Comparing the Royals Through 76 Games During the Hopelessness Era
I'd like to introduce a new phrase: The Hopelessness Era. What's that you ask? The Hopelessness Era is the period which began in 2004, when we all stopped believing in the Royals, right after the 2003 bubble burst. In 2004, when it became evident that the Royals were still very very far away, how did you think they'd be in 2009? Is this what you expected? The Royals will close the 00's as the only AL Central team not to make the playoffs this decade and the only team not to win 90 games at least once.
This is a bigger topic than can be properly talked about in one post, but I think that above all else, for me at least, it's increasingly useful to rethink the second-half of this decade as one coherent whole (or an incoherent fail, as it were). A sharp line between the Moore and Baird regimes looks like too much of a convenient fiction to these eyes, a demarcation that by implication gives Moore a little too much credit and fails to note that many of the team's most prominent players remain Baird products. The idea isn't to reclaim Baird, at least not fully, because, after all, it's the Hopelessness Era. If you prefer to, at the very least you must admit that as of now Dayton has proved unable to overcome the failings he inherited. His rebuild has, essentially, reached the Single A level. In a series of posts to come, I hope to explore the reasons why the Royal resurgence that we all hoped for in 2003 never came.
So how do this year's Royals compare to previous teams after 2009?
Royals Record After 76 Games:
| Record | |
| 2004 | 29-47 |
| 2005 | 25-51 |
| 2006 | 25-51 |
| 2007 | 30-46 |
| 2008 | 33-43 |
| 2009 | 33-43 |
These numbers don't say too much, but I think they do convey the general sense of stagnation that has come to linger around this team. The bottom fell out in '05 & '06, followed by a modest improvement in 2007, and another, also modest improvement in 2008. Of course, in all these seasons, many things happened over the remaining games. In no season, however, were the Royals still looking good by this point.
Prior to the season I wrote that the first three months were definitely the easy portion of the schedule, and that the Royals had a good chance to bank a number of wins against weaker teams. It'll be interesting to watch what happens around town if the Royals continue to swoon, which according to most evidence looks possible.
2 recs |
56 comments
|
Comments
I would like to be the first
to offer up something against what I’ll call the “gratuitous negativism” that is beginning to permeate this site.
your article is well written sir. however, there are many good things going on with this team that do give us hope that things are going to be different this time.
while i want to be emphatic in saying that i am NOT defending DM or absolving him of some of the poorer moves he has made. nor am i stating with any certainty that he is the correct man for a job; it may turn out to be that he’s just not good enough to get the ship turned around.
however, we do have a process, and for better or worse, DM has convinced the Glasses to open up the checkbook and spend money in the area where it can help us most-the minor leagues. this is the only way that this team is going to become consistently competitive.
fighting a war on two fronts is very difficult to do. trying to turn around the major-league team while at the same time stocking the minor leagues has got to be a very difficult task.
All I am saying is, there has got to be an acknowledgement that this year’s team, while poorly constructed, has also experienced a litany of key injuries. so, while we are all rightfully disappointed in this year’s team, it is way, way too early to decide that DM has got to go or that he’s not the right man for the job.
let’s give credit where credit’s due, criticize where it’s warranted, and see what the results of his plans are, instead of just throwing up our hands and deciding that every move that DM makes is destined to fail.
Kansas City Royals - rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic since 1994.
by Home Run Tony Cogan on Jul 1, 2009 10:43 AM EDT reply actions 2 recs
I think
Dayton is a great GM to help us avoid 100 losses, and a crappy GM to take us to playoff contention.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Jul 1, 2009 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions 5 recs
I'd have to agree
with both posters. I don’t know if it is from a “historical perspective” or a “general overview,” but royalsreview is definitely correct in the statement that this season is lost in hopelessness to the fans of the Kansas City Royals. I don’t know any Royals’ fans who are upbeat about this season.
You, too, HRTC are correct with your “gratuitous negativism” statement, because for some reason my friends who are big Royals’ fans all (seemingly) gave up on the season as soon as Greinke’s ERA spiked over 1.00. That wasn’t the reason for it, obviously, but it was right at that same time period. Granted, it came with a road trip in which the team scored 6 runs total, or something to that effect. It was ridiculous to see…and yet all of the talk shows, the reporters, my friends…everyone jumped on the “we suck and we’re going to lose 90 games again this year” bandwagon in what seemed to be mere seconds.
Until the Crisp injury, I thought this team could still win 81 games and be a .500 team. I’m not so sure now, but I think it could be close. The division is just too horrible to not have a shot at it. For the first time since ‘06 the Royals have 3 players OPSing .800+ (for the moment). They are getting a key player (Gordon) back from injury soon (if we’re to believe what we’re told on injuries). They are getting solid #1 pitching from Greinke and Meche. No other team in the Central has two #1 pitchers on the roster.
In any case…both a great post to start the day and a just as good first comment. Good job guys!
by stlfan on Jul 1, 2009 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Moore has done some good things
but as I said in the post, essentially the rebuild of the team has reached Single A. Moore, for all the work he’s done in the minors, has left Omaha as still essentially unable to help the team in a pinch.
I don’t see injuries as being a major issue holding this team back. Moreover, the injuries have also been woefully mishandled, which again comes back to Moore.
by royalsreview on Jul 1, 2009 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I've always thought injuries were a lame excuse
because pretty much every team gets hit with the injury bug and has players that underperform. That’s normal. Not many major league rosters get through a year without being decimated in some important area. Things like the Kyle Farnsworth contract, however, just make no sense whatsoever to anyone but DM, apparently. The question is whether the FO learns from the obvious mistakes of the past offseason or repeat them again in the future.
by swing and a miss on Jul 1, 2009 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Injuries are a lame excuse, but when you have no minor league fill ins
it does get bad pretty quick. No depth will kill an injured team.
by AxDxMx on Jul 1, 2009 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rec'd simply for the irony
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
by devil_fingers on Jul 1, 2009 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
At least the Royals have one thing they haven't had in years
A legitimate star who makes Royals baseball occasionally SportsCenter highlight-worthy. It’s at least the beginning of an image makeover, if nothing else. Maybe actual good-but-not-uber-priced free agents will take a second look at KC without being offered inordinately above market value deals, who knows? /delusional
by swing and a miss on Jul 1, 2009 11:10 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
nice point
ZG has been amazing and could be starting the All-Star game, that would be pretty fuckin sweet
by I need more Esteban on Jul 1, 2009 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes it would.
If you were thinking, you wouldn't have thought that.
by Warden11 on Jul 1, 2009 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yeah, that is awesome
kudos to Dayton Moore for drafting Zack Greinke
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
by devil_fingers on Jul 1, 2009 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
If the prof. slate on every player was wiped clean (we all went back in a time machine)
and the 2002 draft was held again today, who do you think Dayton would take?
by MkeRoyal on Jul 1, 2009 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Never mind
I forgot Jeff Francouer was also in the first round that year. Don’t even bother answering this hypothetical.
by MkeRoyal on Jul 1, 2009 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
HRTC offered it up very well above IMO
I’ll put my two cents in too.
How quickly things can change in a sport where “rebuilding is a long process that we must be patient with”. Ok I have no one to source with my quote but this is definitely the same context that I saw countless times in 2007 and 2008 on this site and I totally agree with it. It seems as if all the rational thinking of how tough it is to rebuild an organization that was so awful has just disappeared.
Like HRTC, I’m not here to say that DM is doing a wonderful job and everything is fine and dandy. This year is a dissappointment (so far). DM’s window has been put closed ever so slightly, I believe.
But still, the things that he can’t control, like injuries are something that I know have affected this team winning at least a couple more games. I mean c’mon, our roster consists of Luis Hernandez, TPJ, Tug Hulett and Willie Bloomquist right now,,,,uggh. The argument will be, “well he should’ve got better players to be backups”. Well solid major leaguers don’t grow on trees and I feel that with the lower organizational depth that hasn’t quite hit the upper minors yet, in a couple years, we won’t have terrible replacement guys, we’ll have replacement level replacement guys.
This team is hard to watch right now, I’ll admit that. Mostly because of the hitters. To me, a solid middle of the lineup guy + Alex Gordon is all we’d need to be right in this division race with our pitching. I don’t think that is sooo far off that we all need to jump ship.
My final question is, If the Royals finish with more wins than last season, just like every season under Dayton Moore, what will your opinion be of where the KC Royals are going?
BTW, good post RR
by I need more Esteban on Jul 1, 2009 11:18 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
the problem is that Moore has been EXTREMELY active at the ML level
and he has failed miserably
it as not as if he’s merely been stockpiling depth, he hasn’t
look at last year’s trade deadline: no major moves
clearly, the plan was to build a team to compete this season and next, with the reinforcements coming in from the system after that
by royalsreview on Jul 1, 2009 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Very hard to be optimistic
I wish could look at the injuries as a legitimate reason why this team is bad right now, but to me, that’s a bit of a red herring. Let’s be honest: there just isn’t that much talent on this team, and that falls almost exclusively at this point on Moore’s shoulders.
Look up and down the roster (including the DL). Greinke is a star, and Soria is very good. As a Royal, Meche has pitched very well in spots but terrible in others (I disagree that the Royals have “two number one starters”). You can make a case that Butler and Hochevar have a chance to be above-average players down the road (along with Gordon, when he returns). The rest of the roster is primarily filled with average to below-average major leaguers with limited upside at best. It’s really as simple as that, I’m afraid.
I, like everyone else, am hoping that the team’s recent increase in spending on the draft and international free agents will pay dividends down the road. But right now, it’s extremely difficult to look at how the team is being run and find reasons for optimism.
by cookierojas73 on Jul 1, 2009 11:34 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm optimistic but cynical
It’s nearly impossible to be a Royals fan and not be cynical about the future. I fully expect Hosmer/Moustakas/Crow to flame out. DM will continue to make dumb FA signings. TPJ will be on the roster next year. Ad nauseum.
But I’m also optimistic. By all accounts, the farm system is improving. Our starting pitching is very good. Glass spends some money now. DM will get lucky with a FA or two.
I don’t think DM will ever get us that parade, but maybe no one can do that. We’re not too far from a 85-win season. Of course, if he didn’t make so many terrible moves this offseason we could have challenged for 85 wins this year.
At this point, all I want is to be within 5 games in the middle of August. When the farm system starts producing players in a few years, even DM shouldn’t be able to mess things up too badly with dumb FAs. It’s too bad he’s so bad at evaluating FA talent and the market, but our farm system should help us out in a few years.
We just need to be patient. We’ve never heard that before.
by hippdoghipp on Jul 1, 2009 11:47 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I may be too optimistic
But if there’s one thing about this season that’s pissing me off, it’s how we’re treating injuries. Gordon, Aviles, Crisp, Jack, Meche all still have at least some potential to make this team better. They all have tons of gas left in the tank. Who knows how many promising careers we could be destroying?
Eh, my sig needs a little time off
by ratherfantastic on Jul 1, 2009 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, I know
tons.
Eh, my sig needs a little time off
by ratherfantastic on Jul 1, 2009 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey, you are absolutely right
One of the things that I think DM really needs to do is to overhaul this part of the team. There are just too many instances of injuries becoming worse than expected.
And now, Mike Aviles is out with TJ, just heard on 810.
If Meche goes out and pitches today and gets hurt, as much as I hate to say it, that may be a fireable offense re: DM.
Kansas City Royals - rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic since 1994.
by Home Run Tony Cogan on Jul 1, 2009 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It is depressing to be a Royals fan
But I do see some signs of hope for the future. Maybe I’m just looking too hard. And you might be totally right when you say Dayton might be the guy that’ll keep us from the absolute laughingstock of 2005, but he’ll never get us to the playoffs. Not that that’s a goal to shoot for or anything.
I think you have to look at our pitching as a positive. We’re not as good as the numbers of April, but when’s the last time we’ve had a league average staff? Grienke’s a star. Meche is above league average. Banny and Hooch are going to be around league average. Crow is a year-and-a-half away (hopefully), plus you have other young arms in A-ball or rookie league that have actual talent and weren’t college seniors we drafted because we’re forced to draft someone.
Obviously, our rotation in 2011 isn’t going to be Greinke, Meche, Hooch, Banny and Crow (I hope it is, but someone’s going to get hurt or traded or both). The thing that’s encouraging to me is that we actually have options (now those options might not be MLB ready right now, but they will be in due time).
I guess I’m so beaten down that I’ll take Sample, Melville, Montgomery, Duffy, Rosa, Cortes (even Davies) et al in the minors as a realistic option for the foreseeable future as opposed to Redman or Elarton toeing the slab on Opening Day. I know that not all of those guys are going to make it. But the organizational depth was just so bad for so long that we have to be patient.
I’m truly envious of the Twins and how they take a chance and trade away Garza to get an impact bat. But it’s not really THAT big of a chance because all they have to do is call up Perkins or Blackburn. I’ve got to hold on to the hope that once Dayton gets his pitching in line with where he has realistic options to call up, then he’ll start making some trades to go get a young, impact bat. Maybe those trades will flame out, but I don’t really want to think about that scenario.
I’m also optimistic that Dayton will learn from his mistakes. It’s clear he’s a bit of an impatient shopper (Guillen, Farnsworth, HoRam were all obviously signed before the market revealed their true price tags). A little financial restraint might be in order for the free agent market. But I understand what he was trying to do with the Guillen signing. He wanted an impact bat and outbid only himself for it. I’m not happy about it, but I understand the reasoning.
I also understand what a big mess Dayton was left. Again, not happy about it, but I understand. It’s going to take a few more years of good drafts to get us where we need to be.
To me, that’s honestly probably the most frustrating part of being a Royals fan. If you as an owner don’t want to outspend the Yankees for FAs, I understand that. Not happy about it, but I understand that the playing field isn’t level in that area. But there’s no excuse for not being first-class in building your organizational depth. All of those players are relatively cheap and it’s simply a numbers game. Not only were we an embarrassment on the field for so long, but it’s just so frustratring to have been an absolute embarrassment in the draft and Latin America too. We were just shopping at thrift stores on all levels (not even Wal-Mart, but Salvation Army). Unfathomable that you’d run an organization like that, but at the very least, at least Dayton has gotten the Glasses to start spending some real money in the draft an on scouting.
So there’s my hope for the future. Pitching depth and spending money in the draft. And blind faith. And probably a little bit of naiveity. Or just stupidity. But whatever the reason, I’ll never root for another team.
Was once caught putting at night ... with the 15-year old daughter of the dean
by mitch cumstein on Jul 1, 2009 12:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
On a brighter note
The Chefs (intentional misspelling) are starting to look more poised to shock the NFL and make the playoffs every day I read more stuff about the Division. And Mizzou, KU, and K-State (Basketball at the least) look poised to have good seasons. At least we have those.
Eh, my sig needs a little time off
by ratherfantastic on Jul 1, 2009 12:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
If the Chiefs make the Playoffs in '09
I’ll be more shocked than if Mike Jacobs wins a gold glove at any point in his career
BOOM! ROASTED!
by GoBabies!! on Jul 1, 2009 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Have you seen how that division is looking?
It’s basically the AL Central of the NFL. The Raiders are being led into the great unknown of sucky football by a madman. The Broncos have imploded from losing Shanahan, Cutler, and possibly Brandon Marshall. The Chargers are a threat, but they are chronic underachievers. The Chiefs have great chances to do anything from make the playoffs to be in last place again.
Eh, my sig needs a little time off
by ratherfantastic on Jul 1, 2009 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I stand by my comment
San Diego is going to RUN AWAY with this division with something North of an 11-5 record, probably 5-1 or 6-0 vs KC, DEN & OAK.
None of the other 3, KC, DEN & OAK will sniff .500. Denver will finish 2nd, followed by KC, then Oakland
BOOM! ROASTED!
by GoBabies!! on Jul 1, 2009 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm tired of all the anti-Dayton Moore bias and negativity on this site
It’s just like people who complain about Trey Hillman’s managaing, but don’t realize the terrible injury problems he’s had to deal with. Then they have the nerve to criticize the training staff, as if injuries have been a really big problem!
They’re the same kind of people who think that Dayton Moore should be blamed for the failures of the players he’s acquired just a much as he’s given credit for those he’s acquired.
I’m tired of the inconsistency. This team is on the way up. Willie Bloomquist, Jose Guillen, Kyle Farnsworth, Ron Mahay, Miguel Olivo… WINNERS.
Concede now!
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
by devil_fingers on Jul 1, 2009 12:56 PM EDT reply actions 4 recs
it's going to get worse
the royals went 10-16 in June, with a slate featuring: CLE, CIN, ARZ, HOU, PIT and a blah STL team
by royalsreview on Jul 1, 2009 1:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The Royals currently have the same record as last year
but last year also included in incredible September to get to 75 wins
by Top Ramen on Jul 1, 2009 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's been a helluva decade
one third place finish & one season over .500
by royalsreview on Jul 1, 2009 1:05 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, but it's not like they've lost every single game!
Any way you can stop being so negative and biased?
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
by devil_fingers on Jul 1, 2009 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're pretty dedicated to run a blog about the Royals like this
Even if there is that sense of despair and gloom hanging over the site, it’s a damn fine blog. Golf Claps to you.
Eh, my sig needs a little time off
by ratherfantastic on Jul 1, 2009 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
agreed
I love how people rip on RR’s Fandom for being “too negative,” when it’s pretty clear that he’s as far from a bandwagon, fair-weather fan as one can get.
I guess he just hates freedom.
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
by devil_fingers on Jul 1, 2009 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Being negative
Means the terrorists win.
Yeah, it was a stupid screen name.
by CentralChamps2009 on Jul 1, 2009 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Key injuries are a valid excuse on a team still developing organizational depth (the no margin for error argument again)
It’s clear that this lineup just plain sucks, and at face value, that Moore has grabbed a bunch of questionable FAs to fill in the holes. However, I think if a couple of things key happened differently this year, we’d all be singing GMDM’s praises about his miracle work and super-human baseball intellect. Those things are as follows:
1. Crisp and Gordon stay healthy and play the majority of the year (a reasonable assumption)
2. Gordon and Butler have break out years and emerge as top-flight hitters (a big assumption, but something we’ve all been anticipating)
3. Aviles doesn’t necessarily repeat his rookie year stats, but reverts to league average (again, reasonable)
Yes, they’re big assumptions (especially #2), but these are all things we were counting on. The lineup is punchless right now, but it was built around assumption #2 above. Those guys emerge as real, consistent threats at the plate, and suddenly 1 through 6 in the lineup (hypothetically, Crisp-Callaspo-Butler-Guillen-Gordon-Jacobs, or something like that) is an intimidating list, not to mention Teahen, DeJesus, Aviles, Olivo, or however things shake out. I don’t want to play the lineup game but I’m just saying that FAs like Jacobs were added as complementary parts based on the above assumptions. If Gordon and Butler become forces to be reckoned with, suddenly guys like Guillen and Jacobs become great role players protecting those hitters, but instead these guys are the focal point of our lineup, with fucking Willie Bloomquist batting 2nd.
Yes, every team deals with injuries, but on a team still working on building organizational depth, enough injuries and enough slower than expected development is just an absolute killer. I agree that Moore hasn’t done all that well on the offensive side, but if some of those things on the list happen, this offense is so much better.
by Royal Revival on Jul 1, 2009 1:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
good points
I wonder though, how much of a difference Butler & Gordon would have made: they weren’t bad last year when you look at it, and I don’t think it’s reasonable to expect a Pujols-like peak at this point…
so… maybe two or three wins better, that’s about it
by royalsreview on Jul 1, 2009 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
not sure why Moore should get an ounce of credit for anythign Gordon and Butler do
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
by devil_fingers on Jul 1, 2009 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
he should get credit
for failing to trade Butler for Yuni.
I guess.
"Well, if we destroy Kansas the world may not hear about it for years." Blofeld
The General Theory of Royaltivity
by kabrink on Jul 1, 2009 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and if you replaced Butler with Pujols this season, the Royals stil wouldn’t be a .500 team.
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
by devil_fingers on Jul 1, 2009 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe, but, of course, Gordon, Butler, and Aviles were all pre-Moore acquisitions
and he “allegedly” tried to trade Billy Butler for Yuniesky Betancourt, and, of course, did everything he could to not play Aviles last season
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
by devil_fingers on Jul 1, 2009 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nowhere do I argue that they're Moore's acquisitions or that he deserves credit for them, but only that his acquisitions were geared towards building around their emergence...
which hasn’t really happened. But if they make a leap and Crisp is around and Aviles is ok, the offensive looks good, therefore GMDM looks good. Nobody’s talking Pujols-leap, and yes, AG and BB were OK last year but c’mon, guys, I know we’re Royals fans and we have understandably low standards, but the two COMBINED for 27 HRs and 114 RBIs last year. If it was 2006-ish and we were told that’s what they’d combine for in 2008, we’d be somewhat disappointed, let alone what 2009 is turning out to be.
And the notion of the impact of replacing Butler with Pujols one-for-one misses the second biggest point of the post, which is that the right combination of guys in a lineup can be catalytic and greater than the sum of the parts, but by losing a couple of key linchpins, it becomes less than the sum of its parts. Losing your leadoff hitter, along with your hitter who you’re counting on to emerge as the best hitter in the lineup, along with your hitter that, well let’s face it, keeps people like Willie Bloomquist and TPJ on the bench, sorry, these are huge, huge losses on a team like this.
by Royal Revival on Jul 1, 2009 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and that's what wins above replacement tells us
At his pace when he was injured, Crisp was going to be about 2.5-3 wins above replacement
So losing him, assuming he would have kept up the pace he was on, means two more wins for the Royals over the season, assuming that Dayton’s replacements were replacement level.
Gordon healthy is another two wins. well, assuming the team would be smart enough to keep Teahen on the field by playing him over Jose Guillen… which they surely would have been, right?
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
by devil_fingers on Jul 1, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
anyway,
Gordon = 3 more wins, assume Teaehn over Guillen, Cirps healthy = 2 more wins, = still not a .500 team over the full year,
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
by devil_fingers on Jul 1, 2009 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's neat but you skipped the part about assumption #2 (hee hee, #2)
Gordon and Butler actually making the leap and being good hitters, which is key to the whole thing. Don’t know what that’d translate to in terms of WAR.
Also, I’m not a stat geek and don’t know much about WAR, but can you really compare/apply a player’s WAR to the team’s actual record? The current sum of the the roster’s “WARP1” on BP adds up to 20.3 compared to the team’s 33 wins.
by Royal Revival on Jul 1, 2009 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
a replacement team isn't a 0-win team
WARP was really screwed up until lately when they fixed it…
WAR is better. In general, a replacement level team is considerd to be a .300 team
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
by devil_fingers on Jul 1, 2009 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
cool...what's the best source for WAR stats...BP?
by Royal Revival on Jul 1, 2009 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
FanGraphs
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
by devil_fingers on Jul 1, 2009 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with this
We’ve all been happy (and shocked) to see Glass step it up some lately. However, my inbred Royals cynicism FORCES me to expect this to be a relatively short episode of money spending. I fully expect Glass to prove that he is not fully committed to this thing but also won’t ever sell to someone else. He just wants the bragging rights of owning a team.
"Well, if we destroy Kansas the world may not hear about it for years." Blofeld
The General Theory of Royaltivity
by kabrink on Jul 1, 2009 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What's somewhat disturbing about the injuries and the AAA team
Moore has been lauded for his ability to build pitching depth by picking up guys to fill in at AAA. Guys like Bruce Chen, Ponson, Roman Colon, DiNardo, Luke Hudson, (Bobby Keppel?), etc. to fill in whenever a pitcher goes down to an injury or ineffectiveness. None of the AAA pickups are expected to be world-beaters, but players who can come in and give a slightly above-replacement level performance.
The same can’t be said for hitters though. There have been very, very few hitters picked up – (Brayan Pena and Luis Hernandez are probably the best known). AAA is pretty much a wasteland for replacement level+ hitters outside of Kila (and possibly Thorman), and it’s remained that way for much of Moore’s tenure. He’s known that the draft picks aren’t going to make it to AAA for a few more years, but hasn’t gone about stockpiling the hitting depth with nearly as much emphasis as the pitching. As a result, when a hitter goes down, there’s no one competent ready to take their place.
Then, of the few decent hitters in AAA, none are allowed the opportunity to showcase it at the pros. Brayan over Jacobs/Olivo, Kila over Jacobs, Hernandez over TPJ, Thorman over Jacobs/Maier/JoGui, Shealy over Gload, etc. Aviles over TPJ is the only success story, and only came about because of TPJ’s historically awful season.
So, we’re only left to assume that this is the offense he wants. Which is disturbing.
by Top Ramen on Jul 1, 2009 3:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 













