And here's the irony: a strict slotting system -- at least initially -- will actually hurt the Royals as they currently operate [due to their recent over-slot signings in the draft]. It's a bizarre thing that a rule designed to curb spending could actually hurt the Royals. But it's true. . .
In the international market, the Royals haven't been serious bidders on the most expensive prospects the last two years, preferring to spread their money a bit more.
---I say, maybe it won't hurt that much because they can just put the money into the international market instead of the later rounds.
3 months ago
BrRoyal
10 comments
0 recs |
Comments
I say, maybe it won't hurt that much because they can just put the money into the international market instead of the later rounds.
Yea, and so will lots of other smart teams that have more money than us. And you’ll end up with all of them signing with the top teams. At least with the draft, we have exclusive negotiating rights.
I don’t know why I’ve heard from so many Royals fans that we NEED slotting. Hello? Did you not like grabbing Tim Melville and WIll Myers in the fourth round?
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Aug 21, 2009 9:42 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
agree
the biggest problem with the draft now is not including international players.
Slotting doesn’t make any problems go away, it just plays on the average person’s jealousy of multi-million dollar contracts in order to make owners richer.
by ZeppelinDZ on Aug 21, 2009 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"The owners are sick of paying amateurs more than All-Stars"
How many amateurs are getting bonsues more than All-Stars? Very few I would imagine.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Aug 21, 2009 10:51 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
"People who follow baseball are sick of owners bitching about payroll"
I'm not a sabermetrician, but I do play one at Driveline Mechanics.
Can't get enough of me? Check out my Twitter feed.
by devil_fingers on Aug 21, 2009 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Here's a cynical reason why I am in favor of slotting
Suppose this team continues to flounder, due to Moore’s incompetence at hiring a player development team. Or the team could flounder simply due to an “unlucky” spell of good draft picks who don’t develop as most thought they would. What will Glass’ response be? He just might decide to go back to his cheapskate ways, concluding that spending extra money on the draft produced no better results than simply drafting college seniors and giving them miniscule bonuses. At least with a slotting system, there would be no monetary incentive for him to ever return to his misguided philosophy.
Bottom line – I STILL don’t trust this owner, so I want the slotting in place to protect him from himself.
Mr Glass, this is a pro sports team, not a retail store - run it like one!
by loyal2sdad on Aug 21, 2009 1:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
By the way
I always found Charlie Finley’s idea to make every player a free agent every season very interesting. It would certainly give a better chance to a small market team run by an excellent management team than the current system does. I imagine it would work more like a fantasy baseball draft, with players receiving something closer to their real value, regardless of service time. Another effect would be that teams would have little or no incentive to develop players in the minors, as they would seemingly only have them for 1 year before they would become free agents. Overall effect, I would imagine, would be to depress salaries somewhat – because one of the main reasons FA salaries are higher than they should be is that demand has traditionally exceeded supply by a large amount.
Sorta ironic that an owner who was otherwise known for being equal parts of obstinance and flakiness would be the ONLY owner who knew what to do when the Messersmith ruling came down. Too bad the other owners were too dumb to think things thru.
Mr Glass, this is a pro sports team, not a retail store - run it like one!
by loyal2sdad on Aug 21, 2009 1:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I saw an interview with Marvin Miller
Where he basically said that the courts gave the owners a huge gift when they decreed that every player could become a free agent every year – but it was the owners who thought that would be a bad idea. Miller thought that would depress salaries quite a bit and was all too willing to negotiate the six year reserve clause, staggering free agency, understanding that reduced demand would lead to rich ballplayers.
Marvin Miller is a smart man. Owners are dumb.
Relive Royals History at royalsretro.blogspot.com
by RoyalsRetro on Aug 21, 2009 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you kinda get into it
but ya, the idea has parallels to copyright/patent laws. By turning assets (whether baseball players or prescription drugs) into exclusive property of an owner, it gives more incentive for development. The product on the field is better because teams develop players in the minor leagues. Why would any team do that if they knew they would leave immediately.
by ZeppelinDZ on Aug 21, 2009 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it would decrease fandom
It’s hard to follow a team that has different players every year.
by BrRoyal on Aug 21, 2009 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Go the other direction
Never mind slotting systems, scrap the draft entirely.
by awolfson on Aug 21, 2009 5:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs














