Poll: Should Dayton Moore Be Fired Right Now?
It seems Dayton Moore's name has - like the Royals themselves - become more of a punchline in recent months, rightfully deserved or not. I've been thinking about generating a poll asking this simple question for several weeks now, but have finally come around to carrying that action through. Some may argue his questionable trades and free agent signings of recent months (and years) don't bear much significance, some believe they are a damning indicator of Moore's ruthless old school vulnerabilities, and few actually support every move.
I would like each RR poster to go on record as stating whether they would fire Dayton Moore right now. If possible, provide explanations below. What have been his strengths - I mean, his true strengths - if any? And dwell on his weaknesses and let the punchlines carry on.....
58 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
YES!
For reasons we already know. His evaluation of major league players the past two seasons has been awful.
The only strength is that Glass started spending money on amateur talent and PD when DM arrived, and I assume this would continue if DM was fired.
I voted No
But I didn’t feel good about it.
GMDM has done SOME good in his time w/ KC.
Meche signing
Getting Greinke signed a month before he channeled Bob Gibson
Increased spending in the draft
Increased spending Internationally
Trading for Bannister
Picking up Ram-Ram
Signing Soria long term to a very team friendly contract
But that being said, we all know his bad points too.
Signing Ho-Ram
Jacobs
Getting rid of Ram-Ram (though I didn’t hate that trade when it happened, and I think if Crisp hadn’t gotten hurt it could have worked out well)
Trading for Yuni
et all
The thing that I keep coming back to is that his WORST moves BY FAR were made last off-season and this season. I can’t help but wonder if Ownership is meddling in what he is doing now. Giving him the typical, “Where’s the results?” talk, and demanding improvements be made at the MLB level ASAP.
I dunno. Maybe I’ll get labelled as a GMDM apologist, and I don’t want that. I think his disregard for OBP, despite strong rhetoric saying the opposite is laughable. But the fact that the vast majority of his shitty moves came right before or during the season which we move into the “New” K. It looks to me like ownership wanted him to gut things to bring in players that they thought would sell tickets…
BOOM! ROASTED!
well said
although i really don’t believe that DM would stand for meddling by the glasses. i do think they have some right to ask for results, in fact i see that as a good thing in that it means that they really do want to win.
i don’t want to be seen as a DM apologist either, and in fact i don’t think i am. i do think he deserves more time. in my mind he hasn’t done anything yet that i would consider a “fireable offense”. having said that, he obviously needs to improve. i think this offseason, if poor, would probably seal his fate with me. he has been given significant resources and thus far has not produced enough results.
he should do better, and i hope he does better, because i believe the results could prove to be disastrous should he be fired.
Kansas City Royals - rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic since 1994.
by Home Run Tony Cogan on Jul 30, 2009 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions
That Crisp-Ramirez trade made sense at the time.
Can’t hold it against him that Crisp got hurt. As much as I gripe myself I think any GM should get five seasons.
i guess that's your opinion....
alot of people, myself included disagreed. He hasnt been good, he hasnt been healthy, he was expensive and soon to be a FA.
Fire Everyone
by billybeingbilly on Jul 31, 2009 12:48 AM EDT up reply actions
But was Crisp ever healthy this year?
would a competent training staff caught something was wrong in his shoulder and voided the trade?
It makes me wonder how Milton Bradley was rejected for failing his physical, only to go on and kick ass the following year (granted in Texas), if that trade hadn’t been vetoed would it have been possible for us to flip him for a good player, not that GMDM has ever done that.
Desperately hoping for Desperate Measures
by averagegatsby on Jul 31, 2009 12:53 AM EDT up reply actions
the frustrating thing about dayton...
is that he is good, not great, regarding pitchers… but utterly horrible with position players
I'd demote him to scouting director
And let someone else take the GM reigns.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
I voted No...
and I say so not because of the stuff GoBabies said but because he has surrounded himself with some good people. If he takes a good hard look at the team he built I think its possible that a rational individual will make changes, maybe he will even surround himself with more good people.
I guess it comes down to the fact that the stuff he has done organization wide is a wash with the stuff he has done at the major league level. I think he deserves another shot purely because of what he has accomplished drafting wise.
Desperately hoping for Desperate Measures
no, atleast not yet
He has made a lot of bad, head-scratching moves in his time here, but he has also made a few good moves also. And. lets face it, it would take a very good- great GM to win here. At this point, DM doesnt even look like an average GM, but that all could change if he continues to improve our minor league system. I think he deserves another year or two to see if the farm system he has assembled can push this team towards contention.
All along, 2010 has been the target year for contention, so I believe it would be worthless to fire him before next year, even though he has not done a very good job so far.
zack greinke for cy young
I'm mostly a Mariners and Rays fan. But the Royals are my next favorite team.
Due to the fact Moore keeps signing our crappy leftovers. (HoRam, Guillen, Olivo, Yuni, Bloomquist), I’d like to see him fired. KC deserves better.
Don't forget Meche...
oh wait he isn’t crappy. Im sure we will sign Ichiro when he is like 41
Desperately hoping for Desperate Measures
by averagegatsby on Jul 30, 2009 11:55 PM EDT up reply actions
It will probably be similar to when the Chiefs signed Ronnie Lott...
get hurt in training camp and never play again.
Desperately hoping for Desperate Measures
by averagegatsby on Jul 31, 2009 12:40 AM EDT up reply actions
actually I think you can make the argument that Meche may be underpaid...
if you look at the numbers of his that aren’t influenced by his surrounding cast he has bee really good.
Desperately hoping for Desperate Measures
by averagegatsby on Jul 31, 2009 12:46 AM EDT up reply actions
That's true, didn't think about it that way.
I would have like to see Meche resign with Seattle, but not for his hefty price tag.
Yes
As said above, for his COMPLETE inability at evaluating/acquiring MLB level offensive players.
"I'll take some Coco with that please"
A reluctant no
But I can foresee changing my mind at a moment’s notice. He’s on that short a lead with me.
by Siberian Khatru on Jul 31, 2009 12:08 AM EDT reply actions
I'm torn, I haven't voted yet
On the “no” side., it just “feels” too early (now I"m talking like a on of Dayton’s “top people.”), he hasn’t been here long.
ON the “yes” side, I’m convinced that there are many, many people in the industry who could come in and do a far, far, better job that Dayton is, even starting now.
One issue with the latter is if this would be good timing during the season, or wait until the offseason.
The final issue is whether the poll is asking as if I were the owner, or just a fan. If the former, I would say “yes,” because as owner I would make sure the timing was right, then put together a group of trusted people (who actually know about baseball) and find a good guy to put together a team in a non-traidtional style (a la Tampa Bay, perhaps) — so the “GM” would be more like a club president, in that sense.
But if the Glasses are assumed to be in charge… wel,l it gets more complicated. Dayton was a good candidate, seemingly, and one gets the feeling the knew to hire him because he brought prestige with him. Would they be smart enough, if Dayton were fired (whenever) to find someone better? I don’t know. Worse — would they cut the budget back to a quasi-Marlins level (but without the F.O. with the smarts of the Marlins, Rays, or the current Pirates F.O.)
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
we just can't have all this instability...
The Royals have had <strong>three</strong> GMs since the early 1990s... we need STABILITY
+1 on the timing
If Moore is going to be sacked, better to do that during the offseason, not midseason. That is the biggest reason why I voted no. That being said, I do feel like we have a strong internal candidate to replace Moore already (Arbuckle). And, to be honest, part of me feels like Moore deserves one more year—he was hired in 2006, he has basically only had about three years, and I don’t think that is necessarily enough time to fairly evaluate a GM, especially one who was given the thankless task of cleaning up the mess left behind by Allard Baird and Co. But only a part of me feels that way.
I think that Moore’s last offseason has been a resounding failure, and that he has sacrificed a significant part of the Royals’ pitching future (RamRam, Nunez, Cortes, et al) for almost nothing in return, and the Guillen signing has turned into a fiasco. Moore’s apparent genius in signing Gil Meche feels more and more like lightning in a bottle, a lone consolation prize in an array of abysmal FA signings. I have next to no confidence in Moore at the moment, but at the very least, the Royals should ride out the season with him at the helm before they consider giving him the ol’ heave-ho. So for now, I vote no, but I could very easily change my vote come October.
I agree with this, I also think Mr. Glass should keep him on a short leash with any extensions and free agent signings.
he was hired in 2006, he has basically only had about three years, and I don’t think that is necessarily enough time to fairly evaluate a GM, especially one who was given the thankless task of cleaning up the mess left behind by Allard Baird and Co. But only a part of me feels that way.
He can get 4, NOT 5.
I agree with you now
As the trade deadline has come and gone, Dayton can no longer screw this team up worse til the offseason. Might as well ride him out for the year, and Trey too for that matter.
Voted No.
I wanted to vote yes, but he deserves whatever credit is available for the expanded budget in the draft, minor leagues, and payroll. One more off-season full of overpriced shitty players and I’ll gladly flip on this issue.
He can get 4, NOT 5.
what's the point of an expanded budget if we still suck just as much....
or more?
Fire Everyone
by billybeingbilly on Jul 31, 2009 12:57 AM EDT up reply actions
that expanded budget is a black mark for me
Fire Everyone
by billybeingbilly on Jul 31, 2009 12:57 AM EDT up reply actions
Hopefully the expanded budget pays off in 2 or 3 years
when the draft picks and guys in the low minors come through. If the Royals are in the same shape in 6 years, then it’s a HUGE black mark.
He can get 4, NOT 5.
Absolutely NO!
I work for the Kansas City, Missouri School District, an organization that makes the Royals look like a well oiled machine. The analogy I always use to describe the change in Superintendents (GM/Manager) is asking people what it would look like if a major league baseball team like the Royals changed GMs every 18-36 months. It’s not that it isn’t okay to make a change, but the danger of making multiple changes in a small amount of time without allowing any sort of plan develop is doomed to failure. Any Superintendent coming in will have their own philosophy (may it be a canned curriculum program or the lust for extra fast sub-.300 oba pieces of grit), which will inherently cause a complete re-organization of personnel. You have now put yourself 3 years (at the minimum) of having a reliable and valid chance of having success AND you have put yourself 3 years (at the minimum) of even being able to evaluate if you have a quality person running your organization. If you’re going to make a change, you’d better be bringing in the holy fucking messiah, because otherwise you most likely will be having this same conversation in 18-36 months from your change in leadership.
Turning Kool-Aid to Jesus Juice since 2009.
Really? look at Seattle, from worst to contention in ONE year.
Done almost entirely through productive tradeing and free agents when he had virtually nothing.
Good pickups this year and last year for the money we had, could have us winning the central handily, instead we are a laughingstock.
Go Royals!
and a stable of farm guys ready to go
soon to change name to, "The Not So Curious Case of Benjamin Bratt"
by MarioVanPeebles Republic of China on Aug 1, 2009 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions
seattle had a stable of farm guys?
Fire Everyone
by billybeingbilly on Aug 1, 2009 11:08 PM EDT up reply actions
this last little exchange
somehow made me feel icky.
Hopes fade once again from blue to red. Go New Chiefs!!
Gotta be no
You’re not going to be able to recruit candidates if you can’t demonstrate in good faith that the previous candidates have had full opportunities. Moore’s focus is revamping the minor leagues. Only two of his drafts are in the system at this point, and both have been well received. You’ve got to at least give the core of Dayton’s plan a minimum time to play out (a couple more years still), or what will you say to the next guy?
if moore's goal is revamping the minor leagues...
then why did we double the major league payroll by signing a bunch of scrubs
Fire Everyone
by billybeingbilly on Jul 31, 2009 4:51 AM EDT up reply actions
well
(1) he didn’t double it, but yes, he increased it
(2) you’re not really making a clear point. if you’re saying that the fact that moore has signed players at the major league level proves that improving the minor league system is not is the core of his plan to improve the team, i think that’s a pretty weak argument. it’s hard to imagine a GM not signing any players at the MLB level. now if you’re saying that moore has signed bad players, and that is sufficiently condemning to scrap the plan before the core strategy has had time to bear fruit, you’ve got a more defensible point. i think moore has shown that he is not good enough at valuing talent at the MLB level for the royals to become competitive on a regular basis UNLESS the revamped farm system starts churning out a steady stream of stars.
i think that’s unlikely, and that even with a great farm system, you’re still going to have to be strong in all facets of the job, so i think Moore will ultimately fail. but you can’t bring a guy in and listen to him lay out a 6 year plan for improvement, hire him on the basis of that 6 year plan, and then fire him after 3 years without very clear and solid cause. this is baseball—there isn’t a reliable 2 year plan to turn a perenial loser into a regular contender. if you let moore go, you want to bring in a guy who wants to build a winner over the long term, and he’ll know that he’ll need more than 3 years to make that happen. when you fail as a GM, you don’t get another chance. when he sees you’re bringing in guys promising them 6 years and letting them go after 3, do you think he’ll sign on with you or wait for the next opportunity?
Moore's position player draft picks have failed immensely
….and the position players we have in the system have, for the most part, regressed. Sure, there has been Kila, but come on! He’ll be a San Diego Padre next year. Lough has probably been his best pick in terms of actual production/results, and although I’m excited about it, he still won’t be an A prospect even if he keeps this pace simply due to the lack of pure power numbers.
And those pitchers we have dominating and/or pitching effectively in the low minors? Expect one or two of those to regress and one or two more to be turned into Willy Pierre.
Also, there’s the mysterious and progressive regressing of our system annually.
Baird is still causing the regression
you can’t recover from that overnight
’cept for guys like Kila and Bianchi. Again, thank goodness Dayton Moroe drafted those guys. and Hochevar.
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
by Matt Klaassen on Jul 31, 2009 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions
I voted yes, but I have mixed feelings
I agree with the comments that any GM deserves time to turn things around. Three years isn’t enough. That said, I feel that some of DM’s moves have been so bad and wasteful that he doesn’t deserve anymore opportunities. What’s the point of spending $30MM more for the same results as several years ago? With the minor league system very weak and payroll maxed out, DM hasn’t given himself many opportunities to improve this team. He should have replenished the farm system sooner, when he still had credibility. Now every other GM in the league assumes that DM is going to take their garbage…and he probably will.
I think today will be a somewhat pivotal day
If he makes another couple of boneheaded moves today (trading Banny, DDJ, or Teahen for crap), then it’s time to make a more snap judgement.
Otherwise, he gets this offseason a chance to right to ship and next season he’s on the hot seat as much for the major league club as for his guys in the minors.
I voted NO, but not resoundingly
I believe in the 5 year term, what would give me confidence is bold no bullshit moves dare I say oldschool moves. Trading JoGui (eating his damn salary) and get a couple low level prospects with upside, dumping Jacobs, dumping people that aren’t performing sending a message that players need to perform or pack.
by Your_Moms_Boyfriend on Jul 31, 2009 11:29 AM EDT reply actions
Yes
I’m shocked that the voting is as close as it is.
The immoderate moderator
by Scott McKinney on Jul 31, 2009 11:51 AM EDT reply actions
No
We should try to be a bit less reactionary than your standard RBIs and Wins fan.
Yeah, Dayton sucks in a lot of ways, and his personality has become rather off-putting. But fire him right now? Leaving aside the idea that firing any GM right before the trade deadline is a terrible idea (since that’s not really the intent of the question), I still feel like this would need to be handled a) in a more delicate manner, and b) in the offseason, please.
Also, for whatever reason I don’t have the fear that Dayton will screw up the team inexorably in the next year or two. Trading for the Betancourts and Freels of the world is stupid and wasteful, but it’s not going to destroy the team. It’s not as if he’s trading Meche for relief prospects and signing Olivo to an $8MM/year extension. Letting Dayton stick around a little longer isn’t going to set us back as far as replacing him right now with an unknown probably would.
We owe Betancourt $5M next year, IIRC, and Olivo is a better player, so $8M sounds right on target.
Seriously, I think the problem is that we haven’t been reactionary enough. The standard RBIs and Wins fan thinks Dayton Moore is doing some good stuff and injuries have derailed this season. Dayton’s trades for Jacobs and Crisp have derailed this season directly leading to the failure of the bullpen. Nunez and RamRam have been missed terribly.
One old school quality of mine
(This pertains to Moore’s trading of bullpen arms and “re-stocking” of that area)….but one glaring old-school quality of mine is that a bullpen can make a world of difference in the outcome of a season. Proper implementation of that bullpen can go further. How many games would the Royals be with Boston’s bullpen and proper implementation of that ’pen (i.e. usage of situational lefties which, IMO, are important, in addition to stretching out of the closers role or even abandonment altogether). With a team that plays many close games (i.e. bad offense, good starting pitching – like us!)….that can make a 70-win team an 85-win team. Yeah. I said it.
I voted no
merely because I think he should get more time. I do think, however, we should be allowed to line up and punch him in the gut (or face) because of his moves in the meantime, and the pompous and arrogant manner in which he’s made them. (Or hasn’t made them, as was the case today.) He should know what it feels like to root for a team that makes these moves.
No
The Royals are contending at AA, High A and one of their rookie short season clubs. He has hired some very good front office talent in Arbuckle and the guy who built up the Milwaukee farm system (sorry, I am blanking on his name). The Royals are finally competing for some of the international players.
He signed a solid pitcher in Meche and got an all star closer through rule 5 in Soria.
Call me crazy, but I don’t think the Royals are that far away from contending.
With Greinke, Meche, Hochevar, Bannister there is a solid core of starters that could be spectacular. They have the closer, and both Rosa and Hayes are interesting AAA relievers.
Billy Butler is turning into the hitter they thought he would be and is doing better defensively than thought. Alex Gordon IMO will be a very good 3rd baseman.
DDJ is a solid outfielder. Teahen can cover just about any position that the Royals have a weakness except short.
Aviles will provide Betancourt and/or Callaspo competition next year. Bianchi will be up in 2011.
Mahay and Yabuta’s contracts are up this year. Cut or trade Jacobs. Cut or trade either Olivo or Buck and use Pena as your second catcher.
They need more speed at CF, SS and 2nd – they should be able to address at least one of those positions in the off-season.
The bad news is that Betancourt, Guillen and Farnsworth will all be on the roster next year, but it will be their last year (or does Betancourt have another year?). I am more familiar with football than baseball, but it always seems to me that players do better in their last contract year.
The guy who built of the Milwaukee farm system
is in Seattle, improving the team trading his crappy and/or overpaid players like Yuniesky Betancourt to the few GMs dumb enough to fall for it.
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
by Matt Klaassen on Jul 31, 2009 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions
Berroacourt
has 2 1/2 years or something ridiculously stupid like that.
Also, why wouldn’t you just make Pena the starting catcher and dump BOTH Olivo and Buck and find a different younger backup with growth potential?
Hopes fade once again from blue to red. Go New Chiefs!!
Moore is not responsible for half of your reasons, Baird is
Billy Butler is turning into the hitter they thought he would be and is doing better defensively than thought. Alex Gordon IMO will be a very good 3rd baseman. DDJ is a solid outfielder. Teahen can cover just about any position that the Royals have a weakness except short.
Baird drafted all of these.
The bad news is that Betancourt, Guillen and Farnsworth will…
Moore did these
Moore really hasn’t done much right other than trade for Callaspo, get lucky with Meche, draft Soria on a scout’s advice and then extend him, and extend Greinke. The draft is possibly another bright spot, but we will see.
Yes and No.
He should be the GM except for trades, determining roster spots, negotiations, and signing any players. Someone or several someones else should do those jobs, or at least have the final say.
Go Royals!
Best possible solution for the always stringent Glass-family
Hire a stats guy who would be willing to serve as G.M. for a historically low salary (relative to era).
Sadly, the team probably wouldn't be any worse
and probably would be better, since other than Meche, Moore’s “money” signings have been garbage
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
by Matt Klaassen on Aug 1, 2009 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions
I voted no, but only because I think "not yet"
He has done some really good things
He has done some really strange things
Many players out of his control have come up short, got hurt, ect.
Let’s let this play out until he can't put together a bullpen with shoe string and bubble gum
wait, ok, let it ride for two more years until the farm system can actually start putting people in, and HE ACTUALLY DOES IT
soon to change name to, "The Not So Curious Case of Benjamin Bratt"
by MarioVanPeebles Republic of China on Aug 1, 2009 11:36 AM EDT reply actions
Voted Yes
But it should be done this offseason. You should never want someone to lose their job, but who seriously has faith in Moore at this point? He sounded ridiculous defending himself in such a condescending manner. He spent 55 million on a starting pitcher that turned out well. Not sure you can credit someone for signing a player for 55 million bucks? Doesn’t he supposed to be good? What if Silva or Jones were signed for Guillen money like Moore tried to do?
He made some decent moves before last offseason, but the tweaks he made this year have completely backfired. Our bullpen used to be a strength and now has to be completely rebuilt. Our offense sucks.

by 













