off-season, or Soria, who would be traded after just signing a long-term deal also this off-season, or Meche who’d be halfway through a five-year deal, but it would send a terrible message to the league that KC’s a bush league operation again. We’ve had to overpay free agents just to get them to listen, and it feels like that tide is starting to turn in terms of perception (even if the onfield antics don’t show it recently). Nevertheless, Pittsburgh inked McLouth to a long-term deal in the off-season and just dumped him for three prospects. Maybe they know something about fielding a winning team that we don’t.

More personally, I don’t see Moore pulling the trigger on Meche or Soria b/c it will be admitting defeat, admitting that he hasn’t done the job. Meche and Soria are his most brilliant acquisitions. You move them off the roster and there’s very little evidence of his shrewdness as a GM on the team. There’d be Banny and Callaspo if they can stay consistent, plus holdovers from the previous regime (high-upside prospects like Gordon and Butler plus no-upside guys like Teahen, DeJesus, and Buck) plus whatever’s left of the current gang of hapless FA’s he’s signed, and then just more prospects that we’re all really pulling for to join Butler and Gordon.

Tough call…guess it depends on the prospects, and if GMDM can do better than the past trades for Gator, Shealy, etc. I just don’t see even the highest-payroll teams in the most win-now modes dumping prospects they perceive as franchise guys.

by Royal Revival on Jun 23, 2009 4:29 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Yes! We demand more shorter, less thought out posts

One liners and images only. No complete thoughts ;)

by sterlingice on Jun 23, 2009 5:43 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No Problem

and catch phrases, only catch phrases in posts!!!! (Shazam!!)

jk

this has been an interesting post, there could be some real good deals sitting in here that possibly could happen. Though I would wager GMDM will do nothing approximating any of these and leave us all ‘head in hand’ wondering a) what is he doing? b) I guess that’s why I’m not a GM, but still!!!! .

by MarioVanPeebles Republic of China on Jun 23, 2009 6:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What I don't understand

is the never ending parade of mental blunders this team always produces. How does Boston dig up young guys like Youkilis and Pedroia that seem to play like veterans from day one? Even our so called veteran guys make completely stupid baserunning and fielding errors all the time and don’t seem to ever learn anything from them.

"Well, if we destroy Kansas the world may not hear about it for years." Blofeld

The General Theory of Royaltivity

by kabrink on Jun 24, 2009 3:23 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think there is a "presence" in each locker room...

I grew up in STL, so I heard all the time about players from other teams, via trade or as free agents, coming into the Cardinal clubhouse and immediately there is a different feeling to the game. Not because of “our best baseball fans” or anything like that (that you would immediately dismiss this post for)…but because there is a tradition behind it. I don’t know what this “presence” is. Maybe it’s tradition behind it. Maybe it’s having guys like Joe Torre and Tony LaRussa at the helm. I don’t know…but teams like Boston (right now), New York, St. Louis, etc. have players come in playing like veterans because it’s just how it’s done in those organizations.

by stlfan on Jun 25, 2009 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Kansas City Royals.
Start posting about the Royals »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

Cbs_fantasy_baseball_promo

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Royals 2009 review and 2010 manifesto

Recent FanPosts

Small
SB Nation Survey + Chance to donate $500 to a charity of this community's choice
Royalsreview_small
Completely Open Friday Fun Thread In Which I Will Also Answer Your Questions Should You Have Them
Small
Game at Fenway
Royalsreview_small
Help Me Out With Spammers
Royals40_small
A line-up that doesn't suck
New-kaufmann-stadium_small
Game 13 vs. Padres (3/17) - 3:05 CT
Gordon_small
Elijah Dukes anyone ?
Royalsreview_small
The Royals Authority Annual
Small
Out of Options Players From Around the Majors
Trust_small
Two questions about calculating replacement level

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Seattle Mariners pitcher Cliff Lee speaks during a baseball news conference at Safeco Field in Seattle on Friday, Jan. 22, 2010. Lee was acquired by the Mariners in a trade with the Philadelphia Phillies last December. (AP Photo/John Froschauer) link

Cliff Lee Out With Right Abdominal Strain

Detroit Tigers' Gerald Laird, left, is greeted by teammates Ryan Strieby, center, and Miguel Cabrera who were on base for his third-inning grand slam off New York Yankees pitcher Joba Chamberlain during a spring training baseball game in Lakeland, Fla., Wednesday, March 10, 2010.  (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar)

SB Nation's 2010 MLB Previews: Detroit Tigers, Sights Set On Success

Davey Johnson, center, a senior adviser for the Washington Nationals,  is shown in the dugout during a spring training baseball game against the New York Mets, Saturday, March 6, 2010, in Viera, Fla. (AP Photo/Rob Carr) +6 updates

Spring Training News and Notes, 3/19: Catching Up With Everyone

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Royalsreview_small Will McDonald